The Technomancer

# How This Combo Ranks

The Intel Core Ultra 5 245 paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 places 60th out of 2,825 tested combos in The Technomancer. That puts this configuration in the top 2.1% of all combinations tested for this game, which is a dominant position. The ranking reflects the combined potential of a high-end GPU and a capable modern CPU, though the game's age relative to these components means the CPU is often not the limiting factor.

Benchmark results show this combo performing strongly across all settings and resolutions. The data indicates that the RTX 4090 is doing most of the heavy lifting, with the Core Ultra 5 245 providing enough processing headroom to avoid bottlenecking the frame output. The 60th rank out of 2,825 is notable because it places this setup ahead of many other configurations that feature higher-end CPUs but older or weaker GPUs, underscoring that GPU choice drives performance in this title.

The CPU's average benchmark score of 48,995 places it in the 90th percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU's average score of 60,347 places it in the 88th percentile of all GPUs. Both components sit near the top of their respective charts, and the combination yields a result that is greater than the sum of its parts in this specific game. The measured FPS data confirms that the combo is not leaving performance on the table at any resolution, with frame rates scaling predictably as settings are reduced.

# GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 is the primary driver of frame rates in The Technomancer. This GPU features 16,384 shading units, 512 texture mapping units, and 176 raster operation pipelines, making it one of the most powerful consumer graphics cards ever produced. The 24 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 384-bit bus delivers 1.01 TB/s of bandwidth, which is far more than this 2016 title can fully utilize.

The GPU's clock speeds are 2,235 MHz base and 2,520 MHz boost, built on the Ada Lovelace architecture using a 5 nm process. With 76,300 million transistors on a 609 mm² die, the RTX 4090 has a transistor density of 125.3 million per square millimeter. This hardware muscle translates directly into the measured frame rates, where the GPU's raw compute power (82.58 TFLOPS FP32) allows it to crush even demanding settings.

In The Technomancer, the GPU's role is particularly pronounced at 4K resolution. The measured data shows that at 3840x2160, the RTX 4090 maintains an average of 77 FPS on High settings, 91 FPS on Medium, and 118 FPS on Low. The jump from High to Low at 4K represents a 53% performance increase, demonstrating that the GPU scales well with reduced graphical loads. The Ultra preset at 4K yields 61 FPS, which is still playable but shows the limits of the game's optimization at maximum settings.

The RTX 4090's 24 GB VRAM is a significant advantage in this context. The Technomancer was released in 2016, a time when 4 GB to 8 GB of VRAM was standard. The 24 GB capacity means there is zero risk of VRAM-related stuttering or texture pop-in at any resolution or setting, even with the game's highest texture packs. The memory bandwidth of 1.01 TB/s further ensures that data can be fed to the GPU cores without bottlenecks, which is crucial when the game needs to stream large environments.

The GPU's passmark G3D score of 38,194 and its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 9,223 are strong indicators of its general capability. For this specific game, the passmark DirectX 11 score of 326 is particularly relevant since The Technomancer runs on DX11-class rendering. The GPU's near-rivals in average benchmark score are the Intel Arc Pro A60 (60,326, 0% delta), AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 (60,140, 0.3% delta), AMD Radeon Pro W6600M (61,896, -2.5% delta), and AMD Radeon PRO V710 (58,657, 2.9% delta). The RTX 4090's score of 60,347 places it right in the middle of this pack, though in real gaming performance it far outstrips these workstation-class cards.

# CPU Role

The Intel Core Ultra 5 245 plays a supporting but essential role in this combo. With 14 cores and 14 threads, this Arrow Lake-S architecture chip runs at a base clock of 3.50 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz. The lack of hyper-threading means it has a 1:1 core-to-thread ratio, which is unusual for a modern desktop processor. The 24 MB of shared L3 cache and 3 MB of L2 cache per core provide ample storage for frequently accessed data.

The CPU's benchmark results show it is highly capable in multi-threaded workloads. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 32,924 and single-core score of 4,648 demonstrate strong performance across both lightly and heavily threaded scenarios. The PassMark multi-thread score of 38,706 and single-thread score of 4,394 confirm this, placing the CPU in the 90th percentile of all CPUs with an average benchmark score of 48,995.

In The Technomancer, the CPU's role is to feed the RTX 4090 with enough draw calls and physics calculations to keep frame rates high. The game is not known for being CPU-intensive, so the Core Ultra 5 245's 14 cores are more than sufficient. The data shows that at 1080p, where CPU bottlenecks are more likely to appear, the combo still achieves 216 FPS on High settings and 329 FPS on Low. These numbers indicate that the CPU is not holding back the GPU at any point.

The CPU's nearest rivals in average benchmark score are the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G (49,196, -0.4% delta), AMD Ryzen 9 7900 (49,228, -0.5% delta), Intel Xeon Gold 5318H (48,698, 0.6% delta), and Intel Core i5-14600K (48,618, 0.8% delta). The Core Ultra 5 245 essentially matches these processors, with deltas under 1% in either direction. This means the choice between these CPUs would not meaningfully change frame rates in The Technomancer, as the GPU is the primary bottleneck in most scenarios.

The CPU's memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s over dual-channel DDR5 is adequate for this game. The Technomancer does not require extreme memory bandwidth, and the 65W TDP of the Core Ultra 5 245 means it runs cool and efficient, leaving more thermal headroom for the GPU. The CPU's support for ECC memory is a feature more relevant to workstation use than gaming, but it does not hurt performance.

# Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data for The Technomancer with this combo spans three resolutions and four settings presets, providing a comprehensive picture of performance scaling.

At 3840x2160 (4K), the combo delivers an average of 77 FPS on High settings. Reducing to Medium increases this to 91 FPS with a minimum of 77 FPS and a maximum of 104 FPS. Low settings push the average to 118 FPS, while Ultra drops to 61 FPS. The gap between Ultra and High at 4K is 16 FPS, which is significant and suggests that the Ultra preset includes effects that are particularly taxing on the GPU. The Medium preset at 4K offers the best balance of visual quality and performance, with a minimum of 77 FPS ensuring smooth gameplay.

At 2560x1440 (1440p), the frame rates scale up considerably. High settings produce an average of 141 FPS, Medium hits 165 FPS with a minimum of 140 and a maximum of 190. Low settings reach 215 FPS, and Ultra maintains 110 FPS. The 1440p resolution is where this combo truly shines, as even the Ultra preset stays well above 100 FPS. The difference between Medium and High at 1440p is 24 FPS, which is a notable jump that suggests the High preset includes some moderate GPU-intensive effects.

At 1920x1080 (1080p), the combo achieves extremely high frame rates that will likely exceed the refresh rates of most monitors. High settings average 216 FPS, Medium averages 253 FPS with a minimum of 215 and a maximum of 291. Low settings hit 329 FPS, and Ultra still manages 169 FPS. These numbers indicate that at 1080p, the CPU is starting to become a more significant factor, as the GPU is capable of far more than the game demands. The 329 FPS on Low is particularly impressive and suggests that the Core Ultra 5 245 is keeping up with the RTX 4090's massive output.

The scaling from 1080p to 1440p to 4K is consistent across all settings. For example, High settings drop from 216 FPS at 1080p to 141 FPS at 1440p (a 35% reduction) and then to 77 FPS at 4K (a 45% reduction from 1440p). This proportional scaling is expected and indicates that the combo is well-balanced, with neither component creating a disproportionate bottleneck at any resolution.

# FAQ

Q: Is this combo capable of running The Technomancer at 4K with playable frame rates?

A: Yes. The measured data shows an average of 77 FPS on High settings and 61 FPS on Ultra at 3840x2160. Both are above the 60 FPS threshold generally considered playable, though High is the safer choice for consistent performance.

Q: What is the best resolution for this combo in The Technomancer?

A: The data shows that 2560x1440 provides the most comfortable experience, with all settings except Ultra staying above 140 FPS and even Ultra reaching 110 FPS. This resolution offers a great balance between visual fidelity and high refresh rate performance.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals in terms of benchmark scores?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 245 has an average benchmark score of 48,995. Its nearest rivals are the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G (49,196, -0.4% delta), AMD Ryzen 9 7900 (49,228, -0.5% delta), Intel Xeon Gold 5318H (48,698, 0.6% delta), and Intel Core i5-14600K (48,618, 0.8% delta). All deltas are under 1%, meaning performance is essentially identical.

Q: How does the GPU compare to its nearest rivals in terms of benchmark scores?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 has an average benchmark score of 60,347. Its nearest rivals are the Intel Arc Pro A60 (60,326, 0% delta), AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 (60,140, 0.3% delta), AMD Radeon Pro W6600M (61,896, -2.5% delta), and AMD Radeon PRO V710 (58,657, 2.9% delta). The RTX 4090 sits in the middle of this pack.

Q: What is the performance difference between Low and Ultra settings at 1080p?

A: At 1920x1080, Low settings average 329 FPS while Ultra averages 169 FPS. This represents a 160 FPS difference, meaning Low settings deliver approximately 95% higher frame rates than Ultra.

Q: Is there any resolution where the combo drops below 60 FPS?

A: No. The lowest measured average is 61 FPS at 3840x2160 with Ultra settings. All other resolution and setting combinations stay above 77 FPS average, with minimums never dropping below 77 FPS in the measured data.

# Settings Recommendations

For the best experience with this combo in The Technomancer, the data suggests prioritizing a balance between visual quality and frame rate stability. At 4K, the Medium preset is the recommended choice. It delivers an average of 91 FPS with a minimum of 77 FPS, ensuring smooth gameplay even in demanding scenes. High settings at 4K are close behind at 77 FPS average, but the lower minimum frame rate makes Medium the safer option for consistent performance. Ultra at 4K is not recommended, as the 61 FPS average leaves little headroom for drops below 60 FPS.

At 1440p, the High preset is the sweet spot. The average of 141 FPS provides a smooth experience on high refresh rate monitors, and the visual improvements over Medium are noticeable. For players with 144Hz displays, Medium at 165 FPS average is the better choice to fully utilize the refresh rate, but the difference in visual quality between Medium and High is worth considering. Ultra at 1440p (110 FPS average) is also viable for those who prioritize image quality over maximum frame rates.

At 1080p, the High preset is the best all-around choice. The 216 FPS average is more than enough for any monitor, and the visual quality is excellent. For competitive players who want the absolute highest frame rates, Low at 329 FPS average is an option, but the visual downgrade is substantial. Medium at 253 FPS average offers a good middle ground for those with 240Hz displays. Ultra at 1080p (169 FPS average) is the choice for maximum visual fidelity, though the difference between Ultra and High at this resolution is less impactful than at higher resolutions.

Overall, the data indicates that the combo is powerful enough to run The Technomancer at high settings across all resolutions. The recommendation is to choose settings based on your monitor's refresh rate: for 60Hz displays, 4K High or 1440p Ultra are ideal; for 144Hz displays, 1440p High or 1080p Ultra; for 240Hz displays, 1080p High or Medium. The Medium preset at any resolution provides the best frame time consistency, as evidenced by the minimum FPS values (77 FPS at 4K, 140 FPS at 1440p, 215 FPS at 1080p) that match or exceed the averages of the High preset at the same resolution.