The Technomancer
This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 114 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 40 | 55 | 66 | 82 |
| 1440p QHD | 77 | 98 | 118 | 151 |
| 1080p Full HD | 121 | 153 | 179 | 233 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
The Technomancer with AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, In-Depth Analysis
The Technomancer, a 2016 Action RPG, presents an interesting case study when paired with the AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti. The measured data reveals a configuration that is heavily influenced by graphics settings and resolution, with performance characteristics that shift the bottleneck between the CPU and GPU depending on the workload. This analysis breaks down the measured FPS to understand where this combo excels and where its limits lie.
Resolution Scaling
The FPS drop from 1080p to 4K is stark and reveals the growing dominance of the GPU as pixel count increases. At 1080p with Low settings, the combo achieves 232.9 FPS, but this falls to 82.1 FPS at 4K, a reduction of roughly 65%. This precipitous decline indicates that at lower resolutions, the system is not fully GPU-bound, allowing the high-frequency CPU to push frame rates to very high levels. The gap between 1080p and 1440p is also significant, with the Low preset dropping from 232.9 FPS to 150.8 FPS, a 35% decrease. This suggests that even at 1440p, the GPU is starting to become a more limiting factor.
The transition from 1440p to 4K is less drastic in percentage terms but still substantial. For the High preset, the drop is from 97.8 FPS at 2560x1440 to 55.4 FPS at 3840x2160, a 43% reduction. This pattern across all settings shows that the RTX 3080 Ti is the primary constraint at 4K, while the Ryzen 9 9950X3D has more headroom to flex its capabilities at lower resolutions. The data implies that for 4K gaming, this combo is firmly GPU-limited, and the powerful 16-core processor is not the determining factor for frame rates at this resolution. The scaling is steep, indicating that the game’s visual fidelity at 4K places a heavy load on the graphics card’s 12 GB of memory and processing units.
GPU Role
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, with its 12 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 384-bit bus, provides a total bandwidth of 912.4 GB/s. This is a substantial amount of memory bandwidth, but the 4K Ultra results suggest it is still a bottleneck. At 4K Ultra, the average FPS plummets to 39.8, which is a 52% drop from the 4K High setting of 55.4 FPS. This significant performance penalty for moving from High to Ultra at 4K points to the GPU’s memory capacity and bandwidth being saturated by the highest texture and detail settings. The card’s boost clock of 1665 MHz and its 10240 shading units are capable, but the data shows that the most demanding settings can overwhelm it.
The RTX 3080 Ti's compute capabilities, measured at 34.10 TFLOPS for FP32, are put to the test as resolution scales. The fact that the 4K Low preset (82.1 FPS) is nearly double the 4K Ultra preset (39.8 FPS) highlights how much of the GPU’s raw compute power is being consumed by the higher-fidelity effects. The benchmark results indicate that while the card is powerful enough for high-refresh 1440p gaming, it struggles to maintain playable frame rates at 4K with the Ultra preset. This behavior is characteristic of a GPU that is powerful for its generation but is being pushed to its limits by a demanding title at maximum settings.
Settings Recommendations
Based on the measured rows, the data suggests that the "High" preset offers the most balanced experience across all resolutions. At 1440p, High yields a very playable 97.8 FPS, while at 4K it manages a respectable 55.4 FPS. The jump from High to Ultra is not worth the performance cost at higher resolutions. For instance, at 1440p, Ultra delivers 77.1 FPS, which is a 21% reduction compared to High’s 97.8 FPS. At 4K, the gap widens, with Ultra dropping below 40 FPS. The "Medium" preset provides a good middle ground for 4K, offering 66.4 FPS, which is a 20% improvement over High.
For players targeting 4K, the "High" preset is the recommended choice to maintain a smooth experience around 55 FPS. If a higher frame rate is desired, the "Medium" preset at 4K provides a significant boost to 66.4 FPS without a massive visual compromise. For 1080p and 1440p users, the "High" preset is also excellent, but the "Ultra" preset becomes viable at 1440p with 77.1 FPS and highly viable at 1080p with 121.3 FPS. The data strongly suggests avoiding the "Ultra" preset at 4K, as the 39.8 FPS average is below the threshold for a fluid experience. The "Low" preset, while offering the highest frame rates, is best reserved for competitive play or when maximum frame rates are desired over visual quality.
FAQ
Q: What is the best resolution and preset combination for this hardware?
A: The data shows that 2560x1440 with the High preset (97.8 FPS) provides an excellent balance of visual quality and performance. For 4K, the High preset (55.4 FPS) is the most balanced, while the Medium preset (66.4 FPS) is a good option for higher frame rates.
Q: Can this combo handle 4K Ultra settings in The Technomancer?
A: No, the measured results show an average of 39.8 FPS at 3840x2160 with Ultra settings. This is below the generally accepted threshold for smooth gameplay, indicating that the RTX 3080 Ti is a limiting factor at this setting and resolution.
Q: How much of a performance drop is there between 1080p and 4K?
A: The drop is significant. For example, with the High preset, the average FPS falls from 152.8 at 1920x1080 to 55.4 at 3840x2160, a decrease of about 64%. This shows the GPU becomes the primary bottleneck as the resolution increases.
Q: Is the CPU or GPU the main bottleneck at 1080p?
A: At lower resolutions like 1920x1080, the system appears to be less GPU-bound. The very high frame rates, such as 232.9 FPS on Low settings, suggest the CPU is capable of feeding frames quickly, and the GPU becomes the limiting factor as settings and resolution are increased.
Q: What is the difference in performance between the High and Medium presets at 4K?
A: At 3840x2160, the Medium preset achieves 66.4 FPS, which is 11 FPS higher than the High preset's 55.4 FPS. This represents a 20% performance increase for a likely modest visual downgrade.
Q: How does the combo rank among all tested configurations for this game?
A: The combination ranks 431st out of 1656 tested combos, placing it in the top 26% of all configurations tested for The Technomancer. This indicates a solid, above-average performance level.
CPU Role
The AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D is a 16-core, 32-thread processor with a base clock of 4.30 GHz and a boost clock of 5.70 GHz. Its substantial 128 MB of shared L3 cache is a key feature for gaming. The measured FPS data suggests that the CPU is not the primary bottleneck in this game, especially at higher resolutions. At 4K, the frame rates are largely dictated by the GPU, but at 1080p, the CPU’s strength becomes apparent. The jump from 121.3 FPS at 1080p Ultra to 152.8 FPS at 1080p High shows a 26% improvement, indicating that the CPU can handle a significant increase in frame rate when the GPU load is reduced.
The processor's multi-threaded performance, evidenced by a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 59712, is far beyond what this game is likely to require. The single-core performance is also strong, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 8430. This combination ensures that even in CPU-bound scenarios at lower resolutions, the processor provides ample headroom. The data implies that the 9950X3D is more than capable of supporting the RTX 3080 Ti, ensuring that the graphics card is the primary determinant of performance in most situations. The 3DMark single-thread score of 1292 further confirms the processor's ability to handle the game's logic and draw calls without becoming a limiting factor.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The complete set of measured average FPS values provides a clear picture of performance scaling.
At 1920x1080, the frame rates are high across all settings. The Low preset leads with 232.9 FPS, followed by Medium at 179.2 FPS, High at 152.8 FPS, and Ultra at 121.3 FPS. The gap between Low and Ultra is 111.6 FPS, showing a wide performance range.
At 2560x1440, performance remains strong. The Low preset delivers 150.8 FPS, while Medium achieves 118 FPS. The High preset comes in at 97.8 FPS, and Ultra drops to 77.1 FPS. The scaling from Low to Ultra here shows a 73.7 FPS difference.
At 3840x2160, the GPU becomes the limiting factor. The Low preset yields 82.1 FPS, which is still playable. Medium provides 66.4 FPS, while High manages 55.4 FPS. The Ultra preset is the most demanding, with an average of only 39.8 FPS. The difference between Low and Ultra at 4K is 42.3 FPS, a much smaller absolute range than at 1080p, but the percentages show a much steeper relative drop for the higher settings.
How This Combo Ranks
The AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti combination ranks 431st out of 1656 tested combos for The Technomancer. This places it in the top 26% of all configurations, which is a strong showing. The ranking suggests that while this is a high-performing combo, there are many other configurations that achieve higher frame rates in this specific title. This is likely due to the GPU being a previous-generation model, as its performance is closely matched by the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 in the average benchmark score (41,441 vs. 41,224, a delta of -0.5%).
The CPU’s performance is also a factor in the overall ranking. The Ryzen 9 9950X3D has an average benchmark score of 71,660, putting it in the 96th percentile of all CPUs. It is 1.8% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 9 9950X and 2.2% ahead of the Intel Core i7-14700KF in average scores. However, its raw power does not translate into a top-100 ranking for this game, implying that the game's engine is not fully utilizing the CPU's capabilities, or that the GPU is the constraining factor for the majority of the tested settings. The fact that it ranks above the 50th percentile indicates it is a capable pairing, but the data suggests that for The Technomancer, a newer, more powerful GPU would be needed to push this combo higher in the rankings.
Hardware Specifications
AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti in The Technomancer
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 82.1 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 66.4 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 55.4 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 39.8 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 150.8 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 118.0 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 97.8 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 77.1 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 232.9 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 179.2 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 152.8 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 121.3 |
The Technomancer with Ryzen 9 9950X3D + Other GPUs
See how The Technomancer performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
The Technomancer with RTX 3080 Ti + Other CPUs
See how The Technomancer performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with Ryzen 9 9950X3D + RTX 3080 Ti
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.