The Technomancer

The Technomancer

AVERAGE FPS
103
good

This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 103 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 38 47 56 73
1440p QHD 72 91 103 135
1080p Full HD 109 140 162 212

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Low 73
3840x2160 Medium 56
3840x2160 High 47
3840x2160 Ultra 38
2560x1440 Low 135
2560x1440 Medium 103
2560x1440 High 91
2560x1440 Ultra 72
1920x1080 Low 212
1920x1080 Medium 162
1920x1080 High 140
1920x1080 Ultra 109

The Technomancer with AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D + AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT, In-Depth Analysis

The Technomancer, a 2016 Action RPG, presents an interesting test for the AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D and AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT combination. The pairing of a high-end 16-core processor with a capable 16 GB graphics card yields a dataset that clearly delineates the performance boundaries across resolutions and settings. The benchmark results indicate a system that is exceptionally strong at 1080p and 1440p, while showing the expected strain at 4K Ultra.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination of the AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D and AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT is placed at rank 623 out of 1656 tested combos for this game. This places the pairing in the upper 37% of all tested configurations, signifying a performance level that is above the median but not at the very top of the leaderboard. This rank reflects a hardware pairing where the CPU’s considerable compute power is well-matched with a GPU that can deliver high frame rates in this specific title.

The CPU itself is a powerhouse, with an average benchmark score of 71660, placing it in the 96th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the Intel Xeon Platinum 8270, is only 0.9% behind, while the AMD Ryzen 9 9950X is a close 1.8% behind. This indicates that the Ryzen 9 9950X3D is at the leading edge of processor performance, a fact that is leveraged by the system’s strong 1080p results. The GPU, scoring an average of 32619, sits in the 76th percentile of all GPUs, with its nearest rival, the AMD FirePro S9300 X2, being essentially tied at a 0.2% delta. This shows the RX 7800 XT is a solid performer, but it is the CPU’s dominance that helps secure the overall combo's position.

The rank of 623 suggests that while the individual components are strong, the combination is not the absolute best for The Technomancer. This is likely due to the game’s engine scaling and the fact that at higher resolutions, the GPU becomes the primary bottleneck, reducing the impact of the top-tier CPU. The data shows a system that is more than capable, but one where the law of diminishing returns begins to apply when pushing 4K resolutions.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT is the defining component for the system's visual output, and its role becomes increasingly critical as resolution scales. It features 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a substantial 624.1 GB/s of memory bandwidth. This capacity is more than sufficient for The Technomancer at any of the tested settings, ensuring that texture data is not a limiting factor. The GPU's boost clock is rated at 2430 MHz, with a game clock of 2124 MHz, which are the frequencies that allow it to achieve the frame rates seen in the benchmarks.

The GPU's performance profile is most evident in the 4K results. At 3840x2160 with Ultra settings, the average frame rate drops to 38.1 FPS. This is below the 60 FPS threshold that is often considered the target for a smooth experience. The data indicates that the GPU is the bottleneck here, as the CPU has ample headroom. The RX 7800 XT's 37.32 TFLOPS of FP32 performance is being fully utilized, but it is not enough to maintain high frame rates with the most demanding settings at this resolution. In contrast, when the settings are lowered to Low at 4K, the average frame rate jumps to 73.2 FPS, showing that the GPU has the raw power to provide a playable experience when the graphical load is reduced.

Resolution Scaling

The measured frame rates show a clear and predictable scaling pattern across the three tested resolutions. At 1080p, the system is clearly CPU-limited in many scenarios, as evidenced by the very high frame rates. At 1920x1080 with Low settings, the average FPS is 212.2, a figure that highlights the immense power of the Ryzen 9 9950X3D. Even at the High preset, the system maintains an average of 140.2 FPS, indicating a very responsive and fluid experience.

When moving to 2560x1440, the strain on the GPU becomes more apparent, but the results remain excellent. The average FPS at High settings is 91.2, which is a drop of 49 FPS from the 1080p result. This demonstrates that the GPU is starting to become a more significant factor, but the combination still delivers a performance level that is well above the 60 FPS target. The scaling from 1080p to 1440p at High settings results in a 35% reduction in frame rate, which is a significant but expected cost for the increase in pixel count.

The most dramatic scaling occurs at 4K. At 3840x2160 with High settings, the average FPS is 47.3, a 53% drop from the 1440p High result of 91.2 FPS. This sharp decline confirms that the system is now firmly GPU-limited. The transition from 1440p to 4K is a far greater burden on the RX 7800 XT than the transition from 1080p to 1440p. The data suggests that while the CPU provides a massive performance headroom at lower resolutions, the GPU's capabilities define the upper limits of the system's performance at 4K.

Settings Recommendations

The benchmark data provides clear guidance for the optimal settings configuration for this hardware combination. At 1920x1080, the system is so powerful that even the Ultra preset, with an average FPS of 108.9, provides a fully playable and highly smooth experience. For users with high refresh rate monitors, the High preset at 140.2 FPS or the Medium preset at 161.9 FPS would be excellent choices to maximize the visual experience while keeping frame rates very high. Even the Low preset at 212.2 FPS shows the CPU's dominance, but the visual quality trade-off is not necessary given the other options.

For 2560x1440, the High preset, with an average FPS of 91.2, is the recommended choice. It offers a significant visual upgrade over Medium (102.5 FPS) while still maintaining a frame rate that is well above the 60 FPS standard. The Ultra preset at 71.8 FPS is also viable if the user prioritizes maximum graphical fidelity over a higher frame rate buffer. The data shows that High provides the best balance, as the difference between High and Medium is only 11.3 FPS, but the visual quality difference is typically more substantial.

At 4K, the situation changes. The Ultra preset's 38.1 FPS average is too low for a consistently smooth experience. The High preset at 47.3 FPS is also below the 60 FPS target. The Medium preset at 56.3 FPS is the most playable option that still provides a reasonable level of visual quality. However, the Low preset at 73.2 FPS is the only preset at this resolution that comfortably exceeds the 60 FPS threshold. For a 4K experience, the data suggests that dropping to Medium settings is necessary to achieve a playable frame rate, sacrificing some visual fidelity for performance.

FAQ

Q: What is the highest average frame rate the system can achieve at 1080p?

A: The highest average frame rate recorded is 212.2 FPS, which occurs at 1920x1080 with the Low settings preset.

Q: Is the system capable of 60+ FPS at 4K Ultra settings?

A: No. At 3840x2160 with Ultra settings, the average frame rate drops to 38.1 FPS, which is significantly below the 60 FPS target.

Q: How much of a performance drop is there from 1080p to 4K at High settings?

A: The average frame rate falls from 140.2 FPS at 1920x1080 to 47.3 FPS at 3840x2160, a reduction of 92.9 FPS, representing a 66% decrease in performance.

Q: What is the best settings preset for a smooth 1440p experience?

A: The High preset at 2560x1440, with an average frame rate of 91.2 FPS, provides the best balance of visual quality and performance, well above the 60 FPS standard.

Q: How does the CPU's performance rank compared to its nearest rival?

A: The AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D has an average benchmark score of 71660, which is 0.9% higher than its nearest rival, the Intel Xeon Platinum 8270, which has an average score of 71056.

Q: At what resolution and settings does the system's performance drop below 60 FPS for the first time?

A: The first instance where the average frame rate falls below 60 FPS is at 3840x2160 with High settings, where the average is 47.3 FPS. At 1440p, all tested presets remain above 60 FPS.

Hardware Specifications

AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D

Cores / Threads 16 / 32
Base Clock 4300 MHz
Boost Clock 5700 MHz
TDP 170W
Socket AMD Socket AM5
View Full CPU Details →

AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT

VRAM 16 GB GDDR6
Base Clock —
Boost Clock 2430 MHz MHz
TDP 263 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D + AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT in The Technomancer

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Low 73.2
3840x2160 Medium 56.3
3840x2160 High 47.3
3840x2160 Ultra 38.1
2560x1440 Low 135.3
2560x1440 Medium 102.5
2560x1440 High 91.2
2560x1440 Ultra 71.8
1920x1080 Low 212.2
1920x1080 Medium 161.9
1920x1080 High 140.2
1920x1080 Ultra 108.9

The Technomancer with Ryzen 9 9950X3D + Other GPUs

See how The Technomancer performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.

The Technomancer with RX 7800 XT + Other CPUs

See how The Technomancer performs with the same GPU but different processors.

Other Games with Ryzen 9 9950X3D + RX 7800 XT

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.