The Technomancer
This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 69 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 26 | 33 | 38 | 50 |
| 1440p QHD | 47 | 60 | 70 | 91 |
| 1080p Full HD | 71 | 91 | 107 | 139 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
The Technomancer with AMD Ryzen 9 5950X + AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT, In-Depth Analysis
The AMD Ryzen 9 5950X paired with the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT delivers a playable but constrained experience in The Technomancer, with performance heavily dependent on resolution and quality presets. The data shows a combination that excels at 1080p, remains viable at 1440p, and struggles to maintain fluid frame rates at 4K. The system ranks in the lower third of tested configurations, indicating that while the CPU is a top-tier part, the GPU becomes the decisive factor in this title's most demanding scenarios.
FAQ
*Q: What is the best resolution for this combo in The Technomancer?*
A: Based on the measured FPS, 1920x1080 is the only resolution where every preset achieves at least 71 FPS on average. At 2560x1440, the Ultra preset drops to 47 FPS, and at 3840x2160, even the Low preset only reaches 50 FPS.
Q: How does the RX 5700 XT compare to its closest rivals in synthetic benchmarks?
A: The GPU's average benchmark score of 16361 places it 0.1% above the AMD Radeon Pro 5600M (16351), 0.3% ahead of the NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell (16408), and 0.9% behind the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 (16504). These are marginal differences, indicating near-identical raw compute performance.
Q: Is the Ryzen 9 5950X a bottleneck in this game?
A: The CPU's synthetic scores are very high, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 26017 and a single-core score of 1614. Given the FPS drops observed when increasing resolution, the data indicates the GPU is the primary limiting factor, not the 16-core processor.
Q: What is the frame rate difference between Low and Ultra settings at 1440p?
A: At 2560x1440, the Low preset averages 91 FPS, while the Ultra preset averages 47 FPS. This represents a 44 FPS drop, or roughly a 48% reduction in average frame rate when moving from the lowest to the highest quality settings.
Q: Does the 8 GB VRAM appear to be a limitation at 4K?
A: The 4K results show a steep decline, with the High preset at 33 FPS and Ultra at 26 FPS. While the data does not explicitly measure VRAM usage, the RX 5700 XT's 8 GB GDDR6 memory with 448.0 GB/s bandwidth is paired with a 256-bit bus, and the performance collapse at 3840x2160 suggests the memory subsystem is under significant strain.
Q: How does this specific combo rank among all tested systems?
A: The combination ranks 2741 out of 3696 total tested combos. This places it in the 74th percentile of all configurations, meaning roughly a quarter of tested systems deliver better performance in this game.
GPU Role
The AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT is the central component in determining this combo's gaming performance. Built on the RDNA 1.0 architecture and the Navi 10 chip, the GPU operates with a base clock of 1605 MHz and a boost clock of 1905 MHz. The memory runs at 1750 MHz, which translates to 14 Gbps effective, across a 256-bit bus for a total bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s. The 8 GB GDDR6 frame buffer is a critical resource, and the measured FPS data shows how heavily the game leans on it.
The GPU's compute capabilities are defined by 2560 shading units, 160 TMUs, and 64 ROPs. This configuration yields a pixel rate of 121.9 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 304.8 GTexel/s, with FP32 performance rated at 9.754 TFLOPS. In synthetic tests, the card scores 16277 in Passmark G3D and 2134 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12. The percentile ranking of 59 versus all GPUs indicates it sits slightly above the median, but the nearest rival data shows a tight cluster of similar performers: the AMD Radeon Pro 5600M is just 0.1% slower, and the NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell is 0.3% faster.
In The Technomancer, the GPU's role is clear from the FPS scaling. At 1080p, the GPU is able to feed frames quickly, but as resolution rises, the rendering load increases. The 4K Ultra result of 26 FPS is the lowest recorded, and even 4K Low only reaches 50 FPS. This pattern demonstrates that the RX 5700 XT's 9.754 TFLOPS of compute and 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth are insufficient for the pixel throughput required at 3840x2160, making the GPU the definitive performance ceiling for this pairing.
How This Combo Ranks
The AMD Ryzen 9 5950X + RX 5700 XT combination is positioned at rank 2741 out of 3696 tested combos in The Technomancer. This is a lower-third placement, indicating that while the system is functional, it is far from the top performers in this specific title. The ranking reflects the GPU's mid-tier status rather than the CPU's high-end standing.
The CPU itself is a powerhouse in synthetic benchmarks, with a percentile rank of 91 versus all CPUs and an average benchmark score of 51947. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Core Ultra 5 235HX (52073, -0.2% delta), the AMD EPYC 8124P (52121, -0.3% delta), and the Intel Core i9-13900F (51730, +0.4% delta). The i9-13900F is the only rival that the 5950X beats by a meaningful margin, while the others are within a fraction of a percent.
However, the GPU tells a different story. With a percentile rank of 59 versus all GPUs and an average score of 16361, the RX 5700 XT is only slightly above average. Its nearest rivals are all within 0.9% of its score, which suggests that swapping to any of these would yield nearly identical results. Despite the strong CPU, the combo's rank of 2741 is dragged down by the GPU's inability to push high frame rates at higher resolutions. The data indicates that the 5950X has substantial headroom, but the RX 5700 XT cannot utilize it in this game.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The measured FPS data provides a complete picture of performance across three resolutions and four quality presets. At 1920x1080, the results are strong across the board. The Low preset averages 139 FPS, Medium averages 107 FPS (with a minimum of 91 and maximum of 123), High averages 91 FPS, and Ultra averages 71 FPS. Every preset at 1080p is above the 60 FPS threshold, making this resolution the clear sweet spot for smooth gameplay.
Moving to 2560x1440, performance drops noticeably. The Low preset averages 91 FPS, which is still excellent. Medium averages 70 FPS with a minimum of 59 and maximum of 80, keeping it just at the edge of playability. High averages 60 FPS, which is a borderline result for action-oriented gameplay. Ultra drops to 47 FPS, which is below the ideal smoothness target but still technically playable for less demanding scenes.
At 3840x2160, the GPU is clearly overwhelmed. Low averages 50 FPS, Medium averages 38 FPS (with a minimum of 33 and maximum of 44), High averages 33 FPS, and Ultra averages 26 FPS. The minimum FPS of 33 at 4K Medium highlights the stutter potential, and the Ultra preset's 26 FPS average is on the edge of being unplayable. The step between each preset at 4K is roughly 12 FPS, showing a linear degradation as quality increases.
Resolution Scaling
The FPS scaling from 1080p to 4K reveals the GPU-bound nature of this system. At High settings, the average frame rate drops from 91 FPS at 1920x1080 to 60 FPS at 2560x1440 and then to 33 FPS at 3840x2160. This represents a 34% drop from 1080p to 1440p and a further 45% drop from 1440p to 4K. The total decrease from 1080p to 4K is 64%, which is a steep penalty for the increased pixel count.
The Low preset shows a similar trend: 139 FPS at 1080p, 91 FPS at 1440p, and 50 FPS at 4K. This is a 35% drop from 1080p to 1440p and a 45% drop from 1440p to 4K. The consistency of these percentage drops across presets suggests that resolution scaling is the dominant factor, and the GPU's rendering throughput is the limiting component.
The data indicates that the Ryzen 9 5950X is not the bottleneck here. If the CPU were limiting, the FPS would remain more constant across resolutions. Instead, the sharp decline at 4K points squarely at the RX 5700 XT's 9.754 TFLOPS FP32 performance and its 448.0 GB/s memory bandwidth. The 8 GB VRAM also likely comes into play, as the higher resolutions demand more frame buffer capacity, and the card's 256-bit bus struggles to feed the data.
Settings Recommendations
For a smooth experience, the 1920x1080 resolution with the Ultra preset is the best choice. At 71 FPS average, it delivers high visual quality without compromising frame rate. If a higher refresh rate is preferred, dropping to High at 1080p yields 91 FPS, which is a 28% improvement over Ultra while still looking excellent.
At 2560x1440, the Medium preset offers the best balance. The 70 FPS average with a minimum of 59 FPS keeps gameplay fluid, and it is a 49% improvement over the Ultra preset's 47 FPS. High at 1440p is also acceptable at 60 FPS, but the minimum frame rate data is not available, and the Medium preset's recorded minimum of 59 FPS suggests it is a safer choice.
For 3840x2160, the Low preset is the only option that approaches playability. At 50 FPS, it is playable but not ideal. Medium drops to 38 FPS with a minimum of 33 FPS, which will be noticeable in combat scenarios. Ultra at 26 FPS should be avoided. The data supports using 1080p as the primary resolution, with 1440p Medium as a fallback for those who prioritize resolution over settings.
CPU Role
The AMD Ryzen 9 5950X is a 16-core, 32-thread processor based on the Zen 3 architecture, codenamed Vermeer. It has a base clock of 3.40 GHz and a boost clock of 4.90 GHz, with a TDP of 105 W. The CPU features a substantial 64 MB of L3 cache, with 64 KB of L1 and 512 KB of L2 per core. It supports DDR4 memory in a dual-channel configuration with a bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s.
Synthetic benchmarks show the CPU's strength. It scores 26017 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 1614 in single-core. In 3DMark, it scores 10810 with 16 threads and 11597 with max threads. The Passmark multi-thread score is 45424, and the single-thread score is 3470. These results place the CPU at the 91st percentile, with an average benchmark score of 51947.
In The Technomancer, the CPU's role is to feed the GPU with draw calls and physics data. Given the high core count and clock speeds, the 5950X has ample headroom. The measured FPS data does not indicate any CPU-related stutters or frame drops that would suggest a bottleneck. The consistent FPS scaling with resolution confirms that the GPU is the limiting factor. The CPU's nearest rival, the Intel Core i9-13900F, scores 51730 (0.4% lower), and the Intel Core i7-14700 scores 52301 (0.7% higher), but none of these differences would manifest in this game because the GPU is saturated first. The 5950X's 16 cores are more than sufficient for The Technomancer, leaving the RX 5700 XT as the sole performance barrier.
Hardware Specifications
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X
AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for AMD Ryzen 9 5950X + AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT in The Technomancer
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 50.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 38.0 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 33.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 26.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 91.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 70.0 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 60.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 47.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 139.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 107.0 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 91.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 71.0 |
The Technomancer with Ryzen 9 5950X + Other GPUs
See how The Technomancer performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
The Technomancer with RX 5700 XT + Other CPUs
See how The Technomancer performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with Ryzen 9 5950X + RX 5700 XT
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.