The Medium

The Medium

AVERAGE FPS
48
playable

This combination offers playable performance with an average of 48 FPS, though you may want to lower settings for smoother gameplay.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 22 28 39 63
1440p QHD 28 36 50 80
1080p Full HD 34 43 59 95

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Low 63
3840x2160 Medium 39
3840x2160 High 28
3840x2160 Ultra 22
2560x1440 Low 80
2560x1440 Medium 50
2560x1440 High 36
2560x1440 Ultra 28
1920x1080 Low 95
1920x1080 Medium 59
1920x1080 High 43
1920x1080 Ultra 34

The Medium with AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D + AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT, In-Depth Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D paired with the AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT presents a fascinating study in component balance within The Medium. The data reveals a configuration where the processor’s immense capabilities are frequently sidelined by the graphics card’s more modest throughput, leading to a performance profile that is heavily dictated by resolution and preset choices. This analysis explores how the measured FPS numbers illuminate the distinct roles of the CPU and GPU, and what the overall ranking suggests about this pairing for this specific horror title.

Resolution Scaling — how FPS drops from 1080p to 4K and what it says about the limiting component

The measured frames per second across resolutions paint a clear picture of where the bottleneck lies in this configuration. At the Low preset, the data shows a stark drop from 95 FPS at 1920x1080 to 80 FPS at 2560x1440, and then a more severe decline to 63 FPS at 3840x2160. This scaling behavior is classic for a GPU-bound scenario: as the pixel count increases, the rendering load on the graphics card grows exponentially, directly reducing the frame rate. The CPU, with its 16 cores and 32 threads, is hardly taxed by the lower-resolution frames, allowing the GPU to be the sole determining factor for performance.

Moving to the Medium preset, the same pattern emerges but with lower absolute numbers. The average FPS drops from 59 at 1080p to 50 at 1440p, and then to 39 at 4K. The incremental drop from 1080p to 1440p is about 15%, while the drop from 1440p to 4K is roughly 22%. This non-linear scaling is indicative of the GPU struggling more as the pixel fill-rate demands increase, confirming that the RX 6650 XT is the primary performance limiter. The CPU's workload remains relatively static, and its high single-thread and multi-thread scores are not being pushed to their limits in this title.

At the High preset, the scaling continues, with averages of 43 FPS at 1080p, 36 FPS at 1440p, and 28 FPS at 4K. The Ultra preset shows the most dramatic decline, starting at 34 FPS at 1080p and falling to 28 FPS at 1440p and finally to 22 FPS at 4K. The fact that the 4K Ultra score is just 22 FPS suggests the GPU is completely saturated, rendering the scene at the absolute limit of its capabilities. The data implies that the Ryzen 9 9950X3D is never the limiting factor; even at 1080p with Low settings, the 95 FPS average is likely far below what this CPU could theoretically support, leaving the RX 6650 XT as the definitive barrier to higher frame rates across all tested configurations.

GPU Role — VRAM, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT is built on the RDNA 2.0 architecture with a Navi 23 chip, and its specifications directly explain the measured performance. The card features 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 280.3 GB/s. In a game like The Medium, which uses fixed camera angles and pre-rendered scenes, memory bandwidth and capacity are critical for streaming high-resolution textures. The data shows that at 4K with Ultra settings, the average FPS plummets to 22, a clear sign that the 8 GB frame buffer might be insufficient for the highest fidelity assets, or that the GPU's compute units are simply overwhelmed.

The GPU's boost clock of 2635 MHz and game clock of 2410 MHz are relatively high, but the core configuration is where its limitations lie. With 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, and 64 render output units, the card is positioned for 1080p and light 1440p gaming. This is reflected in the measured results: at 1080p Low, it achieves a solid 95 FPS, but at 4K High, it drops to 28 FPS. The 32 ray accelerators are present, but they do not appear to provide a significant advantage in this title's standard rendering path, as the FPS drops are consistent with traditional rasterization load.

The GPU's performance percentile of 65 places it in the mid-range of all GPUs, and its nearest rivals include workstation cards like the AMD FirePro W7000 and NVIDIA Quadro K5200. This further contextualizes its position as a capable but not high-end performer. The data suggests that the RX 6650 XT is best suited for the Medium preset at 1080p or 1440p, where it can maintain playable frame rates without hitting the severe performance walls seen at High and Ultra. The 4K results, with a maximum of 45 FPS on Medium, indicate that this resolution is only marginally playable and only with significant graphical compromises.

CPU Role — cores, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D is a powerhouse processor with 16 cores, 32 threads, and a boost clock of 5.70 GHz. Its benchmark scores are exceptional, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 42018 and a single-core score of 2259, placing it in the 95th percentile of all CPUs. However, the measured FPS in The Medium shows that this processing power is largely underutilized. The game's engine, as evidenced by the data, is not heavily multi-threaded to the point of saturating 32 threads, and the CPU's role is to feed frames to the GPU as quickly as possible.

The data shows that the CPU is not the bottleneck at any resolution. At 1080p Low, the 95 FPS average is a respectable number, but it is far from the limits of what the 9950X3D could deliver with a more powerful GPU. The CPU's L3 cache of 128 MB and high single-thread performance (Geekbench single-core score of 3064) would typically ensure stable frame pacing, but the GPU's inability to render frames faster than the measured averages negates any potential CPU advantage.

The nearest rivals to the 9950X3D, such as the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 9755 and Intel Core Ultra 9 285, have nearly identical average benchmark scores with delta percentages of 0.1% and 0.4%, respectively. This indicates that any of these top-tier CPUs would perform nearly identically in this game when paired with the RX 6650 XT. The bottleneck is so firmly on the GPU side that the choice of high-end processor has virtually no measurable impact on the final FPS numbers. The CPU's role here is to ensure that it never introduces a frame rate limit, which it clearly succeeds in doing, leaving all performance variation to the graphics card.

How This Combo Ranks — use comboRankInGame vs other tested combos

The combination of the Ryzen 9 9950X3D and RX 6650 XT is ranked 2434 out of 3724 tested combinations in The Medium. This position, in the lower third of all combos, is a direct consequence of the GPU's mid-range capabilities. The ranking is not a reflection of the CPU's performance, but rather a statement about the overall system's ability to render the game at high frame rates. A combo with a more balanced or higher-end GPU would naturally rank higher, as the CPU has ample headroom to support it.

This ranking of 2434 suggests that while the system is fully functional, it is not optimized for maximum performance in this title. The data implies that a user with this specific CPU would be better served by a more powerful GPU to unlock the processor's potential. The fact that the CPU scores in the 95th percentile while the combo ranks in the 65th percentile of all combos (2434/3724 is roughly 65.4%) highlights the severe imbalance. The CPU is doing its part, but the GPU is holding the system back from achieving a higher standing among the tested configurations.

The delta percentages between the 9950X3D and its nearest CPU rivals are minuscule, ranging from 0.1% to 0.4%. This reinforces the idea that the combo's rank is almost entirely dictated by the GPU. If one were to swap the RX 6650 XT for a stronger card, the combo's rank would improve dramatically, as the CPU's high benchmark scores would finally be able to translate into higher FPS. As it stands, the data shows a system that is waiting on its graphics card to catch up, resulting in a ranking that undersells the potential of the processor.

Measured FPS Breakdown — resolution by resolution, settings by settings, exact numbers

The measured FPS data provides a comprehensive view of the system's performance across all settings and resolutions. At 1920x1080, the Low preset yields an average of 95 FPS, while Medium drops to 59 FPS with a minimum of 51 and a maximum of 68. High yields 43 FPS, and Ultra drops to 34 FPS. This shows a clear progression where each preset step imposes a significant cost, with the jump from Low to Medium being the most substantial (a 36 FPS drop). The 1080p results are the most playable, with even High being acceptable, though Ultra starts to dip below the 40 FPS threshold.

At 2560x1440, the Low preset maintains a solid 80 FPS, but Medium falls to 50 FPS (min 43, max 58). High yields 36 FPS, and Ultra drops to 28 FPS. The 1440p results show that the RX 6650 XT is starting to struggle, as the pixel count increases. The Medium preset is still a viable option for a smoother experience, but High and Ultra become increasingly demanding, with frame rates dropping to levels that may not be ideal for a horror game where smooth motion is important for immersion.

At 3840x2160, the Low preset surprisingly delivers 63 FPS, which is a notable result for a 4K resolution. However, Medium drops to 39 FPS (min 33, max 45), High to 28 FPS, and Ultra to a barely playable 22 FPS. The 4K data shows that the Low preset is the only one that provides a consistently smooth experience, while the higher presets are all below the 60 FPS target. The minimum FPS of 33 on Medium at 4K suggests potential stuttering, making this resolution a challenging environment for this GPU.

Settings Recommendations — which preset gives the best experience per the measured rows

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings for this system depend heavily on the target resolution and desired frame rate. For a 1080p display, the Medium preset is the recommended choice, as it delivers a 59 FPS average with a minimum of 51 FPS, ensuring a mostly smooth experience without the visual fidelity loss of Low. The High preset at 43 FPS is acceptable for slower-paced games, but the drop below 60 FPS may be noticeable. Ultra at 34 FPS is not recommended, as the frame rate dips into a range that can compromise the game's atmospheric tension.

For 1440p, the Low preset is the only one that consistently achieves a high frame rate, with an 80 FPS average. The Medium preset at 50 FPS is a reasonable compromise, offering better visuals while maintaining a playable frame rate. The High (36 FPS) and Ultra (28 FPS) presets are too demanding for this GPU at this resolution, as the frame rates fall below the 40 FPS threshold, which can lead to a less fluid experience in a game that relies on slow, deliberate camera movements.

For 4K, the data strongly suggests using the Low preset, which achieves a 63 FPS average. This is a surprisingly good result for 4K and provides a smooth experience. The Medium preset at 39 FPS is borderline, but the minimum FPS of 33 indicates potential for stutter. High and Ultra are not recommended, as their average FPS of 28 and 22, respectively, falls well below the standard for a playable experience. In summary, the Medium preset at 1080p offers the best balance of visual quality and performance, while Low is the safe choice for higher resolutions.

FAQ — 4-6 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data

Q: What is the average FPS at 1080p with the Medium preset?

A: The average FPS at 1920x1080 with the Medium settings is 59, with a minimum of 51 and a maximum of 68.

*Q: Is this system capable of 4K gaming in The Medium?*

A: Yes, but only at the Low preset, which yields an average of 63 FPS. At Medium settings, the average drops to 39 FPS, and at Ultra, it falls to 22 FPS.

Q: How does the CPU's benchmark performance compare to its nearest rival?

A: The AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D has an average benchmark score of 75779, which is 0.1% higher than the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 9755 and 0.4% higher than the Intel Core Ultra 9 285.

Q: What is the GPU's memory bandwidth and size?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 280.3 GB/s.

Q: What is the combo's rank among all tested systems?

A: This specific combination of CPU and GPU is ranked 2434 out of 3724 tested combos in The Medium.

Q: Does the 9950X3D's high core count help in this game?

A: The data indicates that the CPU is not the limiting factor. The FPS drops are consistent with GPU limitations, suggesting the game does not fully utilize the 16 cores and 32 threads, as the RX 6650 XT is the primary bottleneck.

Hardware Specifications

AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D

Cores / Threads 16 / 32
Base Clock 4300 MHz
Boost Clock 5700 MHz
TDP 170W
Socket AMD Socket AM5
View Full CPU Details →

AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT

VRAM 8 GB GDDR6
Base Clock —
Boost Clock 2635 MHz MHz
TDP 176 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D + AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT in The Medium

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Low 63.0
3840x2160 Medium 39.0
3840x2160 High 28.0
3840x2160 Ultra 22.0
2560x1440 Low 80.0
2560x1440 Medium 50.0
2560x1440 High 36.0
2560x1440 Ultra 28.0
1920x1080 Low 95.0
1920x1080 Medium 59.0
1920x1080 High 43.0
1920x1080 Ultra 34.0

The Medium with Ryzen 9 9950X3D + Other GPUs

See how The Medium performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.

The Medium with RX 6650 XT + Other CPUs

See how The Medium performs with the same GPU but different processors.

Other Games with Ryzen 9 9950X3D + RX 6650 XT

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.