Steamworld Build
This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 77 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 19 | 34 | 43 | 56 |
| 1440p QHD | 44 | 66 | 85 | 112 |
| 1080p Full HD | 68 | 98 | 132 | 172 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Steamworld Build with Intel Core i7-12700KF + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060, In-Depth Analysis
Steamworld Build presents an interesting case study in system scaling, as the data for the Intel Core i7-12700KF and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 combination reveals a clear narrative about where the performance boundaries lie. This pairing of a high-end 12th Gen processor with a mid-range Turing graphics card yields a predictable yet informative pattern across resolutions and settings, with the measured results showing a consistent shift in the bottleneck between the CPU and GPU.
Resolution Scaling
The measured FPS data shows a steep and consistent decline as resolution increases, which is the classic signature of a GPU-limited scenario at higher pixel counts. Moving from 1920x1080 to 2560x1440 on the Ultra preset, the average frame rate drops from 68.3 FPS to 44.1 FPS, a reduction of approximately 35%. This trend continues and accelerates when stepping up to 3840x2160, where the Ultra preset yields just 19.4 FPS, which is a further 56% drop from the 1440p figure. This dramatic falloff indicates that the RTX 2060 is being pushed well beyond its comfortable operating range at 4K, especially with the most demanding settings enabled.
The scaling pattern becomes even more telling when examining the Low preset. At 1080p, the system achieves a very high 172.4 FPS, suggesting that the CPU is capable of feeding the GPU with plenty of frames. However, at 4K Low, the average FPS plummets to 55.5, which is a 68% reduction. This significant drop at lower settings, where the GPU workload is relatively lighter, still points to the graphics card as the limiting factor. Even with reduced visual complexity, the sheer number of pixels at 3840x2160 overwhelms the 6 GB frame buffer and the TU106 chip's compute throughput. The data implies that for this game, the RTX 2060’s role is paramount; the CPU’s performance ceiling is essentially never reached, as the GPU becomes the primary constraint before the processor can be fully utilized.
CPU Role
The Intel Core i7-12700KF is a formidable processor on paper, with 12 cores, 20 threads, and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. Its benchmark scores are impressive, with a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 28979 and a single-core score of 4091, placing it in the 89th percentile of all CPUs. The data suggests that this processor has far more capability than Steamworld Build requires at the tested settings. The high frame rates observed at 1080p Low (172.4 FPS) are evidence of the CPU's ability to handle game logic and draw calls without breaking a sweat. Even at its most demanding, the Ultra preset at 1080p yields a playable 68.3 FPS, which is still a strong result for a city builder.
The CPU's performance is further contextualized by its nearest rivals. The Core i7-12700KF shows a deltaPct of only 0.1% compared to the Intel Core i5-14400, and 0.2% versus the Intel Core i9-12900HX. This indicates that its processing power is very much in the mainstream high-end tier, with no single rival offering a significant advantage. In a game like Steamworld Build, where the simulation of a growing city can be CPU-intensive, this extra headroom is beneficial. However, the measured FPS data shows that even with a slower CPU, the results would likely be similar, as the GPU becomes the bottleneck at higher resolutions. The processor’s role here is to ensure a stable foundation, preventing frame drops in complex scenes, but it is not the component driving the performance differences seen across the resolution and settings matrix.
GPU Role
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 is the clear performance limiter in this pairing. With 6 GB of GDDR6 memory and a memory bandwidth of 336.0 GB/s, it is a capable 1080p card, but its 192-bit bus width and 12 nm Turing architecture are challenged by higher resolutions. The benchmark results show this clearly, with the GPU sitting in the 58th percentile of all GPUs. Its Passmark G3D score of 14111 is respectable, but its nearest rivals, such as the AMD Radeon RX 7600S (0.5% faster) and the AMD Radeon Pro W5500 (1.8% slower), show that it is in the heart of the mid-range pack.
The impact of the GPU is most evident in the 4K results. The fact that the Ultra preset can only manage 19.4 FPS at 3840x2160 is a clear indication that the card’s memory capacity and processing power are insufficient for such a high pixel count. Even the Low preset at 4K (55.5 FPS) is significantly lower than the 1080p Medium result (131.6 FPS), highlighting how pixel count, rather than visual effects, is the primary challenge for this GPU. The data suggests that the RTX 2060 is best suited for 1080p and, to a lesser extent, 1440p gaming, but it is not a viable option for a smooth 4K experience in this title. The VRAM size of 6 GB is likely a contributing factor, as high-resolution textures and effects can easily exceed this limit, leading to performance degradation.
How This Combo Ranks
In the global ranking of tested hardware combinations for Steamworld Build, this specific pairing of the Intel Core i7-12700KF and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 holds the 1406th position out of 1730 combos. This rank places it in the lower-middle tier of systems, which is consistent with the GPU being a mid-range component from a previous generation. The high-performing CPU does not boost the combo's standing significantly because the overall experience is so heavily dictated by the graphics card. The data implies that the processor is not a limiting factor, but it also cannot compensate for the GPU’s shortcomings at higher resolutions.
This ranking suggests that for a better overall experience, a user would need to prioritize a more powerful GPU. The CPU is already in the 89th percentile, so upgrading it would yield minimal gains in this game. The bottleneck is clearly on the graphics side, and the combo rank reflects that reality. It is a well-balanced pairing for 1080p gaming, but it falls behind other systems that feature more robust graphics solutions. The fact that it ranks below the 50th percentile (1406 out of 1730) underscores that while it is a functional system, it is not optimized for high-end 4K performance, which is where many other tested combos likely excel.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The measured FPS data provides a comprehensive look at the system's performance envelope. At 1920x1080, the results range from a very fluid 172.4 FPS on Low to a still-playable 68.3 FPS on Ultra. The Medium preset delivers 131.6 FPS, and High comes in at 98.2 FPS. This shows a clear scaling curve where the system is capable of high refresh rates at lower settings and maintains a solid 60+ FPS experience on the High preset.
Moving to 2560x1440, the performance drops are noticeable but not catastrophic. The Low preset still manages a high 111.7 FPS, while Medium yields 85.2 FPS and High delivers 65.8 FPS. The Ultra preset drops to 44.1 FPS, which is below the ideal threshold for smooth gameplay. At 3840x2160, the results become more challenging. Low is the only playable option at 55.5 FPS, followed by Medium at 43.1 FPS. High drops to 34.2 FPS, and Ultra is effectively unplayable at 19.4 FPS. This breakdown clearly shows that the system’s sweet spot is at 1080p, with 1440p being acceptable for lower settings, and 4K only viable on the Low preset.
Settings Recommendations
Based on the measured rows, the optimal experience for this hardware combination is clearly at 1920x1080 with the High preset, which delivers an average of 98.2 FPS. This provides a smooth and visually appealing experience without the performance cost of Ultra. The Ultra preset at 1080p is also viable at 68.3 FPS, but the jump from High to Ultra yields a 30% performance hit for what is likely a marginal visual improvement. For users prioritizing frame rate, the Medium preset at 1080p (131.6 FPS) offers a significant boost in smoothness.
At 2560x1440, the High preset (65.8 FPS) is the best balance between visual fidelity and performance, but users with 144 Hz monitors may prefer the Medium preset (85.2 FPS) for a more responsive feel. The Low preset at 1440p (111.7 FPS) is an option for competitive play, but it sacrifices too much visual quality for most city-building enthusiasts. For 4K, the data strongly suggests avoiding this resolution altogether. The Low preset (55.5 FPS) is the only playable option, but the visual compromise is severe. The Ultra preset at 4K (19.4 FPS) is not recommended for any scenario.
FAQ
Q: Can this system run Steamworld Build at 4K resolution?
A: Technically yes, but only at the Low preset, which averages 55.5 FPS. The Medium, High, and Ultra presets at 3840x2160 produce 43.1, 34.2, and 19.4 FPS respectively, making them largely unplayable.
Q: What is the best settings preset for a 60 FPS target at 1080p?
A: The High preset at 1920x1080 achieves an average of 98.2 FPS, which is well above the 60 FPS target. The Ultra preset also averages 68.3 FPS, so both are viable options for a smooth experience.
Q: How does the Intel Core i7-12700KF compare to its nearest rival, the Intel Core i5-14400?
A: The benchmark data shows the Core i7-12700KF is 0.1% faster than the Core i5-14400, indicating they are essentially tied in overall processor performance.
Q: Is the CPU or GPU the limiting factor in this system for Steamworld Build?
A: The data clearly indicates the GPU is the limiting factor. This is evidenced by the significant FPS drops when increasing resolution, which is a classic sign of GPU bottlenecking. The CPU's high benchmark scores and consistent performance across settings support this conclusion.
Q: What is the average FPS difference between the Low and Ultra presets at 1440p?
A: The Low preset at 2560x1440 averages 111.7 FPS, while the Ultra preset averages 44.1 FPS, representing a difference of 67.6 FPS.
Q: How does the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 rank against other GPUs?
A: The RTX 2060 is in the 58th percentile of all GPUs. Its average benchmark score is 16074, which is about 0.5% higher than the AMD Radeon RX 7600S and 1.8% higher than the AMD Radeon Pro W5500.
Hardware Specifications
Intel Core i7-12700KF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for Intel Core i7-12700KF + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 in Steamworld Build
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 55.5 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 43.1 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 34.2 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 19.4 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 111.7 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 85.2 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 65.8 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 44.1 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 172.4 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 131.6 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 98.2 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 68.3 |
Steamworld Build with ii7-12700KF + Other GPUs
See how Steamworld Build performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Steamworld Build with RTX 2060 + Other CPUs
See how Steamworld Build performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with ii7-12700KF + RTX 2060
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.