Rust

This page documents the measured average FPS for Rust with an AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D and an AMD Radeon RX 7600. The dataset contains entries for Low, Medium, High, and Ultra settings at 1920x1080, 2560x1440, and 3840x2160. Minimum and maximum FPS values are not present, so all analysis is based on average FPS. The combination is ranked 1266 out of 1717 in the game's combo ranking.

Resolution Scaling

The measured FPS data shows a consistent decline as resolution increases. With Low settings, the average moves from 138 at 1920x1080 to 94.3 at 2560x1440 and then to 56.1 at 3840x2160. High settings produce 80.2, 54.7, and 30.2. Medium produces 93.1, 61.4, and 35.5. Ultra produces 58.7, 39, and 26.2. Every settings preset follows the same downward path as the pixel count grows.

The shape of these drops points to the GPU as the limiting component at higher resolutions. The Ryzen 7 7800X3D remains constant across all rows, and its CPU-side credentials are high: 8 cores, 16 threads, a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, and a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 29149. At 1920x1080, that CPU headroom allows the system to reach 138 on Low. At 3840x2160, even Low falls to 56.1, which indicates that the Radeon RX 7600 can no longer convert lower settings into the same large FPS gains seen at 1920x1080.

The spacing between settings also compresses at higher resolution. At 1920x1080, the range from Low to Ultra spans 138 down to 58.7. At 3840x2160, the same range spans only 56.1 down to 26.2. That compression is a sign that the GPU is saturated by the pixel throughput required at 3840x2160, so reducing settings has less impact than it does at 1920x1080.

GPU Role

The Radeon RX 7600 is built on the Navi 33 chip with RDNA 3.0 architecture and a 6 nm process. Its memory subsystem includes 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, with 288.0 GB/s bandwidth. The base clock is 1720 MHz, the game clock is 2250 MHz, and the boost clock is 2655 MHz. Memory runs at 2250 MHz, listed as 18 Gbps effective. The GPU's aggregate benchmark score is 20258, placing it in the 63rd percentile. Its nearest rivals in the database are the Radeon RX 7600 XT at 20146 with a deltaPct of 0.6, the Radeon RX 460 at 20088 with a deltaPct of 0.8, the GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile at 20534 with a deltaPct of -1.3, and the Intel Arc B570 at 20556 with a deltaPct of -1.5.

These specifications are reflected in the measured Rust rows. At 1920x1080, the RX 7600 produces 80.2 on High and 58.7 on Ultra. At 2560x1440, High drops to 54.7 and Ultra to 39. At 3840x2160, High reaches only 30.2 and Ultra reaches 26.2. The 8 GB memory capacity and 128-bit bus are the context for the 3840x2160 results; the card simply has less memory bandwidth and a narrower interface than would be needed to maintain the 1920x1080 performance level.

The GPU's compute figures are also present in the dataset: 21.75 TFLOPS FP32, 339.8 GTexel/s texture rate, and 169.9 GPixel/s pixel rate. Those figures are enough to keep 1920x1080 High at 80.2, but they do not prevent 3840x2160 Ultra from falling to 26.2. In short, the RX 7600 behaves like a capable 1920x1080 and entry-level 2560x1440 card in this dataset, while 3840x2160 is clearly outside its comfortable range.

CPU Role

The Ryzen 7 7800X3D is an 8-core, 16-thread Zen 4 processor on AMD Socket AM5, with a base clock of 4.20 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. It has 96 MB of shared L3 cache. Its aggregate benchmark score is 31580, placing it in the 87th percentile of all CPUs. The nearest rivals are the Core i7-12700F at 31543 with a deltaPct of 0.1, the Ryzen 9 5980HX at 31495 with a deltaPct of 0.3, the Ryzen 7 8700G at 31407 with a deltaPct of 0.6, and the Ryzen 7 7745HX at 31402 with a deltaPct of 0.6.

The CPU's benchmark profile is strong in both single-thread and multi-thread work. Cinebench R23 single-core is 4115 and multi-core is 29149. 3DMark 16-thread is 7980 and max-thread is 7967. PassMark single-thread is 3759 and multithread is 34293. In the measured Rust data, this CPU is present in every row, so it cannot be the source of the FPS differences between resolutions. Instead, the CPU provides the foundation for the high 1920x1080 numbers: 138 on Low, 93.1 on Medium, 80.2 on High, and 58.7 on Ultra.

At 2560x1440, Medium averages 61.4 and High averages 54.7. At 3840x2160, even Low drops to 56.1. Since the CPU remains unchanged, the decline across these rows is best explained by the GPU's rendering load. The 7800X3D's high L3 cache and 5.00 GHz boost clock are present at all times, but they cannot compensate for the pixel throughput limits of the RX 7600 at 3840x2160.

FAQ

Q: What is the fastest measured resolution and settings combination in this dataset?

A: 1920x1080 with Low settings, at 138 FPS average. The next highest rows are 2560x1440 Low at 94.3 and 1920x1080 Medium at 93.1.

Q: At which resolution does the GPU become the main limiting component?

A: The data shows a large drop from 1920x1080 Low at 138 to 2560x1440 Low at 94.3, and then to 3840x2160 Low at 56.1. Since the CPU is identical in all rows, the GPU is the component that cannot sustain high averages as resolution increases. The 3840x2160 Ultra result of 26.2 is the clearest sign of GPU saturation.

Q: How does the Ryzen 7 7800X3D compare with its nearest CPU rivals in aggregate benchmarks?

A: The 7800X3D has an average benchmark score of 31580. The Core i7-12700F scores 31543 with a deltaPct of 0.1, the Ryzen 9 5980HX scores 31495 with a deltaPct of 0.3, the Ryzen 7 8700G scores 31407 with a deltaPct of 0.6, and the Ryzen 7 7745HX scores 31402 with a deltaPct of 0.6.

Q: Is 3840x2160 usable with this configuration?

A: At 3840x2160, Low averages 56.1 FPS, Medium 35.5, High 30.2, and Ultra 26.2. Low is the only 3840x2160 preset that exceeds the 2560x1440 High figure of 54.7. The other presets are all below that mark.

Q: What does the 2560x1440 data show for Ultra settings?

A: At 2560x1440 Ultra, the average is 39 FPS. That is below the 1920x1080 High result of 80.2 and also below the 2560x1440 Medium result of 61.4. The data shows diminishing returns from Ultra at this resolution.

Settings Recommendations

Low produces the highest measured average FPS at every resolution: 138 at 1920x1080, 94.3 at 2560x1440, and 56.1 at 3840x2160. Medium is the next step at 93.1, 61.4, and 35.5. High yields 80.2, 54.7, and 30.2. Ultra yields 58.7, 39, and 26.2.

At 1920x1080, High is 80.2, which is above the 2560x1440 Medium figure of 61.4. Ultra at 1920x1080 is 58.7, which is below that same 2560x1440 Medium figure. So High at 1920x1080 offers a stronger measured trade-off between visual setting and average FPS than Ultra at 1920x1080.

At 2560x1440, Medium averages 61.4, which is above the 3840x2160 Low figure of 56.1. High at 2560x1440 averages 54.7, which is below that 3840x2160 Low figure. This makes Medium the highest 2560x1440 preset that outpaces the best 3840x2160 row in the dataset.

At 3840x2160, Low is the recommended preset based on the measured rows. It produces 56.1 FPS and is the only 3840x2160 row above the 2560x1440 High result of 54.7. Medium, High, and Ultra at 3840x2160 are 35.5, 30.2, and 26.2 respectively.

Measured FPS Breakdown

| Resolution | Settings | Average FPS |

|---|---:|---:|

| 3840x2160 | High | 30.2 |

| 3840x2160 | Low | 56.1 |

| 3840x2160 | Medium | 35.5 |

| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 26.2 |

| 2560x1440 | High | 54.7 |

| 2560x1440 | Low | 94.3 |

| 2560x1440 | Medium | 61.4 |

| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 39 |

| 1920x1080 | High | 80.2 |

| 1920x1080 | Low | 138 |

| 1920x1080 | Medium | 93.1 |

| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 58.7 |

The table mirrors the source data exactly. Every row reports only average FPS; minimum and maximum FPS are absent. The highest value in the dataset is 1920x1080 Low at 138, and the lowest is 3840x2160 Ultra at 26.2.