Rust

FAQ

Q: What is the average FPS for this combo at 1920x1080 on High settings?

A: The measured average FPS is 107 at 1080p High. This is the middle-ground setting in the resolution's lineup, sitting between 188 FPS on Low and 81 FPS on Ultra.

Q: Does the 8 GB VRAM on the RTX 5060 Ti cause a measurable performance ceiling?

A: The data shows the GPU's 8 GB GDDR7 memory with a 128-bit bus and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth is a factor at higher resolutions. At 4K Ultra, the combo drops to 33 FPS average, which is a 59% reduction from 4K Low (76 FPS), indicating that memory capacity and bandwidth pressures scale with settings and resolution.

Q: How does this combo rank among all tested combinations in Rust?

A: The combo ranks 1085 out of 2953 tested combinations. This places it in the upper-middle tier of the database, meaning it outperforms the majority of tested systems but is not near the top of the leaderboard.

Q: What is the CPU's multi-threaded performance relative to its nearest rival?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 8400F scores 20,851 in Cinebench R23 multi-core. Its closest rival, the AMD Ryzen 5 7500F, averages 24,964 across all benchmarks, a delta of 0.2%. The 8400F is effectively performance-equivalent to that rival in aggregate.

Q: Is there a measurable FPS difference between Medium and High settings at 2560x1440?

A: Yes. At 1440p, Medium averages 87 FPS (with min/max of 74/100), while High averages 73 FPS. The 14 FPS gap shows that the Medium preset provides a smoother experience with less variance when moving to a higher resolution.

Q: What is the GPU's synthetic benchmark score and how does it compare to its nearest rival?

A: The RTX 5060 Ti 8 GB scores 21,981 in Passmark G3D. Its nearest rival, the AMD FirePro W5130M, scores 4,904 (a -0.1% delta), while the NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 scores 4,893 (0.2% delta). The RTX 5060 Ti is in a completely different performance class than these rivals, despite the database's percentile ranking.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8 GB is built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture with a GB206 chip fabricated on TSMC's 5 nm process. It contains 21,900 million transistors on a 181 mm² die. The GPU operates at a base clock of 2407 MHz and a boost clock of 2572 MHz, with memory running at 1750 MHz (28 Gbps effective) across an 8 GB GDDR7 pool on a 128-bit bus. This configuration yields 448.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth, which is critical for Rust's texture streaming and draw call handling.

In Rust, the GPU's role becomes increasingly dominant as resolution and settings scale upward. The measured data shows that at 1080p Low, the combo achieves 188 FPS, which suggests the CPU is capable of feeding the GPU efficiently at lower loads. However, at 4K Ultra, the average drops to 33 FPS. The GPU's 8 GB VRAM is a limiting factor at 4K, as the game's high-resolution textures and complex geometry can exceed this capacity, leading to memory swapping and frame time spikes.

The GPU's shading units (4608) and texture mapping units (144) provide a theoretical FP32 performance of 23.70 TFLOPS and a texture rate of 370.4 GTexel/s. These figures support the observed scaling: at 1440p High, the combo hits 73 FPS, while at 1080p High it reaches 107 FPS. The 34 FPS difference between these resolutions is consistent with a GPU-bound scenario where pixel fill rate and memory bandwidth are the primary constraints.

The RTX 5060 Ti's pixel rate of 123.5 GPixel/s and 48 ROPs are modest for a 50-series card, which explains the steep drop at 4K. At 3840x2160, the GPU must process over four times the pixels of 1080p, and the measured averages reflect this: 76 FPS on Low, 51 FPS on Medium (with min/max of 44/59), 43 FPS on High, and 33 FPS on Ultra. The gap between Low and Medium at 4K (25 FPS) is more pronounced than the gap between Medium and High (8 FPS), indicating that the GPU's shading resources are saturated early when resolution is high.

The GPU's Passmark G3D score of 21,981 places it in the 29th percentile of all GPUs in the database. However, this percentile is skewed by the inclusion of legacy and low-end parts; the nearest rivals listed (FirePro W5130M, GTS 450, R7 M265) are all far older or lower-tier products with average scores around 4,900. This discrepancy suggests that the RTX 5060 Ti's actual gaming performance is better than its percentile implies, but the database's scoring methodology weights synthetic workloads that may not reflect Rust's specific demands.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 5 8400F is a 6-core, 12-thread processor from the 8000 series, based on the Zen 4 (Phoenix) architecture. It runs at a base clock of 4.20 GHz and a boost clock of 4.70 GHz, with a 65 W TDP. The CPU features 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache. It supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s, which is sufficient for feeding the GPU's 448.0 GB/s bandwidth without bottlenecking at lower resolutions.

In Rust, the CPU handles game logic, entity updates, and physics calculations, which are heavily single-threaded. The 8400F's single-thread performance is measured at 951 in 3DMark single-thread and 2,943 in Cinebench R23 single-core. These scores are competitive, and the measured FPS at 1080p Low (188 FPS) demonstrates that the CPU can sustain high frame rates when the GPU is not the bottleneck. The multi-threaded score of 20,851 in Cinebench R23 indicates that the 6-core/12-thread configuration is adequate for Rust's multi-threaded rendering tasks, such as terrain generation and world streaming.

The CPU's aggregate benchmark score is 25,005, placing it in the 77th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 5 7500F, averages 24,964, a delta of only 0.2%, meaning the 8400F is statistically identical in overall CPU performance. The Intel Core i7-11850H and i7-13620H are also within 0.4% delta, showing that the 8400F sits in a tight cluster of mid-range processors. The AMD EPYC 9474F is 0.4% faster, but that is a server-grade part with a different market focus.

At higher resolutions, the CPU's role diminishes. The data shows that at 4K Low, the combo averages 76 FPS, while at 1080p Low it averages 188 FPS. This 112 FPS drop is almost entirely attributable to the GPU's resolution scaling, not CPU limitation. However, at 1080p Low, the 188 FPS result suggests the CPU is the primary limiter, as the GPU is underutilized at such low settings. The CPU's 12 threads allow for background tasks (like Rust's server-side simulation) without stalling the render thread, as evidenced by the stable min/max values at 1080p Medium (107/145 FPS) and 1440p Medium (74/100 FPS).

Settings Recommendations

The measured data provides a clear hierarchy of settings for this combo, and the optimal choice depends on the target resolution and desired frame rate stability.

At 1920x1080, the Low preset delivers 188 FPS, which is far beyond the refresh rate of most monitors. Medium yields 126 FPS (min/max 107/145), providing a substantial visual improvement over Low while maintaining a high frame rate. High drops to 107 FPS, and Ultra falls to 81 FPS. For 1080p, the Medium preset is the best balance: it offers a 62 FPS advantage over High and a 107 FPS advantage over Ultra, while still staying above the 100 FPS threshold that most esports and competitive players consider smooth. The min/max spread of 38 FPS at Medium is acceptable, but High's 107 FPS average with no reported min/max suggests less variance.

At 2560x1440, the Low preset achieves 129 FPS, which is playable for competitive modes. Medium averages 87 FPS with a min/max of 74/100, providing a more consistent experience than High's 73 FPS. Ultra drops to 56 FPS, which is borderline for fast-paced gameplay. The recommendation at 1440p is Medium: it provides a 14 FPS uplift over High and a 31 FPS uplift over Ultra, while the min/max range (74-100) indicates that frame times are stable enough for most players.

At 3840x2160, the situation is more constrained. Low averages 76 FPS, Medium 51 FPS (min/max 44/59), High 43 FPS, and Ultra 33 FPS. For 4K gaming, the Low preset is the only option that approaches a playable frame rate, and it sacrifices significant visual fidelity. Medium at 51 FPS is acceptable for slower, exploration-focused gameplay, but the min FPS of 44 suggests potential stuttering during intense moments. The data indicates that this combo is not well-suited for 4K Ultra, and players should either stick to 1440p or accept Low settings at 4K.

The best overall experience for this combo is 1440p Medium, which balances visual quality (higher than Low) with a frame rate (87 FPS) that is above the 60 FPS standard and close to the 100 FPS target for smooth gameplay. At 1080p, Medium is also recommended if the user prioritizes visual fidelity over raw frame rate, but Low is viable for competitive play.

How This Combo Ranks

The AMD Ryzen 5 8400F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8 GB combination ranks 1085 out of 2953 tested combos in Rust. This places it in the 63rd percentile of all tested systems, meaning it outperforms roughly two-thirds of the database but lags behind the top-tier configurations that pair high-end CPUs with flagship GPUs.

The ranking reflects the mid-range nature of both components. The CPU's 77th percentile standing (average score 25,005) is stronger than the GPU's 29th percentile (average score 4,901), but in Rust, the GPU's limitations at high settings and resolutions drag the overall combo down. The rank of 1085 suggests that this combo is competitive in the mid-range segment, but it will not compete with systems using RTX 4080-class GPUs or Ryzen 7/9 processors.

The discrepancy between the CPU and GPU percentiles is telling. The 8400F's performance is near the top of the mid-range CPU market, but the RTX 5060 Ti's percentile is artificially low due to the database's inclusion of many legacy GPUs. In real-world gaming, this combo is likely more competitive than the raw percentile suggests, but the measured FPS data in Rust confirms that the GPU is the limiting factor at 4K and Ultra settings.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the combo delivers the following average FPS across presets:

• Low: 188 FPS
• Medium: 126 FPS (min/max: 107/145)
• High: 107 FPS
• Ultra: 81 FPS

The scaling from Low to Ultra is 107 FPS (a 57% reduction), which is steep but expected for a GPU with 8 GB VRAM. The Medium preset's min/max range of 38 FPS is the largest spread across all 1080p settings, indicating that the game's world-loading events cause noticeable frame dips.

At 2560x1440:

• Low: 129 FPS
• Medium: 87 FPS (min/max: 74/100)
• High: 73 FPS
• Ultra: 56 FPS

The drop from 1080p to 1440p is consistent across settings: Low loses 59 FPS, Medium 39 FPS, High 34 FPS, and Ultra 25 FPS. The decreasing absolute loss as settings rise indicates that the GPU is already struggling at Ultra, so resolution scaling has a smaller marginal impact.

At 3840x2160:

• Low: 76 FPS
• Medium: 51 FPS (min/max: 44/59)
• High: 43 FPS
• Ultra: 33 FPS

The 4K results show a severe bottleneck. The difference between Low and Ultra is 43 FPS, but the most significant drop is from Low to Medium (25 FPS), suggesting that the GPU's shading units and memory bandwidth are overwhelmed once textures and effects are increased. The min FPS of 44 at 4K Medium indicates that the combo cannot maintain a stable 60 FPS experience at this resolution.

Resolution Scaling

The data reveals how this combo's performance scales as resolution increases from 1080p to 4K, and this scaling pattern identifies the limiting component.

From 1080p to 1440p, the average FPS drops by 31% on Low (from 188 to 129), 31% on Medium (from 126 to 87), 32% on High (from 107 to 73), and 31% on Ultra (from 81 to 56). This consistent 31-32% reduction across all settings indicates that the GPU is the primary limiter at 1440p, as the CPU's frame rate ceiling (evidenced by 188 FPS at 1080p Low) is not being approached.

From 1440p to 4K, the drops are more pronounced: Low loses 41% (from 129 to 76), Medium loses 41% (from 87 to 51), High loses 41% (from 73 to 43), and Ultra loses 41% (from 56 to 33). The uniformity of these percentage drops (all around 41%) confirms that the GPU's pixel fill rate and memory bandwidth are the dominant constraints at 4K, regardless of settings.

The scaling behavior points to a GPU-bound configuration in Rust. The CPU's 6 cores and 12 threads are sufficient to maintain high frame rates at 1080p Low (188 FPS), but as resolution and settings increase, the GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 128-bit bus become the limiting factors. The 4K Ultra result of 33 FPS is particularly telling: it is 82% lower than the 1080p Low result, and the gap between 1440p Ultra (56 FPS) and 4K Ultra (33 FPS) suggests that the GPU cannot handle the memory pressure of 4K textures.

For users of this combo, the data suggests that 1440p is the sweet spot, where the GPU is still capable of delivering playable frame rates (56-129 FPS depending on settings). At 4K, only Low settings provide a comfortable experience (76 FPS), and even then, the margin for error is thin. The CPU is not the bottleneck in this pairing; rather, the RTX 5060 Ti's 8 GB VRAM and modest bus width are the primary constraints on Rust's performance.