Rust
This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 103 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 46 | 61 | 68 | 103 |
| 1440p QHD | 72 | 97 | 113 | 140 |
| 1080p Full HD | 111 | 129 | 136 | 156 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Rust with AMD Ryzen 5 4600G + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER, In-Depth Analysis
The AMD Ryzen 5 4600G paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER ranks 436th out of 1,717 tested combinations in Rust. This places the combo in the top 25.4% of all tested systems for this game, a solid standing that reflects the substantial GPU horsepower available. The ranking indicates that while the CPU is not a top-tier part, the overall combination is capable of delivering a smooth experience in most scenarios, with the GPU taking the lead in driving frame rates.
How This Combo Ranks
The combo’s rank of 436 out of 1,717 tested combinations puts it comfortably in the upper quartile of all systems tested in Rust. This is a strong result, particularly considering the CPU’s position in the broader market. The Ryzen 5 4600G sits at the 75th percentile when compared to all CPUs, meaning it outperforms three-quarters of all processors in general benchmarks. However, its average benchmark score of 17,489 is nearly identical to its nearest rivals, with the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5355GE scoring 17,482 (a 0% delta) and the Intel Core i5-12450H scoring 17,475 (a 0.1% delta). The CPU is also slightly behind the Intel Core i3-14100T, which scores 17,636 (a -0.8% delta for the 4600G), and the Intel Core i3-13100F at 17,665 (a -1% delta). These margins are negligible, showing that the 4600G is in a tightly contested performance bracket.
On the GPU side, the RTX 4070 SUPER is a more dominant component. It ranks at the 84th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 42,576. Its nearest rivals are the NVIDIA RTX A6000 (42,653, a -0.2% delta) and the AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE (42,723, a -0.3% delta), indicating the 4070 SUPER is on par with these high-end cards. The data suggests that the GPU’s performance is the primary driver of the combo’s 436th rank, as the CPU is only average relative to its peers. In Rust, which can be CPU-intensive in complex scenes, this pairing still manages to achieve a high rank because the GPU’s raw power compensates for the CPU’s mid-range standing. The result is a balanced system that excels in GPU-bound scenarios but may show limitations in CPU-heavy moments.
FAQ
Q: What is the best resolution for this combo to achieve over 100 FPS in Rust?
A: At 1920x1080, the combo achieves over 100 FPS on all tested settings, with Low hitting 156 FPS, Medium at 136 FPS, High at 129.1 FPS, and Ultra at 110.9 FPS. At 2560x1440, only Low (139.8 FPS) and Medium (113.3 FPS) exceed 100 FPS, while High drops to 96.8 FPS. At 4K, only Low (102.8 FPS) crosses the 100 FPS threshold.
Q: How does the combo perform at 4K resolution?
A: At 3840x2160, the combo delivers 60.6 FPS on High settings, 67.5 FPS on Medium, 102.8 FPS on Low, and 45.7 FPS on Ultra. This shows that 4K is playable, but only Low settings guarantee a frame rate above 100 FPS.
Q: Is the CPU or GPU the limiting factor in this combo?
A: Benchmark data indicates the GPU is the stronger component, ranking at the 84th percentile versus the CPU’s 75th percentile. The measured FPS drops significantly from 1080p to 4K, suggesting the GPU becomes the bottleneck at higher resolutions, while the CPU is sufficient to keep frame rates high at lower resolutions.
Q: What is the frame rate difference between Low and Ultra settings at 1440p?
A: At 2560x1440, the combo achieves 139.8 FPS on Low settings and 71.7 FPS on Ultra settings. This represents a 68.1 FPS difference, showing that Ultra settings nearly halve the performance compared to Low.
Q: How does the Ryzen 5 4600G’s single-thread performance affect Rust?
A: The CPU’s single-thread score in Cinebench R23 is 1,919, which is modest. In a game like Rust, which often relies on single-thread performance, this could limit frame rates in CPU-bound scenes, but the data shows the combo still achieves high FPS at 1080p, indicating the GPU helps mitigate this limitation.
Q: What is the combo’s standing relative to other tested systems?
A: The combo ranks 436th out of 1,717 tested combinations, placing it in the top 25.4% of all systems tested in Rust. This is a strong position, driven primarily by the RTX 4070 SUPER’s high GPU percentile ranking.
CPU Role
The AMD Ryzen 5 4600G is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on the Zen 2 architecture, codenamed Renoir, and fabricated on a 7 nm process. It has a base clock of 3.70 GHz and a boost clock of 4.20 GHz, with a 65 W TDP. The CPU’s cache configuration includes 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and 8 MB of shared L3 cache. This is a relatively modest cache size, which can impact performance in games that rely heavily on data reuse. The CPU supports DDR4 memory with a dual-channel bus and a maximum bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s, which is adequate for feeding the GPU in most scenarios.
In terms of synthetic benchmarks, the 4600G scores 13,593 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 1,919 in single-core. Its multi-threaded performance is respectable for a 6-core part, but the single-core score is only average, which is a critical factor for Rust. Rust is known for its physics simulations and entity updates that can be single-thread bound, meaning the CPU’s single-core performance can become a bottleneck in dense areas with many players or structures. However, the measured FPS data shows that at 1080p, the combo achieves 156 FPS on Low settings, suggesting that the CPU is not severely limiting at lower resolutions. The CPU’s 3DMark scores also reflect its capabilities: 4,863 for 16 threads and 726 for single-thread, which are mid-range values. The CPU’s percentile rank of 75 versus all CPUs indicates it is better than most, but its nearest rivals—the Ryzen 3 PRO 5355GE and Core i5-12450H—are nearly identical in performance, showing it is not a standout part. In this combo, the CPU provides enough processing power to keep frame rates high, but the GPU is clearly the dominant component in driving the overall experience.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The measured FPS data provides a clear picture of how the combo performs across resolutions and settings. At 1920x1080, the frame rates are consistently high: Low settings produce 156 FPS, Medium 136 FPS, High 129.1 FPS, and Ultra 110.9 FPS. This shows that even at the highest settings, the combo maintains a frame rate well above 60 FPS, making 1080p a fully playable resolution for all settings. The gap between Low and Ultra is 45.1 FPS, which is significant but not extreme, indicating that the GPU has enough headroom to handle higher settings without collapsing.
Moving to 2560x1440, the performance drops as expected. Low settings yield 139.8 FPS, Medium 113.3 FPS, High 96.8 FPS, and Ultra 71.7 FPS. The drop from 1080p to 1440p is noticeable, particularly at High and Ultra settings, where frame rates fall below the 100 FPS mark. At 1440p, the combo is still playable, but users seeking 100+ FPS will need to stick to Medium settings or lower. The Ultra setting at 1440p, at 71.7 FPS, is still smooth for most players, but it represents a 68.1 FPS drop from Low, showing the cost of maximum graphical fidelity.
At 3840x2160, the frame rates diminish further. Low settings produce 102.8 FPS, Medium 67.5 FPS, High 60.6 FPS, and Ultra 45.7 FPS. This is the first resolution where the combo struggles to maintain high frame rates, with only Low settings exceeding 100 FPS. At 4K Ultra, the frame rate drops to 45.7 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay, indicating that the GPU is heavily taxed at this resolution. The data shows a clear trend: the combo is best suited for 1080p and 1440p gaming, with 4K being viable only at lower settings.
Resolution Scaling
The resolution scaling analysis reveals how the combo’s performance degrades as pixel count increases. From 1920x1080 to 2560x1440, the average FPS across all settings drops by a notable margin. For example, at Low settings, the FPS drops from 156 to 139.8, a reduction of 16.2 FPS (about 10.4%). At High settings, the drop is from 129.1 to 96.8, a reduction of 32.3 FPS (about 25%). This disproportionate drop at higher settings suggests that the GPU is becoming more stressed as resolution increases, but the CPU is still able to keep up.
Moving from 1440p to 4K, the scaling becomes more severe. At Low settings, the FPS drops from 139.8 to 102.8, a reduction of 37 FPS (about 26.5%). At Ultra settings, the drop is from 71.7 to 45.7, a reduction of 26 FPS (about 36.3%). This indicates that the GPU is the primary limiting factor at 4K, as the increased pixel count demands more from the graphics card. The CPU’s role becomes less critical at higher resolutions because the frame rate is more dependent on the GPU’s ability to render frames. The data shows that the combo is GPU-bound at 4K, with the RTX 4070 SUPER’s performance ceiling being the main constraint. Conversely, at 1080p, the frame rates are high enough that the CPU may occasionally become the bottleneck in CPU-intensive scenes, but the overall scaling suggests the GPU is the dominant component throughout.
Settings Recommendations
Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings depend on the user’s resolution and target frame rate. At 1920x1080, all settings provide a smooth experience, but Ultra settings at 110.9 FPS offer the best visual quality without sacrificing playability. The data shows that even at Ultra, the frame rate is well above 60 FPS, so users with 1080p monitors can safely max out the settings. For those seeking the highest possible frame rates, Low settings at 156 FPS would be the choice, but the visual trade-off is significant.
At 2560x1440, the recommendation is to use Medium settings, which provide 113.3 FPS. This balances visual fidelity with performance, as High settings drop to 96.8 FPS and Ultra falls to 71.7 FPS. Medium settings offer a frame rate that is high enough for competitive play, while still looking better than Low. Users with 1440p monitors who prioritize frame rate over visuals could opt for Low settings at 139.8 FPS, but this would degrade the experience. For a more immersive experience, High settings at 96.8 FPS are acceptable, but may not be ideal for fast-paced action.
At 3840x2160, the only setting that guarantees a smooth experience is Low, which produces 102.8 FPS. Medium settings at 67.5 FPS are playable, but the frame rate is close to the 60 FPS threshold, which may cause noticeable stutters in busy scenes. High settings at 60.6 FPS are borderline, and Ultra at 45.7 FPS is not recommended for smooth gameplay. For 4K users, the data suggests sticking to Low or Medium settings to maintain playable frame rates, with the understanding that the GPU is the limiting factor at this resolution. Overall, the combo is best utilized at 1080p with Ultra settings or 1440p with Medium settings, offering the best balance of performance and visual quality.
Hardware Specifications
AMD Ryzen 5 4600G
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for AMD Ryzen 5 4600G + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER in Rust
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 102.8 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 67.5 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 60.6 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 45.7 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 139.8 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 113.3 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 96.8 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 71.7 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 156.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 136.0 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 129.1 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 110.9 |
Rust with Ryzen 5 4600G + Other GPUs
See how Rust performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Rust with RTX 4070 SUPER + Other CPUs
See how Rust performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with Ryzen 5 4600G + RTX 4070 SUPER
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.