Roblox

Roblox

AVERAGE FPS
89
good

This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 89 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 38 47 53 58
1440p QHD 67 83 94 103
1080p Full HD 101 124 140 154

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Low 58
3840x2160 Medium 53
3840x2160 High 47
3840x2160 Ultra 38
2560x1440 Low 103
2560x1440 Medium 94
2560x1440 High 83
2560x1440 Ultra 67
1920x1080 Low 154
1920x1080 Medium 140
1920x1080 High 124
1920x1080 Ultra 101

Roblox with Intel Core Ultra 5 225 + Intel Arc B370, In-Depth Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 5 225 paired with the Intel Arc B370 integrated graphics lands at rank 2774 out of 3010 tested combos in Roblox. That places this configuration in the bottom 8% of all systems tested, a position that reflects the Arc B370's status as an integrated graphics solution rather than a dedicated card. The combo's percentile ranking among all GPUs is 5, meaning roughly 95% of graphics solutions tested outperform it in raw compute benchmarks. For a game like Roblox, which is known for its blocky aesthetics and relatively modest visual demands, this low ranking is significant: it suggests the system will run the game, but users should temper expectations regarding high frame rates at demanding settings. The data indicates this is a functional entry-level setup, not a performance-oriented one.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo's rank of 2774 out of 3010 in Roblox places it near the bottom of the tested field, but context matters. This is not a pairing of discrete components; the Arc B370 is an IGP, sharing system memory and competing with other integrated solutions. Among all GPUs tested, the Arc B370 sits at the 5th percentile, a figure that aligns with its modest 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 1184. The nearest rivals in GPU benchmarks are older discrete cards like the ATI Radeon HD 5770 (score 1190, delta -0.5%) and ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 (score 1186, delta -0.2%). These deltas are razor-thin, indicating the Arc B370 performs almost identically to legacy dedicated GPUs from over a decade ago. The AMD FirePro M2000 trails slightly at 1168 (delta +1.4%), reinforcing that the Intel IGP is competitive with that vintage of hardware. For the CPU, the Core Ultra 5 225 ranks in the 85th percentile among all processors, with an average benchmark score of 36938. Its nearest rivals—the AMD Ryzen 5 5600F (score 36945, delta 0%), AMD Ryzen 5 5500X3D (score 37018, delta -0.2%), and Intel Core i9-12900T (score 37112, delta -0.5%)—are all within a half-percent of each other. The data shows a stark mismatch: a strong mid-range CPU is hamstrung by a very weak GPU, dragging the entire combo down in Roblox's rankings.

GPU Role

The Intel Arc B370 is the primary bottleneck here, and its specifications make that clear. It operates with a base clock of 300 MHz and a boost clock of 2400 MHz, but its memory configuration is "System Shared," meaning it relies on the host system's RAM rather than dedicated VRAM. Memory bandwidth is listed as "System Dependent," which introduces variability: performance will hinge on the speed and dual-channel configuration of the system's DDR5 memory. The GPU has 1280 shading units, 40 texture mapping units, and 20 raster output units, with 10 ray tracing cores. Its pixel rate is 48.00 GPixel/s and texture rate is 96.00 GTexel/s, yielding 6.144 TFLOPS of FP32 compute. These figures are modest by modern standards, and the GPU's 25 W TDP underscores its integrated nature—it draws minimal power and requires no dedicated power connectors. In Roblox, the measured FPS data shows the GPU's limits clearly: at 1080p Ultra, the average drops to 101 FPS, while at 4K Ultra it falls to 38 FPS. The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 1184 places it near the bottom, with rivals like the ATI Radeon HD 5770 scoring 1190. The data implies that the Arc B370 can handle Roblox at lower settings, but it lacks the headroom for high-resolution, high-preset gaming.

Settings Recommendations

The measured FPS rows provide a clear picture of which settings deliver the best experience. At 1080p, the Low preset achieves an average of 154 FPS, which is excellent for smooth gameplay. Medium at 1080p yields 140 FPS average with a min of 119 and max of 161, still very playable. High at 1080p drops to 124 FPS average. The Ultra preset at 1080p falls to 101 FPS average, which is acceptable but begins to show strain. For the best balance of visual quality and performance, Medium at 1080p is the sweet spot: it offers a 14 FPS improvement over High while maintaining a minimum of 119 FPS, ensuring no noticeable stutter. At 1440p, Medium provides 94 FPS average (min 80, max 108), which remains playable, but the drop to 83 FPS on High suggests diminishing returns. At 4K, even Low only manages 58 FPS average, and Medium falls to 53 FPS with a min of 45, which is borderline for smooth play. The data strongly indicates that users should stick to 1080p with Medium or High settings. Ultra is not recommended at any resolution, as it introduces significant frame rate penalties—a 53 FPS drop from Low at 1080p and a 20 FPS drop from Low at 4K.

Measured FPS Breakdown

Breaking down the measured data by resolution and settings reveals a consistent pattern of decline as demands increase. At 1920x1080, the Low preset delivers 154 FPS average, which is the highest recorded for this combo. Medium follows at 140 FPS average, with a minimum of 119 and maximum of 161, showing a stable frame time distribution. High at 1080p produces 124 FPS average, and Ultra drops to 101 FPS average. The gap between Low and Ultra at 1080p is 53 FPS, a substantial penalty for higher visual fidelity. Moving to 2560x1440, the averages drop across the board: Low yields 103 FPS, Medium 94 FPS (min 80, max 108), High 83 FPS, and Ultra 67 FPS. The 1440p results show a similar pattern, with a 36 FPS difference between Low and Ultra. At 3840x2160, the numbers compress further: Low averages 58 FPS, Medium 53 FPS (min 45, max 61), High 47 FPS, and Ultra 38 FPS. The 4K data reveals that even the Low preset struggles to maintain 60 FPS, with only the Low setting crossing that threshold. The measured minimums, only available for Medium at each resolution, show that 1440p Medium (min 80) and 1080p Medium (min 119) maintain playable floors, while 4K Medium (min 45) risks noticeable dips. The data suggests the Arc B370 is best utilized at 1080p, where even Ultra exceeds 100 FPS, but falters quickly at higher resolutions.

Resolution Scaling

The FPS drop from 1080p to 4K is steep and revealing. At Low settings, the average falls from 154 FPS at 1080p to 103 FPS at 1440p (a 33% reduction) and then to 58 FPS at 4K (a 62% reduction from 1080p). At Medium, the progression is 140 FPS to 94 FPS to 53 FPS, a 62% drop from 1080p to 4K. High shows 124 FPS to 83 FPS to 47 FPS, a 62% drop. Ultra follows suit: 101 FPS to 67 FPS to 38 FPS, a 62% decline. This consistent ~62% reduction from 1080p to 4K across all settings indicates that the limiting factor scales linearly with pixel count, which is characteristic of a GPU-bound scenario. The number of pixels at 4K is roughly four times that of 1080p, but the FPS does not quarter—it drops by about 62%, not 75%. This suggests the GPU is not fully saturated at 1080p, likely due to CPU overhead or the game's engine limits, but becomes progressively more constrained as resolution increases. The data implies that the Arc B370 has enough compute headroom to push higher frame rates at 1080p, but its shared memory bandwidth and limited ROPs (20) become the bottleneck at higher resolutions. The scaling pattern points to the GPU as the primary limiter, with the CPU's strong single-core performance (Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3655) unable to compensate for the GPU's pixel throughput limitations at 4K.

CPU Role

The Intel Core Ultra 5 225 is a 10-core, 10-thread processor based on the Arrow Lake architecture, fabricated on a 3 nm process by TSMC. It has a base clock of 3.30 GHz and a boost clock of 4.90 GHz, with 20 MB of shared L3 cache and 3 MB of L2 per core. Its single-core performance is strong, evidenced by a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3655 and a Passmark single-thread score of 4412. Multi-core performance is equally capable, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 25891 and a Passmark multithread score of 30459. The CPU's 85th percentile ranking among all processors, and its average benchmark score of 36938, places it in the upper tier of desktop CPUs. In Roblox, which is often considered CPU-bound due to its physics and game logic, this processor should theoretically excel. However, the measured FPS data shows that the combo's rank in Roblox (2774 of 3010) is far below what the CPU alone would suggest. The bottleneck is clearly the GPU, as the CPU's high single-thread performance (Cinebench R15 single-core score of 368) is more than sufficient for the game's demands. The nearest CPU rivals—AMD Ryzen 5 5600F (delta 0%), AMD Ryzen 5 5500X3D (delta -0.2%), and Intel Core i9-12900T (delta -0.5%)—all perform within a fraction of a percent of the Ultra 5 225, indicating the CPU is not the differentiating factor in this combo's low ranking. The data suggests that if paired with a discrete GPU, this CPU would likely push Roblox to much higher frame rates, but with the Arc B370, the CPU's potential is unrealized.

FAQ

Q: What is the combo's overall rank in Roblox?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 225 and Intel Arc B370 combo ranks 2774 out of 3010 tested combinations in Roblox, placing it in the bottom 8% of systems.

Q: How does the Arc B370 compare to its nearest GPU rivals in benchmarks?

A: The Arc B370 scores 1184 in 3DMark Steel Nomad, nearly identical to the ATI Radeon HD 5770 (1190, delta -0.5%) and ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 (1186, delta -0.2%), with the AMD FirePro M2000 slightly behind at 1168 (delta +1.4%).

Q: What settings and resolution yield the highest average FPS for this combo?

A: The highest average FPS recorded is 154 at 1920x1080 with Low settings. For a balance of quality and performance, Medium at 1080p offers 140 FPS average with a minimum of 119 FPS.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU the limiting factor in Roblox performance?

A: The GPU is the clear bottleneck. The CPU ranks in the 85th percentile among all processors, but the GPU sits in the 5th percentile. The FPS scaling from 1080p to 4K shows a consistent ~62% drop, typical of GPU-bound scenarios.

Q: What is the average FPS at 4K Ultra settings?

A: At 3840x2160 with Ultra settings, the combo achieves an average of 38 FPS, which is below the generally accepted 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay.

Q: How does the Core Ultra 5 225's performance compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The CPU's average benchmark score is 36938, nearly identical to the AMD Ryzen 5 5600F (36945, delta 0%), AMD Ryzen 5 5500X3D (37018, delta -0.2%), and Intel Core i9-12900T (37112, delta -0.5%).

Hardware Specifications

Intel Core Ultra 5 225

Cores / Threads 10 / 10
Base Clock 3300 MHz
Boost Clock 4900 MHz
TDP 65W
Socket Intel Socket 1851
View Full CPU Details →

Intel Arc B370

VRAM System Shared System Shared
Base Clock —
Boost Clock 2400 MHz MHz
TDP 25 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for Intel Core Ultra 5 225 + Intel Arc B370 in Roblox

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Low 58.0
3840x2160 Medium 53.0
3840x2160 High 47.0
3840x2160 Ultra 38.0
2560x1440 Low 103.0
2560x1440 Medium 94.0
2560x1440 High 83.0
2560x1440 Ultra 67.0
1920x1080 Low 154.0
1920x1080 Medium 140.0
1920x1080 High 124.0
1920x1080 Ultra 101.0

Roblox with iUltra 5 225 + Other GPUs

See how Roblox performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.

Roblox with Arc B370 + Other CPUs

See how Roblox performs with the same GPU but different processors.

Other Games with iUltra 5 225 + Arc B370

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.