Roblox

The benchmark data for Roblox on the AMD Ryzen 7 7700 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER combination reveals a system that is heavily skewed toward CPU performance. Across all resolutions and settings, the measured frame rates are exceptionally high, indicating that this hardware pairing is far more than sufficient for the game’s graphical demands. The analysis below breaks down how the system scales across resolutions, the specific roles of the CPU and GPU, and what settings provide the optimal experience.

Resolution Scaling

The measured FPS data shows a clear and predictable pattern: as resolution increases, average frame rates decrease. At 1920x1080 with Low settings, the system achieves 306.7 FPS. This drops to 205.2 FPS at 2560x1440 and further to 114.6 FPS at 3840x2160. This represents a 62.6% reduction in frame rate when moving from 1080p to 4K at Low settings, which indicates that the GPU is becoming an increasingly significant factor at higher pixel counts.

The scaling behavior differs by settings preset. At High settings, the drop from 1080p (249.7 FPS) to 1440p (167.6 FPS) is a 32.9% decrease, and the subsequent drop to 4K (95.3 FPS) is another 43.1% decrease. The Ultra preset shows the steepest decline: from 201.1 FPS at 1080p to 131.6 FPS at 1440p, then down to 78.7 FPS at 4K. The fact that even at 4K Ultra the system maintains nearly 80 FPS suggests that the RTX 2060 SUPER, despite its age, is not the primary bottleneck in this title.

The gap between Low and Ultra settings widens as resolution increases. At 1080p, the difference between Low (306.7 FPS) and Ultra (201.1 FPS) is 105.6 FPS. At 4K, this gap narrows to 35.9 FPS (114.6 vs 78.7). This convergence at higher resolutions indicates that the GPU workload becomes more uniform across settings, while at lower resolutions the CPU has more headroom to exploit lower graphical demands. The data strongly suggests that at 1080p, the limiting factor is the CPU’s ability to feed frames, while at 4K the GPU’s pixel throughput becomes more relevant.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER is built on the Turing architecture with a TU106 chip manufactured on a 12 nm process. It features 2176 shading units, 136 texture mapping units, and 64 raster output units. The GPU operates at a base clock of 1470 MHz and boosts to 1650 MHz, with 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus providing 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth. These specifications place it in the 63rd percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 19774.

The GPU’s nearest rivals in benchmark scores are the NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN (19706, 0.3% slower), the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (19680, 0.5% slower), the NVIDIA Quadro K5200 (19623, 0.8% slower), and the NVIDIA Tesla K40m (19519, 1.3% slower). The RTX 2060 SUPER is effectively tied with these cards in raw compute, yet the measured FPS in Roblox is extremely high. This indicates that the game is not stressing the GPU’s compute capabilities, but rather its ability to render scenes quickly.

In terms of API support, the GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. Its benchmark scores in DirectX 11 (130) and DirectX 12 (61) suggest that the card’s performance is consistent across modern APIs. The GPU’s pixel rate is 105.6 GPixel/s and texture rate is 224.4 GTexel/s, which are more than adequate for a game with Roblox’s visual complexity. The 8 GB VRAM capacity is not a limiting factor here, as the highest measured FPS at 4K Ultra (78.7 FPS) indicates the card can handle the memory requirements without issue.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 7 7700 is a Zen 4 architecture processor codenamed Raphael, built on TSMC’s 5 nm process. It has 8 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 3.80 GHz and a boost clock of 5.30 GHz. The CPU features a 32 MB shared L3 cache, 1 MB L2 cache per core, and 64 KB L1 cache per core. Its memory support includes DDR5 with dual-channel configuration, providing 83.2 GB/s of bandwidth. The processor sits in the 91st percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 40468.

The CPU’s benchmark results reveal its strength in multi-threaded workloads. It scores 29302 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 12306 in Cinebench R20 multi-core. Single-thread performance is also strong, with scores of 4136 in Cinebench R23 single-core and 1737 in Cinebench R20 single-core. The 3DMark tests show a scaling pattern from 2043 (2 threads) to 8484 (16 threads), indicating good thread utilization. The PassMark single-thread score of 4063 and multithread score of 34470 further confirm its balanced performance.

The nearest rivals to the Ryzen 7 7700 include the AMD Ryzen 9 7940H (40431, 0.1% slower), the AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (40262, 0.5% slower), the Intel Core i9-13905H (40712, 0.6% faster), and the Intel Core Ultra 5 235T (39995, 1.2% slower). These rivals are all mobile or low-power parts, which underscores the Ryzen 7 7700’s desktop-class performance advantage. In Roblox, the CPU’s high single-thread performance is critical, as the game’s physics and scripting often rely on single-core speed. The 5.30 GHz boost clock ensures that the CPU can deliver maximum performance when needed.

FAQ

Q: What is the highest average FPS this system achieves in Roblox?

A: The highest measured average FPS is 306.7, achieved at 1920x1080 resolution with Low settings.

Q: How does the RTX 2060 SUPER compare to its nearest rival, the RTX 2070?

A: The RTX 2060 SUPER has an average benchmark score of 19774, which is 0.5% higher than the RTX 2070’s score of 19680. This makes them effectively equivalent in raw performance.

Q: What is the CPU’s percentile ranking among all processors?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 7700 falls in the 91st percentile of all CPUs, indicating it outperforms 91% of processors in the benchmark database.

Q: Does the system maintain playable FPS at 4K resolution?

A: Yes, at 3840x2160, the system achieves 95.3 FPS on High settings, 106.6 FPS on Medium, and 78.7 FPS on Ultra. All presets exceed 60 FPS at 4K.

Q: What is the difference in FPS between Low and Ultra settings at 1440p?

A: At 2560x1440, Low settings produce 205.2 FPS while Ultra produces 131.6 FPS, a difference of 73.6 FPS.

Q: How much faster is the Ryzen 7 7700 than the Intel Core Ultra 5 235T?

A: The Ryzen 7 7700 has an average score of 40468, which is 1.2% higher than the Core Ultra 5 235T’s score of 39995.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings depend on the display resolution. At 1920x1080, even Ultra settings deliver 201.1 FPS, which is far beyond the refresh rate of most monitors. Since Ultra is only 34.4% slower than Low at this resolution, there is no practical reason to compromise visual quality. The data shows that at 1080p, the CPU is the limiting factor, so the GPU has ample headroom to run higher presets without meaningful frame rate penalties.

At 2560x1440, the High preset delivers 167.6 FPS, while Ultra drops to 131.6 FPS. The 36 FPS difference between High and Ultra is noticeable, but both exceed 120 FPS, making either viable. For players with high-refresh 1440p monitors, High offers a better balance, providing 27.3% more FPS than Ultra. The Medium preset at 185.8 FPS is also a strong option if visual fidelity is less important.

At 3840x2160, the situation changes. Ultra produces 78.7 FPS, which is playable but below the 90 FPS threshold that some players prefer. High settings at 95.3 FPS provide a 21.1% improvement over Ultra, while Medium at 106.6 FPS offers a 35.5% improvement. For 4K gaming, the data suggests that High or Medium is the sweet spot, as they maintain frame rates above 95 FPS while still delivering acceptable visual quality. Low at 114.6 FPS is the maximum performance option, but the visual trade-off is likely too severe for most users. Overall, the High preset across all resolutions provides the best combination of frame rate and visual fidelity based on the measured data.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The complete measured FPS dataset shows a consistent hierarchy across resolutions. At 1920x1080, the average FPS values are: 306.7 (Low), 281.2 (Medium), 249.7 (High), and 201.1 (Ultra). This represents a range of 105.6 FPS between the lowest and highest settings. The Medium preset is 8.3% slower than Low, High is 18.6% slower than Low, and Ultra is 34.4% slower than Low.

At 2560x1440, the values are: 205.2 (Low), 185.8 (Medium), 167.6 (High), and 131.6 (Ultra). The range here is 73.6 FPS. Medium is 9.5% slower than Low, High is 18.3% slower, and Ultra is 35.9% slower. The percentage penalties are similar to 1080p, but the absolute frame rates are lower.

At 3840x2160, the values are: 114.6 (Low), 106.6 (Medium), 95.3 (High), and 78.7 (Ultra). The range narrows to 35.9 FPS. Medium is 7.0% slower than Low, High is 16.8% slower, and Ultra is 31.3% slower. The consistent percentage drops across resolutions indicate that the relative cost of each settings tier remains stable, even as the absolute FPS decreases with higher pixel counts. This dataset confirms that the system is well-balanced, with the CPU providing enough headroom to push high frame rates at lower resolutions, and the GPU capable of maintaining solid performance at 4K.