Road 96

Road 96

AVERAGE FPS
38
playable

This combination offers playable performance with an average of 38 FPS, though you may want to lower settings for smoother gameplay.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 11 16 23 29
1440p QHD 23 33 39 51
1080p Full HD 39 47 62 84

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Low 29
3840x2160 Medium 23
3840x2160 High 16
3840x2160 Ultra 11
2560x1440 Low 51
2560x1440 Medium 39
2560x1440 High 33
2560x1440 Ultra 23
1920x1080 Low 84
1920x1080 Medium 62
1920x1080 High 47
1920x1080 Ultra 39

Road 96 with Intel Core i5-14400F + AMD Radeon RX 570, In-Depth Analysis

Road 96 is an adventure title that scales heavily with graphical settings, and the measured data for the Intel Core i5-14400F paired with the AMD Radeon RX 570 shows a configuration that is firmly bound by its GPU at higher resolutions. The benchmark results indicate a clear and predictable pattern: as resolution increases, average frame rates drop significantly, revealing the Polaris-based graphics card as the primary bottleneck for this combination. At the native 1920x1080 resolution, the combo delivers playable performance across most settings, but the jump to higher pixel counts pushes the system into unplayable territory.

Resolution Scaling

The most striking observation from the data is the steep performance cliff when moving from 1080p to 4K. At 1920x1080 with Low settings, the setup achieves an average of 84 FPS, which is a very fluid experience for an adventure game. However, scaling to 2560x1440 at the same Low settings drops the average to 50.5 FPS, a reduction of roughly 40%. The decline continues to 3840x2160, where the average plummets to 28.8 FPS. This pattern shows that the GPU's rendering load is the dominant factor, as the CPU's 10 cores and 16 threads are not being stressed by the resolution change.

The scaling behavior becomes even more pronounced when examining the High and Ultra presets. At 1080p High, the combo produces 47.1 FPS, which is still above the threshold for smooth play. Moving to 1440p High reduces the average to 33.3 FPS, and at 4K High, the system only manages 16.2 FPS. The Ultra preset is the most demanding, with 1080p yielding 38.8 FPS, 1440p dropping to 23.2 FPS, and 4K producing a mere 10.5 FPS. The data suggests that the RX 570's 4 GB of VRAM and 224.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth are insufficient for the texture and shader demands of 4K, making that resolution impractical for this pairing. The frame rate drops are not linear; they are exponential, indicating that the GPU is running out of resources very quickly as pixel count increases.

CPU Role

The Intel Core i5-14400F is a 10-core, 16-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, with a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.70 GHz. In the context of Road 96, which is an adventure game that does not heavily tax multi-threaded workloads, this CPU provides ample headroom. The processor's benchmark scores confirm its capability, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21914 and a single-core score of 3093. These figures place the CPU in the 88th percentile of all processors, indicating that it is a high-performing part.

The data does not suggest that the CPU is a limiting factor in this game. The performance difference between 1080p Low (84 FPS) and 1080p Ultra (38.8 FPS) is entirely attributable to the GPU's workload. If the CPU were the bottleneck, the frame rates would remain similar across different graphical presets. Instead, the scores show a clear GPU-bound scenario. The processor's high single-thread performance, as evidenced by its Geekbench single-core score of 2333, ensures that game logic and physics are handled without causing stutters, even when the GPU is struggling to keep up at higher resolutions. The 20 MB of shared L3 cache also helps maintain smooth frame delivery.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon RX 570 is an older graphics card built on the GCN 4.0 architecture with a 14 nm process node. It features 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, and 32 ROPs. Its boost clock is 1244 MHz, and it has 4 GB of GDDR5 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing 224.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The GPU's benchmark scores, such as a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 880 and a Geekbench Vulkan score of 42752, place it in the 74th percentile of all GPUs. This is a mid-range part that is clearly showing its age in a modern title.

The measured FPS data directly reflects the GPU's limitations. The card's FP32 performance of 5.095 TFLOPS is not sufficient to maintain high frame rates at 1440p and above. The most telling numbers are the 4K results: at Medium settings, the average FPS is 22.7, and at High, it is 16.2. These are not playable frame rates for a smooth experience. Even at 1440p, the card struggles to hit 60 FPS on any setting, with the best result being 50.5 FPS on Low. The GPU's VRAM capacity of 4 GB is also a concern, as higher resolutions and texture qualities likely exceed this limit, causing the card to swap data and further reducing performance. The 150 W TDP suggests the card is power-hungry relative to its performance, but the data shows that its raw compute power is the primary constraint.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination of the Core i5-14400F and Radeon RX 570 ranks 1598 out of 1684 tested combos for Road 96. This places the configuration in the bottom 5% of all tested systems, which is a poor result. The rank indicates that while the CPU is very capable (88th percentile), the GPU drags the overall performance down significantly. The data shows a mismatch between the two components: the CPU is a modern, high-performance part, while the GPU is an older entry-level model.

Looking at the nearest rivals for the CPU, the Intel Core i7-12800H has an average benchmark score of 32513 with a deltaPct of 0, meaning it performs virtually identically to the i5-14400F. Similarly, the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 7645 is 0.2% faster. This confirms that the CPU is not the weak link. The GPU's nearest rivals are much more modern parts, such as the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 (0.2% faster) and the AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT (0.2% faster). The fact that a 2017 GPU is benchmarked near these modern cards is misleading; the average benchmark scores are based on synthetic tests, not gaming performance. In real-world gaming, the RX 570's lack of modern features and limited VRAM cause it to fall far behind, explaining the poor combo rank.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The data provides a full matrix of average frame rates across three resolutions and four quality settings. At 1920x1080, the results are as follows: Low settings produce an average of 84 FPS, which is excellent. Medium settings drop to 61.8 FPS, still very smooth. High settings yield 47.1 FPS, which is acceptable for a story-driven adventure. Ultra settings produce 38.8 FPS, which is playable but not ideal. This resolution is the only one where the combo can be considered fully viable across all presets.

At 2560x1440, performance degrades noticeably. Low settings average 50.5 FPS, which is good. Medium settings average 38.9 FPS, which is borderline. High settings drop to 33.3 FPS, and Ultra falls to 23.2 FPS. These numbers suggest that 1440p is only playable on Low or Medium settings, and even then, the frame rate is not consistently smooth. The step from 1080p to 1440p costs roughly 40% of performance across all settings.

At 3840x2160, the combo is not viable for gaming. Low settings average 28.8 FPS, Medium averages 22.7 FPS, High averages 16.2 FPS, and Ultra averages just 10.5 FPS. The frame rates are all below the threshold for acceptable gameplay, indicating that the RX 570 cannot handle the pixel count. The data shows a clear progression: 1080p is playable, 1440p is marginal, and 4K is unsupported.

FAQ

Q: What is the best resolution to play Road 96 with this CPU and GPU combo?

A: The data shows that 1920x1080 is the only resolution where the combo achieves consistently playable frame rates. At 1080p, the average FPS ranges from 38.8 on Ultra to 84 on Low, making it the recommended resolution for this pairing.

Q: How does the CPU's performance compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Intel Core i5-14400F has an average benchmark score of 32508. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core i7-12800H, scores 32513, which is a deltaPct of 0. The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 7645 is 0.2% faster, and the AMD Ryzen 7 250 is 0.2% slower.

Q: Is the GPU the bottleneck in this system?

A: Yes, benchmark results strongly indicate the GPU is the limiting factor. The frame rates drop dramatically with resolution increases, while the CPU's high benchmark scores (88th percentile) suggest it is not being fully utilized. The GPU's scores place it in the 74th percentile, and its performance is insufficient for 4K.

Q: What is the average FPS at 1440p with Medium settings?

A: At 2560x1440 with Medium settings, the combo achieves an average of 38.9 FPS. This is a marginal frame rate that may not feel smooth in all scenes.

Q: Can this system handle 4K gaming in Road 96?

A: No. At 3840x2160, the average FPS ranges from 10.5 on Ultra to 28.8 on Low. These are all below playable thresholds, indicating that the GPU lacks the necessary power and VRAM for 4K.

Q: How does the GPU's benchmark score compare to the RTX 5060?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 570 has an average benchmark score of 30158. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 has a score of 30109, which is a deltaPct of 0.2%. This means the RX 570 is actually 0.2% faster in these synthetic benchmarks, though real-world gaming performance may differ.

Hardware Specifications

Intel Core i5-14400F

Cores / Threads 10 / 16
Base Clock 2500 MHz
Boost Clock 4700 MHz
TDP 65W
Socket Intel Socket 1700
View Full CPU Details →

AMD Radeon RX 570

VRAM 4 GB GDDR5
Base Clock —
Boost Clock 1244 MHz MHz
TDP 150 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for Intel Core i5-14400F + AMD Radeon RX 570 in Road 96

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Low 28.8
3840x2160 Medium 22.7
3840x2160 High 16.2
3840x2160 Ultra 10.5
2560x1440 Low 50.5
2560x1440 Medium 38.9
2560x1440 High 33.3
2560x1440 Ultra 23.2
1920x1080 Low 84.0
1920x1080 Medium 61.8
1920x1080 High 47.1
1920x1080 Ultra 38.8

Road 96 with ii5-14400F + Other GPUs

See how Road 96 performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.

Road 96 with RX 570 + Other CPUs

See how Road 96 performs with the same GPU but different processors.

Other Games with ii5-14400F + RX 570

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.