Road 96
This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 194 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 65 | 85 | 104 | 143 |
| 1440p QHD | 125 | 160 | 198 | 270 |
| 1080p Full HD | 196 | 250 | 310 | 422 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Road 96 with AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070, In-Depth Analysis
Road 96 is an adventure title that leans on atmosphere and narrative, but the hardware underneath still dictates how smoothly that experience plays. This analysis examines the AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 combination, using measured frame rate data to show exactly where this system excels and where it hits its limits. The data shows a mobile platform that is powerful enough for high-refresh 1080p and solid 1440p play, but 4K Ultra demands compromises.
CPU Role
The AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX is a 16-core, 32-thread processor based on the Zen 4 architecture, built on a 5 nm process. Its base clock is 2.50 GHz, and it boosts up to 5.40 GHz. This is a Dragon Range mobile part designed for high performance, and its benchmark scores reflect that positioning. In Cinebench R23, it scores 42713 points in multi-core and 6030 points in single-core tests. These numbers place it in the 95th percentile of all CPUs, indicating it is significantly more capable than the vast majority of processors on the market.
The CPU’s performance relative to its closest competitors is remarkably tight. Its average benchmark score is 76212, which is within 0.6% of the AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D and just 0.1% ahead of the Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX. This means that in raw compute tasks, the 8945HX is effectively in a dead heat with the top-tier desktop and mobile chips. For a game like Road 96, which is not a CPU-heavy simulation or strategy title, this processor provides an enormous amount of headroom. The PassMark single-thread score of 3907 and multi-thread score of 51405 further confirm that neither the game’s logic nor background tasks are likely to bottleneck the frame rate.
In the context of Road 96’s measured results, the CPU’s role is largely to stay out of the way. The game’s scenes are often static or slow-moving, but the 16 cores and 32 threads ensure that even with the game’s world streaming in the background, there is no stutter from thread saturation. The high boost clock of 5.40 GHz is also relevant for the single-core performance, which helps in maintaining consistent frame pacing. The data shows that at 1080p Low, the system reaches 201 FPS, a number that is only possible when the CPU can feed the GPU fast enough. The Ryzen 9 8945HX’s passmark physics score of 2168 is a strong indicator of its ability to handle any physics calculations the game throws at it without breaking a sweat.
GPU Role
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 is the graphics workhorse in this pairing. It is based on the Ada Lovelace architecture with the AD104 chip, built on a 5 nm process at TSMC. This GPU features 5888 shading units, 184 texture mapping units, and 64 raster output pipelines. Its clocks are set at a base of 1920 MHz and a boost of 2475 MHz. The memory subsystem is a crucial part of its performance, consisting of 12 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 192-bit bus, delivering a bandwidth of 504.2 GB/s.
The RTX 4070’s benchmark results place it in the 81st percentile of all GPUs. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 3854, and it achieves a PassMark G3D score of 26927. The GPU’s nearest rivals show a very tight grouping in average scores, with the RTX 4080 Mobile just 1.3% ahead and the AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 only 0.4% behind. This suggests that the RTX 4070 is a well-balanced mid-to-high-end performer that trades blows with other strong contenders, though it is not a halo product.
In Road 96, the GPU’s influence is most visible at higher resolutions and settings. At 1080p Low, the frame rate hits 201 FPS, which is likely near the game’s engine limit or the CPU’s frame generation limit. However, as resolution increases, the GPU becomes the primary limiting factor. The 12 GB of VRAM is sufficient for the game’s textures and assets at all measured settings, as the data does not show a catastrophic drop that would suggest memory swapping. The boost clock of 2475 MHz ensures that the GPU operates efficiently, but the raw compute power is finite. The transition from 1080p to 4K shows the GPU struggling to maintain high frame rates on the Ultra preset, which is a direct consequence of the pixel throughput required at 3840x2160.
Resolution Scaling
The measured FPS data reveals a clear scaling pattern that highlights the balance between CPU and GPU load. Starting at 1920x1080, the system is clearly CPU-bound or engine-limited. At High settings, the average FPS is 119, and at Low settings, it jumps to 201 FPS. This massive jump from Low to High at 1080p indicates that the GPU is not the bottleneck at lower resolutions; the CPU is capable of pushing far more frames than the GPU can render at High settings.
Moving to 2560x1440, the scaling becomes more GPU-bound. The average FPS at High settings drops to 75, and at Low settings, it achieves 128 FPS. The delta between Low and High is still substantial, but the overall frame rates are lower, indicating that the GPU is starting to feel the load. At this resolution, the system is well-balanced, offering a great experience on High settings with 75 FPS, and an excellent esports-level experience on Low with 128 FPS.
At 3840x2160, the GPU is the definitive bottleneck. The average FPS at High settings falls to 40, and at Low settings, it reaches 68 FPS. The Ultra preset drops to 31 FPS, which is a significant dip from the 59 FPS at 1440p Ultra. The scaling from 1080p to 4K is steep: High settings drop from 119 FPS to 40 FPS, a 66% reduction. This indicates that the RTX 4070 is not powerful enough to drive 4K at high frame rates for this title. The data suggests that for a smooth 4K experience, users must stick to Low settings, where the 68 FPS average is playable but not ideal for a game that might benefit from higher visual fidelity.
FAQ
Q: Is this CPU-GPU combo good for 1080p gaming in Road 96?
A: Yes, the data shows exceptional performance at 1080p. The system achieves 119 FPS on High settings and 201 FPS on Low settings. Even on Ultra, it maintains 93 FPS, which is well above the standard 60 FPS target for smooth gameplay.
Q: What is the best resolution to play Road 96 with this hardware?
A: The data suggests 2560x1440 is the sweet spot. At this resolution, the system delivers 75 FPS on High settings and 59 FPS on Ultra, providing a great balance between visual quality and smoothness. It is a significant step up from 1080p without the severe performance penalty seen at 4K.
Q: Can this system handle 4K Ultra settings?
A: The data indicates that 4K Ultra is not viable for a consistently smooth experience. The average FPS at 3840x2160 Ultra is 31 FPS, which is below the playable threshold for most users. To play at 4K, you would need to drop to Low settings to achieve 68 FPS.
Q: How does the CPU compare to its direct rivals in raw performance?
A: The Ryzen 9 8945HX is extremely competitive. Its average benchmark score is 76212, which is 0.1% higher than the Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX and 0.6% higher than the AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D. This indicates that it is on par with the best available chips.
Q: Is the 12 GB of VRAM on the RTX 4070 sufficient for Road 96?
A: The benchmark data does not show performance degradation that would indicate VRAM limitations. The frame rates scale consistently with resolution and settings changes, suggesting that 12 GB is adequate for this game’s asset requirements at all tested configurations.
Q: What is the GPU’s standing relative to other graphics cards?
A: The RTX 4070 sits in the 81st percentile of all GPUs. Its average benchmark score is 37648, which is just 1.3% behind the RTX 4080 Mobile and 0.4% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX Vega 56. It is a solid mid-to-high-end performer, but not a top-tier 4K card.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The following table details the exact average frame rates measured for this specific CPU-GPU combination across all tested resolutions and settings.
| Resolution | Settings | Average FPS | Min FPS | Max FPS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1920x1080 | Low | 201 | - | - |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 147 | 125 | 169 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 119 | - | - |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 93 | - | - |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 128 | - | - |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 94 | 80 | 108 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 75 | - | - |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 59 | - | - |
| 3840x2160 | Low | 68 | - | - |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 50 | 42 | 57 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 40 | - | - |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 31 | - | - |
The data shows a consistent pattern of frame rate reduction as resolution and settings increase. The Medium settings are the only rows that provide min and max FPS data, showing that at 1080p Medium, the frame rate fluctuates between 125 and 169 FPS, which is a tight and stable range. At 1440p Medium, the range is 80 to 108 FPS. At 4K Medium, the range tightens to 42 to 57 FPS, indicating that the GPU is working near its limit and frame times are becoming less consistent.
Settings Recommendations
Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings depend heavily on the user’s target resolution and desired frame rate.
For 1080p users, the High preset is the recommended starting point. It delivers an average of 119 FPS, which is smooth and responsive. The Ultra preset still provides 93 FPS, so if visual fidelity is the top priority, it is a viable choice without sacrificing playability. The Low preset is unnecessary at this resolution, as the 201 FPS it provides is beyond the refresh rate of most monitors and offers no tangible benefit over High.
For 1440p users, the High preset is the best balance of quality and performance, achieving 75 FPS. This is a solid experience for a narrative adventure. The Ultra preset drops to 59 FPS, which is still playable but might show slight dips in busy scenes. The Medium preset at 94 FPS is also an excellent choice if you prefer a higher frame rate buffer for a smoother experience, especially since the data shows it maintains a stable range between 80 and 108 FPS.
For 4K users, the options are limited. The Low preset is the only one that provides a consistently playable frame rate, averaging 68 FPS. The Medium preset dips to 50 FPS, and the High and Ultra presets fall to 40 and 31 FPS respectively, which are not ideal for a smooth experience. This system is not suitable for 4K Ultra gaming in Road 96. The data strongly suggests that 1440p is the resolution this hardware is best suited for, offering the most balanced performance across all settings.
Hardware Specifications
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 in Road 96
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 65.0 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 85.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 104.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Low | 143.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 125.0 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 160.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 198.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 270.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 196.0 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 250.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 310.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 422.0 |
Road 96 with Ryzen 9 8945HX + Other GPUs
See how Road 96 performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Road 96 with RTX 4070 + Other CPUs
See how Road 96 performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with Ryzen 9 8945HX + RTX 4070
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.