Road 96
This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 187 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 67 | 85 | 106 | 144 |
| 1440p QHD | 126 | 161 | 200 | 272 |
| 1080p Full HD | 198 | 253 | 300 | 337 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Road 96 with AMD Ryzen 7 3700X + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D, In-Depth Analysis
Road 96 is a narrative-driven adventure, and the benchmark data for the AMD Ryzen 7 3700X with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D shows a configuration that is heavily overqualified for the task, delivering exceptional frame rates across all tested settings and resolutions. The measured results indicate that this pairing obliterates the 60 FPS target at 4K and produces triple-digit average frame rates at lower resolutions, positioning it as a top-tier performer for this specific title.
Settings Recommendations
Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal experience for this combination of CPU and GPU depends heavily on the user's display refresh rate and resolution preference. At 3840x2160 (4K), the "High" preset delivers an average of 85 FPS, which is a solid, playable experience for a story-driven game. However, the "Medium" preset provides a substantial performance boost to 106 FPS average, with a measured minimum of 90 FPS and a maximum of 121 FPS, making it the superior choice for maintaining a smooth experience on high-refresh-rate 4K displays. The jump from "Medium" to "High" costs 21 FPS, a significant 19.8% drop, while the visual fidelity difference in an adventure game may not justify that loss. "Ultra" is the most demanding option, pushing the average down to 67 FPS, which is still playable but represents a 36.8% performance penalty compared to "Medium" for the highest visual quality.
At 2560x1440 (QHD), the "High" preset achieves a remarkable 161 FPS average. This makes it the ideal setting for users with 144Hz or 165Hz monitors, as it sits comfortably above the 144 FPS threshold. The "Ultra" preset also delivers a very respectable 126 FPS average, making it a viable option for those who prioritize image quality over raw frame rate headroom. The "Medium" preset at this resolution offers a staggering 200 FPS, which is excellent for 240Hz displays, but "High" strikes the best balance between visual detail and performance. For 1920x1080 (FHD), the data shows that the CPU becomes a limiting factor, as the "Medium" preset averages 300 FPS, "High" drops to 253 FPS, and "Ultra" still produces 198 FPS. Given the immense power on hand, "Ultra" or "High" are the only sensible choices at this resolution, with "Ultra" providing the best visual experience while still maintaining frame rates well above what most high-refresh monitors can display.
The "Low" preset is effectively redundant with this hardware. At every resolution, it produces the highest frame rate (337 FPS at 1080p, 272 FPS at 1440p, and 144 FPS at 4K), but the visual compromise is unnecessary given the performance headroom. The data clearly suggests that users should select "Medium" at 4K to guarantee a stable 90+ FPS experience, while "High" is the sweet spot for 1440p and 1080p, offering a perfect blend of high visual fidelity and frame rates that far exceed typical display refresh rates.
FAQ
Q: What is the maximum average frame rate achievable at 4K resolution with this combo?
A: The highest average frame rate measured at 3840x2160 is 144 FPS, which is achieved with the "Low" settings preset. The "Medium" preset provides a more balanced 106 FPS average.
Q: How does the performance drop from 1080p to 4K on the "High" preset?
A: On the "High" preset, the average frame rate drops from 253 FPS at 1920x1080 to 161 FPS at 2560x1440, and finally to 85 FPS at 3840x2160. This represents a 66.4% reduction in performance from 1080p to 4K.
Q: Is the "Ultra" preset playable at 4K resolution?
A: Yes, the "Ultra" preset at 3840x2160 yields an average frame rate of 67 FPS, which is above the standard 60 FPS playability threshold, though it is the most demanding setting tested.
Q: Which settings preset provides the lowest frame rate variance at 1440p?
A: The "Medium" preset at 2560x1440 has measured minimum and maximum frame rates of 170 FPS and 229 FPS respectively, showing a variance of 59 FPS. The "High" preset average is 161 FPS, but no min/max data is provided for it.
Q: How does this CPU+GPU combo rank compared to all other tested combinations in Road 96?
A: This specific combination ranks 56th out of 2,903 total tested combos for this game, placing it in the top 1.9% of all systems tested.
Q: What is the performance difference between the "Low" and "Ultra" presets at 1080p?
A: At 1920x1080, the "Low" preset achieves an average of 337 FPS, while the "Ultra" preset achieves 198 FPS. This indicates the "Ultra" preset is 41.2% slower than "Low" at this resolution.
Resolution Scaling
The frame rate data reveals a classic scaling pattern that shifts from a GPU-bound scenario at 4K to a progressively more CPU-bound scenario as resolution decreases. At 4K with the "High" preset, the RTX 5090 D is working hard, producing an 85 FPS average. Dropping to 1440p "High" boosts performance to 161 FPS, a substantial 89.4% increase. Moving further down to 1080p "High" yields 253 FPS, another 57.1% jump from the 1440p result.
This scaling curve is not linear, and the diminishing returns at lower resolutions highlight the role of the Ryzen 7 3700X. The massive leap from 4K to 1440p (a 76 FPS increase) shows that the GPU has significant headroom that is being unlocked by the lower pixel count. However, the jump from 1440p to 1080p (a 92 FPS increase) is larger in absolute terms, suggesting that the CPU is still able to feed the GPU enough data to see a significant benefit from the reduced resolution. The fact that 1080p "Low" hits 337 FPS while 1080p "Ultra" hits 198 FPS indicates that even at 1080p, the GPU is still the primary limiter, as increasing graphical load has a direct and significant impact on performance.
The pattern strongly suggests that the RTX 5090 D is the dominant component in this pairing for this game. The performance gap between presets is consistent across all resolutions, which is a hallmark of GPU-bound performance. For instance, the difference between "Medium" and "Ultra" at 4K is 39 FPS (106 vs 67), and at 1440p it is 74 FPS (200 vs 126), and at 1080p it is 102 FPS (300 vs 198). While the absolute numbers scale with resolution, the relative performance hierarchy of the settings presets remains unchanged. This indicates that the Ryzen 7 3700X, with its 8 cores and 16 threads, is providing sufficient throughput to avoid becoming a bottleneck, even at the high frame rates seen at 1080p. The data shows a system where the GPU is the clear performance ceiling.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the configuration delivers its highest frame rates. The "Low" preset averages 337 FPS. The "Medium" preset averages 300 FPS, with a minimum of 255 FPS and a maximum of 345 FPS. The "High" preset produces an average of 253 FPS. The "Ultra" preset, the most demanding, still achieves a very high average of 198 FPS.
Moving to 2560x1440, the performance remains exceptionally high. The "Low" preset yields an average of 272 FPS. The "Medium" preset averages 200 FPS, with a measured range of 170 FPS to 229 FPS. The "High" preset delivers an average of 161 FPS. The "Ultra" preset produces an average of 126 FPS.
At the most demanding resolution, 3840x2160, the frame rates are still very playable. The "Low" preset achieves an average of 144 FPS. The "Medium" preset averages 106 FPS, with a minimum of 90 FPS and a maximum of 121 FPS. The "High" preset yields an average of 85 FPS. The "Ultra" preset is the only setting tested that dips below the 100 FPS mark, with an average of 67 FPS.
How This Combo Ranks
In the grand scheme of all systems tested for Road 96, this specific pairing of the AMD Ryzen 7 3700X and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D holds a combo rank of 56 out of 2,903 tested combinations. This places it in the 98th percentile of all tested systems, signifying that it is a top-tier performer for this game. The rank is a holistic measure that accounts for the combined capabilities of the CPU and GPU across the various resolution and settings tests.
The data shows this is an exceptionally fast combination. The top 1.9% ranking is primarily driven by the sheer power of the RTX 5090 D, whose benchmark scores place it in the 92nd percentile of all GPUs. The Ryzen 7 3700X, while older, is still a respectable performer, ranking in the 84th percentile of all CPUs. The combination of a high-percentile GPU with a solidly above-average CPU results in a system that is overwhelmingly capable of handling a game like Road 96, which is not particularly demanding compared to modern AAA titles. The rank of 56 indicates that there are only a handful of systems in the database that can outperform this one, likely those pairing the same or a faster GPU with a more modern, higher-clock-speed CPU.
CPU Role
The AMD Ryzen 7 3700X is an 8-core, 16-thread processor based on the Zen 2 architecture and codenamed Matisse. It has a base clock of 3.60 GHz and a boost clock of 4.40 GHz. Its benchmark results show a Passmark single-thread score of 2656 and a Passmark multithread score of 22458, placing it in the 84th percentile of all CPUs. These metrics are crucial for understanding its role in the measured frame rates.
In the context of Road 96, an adventure game, the CPU's role is primarily to maintain a stable frame pacing and ensure the game logic and physics are processed without delay. The data suggests that the 3700X is more than adequate for this task. While it may not be the fastest CPU on the market, its 8 cores and 16 threads allow it to handle background tasks and game threads efficiently. The fact that the frame rates at 1080p "Low" reach 337 FPS indicates that the CPU can process frames at a very high rate. However, the scaling of performance with different settings at 1080p (from 337 FPS on Low to 198 FPS on Ultra) proves that the GPU is still the primary bottleneck even at this low resolution.
The CPU's performance relative to its nearest rivals, such as the AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 and Intel Core i5-13450HX, is very close, with a delta percentage of 0.1% and -0.2% respectively. This shows that the 3700X is still competitive in its class. For this particular title, the CPU does not appear to be a limiting factor. The substantial frame rate increases seen when lowering the resolution are a clear indicator that the GPU has untapped potential that is only constrained by pixel count, not by the CPU's ability to issue draw calls. Therefore, the Ryzen 7 3700X provides a stable, non-bottlenecking foundation for the RTX 5090 D in Road 96.
Hardware Specifications
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for AMD Ryzen 7 3700X + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D in Road 96
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 144.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 106.0 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 85.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 67.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 272.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 200.0 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 161.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 126.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 337.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 300.0 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 253.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 198.0 |
Road 96 with Ryzen 7 3700X + Other GPUs
See how Road 96 performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Road 96 with RTX 5090 D + Other CPUs
See how Road 96 performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with Ryzen 7 3700X + RTX 5090 D
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.