Road 96
This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 98 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 33 | 42 | 53 | 72 |
| 1440p QHD | 63 | 80 | 99 | 136 |
| 1080p Full HD | 98 | 126 | 156 | 213 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Road 96 with AMD Ryzen 5 8400F + AMD Radeon RX 7700, In-Depth Analysis
Road 96 is not a demanding title, and the data for the AMD Ryzen 5 8400F and AMD Radeon RX 7700 combination reflects this, delivering excellent frame rates at 1080p and remaining very playable at 1440p. The optimal experience is found at 1440p with Medium settings, where the game achieves an average of 99 FPS while maintaining a minimum of 84 FPS, offering a smooth and stable experience without the performance cost of higher presets. The 1080p Low setting hits 213 FPS, but the visual compromise is unnecessary given the hardware's headroom. At 4K, the GPU becomes the limiting factor, and only the Low preset (72 FPS) provides a consistently playable experience, while High and Ultra settings drop below the 60 FPS threshold.
Settings Recommendations
The benchmark results indicate a clear hierarchy of performance across the four presets, with the most balanced experience occurring at Medium settings. At 1440p, the Medium preset delivers a 99 FPS average with a minimum of 84 FPS, which is a 24% improvement over High settings (80 FPS) and a 57% improvement over Ultra (63 FPS). This makes Medium the recommended choice for a high-refresh-rate monitor, as the minimum frame rate stays well above common 60 Hz and 75 Hz refresh rates, ensuring consistent frame pacing.
For 1080p users, the Medium preset is again the sweet spot, delivering 156 FPS average with a minimum of 133 FPS. This is more than sufficient for any 144Hz display, and the jump to Low (213 FPS) yields diminishing returns—a 37% increase in average FPS but with a noticeable reduction in visual fidelity that is not justified for a narrative-driven adventure game. The High preset at 1080p (126 FPS) is also excellent, but Medium provides a 24% performance uplift while still offering a detailed scene.
At 4K, the situation is different. The data shows that only the Low preset (72 FPS) maintains a playable frame rate, while Medium (53 FPS) and High (42 FPS) fall below the 60 FPS target. Ultra at 4K is effectively unplayable at 33 FPS. For 4K owners, the Low preset is the only sensible option, but the 1440p Medium experience is superior in both performance and visual quality, making it the definitive recommendation for this hardware combination.
The Ultra preset is consistently the worst performer, offering only 63 FPS at 1440p and 33 FPS at 4K. The performance cost of Ultra over High is steep: a 21% drop at 1440p (80 to 63 FPS) and a 21% drop at 4K (42 to 33 FPS). Given that Road 96's art style is stylized and low-poly, the visual gains from Ultra are unlikely to be perceptible enough to justify halving the frame rate in the most demanding scenarios.
GPU Role
The AMD Radeon RX 7700 is the primary bottleneck at higher resolutions, as evidenced by the sharp FPS decline from 1440p to 4K. The GPU's 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus with 624.1 GB/s bandwidth is more than sufficient for Road 96 at any setting, as the game's asset sizes are modest for an adventure title. The 16 GB capacity is unlikely to be a limiting factor even at 4K Ultra; instead, the rendering load on the GPU's 2560 shading units and 96 ROPs determines the frame rate.
The clock speeds of the GPU—1900 MHz base, 2041 MHz game, and 2459 MHz boost—provide a solid foundation for the measured results. The benchmark scores place this GPU in the 58th percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 15852. Its closest rival is the AMD Radeon R9 370X, which scores 15862, a negligible 0.1% difference. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is 1.7% faster at 16129, while the AMD Radeon RX 9060 is 1% faster at 16014. These margins are small, indicating that the RX 7700 sits in a competitive performance tier.
The GPU's role becomes clear when comparing the 1080p and 4K results. At 1080p High, the average FPS is 126, but at 4K High, it drops to 42—a 67% reduction. This is a classic sign of GPU-bound rendering, where the pixel fill rate and shading throughput are the limiting factors. The GPU's pixel rate of 236.1 GPixel/s and texture rate of 393.4 GTexel/s are being pushed to their limits at 4K. The data suggests that the RX 7700 is a capable 1080p and 1440p card, but 4K gaming requires reducing settings to Low to maintain playability.
CPU Role
The AMD Ryzen 5 8400F is not the bottleneck in this configuration, as its 6 cores and 12 threads are more than adequate for Road 96's single-threaded and light multi-threaded workloads. The CPU's boost clock of 4.70 GHz (from a 4.20 GHz base) provides strong single-thread performance, which is critical for game logic and physics. The 3DMark single-thread score of 951 and the Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2943 indicate robust per-core performance that easily handles the game's simulation tasks.
The CPU's benchmark scores place it in the 77th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 25005. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 5 7500F, scores 24964, a mere 0.2% difference, making them effectively identical in performance. The Intel Core i7-13620H is 0.4% slower at 24911, while the AMD EPYC 9474F is 0.4% faster at 25103. These tight margins confirm that the 8400F is a mid-range performer that does not hold back the GPU in gaming scenarios.
Evidence of the CPU's sufficiency is seen in the 1080p Low result of 213 FPS. This high frame rate, even with reduced GPU load, indicates that the CPU can feed the GPU with draw calls well beyond typical display refresh rates. The 12 threads provide ample headroom for background tasks without impacting game performance. The CPU's 16 MB of shared L3 cache and 1 MB L2 per core ensure fast data access for the game's assets, and the 83.2 GB/s memory bandwidth on the dual-channel DDR5 interface is sufficient for the game's data streaming requirements.
The fact that the FPS scales consistently across resolutions—213 to 136 to 72 FPS from 1080p to 1440p to 4K at Low settings—shows a linear relationship with pixel count, confirming the CPU is not introducing a bottleneck. If the CPU were limiting, the 1080p and 1440p results would be closer together.
FAQ
Q: What is the best preset for a 144Hz monitor at 1080p?
A: The Medium preset is the best choice, delivering an average of 156 FPS with a minimum of 133 FPS. This keeps the frame rate above the 144 Hz refresh rate almost all the time, while the High preset at 126 FPS average would dip below 144 Hz more frequently.
Q: Can this system handle 4K gaming in Road 96?
A: Only at the Low preset, which achieves 72 FPS on average. The Medium preset drops to 53 FPS, and High falls to 42 FPS, both below the 60 FPS target. Ultra is not viable at 33 FPS.
Q: How does the CPU compare to its closest rival?
A: The AMD Ryzen 5 8400F scores 25005 on average, which is 0.2% higher than the AMD Ryzen 5 7500F's 24964. This difference is negligible, meaning they perform identically in practice.
Q: What is the frame rate difference between High and Ultra at 1440p?
A: High settings produce 80 FPS, while Ultra drops to 63 FPS—a 21% reduction. This performance cost is substantial, making High a better choice for smoother gameplay.
Q: Is the GPU's 16 GB VRAM necessary for this game?
A: No, but it provides massive headroom. The GPU's memory bandwidth of 624.1 GB/s is more than enough for the game's assets, and the 16 GB capacity ensures no memory-related stutters at any resolution or preset.
Q: How does the GPU compare to the RTX 3060 Ti?
A: The AMD Radeon RX 7700 scores 15852 on average, which is 1.7% lower than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti's 16129. This makes the RTX 3060 Ti slightly faster, but the difference is minor in real-world gameplay.
Resolution Scaling
The FPS data reveals a predictable scaling pattern as resolution increases, with the GPU becoming the dominant limiting factor. From 1080p to 1440p at High settings, the average FPS drops from 126 to 80, a 37% reduction. This is a significant drop, but the 1440p result remains playable. The jump from 1440p to 4K at High is even more severe, falling from 80 to 42 FPS, a 48% reduction. This steep decline indicates that the RX 7700 is being pushed well beyond its comfortable operating range at 4K.
At Low settings, the scaling is similar but with higher absolute numbers: 213 FPS at 1080p, 136 FPS at 1440p (36% drop), and 72 FPS at 4K (47% drop from 1440p). The consistency of these percentage drops across settings suggests that the GPU's pixel processing capability is the primary constraint. The data shows that the 1080p to 1440p transition is manageable, losing about a third of the frame rate, but the 1440p to 4K transition is brutal, losing nearly half.
The limiting component is clearly the GPU. The evidence is that the CPU's performance is constant across resolutions, and if the CPU were the bottleneck, we would see similar FPS at 1080p and 1440p. Instead, the FPS scales inversely with pixel count, which is the hallmark of GPU-bound performance. The 4K results, where even Medium settings (53 FPS) cannot maintain 60 FPS, confirm that the RX 7700 is best suited for 1080p and 1440p gaming.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the data shows a full range of playable options. The Low preset achieves an average of 213 FPS, which is the highest measured in the entire dataset. Medium settings deliver 156 FPS on average, with a minimum of 133 FPS and a maximum of 179 FPS, providing a tight frame window. High settings produce 126 FPS, and Ultra drops to 98 FPS. All 1080p presets are above 90 FPS, making this resolution the most flexible for the hardware.
At 2560x1440, the performance remains strong. Low settings deliver 136 FPS, which is still high enough for most high-refresh displays. Medium settings provide 99 FPS average, with a minimum of 84 FPS and a maximum of 114 FPS, creating a smooth experience. High settings drop to 80 FPS, and Ultra falls to 63 FPS. The 1440p Medium result is notable for its 84 FPS minimum, which ensures consistent frame delivery without major dips.
At 3840x2160, the performance becomes more constrained. Low settings are the only preset above 60 FPS, achieving 72 FPS on average. Medium settings produce 53 FPS with a minimum of 45 FPS and a maximum of 60 FPS, which means the frame rate can dip below 60 FPS during demanding scenes. High settings average 42 FPS, and Ultra averages 33 FPS. The 4K results show a clear boundary: Low is playable, Medium is borderline, and High/Ultra are not recommended for a smooth experience.
Hardware Specifications
AMD Ryzen 5 8400F
AMD Radeon RX 7700
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for AMD Ryzen 5 8400F + AMD Radeon RX 7700 in Road 96
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 72.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 53.0 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 42.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 33.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 136.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 99.0 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 80.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 63.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 213.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 156.0 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 126.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 98.0 |
Road 96 with Ryzen 5 8400F + Other GPUs
See how Road 96 performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Road 96 with RX 7700 + Other CPUs
See how Road 96 performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with Ryzen 5 8400F + RX 7700
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.