Road 96

Road 96 is an adventure title that rarely stresses hardware the way a competitive shooter or open-world action game does, but the measured results for this AMD Ryzen 5 7400F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER combination still reveal a clear performance hierarchy. The data shows that this pairing lands in the 2059th position out of 2903 tested combos for this specific game, placing it in the lower-middle portion of the database. That rank is not a condemnation; it reflects that Road 96’s engine is more forgiving on older or mid-range parts, and the RTX 2060 SUPER, while a capable 1080p card, becomes the limiting factor as resolution climbs. The CPU, a 6-core, 12-thread Zen 4 part, is clearly not the bottleneck here, as the frame rates scale almost entirely with GPU load and settings changes. What follows is a breakdown of how this specific hardware duo behaves across the four tested presets and three resolutions, with practical advice on where to set the dials for the best experience.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo rank of 2059 out of 2903 places this system in the 29th percentile of all tested pairings for Road 96. That might sound low, but it is essential to contextualize that number. The database includes thousands of combinations, many of which feature top-tier GPUs like the RTX 4080 or RX 7900 XTX, so a mid-range card from the Turing generation will naturally sit lower. What matters more is how this specific CPU and GPU interact. The Ryzen 5 7400F is a strong processor; its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21765 and single-core score of 3072 put it in the 83rd percentile of all CPUs, and it trades blows with rivals like the Intel Core i5-14600T and AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H, with deltaPct values of 0.1% and -0.2%, respectively. This means the CPU is punching well above its weight class for a budget-oriented chip.

The bottleneck is entirely on the GPU side. The RTX 2060 SUPER has an average benchmark score of 18093, which lands it in the 62nd percentile of all GPUs, but its nearest rivals include the RTX 3060 Mobile and AMD Radeon Pro 5700, with deltaPct values of -0.4% and -0.5%. In Road 96, this translates to a system that can handle 1080p with ease but struggles to maintain playable framerates at 4K Ultra. The rank reflects that reality: it is a combo that will satisfy gamers on 1080p or 1440p monitors, but it is not built for 4K enthusiasts. For an adventure game like Road 96, which relies on narrative pacing rather than twitch reflexes, the 2059th rank is less a warning and more a confirmation that this is a sensible, balanced pairing for its intended resolution class.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER is the star of this show, for better or worse. It comes with 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth. That memory configuration is adequate for 1080p and most 1440p scenarios, but it becomes a constraint at 4K, where the higher pixel count demands more memory and bandwidth. The card’s boost clock of 1650 MHz and base clock of 1470 MHz are modest by modern standards, but they are sufficient for a game like Road 96, which is not graphically intensive. The GPU’s FP32 performance of 7.181 TFLOPS and texture rate of 224.4 GTexel/s are the raw numbers that determine how quickly it can fill frames, and the measured FPS shows that the card is doing its job at lower resolutions.

At 1080p, the GPU is rarely the limiting factor. The average FPS at High settings is 100, which is smooth for an adventure title. However, as resolution increases to 1440p and then 4K, the GPU’s workload grows exponentially. At 4K Ultra, the average FPS drops to 26, which is below the threshold for comfortable play. The 8 GB VRAM is not necessarily the issue at 4K for this game, but the raw computational power of the TU106 chip is. The card’s 2176 shading units and 64 ROPs are simply not enough to push 8.3 million pixels at high detail levels. In contrast, the CPU’s role is minimal; the Ryzen 5 7400F’s 32 MB of L3 cache and 6 cores are more than enough to feed the GPU at any resolution, meaning the GPU is the sole determinant of performance scaling.

Resolution Scaling

The data shows a clear and predictable pattern: performance drops sharply as resolution climbs, and the magnitude of that drop reveals where the bottleneck lives. Moving from 1080p to 1440p at High settings, the average FPS falls from 100 to 64, a 36% reduction. That is a significant hit, but it is still playable. Moving from 1440p to 4K at High settings, the average FPS drops from 64 to 34, a 47% reduction. This accelerating decline is a classic sign of a GPU-bound scenario. If the CPU were the limiting factor, the FPS would remain relatively flat across resolutions, but the data shows it dropping consistently, confirming that the RTX 2060 SUPER is being pushed to its limits.

At Low settings, the scaling is even more telling. At 1080p Low, the system hits 170 FPS, which indicates that the CPU is capable of feeding the GPU far beyond what the card can render at higher settings. At 1440p Low, it drops to 108 FPS, and at 4K Low, it falls to 57 FPS. The fact that 4K Low still achieves 57 FPS suggests that the GPU has enough raw power to handle the pixel count when the shading load is reduced. The difference between Low and Ultra at 4K is 31 FPS (from 57 to 26), which is a massive gap and underscores how much the settings impact the GPU’s workload. For a game like Road 96, which has a stylized art direction, the visual difference between Low and Ultra may not justify the performance cost, but the data shows the hardware is capable of delivering a playable experience at 4K if the user is willing to compromise on quality.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the system performs admirably across all settings. Low settings yield an average of 170 FPS, which is exceptionally high and indicates that the CPU is not holding the GPU back in any way. Medium settings drop to 124 FPS, with a minimum of 106 and a maximum of 143, providing a smooth experience with headroom for dips. High settings average 100 FPS, which is still well above the 60 FPS target for most gamers. Ultra settings bring the average down to 78 FPS, which is perfectly playable and suggests that the GPU has enough headroom to handle the extra effects without a significant penalty. For 1080p users, this combo is a winner, offering high refresh rates even at the highest preset.

Moving to 2560x1440, the picture changes. Low settings average 108 FPS, which is still excellent for a 1440p monitor. Medium settings average 79 FPS, with a minimum of 67 and a maximum of 91, which is a comfortable range for most gameplay. High settings drop to 64 FPS, which is playable but begins to show the GPU’s limits. Ultra settings average 50 FPS, which is borderline for an adventure game, but acceptable given the slower pacing. The data shows that 1440p is the sweet spot for this combo; users can achieve high framerates on Medium and still enjoy a smooth experience on High. Pushing to Ultra requires a tolerance for sub-60 FPS, which may be fine for a narrative-driven game.

At 3840x2160, the system struggles to maintain playable framerates on higher presets. Low settings average 57 FPS, which is just above the 60 FPS threshold but may dip in busier scenes. Medium settings average 42 FPS, with a minimum of 36 and a maximum of 48, which is a noticeable drop and will feel stuttery during camera pans. High settings average 34 FPS, which is below the threshold for smooth gameplay. Ultra settings average 26 FPS, which is nearly unplayable. The data clearly indicates that 4K is not a viable option for this combo unless the user is willing to stick to Low settings, and even then, the experience is marginal. For 4K, this system is not recommended, but for 1080p and 1440p, it delivers solid performance.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured rows, the best experience for this combo is at 1080p with High settings, which delivers an average of 100 FPS. This provides a smooth, responsive experience without sacrificing visual quality. For users with 1440p monitors, Medium settings are the sweet spot, offering an average of 79 FPS with a minimum of 67, which ensures a stable framerate. High settings at 1440p also work, but the average of 64 FPS leaves less headroom for dips. If you prioritize visual fidelity over framerate, Ultra at 1440p is playable at an average of 50 FPS, but it is not recommended for action-heavy sequences.

For 4K, the recommendations are stark. Low settings are the only viable option, with an average of 57 FPS. Medium settings drop to 42 FPS, which is below the standard for smooth play. If you are stuck with a 4K monitor and this combo, you will need to accept Low settings and potentially lower the resolution scale in the game’s options. However, given that Road 96 is an adventure game with a focus on story and atmosphere, the visual downgrade to Low might be acceptable. The data suggests that the most balanced experience is 1080p High, which offers the best combination of framerate and visual quality without pushing the GPU to its limits.

FAQ

Q: Can this combo run Road 96 at 4K smoothly?

A: No, not at higher settings. At 4K Low, the average FPS is 57, which is just above the 60 FPS threshold, but at Medium it drops to 42 FPS, and at High it falls to 34 FPS. Ultra is nearly unplayable at 26 FPS. Stick to 1080p or 1440p for a smoother experience.

Q: What is the best settings preset for a 1440p monitor?

A: Medium settings at 2560x1440 deliver an average of 79 FPS, with a minimum of 67 and a maximum of 91. High settings also work at 64 FPS, but Medium provides more headroom. Low settings hit 108 FPS if you prefer maximum framerate.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU the bottleneck in this combo?

A: The GPU is the clear bottleneck. The Ryzen 5 7400F has a single-core score of 3072 and a multi-core score of 21765, placing it in the 83rd percentile of CPUs, which is more than sufficient for Road 96. The RTX 2060 SUPER, with an average benchmark score of 18093, is the limiting factor, as shown by the FPS dropping significantly with resolution.

Q: How does the RTX 2060 SUPER compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The RTX 2060 SUPER has an average benchmark score of 18093, which is 0.4% lower than the RTX 3060 Mobile and 0.5% lower than the AMD Radeon Pro 5700. It is also 1.5% lower than the AMD Radeon RX 460, indicating that it sits at a similar performance level to these mid-range cards.

Q: What FPS can I expect at 1080p Ultra settings?

A: At 1920x1080 Ultra, the average FPS is 78. This is well above the 60 FPS target and provides a smooth experience. High settings average 100 FPS, and Medium hits 124 FPS, so there is ample performance headroom at 1080p.

Q: Is this combo good enough for the game’s minimum requirements?

A: The data shows that this combo far exceeds the minimum requirements. At 1080p Low, it hits 170 FPS, and even at 1440p High, it maintains 64 FPS. For an adventure game like Road 96, this system is more than capable of delivering a playable experience at standard resolutions.