Road 96
This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 168 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 60 | 78 | 100 | 130 |
| 1440p QHD | 116 | 147 | 184 | 246 |
| 1080p Full HD | 184 | 233 | 251 | 283 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Road 96 with AMD Ryzen 5 2600 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090, In-Depth Analysis
Road 96 is an adventure title that leans far more on narrative than on raw GPU throughput, and the benchmark results for the AMD Ryzen 5 2600 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 combination reflect that dynamic. The data shows a system that is overwhelmingly GPU-bound at higher resolutions, but which reveals a significant CPU limitation at 1080p, creating a fascinating split personality where the RTX 4090 is both overkill and underutilized depending on the settings. The measured FPS deltas between presets are the clearest indicator: the gap between Low and Ultra at 4K is a massive 70.1 FPS, while at 1080p that same gap shrinks to 98.9 FPS, yet the absolute ceiling at 1080p Low (283.3 FPS) suggests the CPU is hitting a wall before the GPU can truly stretch its legs.
Resolution Scaling
The resolution scaling behavior here is textbook for a high-end GPU paired with a mid-range older CPU. Moving from 1080p to 1440p at High settings, the average FPS drops from 233.3 to 147.2, a 36.9% reduction. That is a steep decline, indicating that the GPU is starting to become the primary constraint as pixel count rises. The trend continues from 1440p to 4K High, where FPS falls to 77.7, another 47.2% drop. This pattern—where each doubling of pixel count roughly halves the frame rate—is the signature of a GPU-limited scenario, and it holds true across all four settings presets.
However, the story changes when examining the Low preset. At 1080p Low, the system produces 283.3 FPS, but at 1440p Low it only falls to 245.6 FPS, a mere 13.3% reduction. This smaller drop suggests that at these lower graphical loads, the CPU is becoming the limiting factor, preventing the GPU from scaling its output as aggressively as it otherwise could. At 4K Low, the FPS falls to 129.9, which is still a massive 54.7 FPS higher than 4K Ultra, proving that the GPU has ample headroom when the visual load is light. The data indicates that at 1080p, the Ryzen 5 2600 is the bottleneck, while at 4K, the RTX 4090 is clearly the dominant constraint. This is a classic case where resolution scaling reveals the weakest link in the chain.
GPU Role
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 is a behemoth, and its specifications in the data pack are staggering: a boost clock of 2520 MHz, 24 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 384-bit bus, and a memory bandwidth of 1.01 TB/s. These numbers explain why the card can push 129.9 FPS at 4K Low, a figure that would be impossible for almost any other GPU. The 24 GB frame buffer is entirely irrelevant for Road 96 at these settings, as the game is not demanding enough to approach that capacity, but the sheer compute power—82.58 TFLOPS of FP32 performance—is what drives the high frame rates even at 4K.
The GPU's role is most evident in the Ultra preset. At 4K Ultra, the frame rate drops to 59.8 FPS, which is the lowest measured result in the entire dataset. This is not a sign of a weak GPU, but rather a sign of a game that scales its visual effects heavily with the Ultra preset. The RTX 4090's 128 RT cores and 512 tensor cores likely contribute to these demanding effects, but the benchmark results show that even this flagship card cannot brute-force its way past the Ultra preset's requirements at 4K. In contrast, the drop from High to Ultra at 1080p is only 48.9 FPS (from 233.3 to 184.4), showing that the GPU's role diminishes as the CPU becomes more involved at lower resolutions.
How This Combo Ranks
In the grand scheme of all tested combinations for Road 96, this pairing of Ryzen 5 2600 and RTX 4090 ranks 100th out of 1684 combos. That places it in the top 6% of all systems tested, which is an exceptionally strong showing. However, the rank is more evidence of the GPU's raw power than the synergy of the components. The CPU is a 6-core, 12-thread part from the 2000 series, and it sits at the 77th percentile against all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 19616. This is a competent processor, but it is nowhere near the level of the GPU, which sits at the 91st percentile against all GPUs.
The rank of 100 suggests that many other combinations achieve higher frame rates, likely those with more modern CPUs that can feed the RTX 4090 better at 1080p. The data shows that the combo is strong overall, but the CPU is the limiting factor in the lower-resolution scenarios. The GPU's nearest rivals in the data pack, such as the NVIDIA Tesla T4 and AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56, have similar average scores, but this does not translate to gaming performance parity, as this combo's rank in a game-specific test is what matters. The 100th place ranking out of 1684 combos is a clear indicator that this system is fast, but the CPU holds it back from being truly elite.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The measured FPS data provides a granular look at performance across twelve distinct scenarios. At 1080p, the results are: Low 283.3 FPS, Medium 251.4 FPS, High 233.3 FPS, and Ultra 184.4 FPS. The progression from Low to Ultra shows a 98.9 FPS total drop, with the largest single step being from High to Ultra at 48.9 FPS. This indicates that the Ultra preset is particularly demanding, while the jump from Medium to High is only 18.1 FPS, suggesting a more moderate scaling.
Moving to 1440p, the scores are: Low 245.6 FPS, Medium 183.9 FPS, High 147.2 FPS, and Ultra 115.5 FPS. The drop from Low to Ultra here is 130.1 FPS, which is larger than at 1080p, confirming that the GPU is becoming more relevant. At 4K, the scores are: Low 129.9 FPS, Medium 99.9 FPS, High 77.7 FPS, and Ultra 59.8 FPS. The total drop from Low to Ultra is 70.1 FPS, but the relative percentage drop is the largest, with Ultra being 54% slower than Low. The data shows a consistent pattern: higher resolutions amplify the GPU's workload, and the Ultra preset is the most punishing at every resolution.
CPU Role
The AMD Ryzen 5 2600 is a 6-core, 12-thread processor with a base clock of 3.40 GHz and a boost clock of 3.90 GHz. Its benchmark results are respectable: a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 11186 and a single-core score of 1579. In the data pack, its nearest rival is the Intel Core i5-11600KF, which has a deltaPct of -0.6%, meaning the Ryzen is slightly slower. This CPU is clearly capable, but it is not built for extreme frame rates.
The CPU's role is most apparent at 1080p Low, where the system achieves 283.3 FPS. This is an incredibly high number, but it is also the ceiling of what this CPU can push in this game. The fact that the GPU could likely render more frames is irrelevant because the CPU cannot issue draw calls fast enough. The data shows that at 1080p, the CPU is the bottleneck, as evidenced by the relatively small FPS gains from Low to Medium (only 31.9 FPS) compared to the larger gains at 4K. The 12 threads and 16 MB of shared L3 cache are sufficient for Road 96's single-threaded engine, but the 3.90 GHz boost clock limits the absolute maximum frame rate. The CPU's 65W TDP and DDR4 memory support are fine for this game, but they are not the reason for the high frame rates; that credit goes entirely to the GPU.
Settings Recommendations
Based solely on the measured rows, the best experience for this combination is the High preset at 1440p. This yields 147.2 FPS, which is smooth and visually rich, and it avoids the performance cliff of the Ultra preset. At 4K, the High preset at 77.7 FPS is playable, but the Medium preset at 99.9 FPS offers a better balance of visual quality and frame rate, as the jump from Medium to High at 4K costs 22.2 FPS. For players prioritizing frame rate over visuals, the Medium preset at 1440p (183.9 FPS) is an excellent choice, as it is only 28.3 FPS slower than Low but provides a significantly better image.
The Ultra preset is not recommended, as it is the only setting that drops below 60 FPS at 4K (59.8 FPS), and even at 1080p it costs 48.9 FPS compared to High. The data suggests that High is the sweet spot for this hardware combination, as it offers the best balance of visual fidelity and performance across all resolutions. At 1080p, the High preset at 233.3 FPS is more than adequate, and there is no need to drop to Low unless chasing maximum refresh rates. The Low preset at 4K (129.9 FPS) is also viable for competitive play, but for a narrative adventure like Road 96, the Medium preset at 4K offers a far superior experience for only a 30 FPS penalty.
FAQ
Q: Does the RTX 4090's massive 24 GB VRAM matter for Road 96?
A: No. The measured FPS data shows no indication of VRAM limitations, and the game's demands are far below the 24 GB capacity. The GPU's compute power, not its memory, is what drives the high frame rates.
Q: Why is the 1080p Low score (283.3 FPS) so much higher than the 1080p High score (233.3 FPS)?
A: The 50 FPS difference is due to the increased GPU workload from higher graphical settings. However, the fact that Low only gains 37.7 FPS over High at 1440p suggests the CPU begins to limit gains at lower resolutions.
Q: Is this combo better at 1080p or 4K?
A: The data shows it is relatively better at 4K. At 1080p, the CPU limits the GPU, as evidenced by the smaller FPS gains from Low to High. At 4K, the GPU becomes the primary constraint, allowing it to fully utilize its power, as seen in the 59.8 FPS Ultra result.
Q: How does this combo rank against all other tested systems?
A: It ranks 100th out of 1684 combos, placing it in the top 6% of all systems. This is a strong result, though the CPU prevents it from climbing higher.
Q: What is the best setting for a smooth 4K experience?
A: The Medium preset at 4K, which delivers 99.9 FPS, is the best balance. The High preset at 77.7 FPS is also playable, but the Ultra preset at 59.8 FPS is too close to the 60 FPS threshold for comfort.
Q: Is the Ryzen 5 2600 holding back the RTX 4090?
A: Yes, but only at lower resolutions. At 1080p Low, the system hits 283.3 FPS, which is likely near the CPU's maximum. At 4K, the CPU is no longer the bottleneck, and the GPU's performance is fully expressed.
Hardware Specifications
AMD Ryzen 5 2600
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for AMD Ryzen 5 2600 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 in Road 96
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 129.9 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 99.9 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 77.7 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 59.8 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 245.6 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 183.9 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 147.2 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 115.5 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 283.3 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 251.4 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 233.3 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 184.4 |
Road 96 with Ryzen 5 2600 + Other GPUs
See how Road 96 performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Road 96 with RTX 4090 + Other CPUs
See how Road 96 performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with Ryzen 5 2600 + RTX 4090
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.