Red Dead Redemption 2

The AMD Ryzen 5 7400F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 combination delivers a remarkably consistent experience in Red Dead Redemption 2, but the data reveals that the GPU is the primary limiter at every resolution, while the CPU provides ample headroom. At 1080p Low, the combo achieves 214 FPS, but this drops by over half to 106 FPS at 4K Low, indicating that resolution scaling has a dramatic impact on frame rates. The 7400F, with its 6 cores and 12 threads based on Zen 4 architecture, never appears to bottleneck the flagship RTX 4090, as even the most demanding 4K Ultra setting produces 48 FPS, a figure that suggests the GPU is fully saturated. This pairing is best understood as a GPU-bound system where the CPU’s high single-thread performance ensures that frame rates are dictated almost entirely by the graphics card’s workload.

Resolution Scaling

The measured FPS data shows a clear and predictable decline as resolution increases, which is the hallmark of a GPU-limited scenario. At Low settings, the average frame rate falls from 214 FPS at 1920x1080 to 160 FPS at 2560x1440, a reduction of 54 FPS, and then further to 106 FPS at 3840x2160, representing a total drop of 108 FPS from 1080p to 4K. This scaling pattern—where 1440p retains roughly 75% of the 1080p performance and 4K retains roughly 50%—indicates that the RTX 4090’s rendering pipeline is the constraining factor, as pixel count increases disproportionately with resolution.

For Medium settings, the trend is similar but with slightly lower absolute values. The transition from 1080p to 1440p sees the average FPS drop from 161 to 120, a 41 FPS decrease, while moving to 4K further reduces it to 79 FPS, with a minimum of 67 FPS and a maximum of 91 FPS. The 4K Medium result shows a narrower frame time variance compared to other settings, suggesting that the GPU is handling the workload steadily despite the higher pixel count, but the overall scaling still points to the RTX 4090 as the bottleneck.

At High settings, the resolution scaling becomes even more pronounced. The average FPS at 1080p is 134, which falls to 100 at 1440p and then to 66 at 4K. This represents a 50% reduction from 1080p to 4K, with the 4K result being the lowest High preset score in the dataset. The Ultra preset exhibits the most severe scaling, with 96 FPS at 1080p dropping to 72 FPS at 1440p and finally to 48 FPS at 4K. The 4K Ultra figure is exactly half of the 1080p Ultra score, demonstrating that the RTX 4090’s performance is directly proportional to the pixel workload, with no evidence of CPU-induced stalls.

The data indicates that the Ryzen 5 7400F is not the limiting component in this configuration. Even at 1080p Low, where the CPU would typically be most stressed due to high frame rates, the combo achieves 214 FPS without any reported minimum FPS below the average, suggesting that the 12-thread processor can keep up with the GPU’s output. The 7400F’s boost clock of 4.70 GHz and L3 cache of 32 MB provide sufficient single-thread and multi-thread performance to feed the RTX 4090, but the scaling pattern confirms that any frame rate changes across resolutions are driven by the GPU’s rendering capabilities, not CPU limitations.

FAQ

Q: What is the maximum average FPS this combo can achieve in Red Dead Redemption 2?

A: The highest average FPS recorded is 214 FPS, achieved at 1920x1080 resolution with Low settings. This is the only setting that breaks the 200 FPS barrier, and it demonstrates the RTX 4090’s raw throughput when pixel count is minimized.

Q: How does the RTX 4090’s performance compare to its nearest rivals in synthetic benchmarks?

A: The RTX 4090 has an average benchmark score of 60347, which places it 0% ahead of the Intel Arc Pro A60 (60326) and 0.3% ahead of the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 (60140). It trails the AMD Radeon Pro W6600M by 2.5%, but leads the AMD Radeon PRO V710 by 2.9%.

Q: Is the Ryzen 5 7400F a bottleneck for the RTX 4090 in this game?

A: No, the data does not indicate a CPU bottleneck. The FPS scaling from 1080p to 4K is consistent with GPU limitations, and the 7400F’s 6 cores and 12 threads are sufficient to sustain high frame rates, as evidenced by the 214 FPS result at 1080p Low.

Q: What is the percentile ranking of the RTX 4090 among all GPUs?

A: The RTX 4090 is in the 88th percentile of all GPUs based on its average benchmark score. This places it in the top tier of graphics cards, though its nearest rivals in the benchmark database are professional-grade workstation GPUs.

Q: How does the 7400F’s multi-core performance compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The 7400F has an average benchmark score of 32750, which is 0.1% higher than the Intel Core i5-14600T (32707) and 0.2% higher than the Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (32697). It is 0.2% lower than the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H (32812) and 0.3% higher than the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 (32662).

Q: What is the lowest average FPS recorded for this combo?

A: The lowest average FPS is 48, recorded at 3840x2160 resolution with Ultra settings. This is the only configuration in the dataset that falls below 50 FPS, and it represents the most demanding scenario for the RTX 4090.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 plays a dominant role in determining the frame rates for this combo in Red Dead Redemption 2. With 24 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 384-bit bus, the GPU has a memory bandwidth of 1.01 TB/s, which is more than sufficient for the game’s highest texture and detail settings at 4K. The measured FPS data shows no signs of memory capacity or bandwidth limitations, as even the 4K Ultra preset, which would stress memory the most, produces a playable 48 FPS average. The GPU’s 16384 shading units and 176 ROPs are key to its performance, allowing it to process the game’s complex lighting and shadow effects at high resolutions.

The RTX 4090’s clock speeds are also relevant to the results. The base clock is 2235 MHz, which boosts to 2520 MHz under load, and this boost behavior is consistent with the steady frame rates observed across all settings. The GPU’s 128 RT cores and 512 tensor cores support the game’s optional ray tracing features, but the measured data does not specify whether these are enabled, so the FPS figures likely reflect rasterization performance. The pixel rate of 443.5 GPixel/s and texture rate of 1,290.2 GTexel/s provide the raw throughput needed to maintain high FPS at 1440p and playable FPS at 4K.

The GPU’s 82.58 TFLOPS of FP32 compute is a significant factor in the game’s physics and particle effects, but the resolution scaling data suggests that the RTX 4090 is not fully utilized until 4K. At 1080p Low, the GPU achieves 214 FPS, which is likely near its maximum output for this workload, but the CPU is still able to feed it effectively. The 88th percentile ranking of the RTX 4090 among all GPUs confirms its high-end status, yet its nearest rivals in the database are not consumer gaming cards, indicating that the 4090 is in a class of its own for gaming workloads.

The 24 GB memory capacity is particularly relevant for Red Dead Redemption 2, which is known for its large open world and high-resolution textures. Even at Ultra settings, the game is unlikely to exceed the GPU’s memory capacity, allowing for consistent frame times. The measured FPS at 4K Medium shows a minimum of 67 FPS and a maximum of 91 FPS, which is a narrow range that indicates stable memory performance. The GPU’s 450 W TDP and triple-slot design are not directly reflected in the FPS data, but they are consistent with the high performance levels observed.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the combo delivers its highest frame rates across all settings. Low settings produce an average of 214 FPS, which is the only triple-digit result above 200 in the dataset. Medium settings reduce this to 161 FPS, with a minimum of 136 FPS and a maximum of 185 FPS, showing a wider variance than Low. High settings yield 134 FPS, while Ultra settings drop to 96 FPS. The transition from Low to Ultra at 1080p represents a 55% reduction in average FPS, from 214 to 96, which highlights the significant impact of graphical presets on performance.

At 2560x1440, the average FPS figures are lower but still highly playable. Low settings achieve 160 FPS, Medium settings reach 120 FPS with a minimum of 102 FPS and a maximum of 138 FPS, High settings produce 100 FPS, and Ultra settings fall to 72 FPS. The scaling from Low to Ultra at 1440p is a 55% reduction, from 160 to 72 FPS, which is proportionally similar to the 1080p results. This consistency suggests that the GPU is handling the increased pixel count uniformly across all preset levels.

At 3840x2160, the frame rates drop significantly, but the game remains playable at most settings. Low settings achieve 106 FPS, Medium settings reach 79 FPS with a minimum of 67 FPS and a maximum of 91 FPS, High settings produce 66 FPS, and Ultra settings fall to 48 FPS. The 4K Ultra result is the only configuration that dips below 60 FPS, which may be a concern for gamers seeking a smooth experience at maximum fidelity. The scaling from Low to Ultra at 4K is a 55% reduction, from 106 to 48 FPS, which mirrors the percentage drops seen at lower resolutions.

The data reveals that the Relative performance of each preset is consistent across all resolutions. Medium settings are approximately 75% of Low settings at each resolution, High settings are approximately 62% of Low, and Ultra settings are approximately 45% of Low. This uniformity indicates that the game’s graphical settings scale predictably with the RTX 4090’s capabilities, and the 7400F does not introduce any resolution-dependent variability. The minimum and maximum FPS values are only provided for Medium settings, but the lack of such data for other presets suggests that the Medium preset has the most frame time variance, which could be due to more dynamic gameplay elements.

How This Combo Ranks

In the benchmark database, this combination of the AMD Ryzen 5 7400F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 ranks 112th out of 2902 tested combos for Red Dead Redemption 2. This places the combo in the top 4% of all tested configurations, indicating that it is among the higher-performing systems for this game. The rank of 112 out of 2902 is particularly notable given that the CPU is a mid-range 7000 series processor, while the GPU is a flagship GeForce 40-series card. This suggests that the GPU is the primary driver of the combo’s high ranking, as the CPU’s performance is sufficient to avoid being a limiting factor.

The CPU itself has a percentile ranking of 83 among all CPUs, which is a strong showing for a 6-core processor. Its average benchmark score of 32750 is nearly identical to its nearest rivals, with all delta percentages within 0.3%. This level of performance is more than adequate for gaming, and the data confirms that the 7400F does not hold back the RTX 4090 in Red Dead Redemption 2. The GPU’s percentile ranking of 88 among all GPUs is slightly higher than the CPU’s, and its average benchmark score of 60347 is significantly higher than the CPU’s, reinforcing the notion that the GPU is the dominant component in this pairing.

The combo’s rank of 112 out of 2902 suggests that there are 111 other tested configurations that perform better in this game. These likely include combinations with higher-end CPUs, such as the Ryzen 7 or Ryzen 9 series, or possibly Intel Core i7 and i9 processors, but the data does not specify which combos rank higher. The fact that the 7400F and RTX 4090 still rank in the top 4% indicates that the CPU is not a significant drawback, and the GPU’s performance is the key factor in achieving this rank. The deltaPct values for the CPU’s nearest rivals are all within 0.3%, showing that the 7400F is competitive with other mid-range processors, but the combo’s rank is likely driven by the RTX 4090’s superior graphics performance.

Settings Recommendations

For gamers prioritizing maximum frame rates, the Low preset at 1920x1080 is the best choice, delivering an average of 214 FPS. This configuration is ideal for high-refresh-rate monitors, as the frame rates far exceed the typical 144 Hz or 165 Hz refresh rates. However, the Low preset may compromise visual fidelity, so players with 1080p displays should consider the Medium preset, which still achieves 161 FPS and provides a better balance of visuals and performance. The Medium preset also has a minimum FPS of 136, which ensures that the game remains fluid during demanding scenes.

At 2560x1440, the High preset offers the best experience for most gamers, with an average of 100 FPS and no reported minimum FPS below this threshold. This provides a smooth and visually detailed experience that is well-suited for 1440p displays. The Medium preset at 1440p achieves 120 FPS, which is also excellent, but High settings offer improved graphical fidelity at a cost of only 20 FPS, making it the recommended choice for those seeking a balance. The Ultra preset at 1440p drops to 72 FPS, which is still playable, but the visual improvement over High may not justify the 28 FPS reduction.

At 3840x2160, the Medium preset is the recommended choice, with an average of 79 FPS and a minimum of 67 FPS. This provides a playable 4K experience with good visual quality, and the frame rates are high enough for most 60 Hz displays. The High preset at 4K achieves 66 FPS, which is also acceptable, but the Medium preset offers a higher average FPS and better frame time consistency, as indicated by the minimum and maximum values. The Low preset at 4K achieves 106 FPS, which is impressive for 4K, but it sacrifices significant visual quality, so it is only recommended for competitive players who prioritize frame rate over graphics. The Ultra preset at 4K drops to 48 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay, and is therefore not recommended for this resolution.