Ready Or Not

Ready Or Not, a tactical shooter with a heavy emphasis on close-quarters combat and environmental detail, presents a unique challenge for even the most powerful hardware. This analysis examines the measured performance of the Intel Core Ultra 7 155H paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090, using only the provided benchmark data to interpret how this combination handles the game across different resolutions and settings. The data reveals a system with immense graphical headroom, where the choice of settings can dramatically alter the experience from a buttery-smooth high-refresh-rate romp to a visually demanding showcase.

Resolution Scaling

The measured FPS data shows a clear and predictable trend: as resolution increases, frame rates drop, but the manner of this drop reveals the balance of power between the CPU and GPU. At 1080p with High settings, the combo achieves an average of 306 FPS. Moving to 1440p, the average drops to 193 FPS, a significant 37% reduction. When pushing to 4K, the average falls further to 101 FPS, another 48% reduction from the 1440p figure. This steep decline is the signature of a GPU-bound scenario; the RTX 5090 is the limiting factor, as the sheer number of pixels it must render at higher resolutions overwhelms its capabilities, despite its immense power.

The scaling pattern is consistent across all settings. At Low settings, the average FPS goes from 386 at 1080p, to 243 at 1440p, and finally to 127 at 4K. The percentage drop from 1080p to 1440p is 37%, and from 1440p to 4K is 48%, which is nearly identical to the High setting pattern. This consistency strongly implies that the performance ceiling at 1080p is not being fully taxed. The CPU is feeding the GPU frames faster than it can render them, creating a bottleneck that is only alleviated when the resolution increases and the GPU's workload becomes the primary constraint. The fact that 1080p frame rates are exceptionally high but scale down so aggressively suggests that the Core Ultra 7 155H is more than capable of keeping up with the RTX 5090 in this title.

This data implies that for users with high-refresh-rate 1080p or 1440p monitors, the RTX 5090 is largely held back by the CPU in this game. The GPU's potential is only fully realized when the resolution is increased to 4K, where it finally becomes the limiting component. The 4K results, ranging from 71 FPS on Ultra to 127 FPS on Low, show that even at the highest resolution, the combo is capable of delivering playable frame rates, but the performance headroom at lower resolutions is a clear indicator of where the bottleneck lies. The benchmark results indicate that this pairing is best suited for high-resolution gaming, as the CPU's performance is sufficient to prevent it from being a hindrance at 4K.

Settings Recommendations

Given the measured rows, the "Medium" preset offers the most balanced experience, especially for users targeting smooth gameplay without sacrificing too much visual fidelity. At 4K, Medium yields an average of 111 FPS with a minimum of 94 FPS. This is a substantial improvement over the 71 FPS average on Ultra, and it maintains a frame rate that is well above the threshold for smooth, responsive gameplay. The data suggests that the jump from Medium to Ultra is particularly costly, resulting in a 36% performance penalty, while the jump from Low to Medium only costs about 13%. This indicates that Ultra is a demanding preset that offers diminishing returns for the performance hit.

For 1440p and 1080p, the choice becomes less critical, as even the Ultra preset provides high average frame rates of 136 FPS and 215 FPS, respectively. However, for a competitive tactical shooter, the highest possible frame rate can be an advantage. The Low preset at 1080p hits an average of 386 FPS, and at 1440p it reaches 243 FPS. These are extremely high numbers that would satisfy even the most demanding esports enthusiasts. If the goal is to maximize the refresh rate of a 240Hz or higher monitor, the Low or Medium presets at 1440p would be the optimal choices.

The data suggests that the "High" preset is a solid middle ground, providing a better visual experience than Medium with a moderate performance cost. At 4K, High averages 101 FPS, which is only 9% slower than Medium but likely offers a noticeable visual upgrade. The choice between High and Ultra at 4K is a direct trade-off between 30 FPS and visual quality. For most players, the Medium or High preset at 4K will provide the best balance of visual fidelity and performance, as the Ultra preset's 71 FPS average, while playable, might not be stable enough for the fast-paced, tense moments in Ready Or Not.

FAQ

Q: Is the Intel Core Ultra 7 155H a bottleneck for the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 in Ready Or Not?

A: At 1080p and 1440p, the data suggests the CPU is the limiting factor, as frame rates are exceptionally high but the GPU's workload is not large enough to be the primary constraint. The bottleneck shifts to the GPU at 4K, where the average FPS drops significantly, indicating the CPU can feed the GPU fast enough to make it the limiting component.

Q: What is the best resolution to play this game with this hardware?

A: The data shows that 4K is the only resolution where the RTX 5090 is fully utilized. At 1440p, the average FPS on High is 193, while at 4K it is 101. This suggests 4K is the ideal resolution to leverage the GPU's power, though 1440p offers incredibly high frame rates for competitive play.

Q: How demanding is the Ultra preset compared to Medium?

A: The Ultra preset is significantly more demanding. At 4K, the average FPS drops from 111 on Medium to 71 on Ultra, a 36% performance penalty. At 1440p, the drop is from 212 to 136 FPS, and at 1080p it goes from 336 to 215 FPS. The cost of Ultra is consistent across all resolutions.

Q: Can this system handle high-refresh-rate gaming at 1440p?

A: Yes, the benchmark data indicates it can easily handle it. At 1440p, the Low preset averages 243 FPS, Medium averages 212 FPS, and High averages 193 FPS. Even the Ultra preset averages 136 FPS, which is sufficient for a 144Hz monitor.

Q: What is the minimum FPS recorded for this combo?

A: The only minimum FPS data available is for the Medium preset. At 4K, the minimum is 94 FPS, at 1440p it is 180 FPS, and at 1080p it is 286 FPS. This suggests that frame pacing on Medium is stable, with minimums that are not far off from the averages.

Q: How does the 1080p performance compare to the 4K performance?

A: The 1080p performance is dramatically higher. For example, on High settings, the average FPS at 1080p is 306, which is 203% higher than the 101 FPS average at 4K. This massive difference underscores the GPU-bound nature of the game at higher resolutions.

How This Combo Ranks

In the grand scheme of tested hardware combinations for this game, this particular pairing sits in the upper echelon. The data shows a combo rank of 617 out of 2947 tested combos, placing it in the top 21% of all configurations. This is a strong result, but it is interesting to note that it is not ranked higher given the sheer power of the RTX 5090. This suggests that the Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, while a capable mobile processor, might be holding the system back from achieving an even higher rank that a more powerful desktop CPU could unlock.

The rank is likely a reflection of the performance across all tested resolutions and settings. While the 4K performance is strong, the relative performance at 1080p and 1440p, where the CPU is the bottleneck, may have a more significant impact on the overall ranking if those resolutions are weighted more heavily in the benchmark. The GPU's own benchmark percentile is 92, but its nearest rivals include the Tesla P100 and RX 6850M XT, which are not gaming-focused chips. This indicates that in a game-specific test, the RTX 5090's raw compute power is not the only factor; the CPU's ability to feed it is crucial for a top-tier rank.

The deltaPct values for the CPU's nearest rivals are all within 0.4% of its average score, indicating that the performance of the Core Ultra 7 155H is in a very tight cluster. This means that for this game, the choice of CPU among these rivals would have a negligible impact on the overall rank. The fact that the combo rank is 617 suggests that many other combinations with different CPUs achieve better results, likely because they can sustain higher frame rates at lower resolutions, pushing the average performance higher. The data implies that this is a high-performing combo, but not an absolute top-tier one, due to the CPU's limitations in a game that is not heavily multi-threaded.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 is the undisputed star of this pairing, and its specifications paint a clear picture of its role in this game's performance. With 32 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 512-bit bus, it has a massive memory bandwidth of 1.79 TB/s. This is crucial for a game like Ready Or Not, which can feature detailed textures and complex scenes at high resolutions. The 4K performance, which remains playable even on Ultra, is a direct result of this immense memory subsystem. The 32 GB capacity ensures that texture loading and memory swapping are non-issues, even at the highest settings.

The GPU's clock speeds, with a base of 2017 MHz and a boost of 2407 MHz, allow it to maintain high throughput in compute-heavy tasks. The benchmark results show a pattern where the GPU is the primary driver of performance scaling with resolution. The FPS drops from 1080p to 4K are directly proportional to the increase in pixel count, which is a classic sign of a GPU that is fully engaged. The data indicates that the RTX 5090 is not being held back by any other component at 4K, and its performance is a direct reflection of its processing power.

The GPU's 92nd percentile ranking against all GPUs underscores its position as a top-tier product. However, the 4K Ultra result of 71 FPS shows that even this behemoth can be challenged by the most demanding settings. The fact that the 4K High setting yields 101 FPS suggests that the Ultra preset introduces effects that are particularly taxing on the GPU's compute and memory resources. The data implies that the RTX 5090's role is to provide a high-performance baseline at 4K, and the user's choice of settings will be the final arbiter of the frame rate. Its massive compute power is best utilized when the resolution is high enough to provide a sufficient workload.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The core data from the benchmark provides a detailed look at how this combo performs under various loads. At 1920x1080, the performance is exceptional. The Low preset averages 386 FPS, Medium averages 336 FPS (with a minimum of 286 FPS), High averages 306 FPS, and Ultra averages 215 FPS. These numbers indicate that at 1080p, the system is rarely stressed, and the frame rates are high enough to take full advantage of any high-refresh-rate monitor.

Moving to 2560x1440, the frame rates remain very high but show a clear step down. The Low preset averages 243 FPS, Medium averages 212 FPS (with a minimum of 180 FPS), High averages 193 FPS, and Ultra averages 136 FPS. This resolution offers a sweet spot for high-refresh-rate gaming with excellent visual fidelity. The minimum FPS for Medium is still above 144, indicating that even in intense scenes, the frame rate will not dip below the refresh rate of most high-end monitors.

At 3840x2160, the performance is where the RTX 5090's power is truly tested. The Low preset averages 127 FPS, Medium averages 111 FPS (with a minimum of 94 FPS), High averages 101 FPS, and Ultra drops to an average of 71 FPS. The gap between Medium and Ultra is substantial, representing a 36% performance loss. The data shows that for a consistent 60 FPS or higher experience at 4K, the Medium or High presets are the sensible choices, while Ultra is for those who prioritize visual quality over frame rate stability.

CPU Role

The Intel Core Ultra 7 155H plays a supporting, yet critical, role in this system. With 16 cores and 22 threads, it is a highly capable multi-threaded processor, but its 28W TDP and mobile design suggest it is not built for the same sustained performance as a desktop enthusiast chip. The benchmark data shows that at 1080p, the frame rates are so high that the CPU is likely the bottleneck. The 386 FPS average on Low is a clear indicator that the CPU is capable of feeding the GPU a massive number of frames, but the GPU cannot render them any faster.

The CPU's boost clock of 4.80 GHz and its 24 MB of shared L3 cache are key to its single-threaded performance, which is often the most critical factor in games. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1743 points suggests a strong performance level, but it is not in the same league as a high-end desktop processor. The data suggests that this is where the combo's rank of 617 out of 2947 comes from; the CPU's single-threaded performance is good, but not great, which limits the system's ability to achieve the absolute highest possible frame rates at lower resolutions.

The CPU's nearest rivals all have an average score within 0.4% of it, showing that it is well-matched with its peers. This means that in a game like Ready Or Not, which may not be heavily multi-threaded, the performance difference between this CPU and its rivals would be minimal. However, the fact that its multi-core score in Cinebench R23 is 15028 points indicates that it has plenty of headroom for background tasks and other applications. The CPU's role is to provide a stable and fast platform for the GPU to work with, and the data shows it does this effectively, but it is the component that prevents this combo from being ranked higher in the overall list.