Ready Or Not

Ready Or Not

AVERAGE FPS
63
good

This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 63 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 22 31 34 40
1440p QHD 42 60 66 76
1080p Full HD 67 95 104 120

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Low 40
3840x2160 Medium 34
3840x2160 High 31
3840x2160 Ultra 22
2560x1440 Low 76
2560x1440 Medium 66
2560x1440 High 60
2560x1440 Ultra 42
1920x1080 Low 120
1920x1080 Medium 104
1920x1080 High 95
1920x1080 Ultra 67

Ready Or Not with Intel Core i7-14700F + AMD Radeon RX 580, In-Depth Analysis

Resolution Scaling — how FPS drops from 1080p to 4K and what it says about the limiting component

The measured frame rates show a clear, steep performance curve as resolution climbs, with the combination of the Intel Core i7-14700F and AMD Radeon RX 580 shifting from a playable 1080p experience to a borderline 4K one. At 1080p Low, the combo delivers 120 FPS average; moving to 1440p Low drops that to 76 FPS, a 37% reduction, and 4K Low falls further to 40 FPS, which is 67% below the 1080p figure. This pattern is consistent across all settings tiers, indicating that the Radeon RX 580 is the primary bottleneck as pixel count increases.

The scaling from 1080p to 1440p is steep but manageable: High settings go from 95 FPS to 60 FPS, Medium from 104 FPS to 66 FPS, and Ultra from 67 FPS to 42 FPS. The 1440p to 4K transition is even more punishing — High drops from 60 FPS to 31 FPS, Medium from 66 FPS to 34 FPS, and Ultra from 42 FPS to 22 FPS. These are not linear reductions; they are compounded losses that reveal the RX 580's 256-bit memory bus and 8 GB GDDR5 are being saturated at higher resolutions, with bandwidth becoming the limiting factor rather than raw compute.

The data strongly suggests that at 1080p, the CPU still has headroom to push higher frames, but the GPU caps the output. The i7-14700F, with 20 cores and 28 threads, is far more capable than what the RX 580 can feed at lower resolutions. At 4K, the situation reverses slightly — the GPU is so overburdened that even dropping from Ultra to Low only recovers 18 FPS (22 to 40), which is a modest gain compared to the 53 FPS jump seen at 1080p (67 to 120). This indicates that at 4K, the RX 580 is the absolute constraint, and no CPU-side optimization can compensate for the lack of pixel throughput.

Benchmark results indicate that 1080p is the only resolution where this combo approaches a high-refresh experience. The 120 FPS at Low and 104 FPS at Medium are the only measured rows that exceed the 100 FPS threshold. At 1440p, the best case is 76 FPS at Low, which is playable but not competitive for fast-paced tactical shooters. At 4K, every setting falls below 40 FPS, making it unsuitable for smooth gameplay regardless of visual fidelity.

CPU Role — cores, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The Intel Core i7-14700F is a 20-core, 28-thread processor from the Raptor Lake Refresh architecture, with a base clock of 2.10 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz. Its benchmark scores place it in the 91st percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 53,620. This is a high-end desktop part that is clearly not the limiting factor in this gaming configuration.

In multi-threaded workloads, the i7-14700F posts a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 35,122 and a single-core score of 4,958. The single-core performance is particularly relevant for gaming, as most titles, including tactical shooters, rely heavily on a few fast threads. The PassMark single-thread score of 4,257 and Geekbench single-core score of 2,429 confirm strong per-core capability. This is the kind of CPU that can handle high frame rates without becoming a bottleneck, provided the GPU can keep up.

The nearest rivals in the CPU benchmark database include the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X, which scores an average of 53,288 (0.6% behind), and the Intel Xeon 6505P at 53,701 (0.2% ahead). These deltas are negligible in real-world terms, confirming that the i7-14700F is in the top tier of desktop processors. For a game like Ready Or Not, which involves AI-driven enemy behavior and multiple simultaneous threats, the 28 threads provide ample headroom for background tasks and game logic without stealing cycles from the render thread.

The data shows that the CPU's role in this combo is to ensure that frame times remain stable at lower resolutions. At 1080p Low, the combo achieves 120 FPS, and the fact that the CPU has a 91st percentile ranking suggests it could push even higher with a more powerful GPU. The RX 580, by contrast, sits at the 53rd percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 12,928. This massive gap in relative performance — 91st vs 53rd percentile — is the core reason why the GPU dictates the frame rate at every resolution tested.

At 4K Ultra, the combo drops to 22 FPS. This is not a CPU limitation; the processor's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 35,122 indicates it can handle complex scenes. Instead, the RX 580's 6.175 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 42.88 GPixel/s pixel rate are simply insufficient for the 8.3 million pixels in a 4K frame. The CPU is waiting on the GPU, not the other way around.

FAQ

Q: Is the Intel Core i7-14700F + AMD Radeon RX 580 combo capable of running Ready Or Not at 4K?

A: The measured data shows 4K performance ranging from 22 FPS at Ultra to 40 FPS at Low. Only the Low setting approaches playability, but even that falls short of a smooth 60 FPS target. The combo is not recommended for 4K gaming in this title.

Q: What is the best resolution for this combo in Ready Or Not?

A: According to the measured FPS data, 1080p is the clear winner. At Medium settings, it achieves 104 FPS average, and at High settings, 95 FPS. Both are well above the 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay.

Q: How does the RX 580 compare to its nearest GPU rivals in terms of benchmark scores?

A: The RX 580 has an average benchmark score of 12,928, which is 0.1% behind the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile (12,940) and 0.4% behind the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER (12,986). It is 0.5% ahead of the AMD Radeon 740M (12,870) and 0.6% ahead of the AMD FirePro W5100 (12,847).

Q: Does the i7-14700F bottleneck the RX 580 in this game?

A: No. At 1080p, the combo reaches 120 FPS at Low settings, and the CPU's 91st percentile ranking (average benchmark score 53,620) far exceeds the GPU's 53rd percentile. The GPU is the limiting factor at all resolutions tested.

Q: What kind of frame rate can I expect at 1440p with High settings?

A: The measured average is 60 FPS at 2560x1440 with High settings. This is right at the edge of playability, and any demanding scenes may cause dips below that threshold.

Q: Which settings preset provides the highest minimum frame rate?

A: The only rows with recorded min FPS are Medium settings. At 1080p Medium, the min FPS is 89, at 1440p Medium it is 56, and at 4K Medium it is 29. The 1080p Medium preset offers the most stable experience with a 104 FPS average.

Measured FPS Breakdown — resolution by resolution, settings by settings, exact numbers

1920x1080 (1080p):

  • Low: 120 FPS average
  • Medium: 104 FPS average, 89 min, 120 max
  • High: 95 FPS average
  • Ultra: 67 FPS average

At 1080p, the combo is fully playable across all presets. The gap between Low and Ultra is 53 FPS, indicating that the GPU has enough headroom to handle higher visual fidelity, though the jump from High to Ultra costs 28 FPS (95 to 67), which is a significant trade-off for marginal visual gains.

2560x1440 (1440p):

  • Low: 76 FPS average
  • Medium: 66 FPS average, 56 min, 76 max
  • High: 60 FPS average
  • Ultra: 42 FPS average

1440p is the transitional resolution for this combo. Low and Medium presets remain fluid, but High drops to exactly 60 FPS, and Ultra falls below the playability threshold. The 34 FPS difference between Low and Ultra (76 to 42) shows that the RX 580's memory bandwidth is being stretched at this pixel count.

3840x2160 (4K):

  • Low: 40 FPS average
  • Medium: 34 FPS average, 29 min, 40 max
  • High: 31 FPS average
  • Ultra: 22 FPS average

4K is not viable for this combo. Even at Low settings, the 40 FPS average is below the 60 FPS target, and the 29 FPS minimum at Medium indicates significant stutter potential. The 18 FPS spread between Low and Ultra (40 to 22) is the narrowest of any resolution, proving that the GPU is saturated regardless of settings.

The data shows a consistent pattern: each resolution step down halves the performance gap between settings. At 1080p, the Low-to-Ultra spread is 53 FPS; at 1440p it is 34 FPS; at 4K it is only 18 FPS. This confirms that the RX 580's compute and memory resources are exhausted at higher resolutions, leaving little room for settings-based optimization.

How This Combo Ranks — use comboRankInGame vs other tested combos

The Intel Core i7-14700F + AMD Radeon RX 580 combination ranks 3,395th out of 3,714 tested combos in Ready Or Not. This places it in the bottom 9% of all configurations, which is a surprisingly low ranking given the CPU's strength. The reason is clear: the RX 580's 53rd percentile GPU ranking drags the overall combo down, even though the CPU is in the 91st percentile.

This rank indicates that the vast majority of tested combos outperform this pairing in Ready Or Not. The game appears to be heavily GPU-bound, as evidenced by the measured FPS data, and the RX 580's dated architecture (GCN 4.0, 14 nm process) cannot compete with more modern GPUs that have higher pixel rates and more memory bandwidth.

The rank of 3,395 out of 3,714 means only 319 combos performed worse. This is a significant finding: the i7-14700F is a top-tier CPU, but pairing it with an end-of-life GPU from 2017 creates a lopsided system that underperforms in this title. The CPU's 20 cores and 28 threads are essentially wasted in Ready Or Not because the GPU cannot deliver frames fast enough to utilize them.

Benchmark results indicate that the combo's ranking would improve dramatically with a GPU upgrade, as the CPU has demonstrated it can support higher frame rates. The 120 FPS at 1080p Low reflects the CPU's capability, but the 3,395th rank shows that the overall experience is held back by the GPU's limitations.

Settings Recommendations — which preset gives the best experience per the measured rows

For the best overall experience, the 1080p Medium preset is the clear recommendation. It delivers a 104 FPS average with a 89 FPS minimum, meaning it stays above the 60 FPS threshold even in demanding scenes. The 120 FPS maximum shows there is room for the CPU to push higher, but the Medium settings provide a good balance between visual quality and performance.

If visual fidelity is a priority, 1080p High at 95 FPS average is a viable alternative. The 9 FPS drop from Medium to High is modest, and the game will look noticeably better. However, the lack of a recorded minimum FPS for High settings means there is some uncertainty about frame stability in intense firefights.

At 1440p, the Low preset (76 FPS average) is the only one that guarantees a smooth experience above 60 FPS. Medium at 66 FPS is acceptable but the 56 FPS minimum could cause noticeable dips. High at exactly 60 FPS is borderline, and Ultra at 42 FPS should be avoided.

For players with a 1080p monitor, the recommendation is unambiguous: use Medium or High settings. Ultra at 67 FPS is playable but the 28 FPS penalty over High is not justified by the marginal visual improvements. The data shows that Medium offers the best stability with a recorded 89 FPS minimum, which is crucial for a tactical shooter where frame consistency matters more than peak frame rates.

The 4K resolution should be avoided entirely. Even the best case (40 FPS at Low) is below the playability threshold, and the 29 FPS minimum at Medium confirms that this combo cannot handle 4K in Ready Or Not. The CPU's performance is irrelevant at this resolution because the GPU is the sole bottleneck.

In summary, the measured data supports a simple hierarchy: 1080p Medium for best experience, 1080p High for better visuals, 1440p Low for higher resolution, and no 4K. This combo is best suited for 1080p gaming, where the RX 580 can leverage its 8 GB GDDR5 memory and 256-bit bus effectively, and the i7-14700F's processing power can be fully utilized.

Hardware Specifications

Intel Core i7-14700F

Cores / Threads 20 / 28
Base Clock 2100 MHz
Boost Clock 5400 MHz
TDP 65W
Socket Intel Socket 1700
View Full CPU Details →

AMD Radeon RX 580

VRAM 8 GB GDDR5
Base Clock —
Boost Clock 1340 MHz MHz
TDP 185 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for Intel Core i7-14700F + AMD Radeon RX 580 in Ready Or Not

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Low 40.0
3840x2160 Medium 34.0
3840x2160 High 31.0
3840x2160 Ultra 22.0
2560x1440 Low 76.0
2560x1440 Medium 66.0
2560x1440 High 60.0
2560x1440 Ultra 42.0
1920x1080 Low 120.0
1920x1080 Medium 104.0
1920x1080 High 95.0
1920x1080 Ultra 67.0

Ready Or Not with ii7-14700F + Other GPUs

See how Ready Or Not performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.

Ready Or Not with RX 580 + Other CPUs

See how Ready Or Not performs with the same GPU but different processors.

Other Games with ii7-14700F + RX 580

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.