Ready Or Not

The Intel Core i5-9400 pairs six physical cores with six threads, a 2.90 GHz base clock, and a 4.10 GHz boost clock. For a tactical shooter like Ready Or Not, this configuration provides a solid foundation, though the lack of hyper-threading means the CPU relies on raw core count and frequency rather than additional logical processors. Benchmark results show the i5-9400 sits at the 47th percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 2254. Its nearest rivals are tightly clustered: the Intel Core i7-1068NG7 scores 2259 (0.2% higher), the Intel Core i7-10710U scores 2248 (0.3% lower), and the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1500 scores 2246 (0.4% lower). This places the i5-9400 in a competitive mid-range bracket, where slight variations in workload can flip the ranking.

The six cores are relevant to Ready Or Not’s gameplay because the title simulates AI-driven squadmates and multiple hostile entities, which can create multi-threaded load spikes. The 9 MB of shared L3 cache and dual-channel DDR4 memory support (42.7 GB/s bandwidth) are typical for this era of desktop processors. The 4.10 GHz boost clock is the key asset here; when the game demands single-thread responsiveness—such as during target acquisition or dynamic lighting updates—the CPU can ramp up frequency. However, the data suggests this CPU is not the primary bottleneck in this combo, as the FPS figures at lower resolutions indicate headroom. The i5-9400’s 65 W TDP and lack of an unlocked multiplier position it as a mainstream part, but for Ready Or Not, the core count is adequate to feed the GPU without severe stutter in the measured scenarios.

FAQ

Q: What is the average FPS at 1080p with High settings?

A: The measured average FPS at 1920x1080 with High settings is 224.

Q: How does the i5-9400 compare to its closest rival, the Intel Core i7-1068NG7?

A: The i7-1068NG7 has an average benchmark score of 2259, which is 0.2% higher than the i5-9400’s score of 2254. This difference is negligible in real-world gaming.

Q: What is the lowest average FPS recorded for this combo?

A: The lowest average FPS is 52, which occurs at 3840x2160 resolution with Ultra settings.

Q: Does the GPU’s average benchmark score indicate strong performance?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT has an average benchmark score of 26011, placing it at the 71st percentile among all GPUs. This indicates above-average performance relative to the broader GPU market.

Q: What is the combo’s rank among all tested combinations?

A: The combo ranks 1710 out of 3714 tested combinations, placing it in the upper-middle portion of the database.

Q: Is there a significant FPS drop between Medium and Ultra at 1440p?

A: Yes, at 2560x1440, the Medium preset averages 155 FPS, while Ultra drops to 99 FPS, a 36% reduction in performance.

Resolution Scaling

The FPS progression from 1080p to 4K reveals a classic shift in system bottleneck. At 1920x1080 with High settings, the combo produces 224 FPS, which is extremely high and suggests the CPU is capable of driving the GPU well beyond typical monitor refresh rates. Moving to 2560x1440, the High preset yields 141 FPS, a 37% decrease from 1080p. At 3840x2160, the same High settings drop to 74 FPS, a 67% reduction from the 1080p baseline. This scaling pattern indicates that as resolution increases, the GPU becomes the limiting factor, while the CPU has sufficient headroom at lower resolutions.

The data shows a clear trend: at 1080p, the RX 6750 XT is the bottleneck, as the CPU can push frame rates above 280 FPS on Low settings. At 4K, the GPU’s workload quadruples pixel count, and the FPS drops to 93 on Low and 52 on Ultra. The gap between Low and Ultra at 4K is 41 FPS, whereas at 1080p the same settings gap is 125 FPS. This compression at higher resolutions is typical for a GPU-bound scenario; the CPU’s job becomes easier relative to the GPU’s rendering load. The 1440p results sit in a sweet spot: 141 FPS on High is still above 144 Hz monitors, and even Ultra maintains 99 FPS. The measured data suggests that users seeking maximum visual fidelity should consider 1440p as the optimal balance, as 4K Ultra (52 FPS) may feel less fluid for a tactical shooter requiring precise aiming.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination of the Intel Core i5-9400 and AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT achieves a rank of 1710 out of 3714 tested combos in Ready Or Not. This places it in the 46th percentile of all combinations, meaning roughly 54% of tested systems perform better in this specific game. The rank reflects the balance between a mid-range CPU and an upper-mid-range GPU. While the GPU alone sits at the 71st percentile, the CPU’s 47th percentile drags the overall combo down, suggesting that the i5-9400 is a limiting factor in some scenarios, particularly at lower resolutions where CPU overhead matters more.

Compared to other combos in the database, this pairing does not reach the top tier, but it also avoids the bottom quartile. The rank implies that for users with high-refresh-rate 1080p monitors, the system is capable, but for 4K Ultra settings, it falls behind more balanced pairings. The data indicates that the GPU is performing near its expected level, while the CPU’s age (released in 2018) shows in multi-threaded workloads. However, since Ready Or Not is not an extremely CPU-intensive title compared to simulation games, the combo still delivers playable frame rates across most settings. The rank of 1710 suggests that upgrading either component would yield diminishing returns unless the other is also upgraded, as the current pairing is relatively balanced for its price tier.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings depend on the target resolution and refresh rate. At 1920x1080, the High preset delivers 224 FPS, which is excellent for competitive play on 144 Hz or 240 Hz monitors. The Ultra preset at 1080p still yields 157 FPS, so users with 144 Hz displays can enable Ultra without sacrificing fluidity. For 2560x1440, the High preset offers 141 FPS, which is just below 144 Hz but still smooth; the Medium preset at 155 FPS is a better choice for those who prioritize frame rate over minor visual enhancements. The Ultra preset at 1440p (99 FPS) is playable but may not feel as responsive in fast-paced firefights.

At 3840x2160, the situation changes drastically. The High preset averages 74 FPS, which is borderline for a tactical shooter where smooth aiming matters. The Medium preset at 81 FPS (with a minimum of 69 FPS) is the best balance, as it maintains playability while offering moderate visual quality. The Ultra preset at 52 FPS is not recommended for serious gameplay, as the low frame rate can lead to input lag and missed shots. The Low preset at 4K (93 FPS) provides the smoothest experience at that resolution, but it sacrifices visual fidelity. For a game like Ready Or Not, which relies heavily on environmental detail and visibility, the Medium preset at 4K is the recommended compromise, as it keeps the minimum FPS above 60.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the combo delivers its highest frame rates. The Low preset averages 282 FPS, Medium averages 246 FPS (with a minimum of 209 and maximum of 283), High averages 224 FPS, and Ultra averages 157 FPS. The gap between Low and Ultra is 125 FPS, indicating significant scaling with settings. The Medium preset’s minimum of 209 FPS ensures that even in intense firefights, the frame rate stays well above 200 FPS, which is ideal for high-refresh-rate displays.

At 2560x1440, the performance drops but remains strong. Low averages 178 FPS, Medium averages 155 FPS (minimum 132, maximum 179), High averages 141 FPS, and Ultra averages 99 FPS. The Medium preset’s minimum of 132 FPS means that users with 144 Hz monitors will experience occasional dips below refresh rate, but the average is still high. The Ultra preset at 99 FPS is a significant step down from Medium, suggesting that the visual enhancements in Ultra are costly for this GPU.

At 3840x2160, the FPS figures become more modest. Low averages 93 FPS, Medium averages 81 FPS (minimum 69, maximum 93), High averages 74 FPS, and Ultra averages 52 FPS. The Medium preset’s maximum of 93 FPS matches the Low average, indicating that Medium is the highest setting that can consistently stay above 70 FPS. The Ultra preset’s 52 FPS average is below the 60 FPS threshold preferred for smooth gameplay, making it unsuitable for competitive play. The data shows a clear degradation curve: from 282 FPS at 1080p Low to 52 FPS at 4K Ultra, representing an 81% reduction in performance across the extreme settings.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT is built on the RDNA 2.0 architecture with a 7 nm process node from TSMC, featuring 17,200 million transistors on a 335 mm² die. It operates at a base clock of 2150 MHz and a boost clock of 2600 MHz, with a game clock of 2495 MHz. The GPU is equipped with 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, providing 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This memory configuration is crucial for Ready Or Not at 4K, where high-resolution textures and detailed environments demand substantial VRAM. The 12 GB capacity ensures that the game’s largest assets fit comfortably, avoiding texture swapping that could cause stutter.

The GPU’s compute capabilities include 2560 shading units, 160 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operation units, along with 40 ray tracing cores. The peak FP32 performance is 13.31 TFLOPS, which is moderate for a card in its class. In the benchmark database, the RX 6750 XT scores 26011 on average, placing it at the 71st percentile. Its nearest rivals are the AMD Radeon R9 M395X (25891, 0.5% lower), AMD FirePro W7100 (25856, 0.6% lower), and AMD FirePro D700 (25842, 0.7% lower), while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile scores 25740 (1.1% lower). This clustering indicates that the RX 6750 XT performs near the top of its immediate comparison group.

In Ready Or Not, the GPU’s role expands as resolution increases. At 1080p, the GPU is the primary bottleneck, as the CPU can feed it enough frames to exceed 280 FPS on Low settings. At 4K, the GPU’s pixel throughput becomes the limiting factor, with Ultra settings reducing performance to 52 FPS. The 432.0 GB/s memory bandwidth is sufficient for the game’s data flow, as evidenced by the smooth scaling from 1440p to 4K. The GPU’s 64 ROPs handle the rasterization load at 4K, but the 40 ray tracing cores are likely unused in this title, as Ready Or Not does not require ray-traced effects. Overall, the RX 6750 XT provides a strong foundation for 1440p gaming and acceptable 4K performance at medium settings, but it cannot sustain Ultra presets at 4K without dropping below 60 FPS.