Pc Building Simulator

Pc Building Simulator, a simulation title from 2019, presents an interesting case study for the Intel Core Ultra X7 368H and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 combination. The measured frame rates across resolutions and settings reveal a component pairing that behaves differently depending on the workload, shifting between GPU-bound and CPU-bound scenarios as the graphical load changes. This analysis breaks down the performance data, contextualizes the results against the broader benchmark database, and provides actionable settings guidance based strictly on the measured figures.

Resolution Scaling

The performance drop from 1080p to 4K is stark and clearly indicates a transition in system bottleneck. At 1080p with Low settings, the combo produces 237 FPS, but at 4K Low, that figure falls to 78 FPS — a reduction of 159 FPS, or roughly 67% lower. This dramatic scaling suggests that at lower resolutions, the system is not fully constrained by the GPU, allowing the CPU to push frame rates to very high levels. Conversely, at 4K, the GPU becomes the primary limiting factor, as the pixel throughput demands of 3840x2160 overwhelm the RTX 4060's capabilities.

The scaling behavior across the Medium preset is particularly telling. At 1440p Medium, the average FPS is 106, while at 4K Medium it drops to 55 FPS. This 51 FPS difference represents a 48% reduction in performance. The min FPS figures also illustrate this: 4K Medium shows a minimum of 47 FPS, while 1440p Medium shows a minimum of 90 FPS. The gap between these minimums is substantial, indicating that the GPU's frame pacing becomes more erratic and less stable as resolution increases. The data suggests that for a smooth experience at 4K, users will need to make significant compromises in visual quality, as even Medium settings only yield an average of 55 FPS.

Comparing 1440p to 1080p reveals a more moderate scaling pattern. At High settings, 1440p produces 75 FPS versus 119 FPS at 1080p — a 44 FPS difference, or about 37% lower performance. This is a more linear scaling that points to the GPU still being the primary constraint, but with enough headroom that the CPU can maintain adequate frame delivery. The Ultra preset follows a similar trend: 71 FPS at 1440p versus 113 FPS at 1080p, a 42 FPS drop. The consistency of this gap across High and Ultra settings at these resolutions reinforces that the RTX 4060's 8 GB VRAM and 128-bit memory interface are the decisive factors once pixel counts rise.

The 4K Ultra result of 37 FPS is the lowest measured average in the entire dataset. This is barely above the threshold for playability in a simulation game, and the data shows that the RTX 4060 simply does not have the raw throughput to handle 4K Ultra in this title. The scaling from 4K High (39 FPS) to 4K Ultra (37 FPS) is only a 2 FPS difference, which suggests that the GPU is so saturated at 4K that even the jump from High to Ultra settings has minimal additional impact on frame rate, though it would presumably add visual detail. This flatlining behavior is a classic sign of a hard GPU bottleneck at the highest resolution.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 is built on the Ada Lovelace architecture with a 5 nm process node from TSMC. It features 3072 shading units, 96 texture mapping units, and 48 raster output pipelines. The GPU operates at a base clock of 1830 MHz and boosts to 2460 MHz, with memory running at 2125 MHz (17 Gbps effective). The 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus provides 272.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which is a critical specification for understanding the 4K performance drop-off.

The measured FPS data aligns closely with the GPU's memory bandwidth limitations. At 4K, the demand for texture data and framebuffer access increases exponentially, and the 128-bit bus width becomes a severe constraint. The 272.0 GB/s bandwidth is insufficient to feed the shading units efficiently at 3840x2160, which explains why the 4K results hover between 37 and 78 FPS depending on settings. The GPU's FP32 performance of 15.11 TFLOPS is respectable for 1080p and 1440p, but the memory subsystem throttles its potential at higher resolutions.

The RTX 4060's transistor count of 18,900 million on a 159 mm² die results in a transistor density of 118.9M per mm². This high density allows for the inclusion of 24 RT cores and 96 tensor cores, which are relevant for future titles with ray tracing and DLSS support, though Pc Building Simulator's measured results do not specifically isolate these features. The GPU's pixel rate of 118.1 GPixel/s and texture rate of 236.2 GTexel/s provide context for why the 1440p results are more robust — the pixel fill rate is adequate for that resolution, but the 4K pixel count of 8.3 million per frame outstrips the pixel rate capabilities when combined with heavy shading loads.

The GPU's percentile ranking of 61 against all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 17639, places it in the mid-range tier. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon HD 7790 (avgScore 17666, deltaPct -0.2) and AMD Radeon 780M (avgScore 17588, deltaPct 0.3). This close grouping suggests that the RTX 4060's performance is tightly clustered with these competitors in synthetic benchmarks, yet the gaming results here show it can handle 1080p and 1440p comfortably while struggling at 4K. The 8 GB VRAM capacity is sufficient for this game's textures at 1080p and 1440p, but the 4K results imply that memory capacity or bandwidth begins to impede performance.

Settings Recommendations

For a target of 60 FPS or higher, the data provides clear guidance. At 1080p, all four settings presets achieve playable frame rates: Low yields 237 FPS, Medium yields 168 FPS, High yields 119 FPS, and even Ultra maintains 113 FPS. The Ultra preset at 1080p is the optimal choice for visual fidelity without sacrificing smoothness, as the 113 FPS average provides ample headroom above the 60 FPS threshold. The Medium preset at 1080p, with a min FPS of 143 and max of 193, offers a stable experience if users prefer higher frame rates over maximum detail.

Moving to 1440p, the recommendations become more nuanced. The Ultra preset produces 71 FPS, which is above the 60 FPS target and represents the best visual quality at this resolution. The High preset at 75 FPS is nearly identical in performance and might be preferable if the visual difference between High and Ultra is minimal. The Medium preset at 106 FPS with a min of 90 FPS is the safest choice for maintaining high frame rates, especially in simulation games where consistent frame pacing can affect gameplay feel. The Low preset at 150 FPS is unnecessary for this resolution, as the visual compromise is too severe for the marginal frame rate gain.

At 4K, the data strongly recommends against Ultra (37 FPS) or High (39 FPS) settings, as both fall well below the 60 FPS threshold and even struggle to maintain 40 FPS. The Medium preset at 55 FPS is borderline — it is close to 60 FPS but the min FPS of 47 suggests occasional dips that could be noticeable. The Low preset at 78 FPS is the only 4K option that provides a comfortable margin above 60 FPS, though it requires a significant reduction in visual quality. For users with 4K displays, the data suggests that Medium is the highest playable setting, and Low is recommended for those who prioritize frame rate stability over detail.

The best overall experience per the measured rows is the 1080p Ultra preset, which balances the 113 FPS average with the highest visual settings. For 1440p users, the Ultra preset at 71 FPS offers a similar balance, while 4K users should stick to Medium at 55 FPS or drop to Low for a guaranteed smooth experience.

How This Combo Ranks

The Intel Core Ultra X7 368H paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 ranks 1800 out of 3002 tested combos in Pc Building Simulator, placing it in the 40th percentile of all combinations. This ranking reflects the mid-range nature of both components — the CPU sits in the 87th percentile against all CPUs, while the GPU sits in the 61st percentile against all GPUs. The combination's rank is dragged down by the GPU's relative weakness compared to the CPU's strength, suggesting that this pairing is CPU-heavy for this particular game.

The CPU's nearest rivals provide context for its performance ceiling. The Intel Core 7 253PE has an average score of 40557, which is a -0.1% delta from the Ultra X7 368H's 40518 average. The Intel Core 5 223PE is similarly close at 40585 (-0.2% delta), while the AMD Ryzen 9 7940H at 40431 is 0.2% ahead, and the Intel Xeon 6507P at 40426 is also 0.2% ahead. This tight clustering indicates that the Ultra X7 368H's compute performance is essentially on par with these rivals, meaning any ranking differences in-game are likely due to other factors like memory bandwidth or integrated graphics.

The GPU's nearest rivals show a similar pattern. The AMD Radeon HD 7790 has an average score of 17666 (-0.2% delta), the AMD Radeon 780M scores 17588 (0.3% delta), the AMD Radeon Pro 560 scores 17551 (0.5% delta), and the AMD Radeon Pro 460 scores 17509 (0.7% delta). The RTX 4060's score of 17639 places it in the middle of this group, indicating that its raw compute is only marginally better than several older or integrated solutions. This explains the mid-pack ranking in the game, as the GPU does not have a commanding lead over its direct competitors.

The combo rank of 1800 out of 3002 suggests that nearly 1200 tested combinations perform better in this game. Given that the CPU is strong but the GPU is mid-range, the ranking implies that Pc Building Simulator is more sensitive to GPU performance than CPU performance at the resolutions and settings tested. The 4K results, which are the most demanding, likely pull the overall ranking down, as the RTX 4060's 4K performance is poor compared to higher-tier GPUs that could maintain 60+ FPS at that resolution.

CPU Role

The Intel Core Ultra X7 368H is a 16-core, 16-thread mobile processor based on the Panther Lake architecture, built on Intel's 3 nm process node. It has a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, with a TDP of just 25 W. The cache hierarchy includes 192 KB of L1 per core, 2.5 MB of L2 per core, and 18 MB of shared L3 cache. Memory support is LPDDR5X on a dual-channel bus, providing 153.6 GB/s of bandwidth.

In Pc Building Simulator, the CPU's role is most apparent at lower resolutions where the GPU is less stressed. The 1080p Low result of 237 FPS is a strong indicator that the CPU can feed frames at a very high rate when the GPU is not the bottleneck. The single-core performance, as measured by Cinebench R23 at 3984, is sufficient for the game's simulation logic, which typically runs on a single main thread. The multi-core score of 28221 in Cinebench R23 shows that the 16 cores provide ample parallel processing for any background tasks or multi-threaded game systems.

The CPU's boost clock of 5.00 GHz is crucial for the high frame rates seen at 1080p. The transition from 1080p Low (237 FPS) to 1440p Low (150 FPS) demonstrates that the CPU can maintain high frame delivery, but the GPU begins to limit at 1440p. The fact that 1080p Ultra (113 FPS) is very close to 1440p High (75 FPS) further suggests that the CPU is not the limiting factor at higher resolutions — the GPU's pixel throughput is. The CPU's 87th percentile ranking against all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 40518, confirms it is a strong performer, but this strength is underutilized in a game that relies more heavily on GPU rendering.

The CPU's 16 threads are likely sufficient for Pc Building Simulator, which is not a heavily multi-threaded title. The data shows that the game benefits more from high single-thread performance, as evidenced by the 237 FPS at 1080p Low. The L3 cache of 18 MB is adequate for the game's data sets, and the LPDDR5X memory bandwidth of 153.6 GB/s is more than enough to feed the CPU's cores without causing memory stalls. The integrated graphics, Arc B390, are not relevant here since the discrete RTX 4060 handles all rendering, but they do indicate the CPU's overall capability.

FAQ

Q: What is the best resolution to play Pc Building Simulator with this combo?

A: The data shows that 1080p provides the most comfortable frame rates across all settings, with Ultra averaging 113 FPS. At 1440p, Ultra averages 71 FPS, which is still playable, but 4K Ultra drops to 37 FPS, making it the least suitable resolution.

Q: Can this combo handle 4K gaming in Pc Building Simulator?

A: Yes, but with limitations. The 4K Medium preset averages 55 FPS with a min of 47 FPS, and 4K Low averages 78 FPS. The 4K High (39 FPS) and 4K Ultra (37 FPS) presets are below the 60 FPS threshold and are not recommended for smooth gameplay.

Q: How does the RTX 4060 compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The RTX 4060 has an average benchmark score of 17639, which is 0.2% behind the AMD Radeon HD 7790 (17666) and 0.3% ahead of the AMD Radeon 780M (17588). This indicates the GPU's performance is tightly clustered with these competitors.

Q: Is the CPU a bottleneck for this GPU in Pc Building Simulator?

A: At 1080p, the CPU is not a bottleneck, as evidenced by the 237 FPS at Low settings. However, at 1440p and 4K, the GPU becomes the limiting factor, and the CPU's performance headroom is not fully utilized, suggesting the pairing is well-balanced for this game.

Q: What is the difference in performance between 1080p and 1440p at High settings?

A: At 1080p High, the average FPS is 119, while at 1440p High, it is 75. This represents a 44 FPS drop, or approximately 37% lower performance, likely due to the increased pixel count straining the GPU's memory bandwidth.

Q: What is the combo's ranking among all tested combinations?

A: The Intel Core Ultra X7 368H and RTX 4060 combo ranks 1800 out of 3002 tested combinations in Pc Building Simulator, placing it in the lower half of all tested hardware pairings.

Measured FPS Breakdown

1920x1080 (1080p):

• Low: 237 FPS average
• Medium: 168 FPS average, 143 FPS min, 193 FPS max
• High: 119 FPS average
• Ultra: 113 FPS average

2560x1440 (1440p):

• Low: 150 FPS average
• Medium: 106 FPS average, 90 FPS min, 122 FPS max
• High: 75 FPS average
• Ultra: 71 FPS average

3840x2160 (4K):

• Low: 78 FPS average
• Medium: 55 FPS average, 47 FPS min, 64 FPS max
• High: 39 FPS average
• Ultra: 37 FPS average

The data shows a clear progression: as resolution increases, frame rates drop consistently across all settings. The Medium preset at each resolution provides the only min and max FPS measurements, offering insight into frame pacing. At 1080p Medium, the range from 143 to 193 FPS is wide, indicating variability but at a high enough level to be imperceptible. At 1440p Medium, the range narrows to 90-122 FPS, and at 4K Medium, it tightens further to 47-64 FPS, showing that the GPU becomes more consistently saturated as resolution rises.