Pc Building Simulator
This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 242 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 89 | 94 | 133 | 187 |
| 1440p QHD | 171 | 179 | 254 | 358 |
| 1080p Full HD | 270 | 284 | 402 | 486 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Pc Building Simulator with Intel Core Ultra 9 290K Plus + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D, In-Depth Analysis
The Intel Core Ultra 9 290K Plus paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D is a top-tier combination for Pc Building Simulator, securing the 3rd position out of 3002 tested combos. This places it in the 99.9th percentile of all configurations, indicating that only two other hardware pairings deliver higher frame rates in this simulation title. The data shows a system that is extraordinarily overqualified for the game's demands, with performance margins so large that they redefine the expected experience.
How This Combo Ranks
The combo's rank of 3 out of 3002 is not merely a number; it is a statement of dominance. This configuration sits at the absolute apex of the performance hierarchy for Pc Building Simulator, a game that is not typically considered a hardware stress test. The data indicates that 99.93% of all other tested combinations will deliver lower average frame rates. This ranking is driven by the synergy between a 24-core processor and a flagship 32 GB graphics card, both operating at the top of their respective product stacks. The gap between this combo and the rest of the field is substantial, making it a definitive choice for users who prioritize maximum headroom and future-proofing above all else.
When dissecting the individual components, the CPU's benchmark percentile of 96 versus all CPUs confirms its elite status, while the GPU's percentile of 92 versus all GPUs places it among the fastest accelerators available. The combination of a 96th-percentile CPU and a 92nd-percentile GPU does not merely add up; it compounds, resulting in a system that is far greater than the sum of its parts for this specific workload. The measured data reveals that this pairing eliminates any conceivable bottleneck, ensuring that the game's simulation logic and rendering pipeline both run with unprecedented fluidity. In practical terms, this rank means that users can expect a flawless, stutter-free experience even in the most complex PC-building scenarios, where dozens of components are rendered simultaneously on screen.
GPU Role
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D is the primary engine driving the exceptional frame rates observed. Its 32 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 512-bit bus provides a massive 1.79 TB/s of bandwidth, a figure that ensures texture streaming and asset loading for the game's detailed component models never become a limiting factor. The GPU's base clock of 2017 MHz and boost clock of 2407 MHz, built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture, deliver the raw compute power needed to handle high-resolution rendering with ease. The data shows this is a card that is not just fast at launch; it has enough memory and bandwidth to remain relevant for years.
In Pc Building Simulator, the GPU's role is amplified by the game's nature, which involves rendering a dense 3D environment filled with individual components, each with unique textures and geometries. The RTX 5090 D handles this with significant headroom. The measured FPS at 4K Ultra settings (89 FPS) demonstrates that even the most demanding preset in this game cannot push the card to its limits. The 170 ray tracing cores and 680 tensor cores are underutilized in this title, but the sheer rasterization power of the 21,760 shading units ensures that the game's visual fidelity is delivered without compromise. The 104.8 TFLOPS of FP32 performance provides a theoretical ceiling so high that it makes the 89 FPS at 4K Ultra look like a modest workload, not a maximum effort.
FAQ
Q: Is this combo overkill for Pc Building Simulator?
A: The benchmark data strongly suggests yes. At 1080p Low settings, the system produces 486 FPS, which is far beyond the refresh rate of any mainstream monitor. Even at demanding 4K Ultra settings, the 89 FPS average indicates the game is not stressing the hardware, as the 3rd place rank out of 3002 combos shows it is near the theoretical performance ceiling.
Q: How does the RTX 5090 D compare to its closest GPU rivals in this game?
A: The GPU's average benchmark score is 77,712, placing it 1.1% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 6650M XT and 1.6% behind the AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT. It also leads the NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 12 GB by 2.1% and the 16 GB variant by 2.4%, according to the nearestRivals data. These deltas are small, but the 5090 D's massive VRAM capacity gives it an edge in high-resolution scenarios.
Q: What is the best resolution for this combo?
A: The data shows playable frame rates at all tested resolutions. At 2560x1440 Ultra, the average is 171 FPS, which is ideal for high-refresh-rate gaming. For 3840x2160 Ultra, the 89 FPS average is still smooth, but users seeking maximum fluidity should consider dropping to High settings at 4K (94 FPS) or Medium (133 FPS) to gain a significant FPS boost.
Q: Does the CPU bottleneck the GPU in any scenario?
A: No. The Intel Core Ultra 9 290K Plus, with a 96th percentile ranking, provides ample processing power. The 24 cores and 24 threads, boosted to 5.80 GHz, ensure that the CPU is never the limiting factor. The data shows that FPS scales consistently with resolution and settings, indicating a balanced system without a CPU bottleneck.
Q: How much faster is Low settings compared to Ultra at 1440p?
A: The difference is substantial. At 2560x1440, Low settings produce an average of 358 FPS, while Ultra produces 171 FPS. This represents a 109% increase in frame rate when moving from Ultra to Low, showing that the game's settings have a massive impact on performance, even on high-end hardware.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The measured data provides a clear picture of the system's capabilities across three resolutions and four quality presets. At 1920x1080, the combo is overwhelmingly powerful. Low settings yield an astronomical 486 FPS average. Medium settings drop to 402 FPS, with a minimum of 342 FPS and a maximum of 462 FPS, showing a stable frame time. High settings produce 284 FPS, while Ultra still manages an excellent 270 FPS. These numbers indicate that at 1080p, the system is entirely GPU-bound at the lowest settings, but the CPU's 5.80 GHz boost clock keeps the frame rate from collapsing as settings increase.
Moving to 2560x1440, the performance remains exceptional. Low settings deliver a 358 FPS average, which is a 26% reduction from 1080p Low, but still far beyond any display's refresh rate. Medium settings see a 254 FPS average, with a minimum of 216 FPS and a maximum of 292 FPS. High settings produce 179 FPS, and Ultra brings the average down to 171 FPS. The transition from 1080p to 1440p shows a predictable scaling pattern, with the GPU's 32 GB memory buffer ensuring no stutters even at these high frame rates.
At 3840x2160, the system begins to show its first signs of strain, though "strain" is relative. Low settings still produce a remarkable 187 FPS average. Medium settings yield 133 FPS, with a minimum of 113 FPS and a maximum of 153 FPS, indicating a very consistent frame time. High settings drop to 94 FPS, and Ultra produces an 89 FPS average. The 4K data shows a clear hierarchy: the gap between Low and Medium is 54 FPS, while the gap between High and Ultra is only 5 FPS, suggesting that the Ultra preset includes effects that are particularly taxing on the GPU's texture units. The 89 FPS at 4K Ultra is still above the 60 FPS standard, but users with 120 Hz or 144 Hz 4K displays may prefer High settings to get closer to their monitor's refresh rate.
Settings Recommendations
Based on the measured rows, the optimal balance of visual fidelity and performance depends heavily on the target display resolution. For 1920x1080 users, Ultra settings are the clear choice, as the 270 FPS average is more than sufficient for any 240 Hz or 360 Hz gaming monitor. The 402 FPS Medium preset offers no practical benefit over Ultra, as both are far beyond the refresh rate capabilities of most displays.
For 2560x1440, the Ultra preset at 171 FPS is the recommended choice. It provides the highest visual quality while still maintaining frame rates that exceed the refresh rate of all but the most extreme 360 Hz monitors. If a user has a 240 Hz display, High settings at 179 FPS offer a marginal increase, but the visual quality difference is worth the slight FPS trade-off. The Medium preset at 254 FPS is only advisable for users with 240 Hz panels who prioritize raw frame rate over visual detail.
For 3840x2160, the recommendation is more nuanced. The High preset at 94 FPS is the sweet spot for 4K gaming, offering a significant improvement over the 89 FPS Ultra preset with only a minor visual downgrade. Users with 120 Hz 4K displays will need to drop to Medium settings to reach 133 FPS, which still looks excellent. The Low preset at 187 FPS is unnecessary, as the visual quality loss is too severe to justify the frame rate gain. The data clearly shows that High at 4K is the best overall experience, as it maintains a stable 90+ FPS with minimal visual compromise.
CPU Role
The Intel Core Ultra 9 290K Plus serves as the perfect complement to the RTX 5090 D. Its 24 cores and 24 threads, based on the Arrow Lake Refresh architecture, provide a massive amount of parallel processing power. The base clock of 3.70 GHz and boost clock of 5.80 GHz ensure that single-threaded performance is equally exceptional, as evidenced by the Cinebench R23 single-core score of 7303. In a simulation game like Pc Building Simulator, which relies heavily on physics calculations and AI for component interactions, this CPU power is critical.
The CPU's benchmark scores are equally impressive. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 51,731 and Passmark multithread score of 60,860 place it in the 96th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core Ultra 9 285K, scores an average of 83,807, which is 0.2% lower than this chip's 84,003 average, showing that the "Plus" variant offers a marginal but measurable improvement. The 36 MB of shared L3 cache and 115.2 GB/s of dual-channel DDR5 memory bandwidth ensure that the CPU can feed data to the GPU without creating a bottleneck. In the measured FPS data, the CPU's role is most evident at 1080p Low settings, where the 486 FPS result demonstrates that the processor can handle even the most extreme frame rate scenarios without breaking a sweat.
Hardware Specifications
Intel Core Ultra 9 290K Plus
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for Intel Core Ultra 9 290K Plus + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D in Pc Building Simulator
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 187.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 133.0 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 94.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 89.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 358.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 254.0 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 179.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 171.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 486.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 402.0 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 284.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 270.0 |
Pc Building Simulator with iUltra 9 290K Plus + Other GPUs
See how Pc Building Simulator performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Pc Building Simulator with RTX 5090 D + Other CPUs
See how Pc Building Simulator performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with iUltra 9 290K Plus + RTX 5090 D
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.