Pc Building Simulator

Pc Building Simulator is a simulation title that tasks players with assembling and troubleshooting PCs, and its performance profile is distinct from many action-oriented games. The benchmark data for the Intel Core Ultra 5 225 paired with the AMD Radeon RX 7700 shows a combination that is capable of high refresh rate play at mainstream resolutions, but which requires settings management at 4K. This analysis breaks down the measured results, the role of each component, and how to optimize the experience.

FAQ

Q: What is the overall rank of this CPU and GPU combination in Pc Building Simulator?

A: The combo ranks 1348 out of 3002 tested combinations, placing it in the upper-middle portion of the database.

Q: How does the Intel Core Ultra 5 225 compare to its closest rivals in average benchmark score?

A: The CPU has an average benchmark score of 36938. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 5 5600F, scores 36945, a delta of 0%. Other close rivals include the AMD Ryzen 5 5500X3D (37018, -0.2% delta) and the Intel Core i9-12900T (37112, -0.5% delta), indicating near-identical processing power.

Q: What is the best settings preset for 1080p gaming with this hardware?

A: The data shows a distinct scaling pattern. At 1920x1080, the Low preset achieves 282 FPS, Medium hits 200 FPS, High reaches 141 FPS, and Ultra drops to 134 FPS. The Medium preset offers a strong balance, still delivering a very high frame rate while likely providing better visual fidelity than Low.

Q: Can this GPU handle 4K resolution in this game?

A: Yes, but with compromises. At 3840x2160, the High preset yields 47 FPS, Medium gets 66 FPS, and Ultra drops to 44 FPS. Only the Low preset provides a comfortable margin above 60 FPS, hitting 93 FPS. For a smoother 4K experience, the Medium preset is the highest that stays within a playable range.

Q: How much VRAM does the AMD Radeon RX 7700 have and what is its memory bus width?

A: The GPU comes equipped with 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 624.1 GB/s.

Q: What are the core and thread counts for the Intel Core Ultra 5 225?

A: The CPU features 10 cores and 10 threads, with a base clock of 3.30 GHz and a boost clock of 4.90 GHz. It has a 20 MB shared L3 cache.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination of the Intel Core Ultra 5 225 and the AMD Radeon RX 7700 secures the 1348th position out of 3002 tested combos in Pc Building Simulator. This places it in the 55th percentile of all configurations tested, indicating that while it is not a top-tier performer, it sits comfortably above the median. This ranking is a reflection of the balanced nature of this pairing; the CPU is a strong mid-range part, and the GPU, while capable, is not at the extreme high end.

The ranking suggests that a significant number of other combinations, likely featuring more powerful CPUs or higher-end graphics cards, will achieve higher frame rates. However, the 1348th rank is not a mark of failure. In the context of Pc Building Simulator, which is not a particularly demanding title, this combo's position is more about headroom at high resolutions than about basic playability. The data indicates that the system is far more likely to be limited by the GPU at 4K, while at 1080p the CPU's strong single-thread performance can push frame rates to very high levels.

The delta between this combo and others is not available in the provided data, but the rank itself is the primary metric. The fact that the CPU's nearest rivals are all within a 0.5% performance delta suggests that any of these processors would likely yield a very similar combo ranking, making the GPU choice the more significant differentiator for this game's performance.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon RX 7700 is the primary driver of frame rates in Pc Building Simulator, especially as resolution increases. Its 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 624.1 GB/s, provides ample memory bandwidth for storing textures and geometry data at high resolutions. The GPU's 2560 shading units and 96 ROPs, with a boost clock of 2459 MHz and a game clock of 2041 MHz, handle the rendering workload.

The GPU's benchmark scores, while strong, are not exceptional. Its Passmark G3D score of 20974 places it in the 58th percentile of all GPUs, and its average benchmark score of 15852 is nearly identical to the AMD Radeon R9 370X (15862, -0.1% delta) and slightly lower than the AMD Radeon RX 9060 (16014, -1% delta). This shows that the RX 7700 is a solid performer but is not a high-end card; its strength lies in its large VRAM buffer and overall balance.

In Pc Building Simulator, the GPU's role is evident in the frame rate scaling. At 1080p, the system is likely CPU-bound, as the GPU can render frames quickly. However, at 1440p and 4K, the GPU becomes the limiting factor. The difference between 1080p and 1440p at High settings is a drop from 141 FPS to 89 FPS, a 37% decrease. The jump to 4K High results in 47 FPS, a further 47% drop. This indicates that the RX 7700's compute power is sufficient for 1080p but is stretched at higher resolutions.

Settings Recommendations

For the best experience, the settings preset should be chosen based on the target resolution and refresh rate. The measured data provides a clear picture of the performance trade-offs.

• For 1080p: The High preset (141 FPS) is excellent for high-refresh-rate monitors. If a player seeks maximum visual quality, Ultra (134 FPS) is still very playable. The Medium preset (200 FPS) is a strong choice for competitive play or for those who prioritize frame rate above all else. The Low preset (282 FPS) offers extreme frame rates but likely sacrifices significant visual detail.

• For 1440p: The High preset (89 FPS) is the recommended choice for a smooth experience on standard 60Hz monitors, and it is also adequate for 100Hz+ monitors. The Ultra preset (85 FPS) is also viable if visual fidelity is paramount, as the frame rate remains above 60 FPS. The Medium preset (126 FPS) provides a significant boost for higher refresh rate displays, while Low (178 FPS) is for those who want maximum smoothness.

• For 4K: The Medium preset (66 FPS) is the highest setting that maintains an average frame rate above 60 FPS and is the best balance of quality and performance. The High preset (47 FPS) and Ultra preset (44 FPS) are not ideal for smooth gameplay, as they drop below the 60 FPS threshold. The Low preset (93 FPS) is an option for players who want a very smooth 4K experience and are willing to accept lower graphical quality.

The Medium preset appears to be the most versatile, providing a solid frame rate at all three resolutions (200, 126, and 66 FPS). It offers a significant improvement over Low in visual quality while maintaining high performance, making it the best overall recommendation for this hardware.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data reveals a consistent scaling pattern across all resolutions and settings. The system demonstrates its capability to produce very high frame rates at lower resolutions and its limitations at 4K.

1920x1080:

• Low: 282 FPS average.
• Medium: 200 FPS average (170 min, 230 max).
• High: 141 FPS average.
• Ultra: 134 FPS average.

At 1080p, the system is clearly CPU-bound, as the differences between settings are moderate. The drop from Low to Ultra is 148 FPS (from 282 to 134), but even at Ultra, the frame rate is exceptionally high.

2560x1440:

• Low: 178 FPS average.
• Medium: 126 FPS average (107 min, 145 max).
• High: 89 FPS average.
• Ultra: 85 FPS average.

At 1440p, the GPU begins to take a more significant role. The frame rates are still high, but the gap between Low and Ultra narrows (93 FPS difference). The High and Ultra presets are close, suggesting that the GPU is becoming a limiting factor.

3840x2160:

• Low: 93 FPS average.
• Medium: 66 FPS average (56 min, 76 max).
• High: 47 FPS average.
• Ultra: 44 FPS average.

At 4K, the GPU is the dominant bottleneck. The frame rate drops significantly from Low to Medium (27 FPS), and then further to High and Ultra. The Medium preset's minimum FPS of 56 is close to the 60 FPS target, indicating that it is the most demanding playable setting.

The data shows that the step from Medium to High is the most punishing at 4K, with a 19 FPS drop. This suggests that the High preset introduces settings that are particularly demanding on the GPU's compute resources.

CPU Role

The Intel Core Ultra 5 225 plays a crucial role in ensuring high frame rates, particularly at 1080p. Its 10 cores and 10 threads, with a boost clock of 4.90 GHz, provide strong single-threaded performance, which is often critical for simulation games that may have complex logic. The CPU's Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3655 and multi-core score of 25891 indicate a well-rounded processor.

The CPU's performance is on par with its nearest rivals. Its average benchmark score of 36938 is virtually identical to the AMD Ryzen 5 5600F (36945, 0% delta) and only slightly lower than the AMD Ryzen 5 5500X3D (37018, -0.2% delta). This means that in Pc Building Simulator, the choice between these CPUs would likely result in nearly identical performance, with any differences being within the margin of error.

In this game, the CPU's role is most apparent at 1080p. The high frame rates (282 FPS on Low) suggest that the processor can feed the GPU with enough data to prevent it from becoming idle. The 3 nm process node and 20 MB of L3 cache help ensure low latency and efficient data access. However, as the resolution increases to 1440p and 4K, the GPU becomes the bottleneck, and the CPU's performance advantage becomes less relevant to the final frame rate.

The CPU's 65W TDP and dual-channel DDR5 memory support with 102.4 GB/s bandwidth are adequate for this task. The data shows that this processor is not a limiting factor at any resolution tested, as the frame rate scaling from 1080p to 4K is almost entirely dictated by the GPU's capabilities. This makes the Core Ultra 5 225 a solid match for the RX 7700, providing sufficient headroom for the GPU to operate at its full potential.