Pc Building Simulator

Pc Building Simulator, a simulation title from 2019, presents an interesting case study for the Intel Core Ultra 5 135H and AMD Radeon 890M combination. The measured data reveals a configuration that is heavily constrained by its integrated graphics, with performance scaling that clearly defines the boundaries of playability across common resolutions and quality presets. The benchmark results provide a clear picture of what this mobile-focused hardware pairing can deliver, and the analysis below breaks down those numbers to understand the system's strengths and limitations.

Resolution Scaling

The measured FPS data shows a stark and predictable drop as resolution increases, a pattern that directly points to the AMD Radeon 890M as the primary limiting component. At 1080p with Low settings, the system delivers 111 FPS, which is a very playable figure. However, moving to 1440p at the same Low settings cuts that score nearly in half to 70 FPS, a 37% reduction. Scaling further to 4K at Low settings yields just 37 FPS, a 67% drop from the 1080p baseline. This severe scaling behavior is a classic indicator of a GPU-bound scenario; the CPU is not the bottleneck, but rather the integrated graphics are struggling to fill the exponentially increasing pixel count.

The trend continues across all quality presets. At Medium settings, the average frame rate falls from 79 FPS at 1080p to 50 FPS at 1440p and then to 26 FPS at 4K. The gap between 1080p and 4K at Medium settings is a substantial 53 FPS. The High preset sees a similar trajectory, with 55 FPS at 1080p dropping to 35 FPS at 1440p and a very demanding 18 FPS at 4K. Even the most demanding Ultra preset, which only manages 53 FPS at 1080p, falls to 33 FPS at 1440p and a slideshow-like 17 FPS at 4K. The data suggests that this combination is not intended for high-resolution gaming; it is a setup that is best suited for 1080p, where the Radeon 890M can still keep up with the simulation's demands.

The scaling ratios are also informative. When comparing 1080p to 4K at Low settings, the performance drops by a factor of three (111 FPS to 37 FPS). This is a steeper drop than the theoretical increase in pixel count (four times), which suggests that other bottlenecks, such as memory bandwidth, are also coming into play at higher resolutions. The 890M's memory bandwidth is listed as "System Dependent," meaning it shares system memory, and the integrated nature of the GPU means it is competing with the CPU for the same memory resources. The data implies that while the GPU's raw compute power is the main constraint, the shared memory architecture exacerbates the performance penalty at higher resolutions.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured rows, the optimal experience for this hardware combination is clearly at 1080p with the Low preset, which yields an average of 111 FPS. This is the only configuration in the data that breaks the 100 FPS barrier. For players who prioritize a smooth, high-refresh-rate experience, this is the only viable option. The Medium preset at 1080p is a close second, offering 79 FPS, which is still very playable and represents a significant visual upgrade over Low without a catastrophic performance hit. The data suggests that the jump from Low to Medium costs 32 FPS, but the jump from Medium to High costs another 24 FPS, bringing the score down to 55 FPS.

The High and Ultra presets at 1080p, yielding 55 FPS and 53 FPS respectively, are nearly indistinguishable in performance. This is a curious data point, suggesting that the visual difference between these two settings is not translating into a significant additional load on the GPU, or that the game is hitting a different bottleneck. The average frame rates are within 2 FPS of each other, which is within the margin of error for most benchmarking. Given this, there is little reason to choose High over Ultra if the system can handle it, as the performance cost is negligible.

Looking at higher resolutions, the data strongly advises against them. At 1440p, even the Low preset only manages 70 FPS, which is playable but not ideal for fast-paced action. The Medium preset at 1440p drops to 50 FPS, which is acceptable for a simulation title, but the High and Ultra presets fall to 35 FPS and 33 FPS, respectively, which are on the edge of playability. At 4K, all presets fall below 40 FPS, making the game feel sluggish. The only scenario where a 4K resolution might be considered is with the Low preset, but at 37 FPS, it is a suboptimal experience. For a consistent and enjoyable session, the data makes a strong case for sticking with 1080p and adjusting the settings from there based on visual preference.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon 890M is the undisputed star and the main bottleneck in this configuration. Its benchmark scores and measured FPS data tell a consistent story. The GPU's average benchmark score is 9210, placing it in the 45th percentile of all GPUs. This is a mid-range result, and its nearest rivals in the data include the AMD Radeon Vega 8 (scoring 9221) and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 (scoring 9273). The 890M is within 1% of these scores, indicating that its raw compute performance is on par with older entry-level discrete graphics cards, but it is far from a high-end part.

The integrated nature of the 890M is a critical factor. It features 1024 shading units and 32 ROPs, with a boost clock of 2900 MHz. The memory is "System Shared," which means its bandwidth is "System Dependent." This is a major disadvantage in a game like Pc Building Simulator, which likely requires steady memory throughput for asset loading and scene management. The lack of dedicated VRAM means the GPU is fighting the CPU for memory access, which is a likely contributor to the severe frame rate drops at higher resolutions. The pixel rate of 92.80 GPixel/s and texture rate of 185.6 GTexel/s are respectable on paper, but they are not enough to overcome the memory bottleneck.

The GPU's DirectX 12 Ultimate support (12_2) is a plus, but the measured performance in Pc Building Simulator suggests that this API is not being leveraged to its full potential. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 590 is low, and the Passmark DirectX 12 score of 37 is also underwhelming. These synthetic benchmarks support the real-world gaming data, showing that the 890M is a capable iGPU for light tasks and esports titles, but it struggles with more demanding 3D applications. The data indicates that the 890M is the component that dictates the overall gaming experience, and its limitations are the primary reason why the system cannot handle higher resolutions or settings in this title.

How This Combo Ranks

In the specific context of Pc Building Simulator, this hardware combination is ranked near the bottom of the tested pool. The `comboRankInGame` data places it at 2822 out of 3002 combinations, putting it in the 6th percentile of performance. This is a low ranking, indicating that a vast majority of other tested CPU/GPU pairings deliver a better experience in this game. This is expected, given that the 890M is an integrated GPU, and most other combinations likely feature discrete graphics cards.

This low rank is not a reflection of the CPU's capabilities, but rather a consequence of the GPU's limitations. The Intel Core Ultra 5 135H is a competent processor, but its performance is largely irrelevant when the GPU is the bottleneck. The data shows that the system's overall ranking is dragged down by the integrated graphics. For the 890M to compete in this game, it would need to be paired with a very low-end CPU, which it is not; the Core Ultra 5 135H is a modern mobile processor that is more than capable of feeding the GPU. This creates an imbalanced system where the CPU is underutilized in gaming scenarios.

The implication of this ranking is that users of this hardware should have modest expectations. While the system can run Pc Building Simulator at playable frame rates on lower settings, it is not a high-performance gaming rig. The data suggests that this combo is more suited for productivity tasks or light gaming, where the CPU's strengths can be better utilized. The 2822nd rank out of 3002 is a clear signal that for this specific game, the hardware is at a significant disadvantage compared to the rest of the field.

CPU Role

The Intel Core Ultra 5 135H is a 14-core, 18-thread processor based on the Meteor Lake architecture. Its benchmark scores are solid, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 11875.5 and a single-core score of 1700. The CPU's average benchmark score is 29093, placing it in the 81st percentile of all CPUs. This is a strong result, and its nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 7 5800X (scoring 29123, a 0.1% difference) and the Intel Core i5-13500HX (scoring 29270, a 0.6% difference). The data shows that the 135H is a high-performing processor in synthetic tests.

However, in Pc Building Simulator, the CPU's role is diminished due to the GPU bottleneck. The game is a simulation, which often relies on single-threaded performance for game logic and physics. The 135H's single-core score of 1700 in Cinebench R23 is respectable, but the measured FPS data shows that the GPU is the limiting factor. For example, at 1080p with Low settings, the system hits 111 FPS, which is likely close to the CPU's limit for this game. But at 4K with Low settings, the FPS drops to 37, which is a pure GPU limitation, as the CPU is likely still capable of delivering more frames.

The CPU's cache hierarchy, with 18 MB of shared L3 cache, is ample for most games, and its 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth is decent. However, since the GPU shares this memory, the effective bandwidth for both components is reduced. This is a unique challenge for this combo. The data suggests that the CPU is not the problem; it has the horsepower to drive a more powerful GPU. The bottleneck is the 890M, and the CPU's performance is essentially wasted in this gaming context. The 81st percentile CPU ranking versus the 6th percentile combo ranking illustrates this mismatch perfectly.

FAQ

Q: Is this hardware combo capable of running Pc Building Simulator at 4K?

A: Technically yes, but the experience is poor. The measured data shows the highest 4K average is 37 FPS on Low settings. At Medium, High, and Ultra settings, the average frame rates fall to 26, 18, and 17 FPS, respectively, which are not smooth or enjoyable for gameplay.

Q: What is the best settings preset for this system?

A: The data indicates that 1080p with Low settings is the best choice, yielding an average of 111 FPS. If you prefer higher visual quality, 1080p with Medium settings is a solid alternative at 79 FPS, but the High and Ultra presets at 1080p offer only marginal improvements over Medium (55 and 53 FPS) and are not recommended.

Q: How does the AMD Radeon 890M compare to its closest rivals in terms of benchmark scores?

A: The 890M has an average benchmark score of 9210. Its nearest rivals are the AMD Radeon Vega 8 with a score of 9221 (0.1% difference), the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 with 9273 (0.7% difference), and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465 with 9294 (0.9% difference). This shows they are all in the same performance tier.

Q: Is the Intel Core Ultra 5 135H a bottleneck for this game?

A: No. The CPU's benchmark scores are strong (81st percentile), but the GPU is the primary limiting factor. The measured FPS drops heavily with resolution (e.g., 111 FPS at 1080p Low to 37 FPS at 4K Low), which is a classic sign of a GPU bottleneck, not a CPU one.

Q: What is the performance difference between the Low and Medium presets at 1080p?

A: The difference is 32 FPS, with Low averaging 111 FPS and Medium averaging 79 FPS. This is a significant drop for a visual upgrade, but it still leaves the game in a very playable state.

Q: Where does this CPU/GPU combo rank among all tested combinations in this game?

A: It ranks 2822 out of 3002 total combinations. This places it in the bottom 6% of tested systems, indicating that most other pairings will deliver a better experience in Pc Building Simulator.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The following table presents the exact measured average FPS values from the data, organized by resolution and settings preset. No minimum or maximum values were provided for the Low, High, and Ultra settings at any resolution, except for Medium.

| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS | Min FPS | Max FPS |

| :--------- | :------- | :------ | :------ | :------ |

| 3840x2160 | High | 18 | — | — |

| 3840x2160 | Low | 37 | — | — |

| 3840x2160 | Medium | 26 | 22 | 30 |

| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 17 | — | — |

| 2560x1440 | High | 35 | — | — |

| 2560x1440 | Low | 70 | — | — |

| 2560x1440 | Medium | 50 | 42 | 57 |

| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 33 | — | — |

| 1920x1080 | High | 55 | — | — |

| 1920x1080 | Low | 111 | — | — |

| 1920x1080 | Medium | 79 | 67 | 90 |

| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 53 | — | — |