Pc Building Simulator

Pc Building Simulator, a simulation title from 2019, presents an interesting case study for the Intel Core i7-12700K and AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT pairing. The benchmark data reveals a configuration that is heavily skewed toward CPU performance at lower resolutions, with the GPU becoming the definitive bottleneck as resolution increases. Analyzing the measured frames per second (FPS) across settings provides a clear picture of where this combo excels and where it reaches its limits.

CPU Role — cores, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The Intel Core i7-12700K is a 12-core, 20-thread processor based on the Alder Lake architecture, built on Intel's 10 nm process node. It operates with a base clock of 3.60 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. This processor is a powerhouse in synthetic benchmarks, holding an 84th percentile ranking against all CPUs. Its average benchmark score of 35287 places it in a tight cluster with its nearest rivals, including the Intel Core i5-13600T, which scores 35305 with a deltaPct of -0.1, and the Intel Core i7-12700KF, which scores 35365 with a deltaPct of -0.2. The data suggests the i7-12700K is virtually neck-and-neck with these alternatives in raw compute potential.

For a simulation game like Pc Building Simulator, the CPU's role is often pivotal for game logic, physics calculations, and overall system responsiveness. The benchmark results strongly indicate that the i7-12700K is more than capable of handling these tasks. At 1080p resolution, the frame rates are exceptionally high, reaching up to 283 FPS on Low settings and 141 FPS on High settings. These numbers suggest that the CPU is not the limiting factor at this resolution; it has ample headroom to feed the GPU with data. The processor's strong multi-threaded performance, evidenced by a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 19784 and a Geekbench multicore score of 15790, likely contributes to this ability to maintain high frame rates without bottlenecking.

The fact that the FPS drops significantly when moving from 1080p to 1440p and then to 4K, even at the same settings, points to a shift in the bottleneck. The CPU's performance is sufficient to maintain high frame rates, but as the resolution increases, the demand on the GPU grows, and the processor's advantage becomes less relevant. The data implies that in this specific game, the i7-12700K is a high-performance component that provides a strong foundation, but its full potential is only visible when the GPU can keep up.

GPU Role — VRAM, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT is a RDNA 2.0 architecture GPU with 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, providing a memory bandwidth of 432.0 GB/s. It has a base clock of 2150 MHz and a boost clock of 2600 MHz. This GPU holds a 71st percentile ranking against all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 26011. Its nearest rivals in the synthetic benchmark database include the AMD Radeon R9 M395X (score 25891, deltaPct 0.5) and the AMD FirePro W7100 (score 25856, deltaPct 0.6), indicating it sits in a competitive tier of graphics hardware.

In Pc Building Simulator, the GPU's role becomes increasingly critical as the resolution and graphical settings are raised. The measured FPS data shows a clear correlation. At 1080p High settings, the combo achieves 141 FPS, but at 4K High settings, this drops to 47 FPS. This 67% reduction in performance highlights the GPU's struggle to manage the increased pixel count and shading demands. The RX 6750 XT's 12 GB of VRAM is a significant asset, likely preventing memory-related stutters or texture pop-in at higher resolutions, but the raw compute power of the GPU is the limiting factor.

The GPU's clock speeds and memory bandwidth are adequate for 1080p and 1440p gaming, where it can deliver smooth, high-refresh-rate experiences. However, the data shows a steep performance cliff at 4K. The 4K Ultra setting yields only 44 FPS, which is below the threshold for a consistently smooth experience. This suggests that while the RX 6750 XT is a capable mid-to-high-end card for mainstream resolutions, it is not designed for maxing out modern titles at 4K. The benchmark results indicate that the GPU is the component that holds this combo back from achieving high frame rates at the most demanding settings.

Resolution Scaling — how FPS drops from 1080p to 4K and what it says about the limiting component

The FPS scaling across resolutions is the most telling aspect of this dataset. At 1080p Low settings, the combo produces 283 FPS. Moving to 1440p Low, this drops to 178 FPS, a 37% decrease. At 4K Low, the frame rate plummets to 93 FPS, a 67% decrease from the 1080p baseline. This pattern is consistent across all settings. For High settings, the progression is 141 FPS (1080p) → 89 FPS (1440p) → 47 FPS (4K). The percentage drops are steep and consistent, indicating that the GPU is the primary bottleneck as resolution increases.

This scaling behavior is classic for a system where the CPU is over-provisioned relative to the GPU. At 1080p, the CPU can prepare frames faster than the GPU can render them, leading to high FPS. As the resolution increases, the GPU's rendering time per frame grows, and it becomes the constraining factor. The CPU's ample headroom is no longer utilized, and the frame rate is dictated entirely by the GPU's fill rate and shader performance. The data strongly suggests that for this game, the RX 6750 XT is the limiting component at 1440p and especially at 4K, while the i7-12700K provides more than enough processing power.

The frame time data at Medium settings, where min and max FPS are available, reinforces this. At 1080p Medium, the average is 200 FPS with a min of 170 and max of 230. At 1440p Medium, the average is 126 FPS with a min of 107 and max of 145. At 4K Medium, the average is 66 FPS with a min of 56 and max of 76. The absolute spread of frame times remains relatively consistent, but the overall level drops, which is another indicator of a GPU-bound scenario at higher resolutions. The system is not exhibiting wild frame time spikes, but rather a smooth, predictable decline in performance, which points to a stable but ultimately constrained GPU.

Measured FPS Breakdown — resolution by resolution, settings by settings, exact numbers

The dataset provides a comprehensive view of the combo's performance. At 1920x1080, the results are excellent across the board. Low settings deliver an average of 283 FPS, Medium settings produce 200 FPS (min 170, max 230), High settings hit 141 FPS, and Ultra settings achieve 135 FPS. All of these are well above the 60 FPS threshold, making 1080p a very smooth experience for any refresh rate monitor.

Moving to 2560x1440, the performance remains strong but shows the GPU's increasing workload. Low settings yield 178 FPS, which is still very high. Medium settings drop to 126 FPS (min 107, max 145), High settings fall to 89 FPS, and Ultra settings settle at 85 FPS. The step from High to Ultra at this resolution is small, a difference of only 4 FPS, suggesting that the Ultra preset is not significantly more demanding than High in this title, or that the GPU is nearing a performance ceiling.

At 3840x2160, the frame rates become the primary concern. Low settings are playable with 93 FPS, but Medium settings drop to 66 FPS (min 56, max 76), which is just above the 60 FPS target. High settings fall to 47 FPS, and Ultra settings are the lowest at 44 FPS. These numbers indicate that 4K gaming with this combo is only viable at Low or Medium settings for a smooth experience. The data shows a clear pattern: the combo is a 1080p and 1440p champion, but at 4K, the GPU becomes the limiting factor, and the user must make significant compromises in graphical fidelity to maintain playable frame rates.

How This Combo Ranks — use comboRankInGame vs other tested combos

In the specific context of Pc Building Simulator, this hardware combination is ranked 1699 out of 3723 tested combos. This places it in the 54th percentile of all tested systems for this game. This is a middle-of-the-pack ranking, which is interesting given the high synthetic benchmark scores of both components. The discrepancy suggests that the game itself may not be heavily optimized for high-end hardware, or that many other tested combos feature more powerful GPUs that are better suited for the game's demands at higher resolutions.

The ranking implies that while this combo is capable, it is not among the top performers for this specific title. Given the CPU's 84th percentile and the GPU's 71st percentile rankings in general, one might expect a higher placement. However, the game's simulation nature might not fully utilize the i7-12700K's multi-threading capabilities, and the RX 6750 XT's performance at 4K is a bottleneck. The combo's rank of 1699 suggests that a significant number of other tested configurations, likely with more powerful GPUs, achieve higher frame rates in this game. The data indicates that this pairing is solid for mainstream gaming but is outclassed by combos with higher-end graphics cards, particularly at higher resolutions.

Settings Recommendations — which preset gives the best experience per the measured rows

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings depend entirely on the target resolution. For 1920x1080, all settings are viable. The Ultra preset at 135 FPS is an excellent choice for users with high refresh rate monitors, as it provides a massive performance buffer. High settings at 141 FPS are nearly identical in performance and might be preferred by users who want to minimize any potential for frame drops.

For 2560x1440, the High preset at 89 FPS is the recommended balance between visual quality and performance. It is well above the 60 FPS threshold and offers a significant improvement in visual fidelity over Medium (126 FPS) without the steep performance cost of Ultra (85 FPS). The small 4 FPS difference between High and Ultra suggests that High is the more efficient choice, as Ultra provides almost no measurable benefit for its marginal performance hit.

For 3840x2160, the Medium preset at 66 FPS is the only recommended option for a smooth experience. Low settings at 93 FPS would also work but have a significant visual quality penalty. High and Ultra settings, at 47 FPS and 44 FPS respectively, are below the 60 FPS threshold and will likely result in a less responsive and less fluid experience. Therefore, the data clearly points to Medium as the best setting for 4K, providing a playable frame rate while retaining a reasonable level of graphical detail.

FAQ

Q: Can this combo handle 4K gaming in Pc Building Simulator?

A: Yes, but only with compromises. The measured data shows that at 3840x2160, the Medium preset achieves an average of 66 FPS, which is just above the 60 FPS target. High and Ultra presets drop to 47 FPS and 44 FPS respectively, which are below the smoothness threshold.

Q: What is the best resolution for this hardware combination?

A: The data indicates that 2560x1440 is the sweet spot. At this resolution, the High preset delivers 89 FPS and Ultra delivers 85 FPS, both of which are very smooth. 1080p offers higher frame rates, but 1440p provides a significant visual upgrade without a major performance penalty.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU the limiting factor in this system?

A: The GPU is the limiting factor at higher resolutions. At 1080p, the frame rates are very high, indicating the CPU has headroom. However, the FPS drops significantly as resolution increases to 1440p and 4K, which is a classic sign of a GPU bottleneck. The CPU's performance is sufficient, but the RX 6750 XT struggles with the increased pixel workload.

Q: How does this combo compare to other tested configurations?

A: This combo is ranked 1699 out of 3723 tested combos for Pc Building Simulator. This places it in the middle of the pack, indicating that while it is a capable system, many other configurations with more powerful GPUs achieve higher performance in this specific game.

Q: What settings should I use for a 144Hz monitor at 1440p?

A: The data shows that at 2560x1440, the High preset averages 89 FPS and the Medium preset averages 126 FPS. To get closer to 144 FPS, the Medium preset is the more appropriate choice, as it provides a higher frame rate, but it will not fully saturate a 144Hz display.

Q: Is the 12 GB of VRAM on the RX 6750 XT sufficient?

A: Based on the FPS data, there is no indication that VRAM is a limiting factor. The performance drops are consistent with a GPU compute bottleneck rather than memory capacity issues. The 12 GB capacity appears sufficient for the textures and assets used in Pc Building Simulator at the tested settings.