Pc Building Simulator

Pc Building Simulator is a simulation title that is far more forgiving on hardware than most modern games, and the combination of the Intel Core i5-9400 with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER demonstrates this clearly. In the benchmark database, this pairing ranks 539th out of 1769 tested combos, placing it in the top 30% of all systems tested for this specific title. The data indicates that this combo is heavily GPU-bound at higher resolutions, but the CPU provides a sufficient foundation to keep frame rates exceptionally high even at 1080p. The measured results show a system that is overkill for the game's demands, delivering playable frame rates at every tested setting and resolution.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo's rank of 539 out of 1769 is a strong indicator of its performance ceiling in Pc Building Simulator. While it does not crack the top 500, it sits comfortably in the upper third of all results, which is a significant achievement given the game's age and the high-end nature of the GPU. The data suggests that the primary limiting factor for this combo's rank is not the hardware's absolute power but the game's own engine and thread utilization. The RTX 4070 SUPER's raw performance is immense, but the simulation's workload does not scale linearly with GPU power beyond a certain point.

Benchmark results indicate that the GPU is the dominant component in this pairing, as the RTX 4070 SUPER scores in the 84th percentile of all GPUs. This high percentile ranking means that most of the performance variance in this combo comes from the CPU's ability to feed the GPU. The CPU's 50th percentile rank versus all CPUs is a stark contrast, showing that the i5-9400 is a mid-range processor by today's standards. However, in this game, the CPU's lower relative performance does not cripple the system; it merely prevents the GPU from reaching its absolute maximum potential in lower-resolution scenarios. The combination of a top-tier GPU with a mid-tier CPU results in a system that ranks highly but leaves some performance on the table at 1080p.

CPU Role

The Intel Core i5-9400 is a 6-core, 6-thread processor based on the Coffee Lake architecture, with a base clock of 2.90 GHz and a boost clock of 4.10 GHz. It features a shared 9 MB L3 cache and supports dual-channel DDR4 memory with a bandwidth of 42.7 GB/s. In Pc Building Simulator, these specifications are more than adequate, as the game's simulation logic does not heavily tax multi-core processors. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 7969 and single-core score of 1125 show a processor that is capable but not exceptional, especially when compared to modern alternatives.

The CPU's role in this combo becomes clear when examining the frame rates. At 1080p with Low settings, the system hits 246.5 FPS, which is a very high number that suggests the CPU is still able to keep up with the GPU's output. However, the delta between the i5-9400 and its nearest rivals is minimal; the Intel Core i3-10305 scores a 0.2% higher average benchmark score, while the Intel Core i7-8809G is 0.6% lower. This indicates that the i5-9400 is not a bottleneck in a conventional sense, but rather a component that provides a stable, mid-range foundation. The CPU's 6 threads are sufficient for this title, and the data shows that spending more on a higher-core-count CPU would yield diminishing returns for Pc Building Simulator specifically.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER is the clear star of this combination. Built on the Ada Lovelace architecture and a 5 nm process, it features 7168 shading units and a boost clock of 2475 MHz. Its memory subsystem includes 12 GB of GDDR6X on a 192-bit bus, delivering a bandwidth of 504.2 GB/s. These specifications place the GPU in the 84th percentile of all GPUs, and its average benchmark score of 42576 is nearly double that of the CPU's average score. The GPU's Passmark G3D score of 29995 further underscores its dominance.

The GPU's performance in Pc Building Simulator is nothing short of exceptional. At 4K with High settings, it manages 68.2 FPS, which is a playable frame rate for a simulation title. The data shows that the GPU's power is the primary driver of performance at higher resolutions, as the frame rate scales almost directly with the GPU's workload. The RTX 4070 SUPER's nearest rival, the NVIDIA RTX A6000, scores just 0.2% higher on average, while the AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE is 0.3% higher. This tight grouping suggests that the RTX 4070 SUPER is at the top of its class, and its performance in this game is a direct reflection of its compute and memory capabilities. The GPU's 56 RT cores and 224 tensor cores do not significantly impact this simulation, but its raw FP32 throughput of 35.48 TFLOPS ensures that even the most complex simulation renders are handled with ease.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data reveals a clear performance hierarchy across resolutions and settings. At 1920x1080, the system is exceptionally fast, with Low settings producing 246.5 FPS and High settings hitting 188.6 FPS. The Ultra preset at 1080p yields 182.8 FPS, which is only slightly lower than High, indicating that the GPU is not stressed at this resolution. Moving to 2560x1440, the frame rates remain high but show a more pronounced drop. Low settings produce 208.2 FPS, while High settings drop to 130.8 FPS. The Ultra preset at 1440p delivers 120.3 FPS, which is still well above the 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay.

At 3840x2160, the GPU's workload becomes the defining factor. Low settings produce 132.8 FPS, which is a remarkable result for 4K. Medium settings drop to 95.4 FPS, and High settings fall to 68.2 FPS. The Ultra preset at 4K yields 66.2 FPS, which is still playable but shows the game's engine starting to strain under the GPU's full load. The data shows a consistent pattern: the RTX 4070 SUPER is capable of handling this game at maximum settings even at 4K, but the frame rate difference between Low and Ultra at 4K is a substantial 66.6 FPS, highlighting the GPU's sensitivity to settings changes at higher resolutions.

Resolution Scaling

The resolution scaling behavior is a textbook example of a GPU-bound system. From 1080p to 1440p, the frame rate drops by approximately 15-20% across most settings, which is a modest decline that indicates the GPU is still the primary bottleneck. For instance, at High settings, the system drops from 188.6 FPS at 1080p to 130.8 FPS at 1440p, a reduction of 57.8 FPS or about 30%. This is a larger drop than expected, but it is still manageable.

The scaling from 1440p to 4K is far more aggressive. At High settings, the frame rate drops from 130.8 FPS at 1440p to 68.2 FPS at 4K, a reduction of 62.6 FPS or nearly 48%. This steep decline is a clear sign that the GPU is being pushed to its limits at 4K, and the CPU's role becomes negligible. The data reveals that the limiting component at 1080p and 1440p is the GPU, but the CPU's 6 cores and 6 threads are still sufficient to avoid becoming a bottleneck. At 4K, the GPU is fully saturated, and the i5-9400's lower performance has no impact on the results. The resolution scaling suggests that users seeking the highest frame rates should stick to 1440p, while 4K is viable for a more cinematic experience.

FAQ

Q: Is the Intel Core i5-9400 a bottleneck for the RTX 4070 SUPER in this game?

A: The data shows that at 1080p and 1440p, the CPU is not a bottleneck, as frame rates remain high. At 4K, the GPU is the limiting factor, and the CPU's performance has no measurable impact on the results.

Q: What is the best resolution for this combo in Pc Building Simulator?

A: Based on the measured FPS, 2560x1440 offers the best balance of visual quality and performance, with High settings producing 130.8 FPS and Ultra settings at 120.3 FPS.

Q: Can this system handle 4K gaming?

A: Yes, the RTX 4070 SUPER can handle 4K, with High settings producing 68.2 FPS and Low settings hitting 132.8 FPS. Ultra settings at 4K are still playable at 66.2 FPS.

Q: How does the RTX 4070 SUPER compare to its nearest rivals in this game?

A: The RTX 4070 SUPER scores 0.2% lower than the NVIDIA RTX A6000 and 0.3% lower than the AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE, making it competitive with the top GPUs in its class.

Q: Is the CPU's 6-thread configuration sufficient for this simulation game?

A: Yes, the i5-9400's 6 threads are sufficient, as the game does not heavily utilize multi-core processing. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 7969 is adequate for this title.

Q: What is the frame rate difference between Low and Ultra settings at 1080p?

A: At 1080p, Low settings produce 246.5 FPS, while Ultra settings produce 182.8 FPS, a difference of 63.7 FPS that shows the GPU's headroom even at the highest settings.

Settings Recommendations

The measured data provides clear guidance for optimizing the experience. For users with a 1080p monitor, the Ultra preset is the obvious choice, as it delivers 182.8 FPS and provides the best visual fidelity without any compromise in smoothness. The High preset offers a marginal improvement to 188.6 FPS, but the visual difference is unlikely to justify the change. At 1440p, the Ultra preset at 120.3 FPS is the recommended choice, as it offers a significant visual upgrade over High with only a 10.5 FPS penalty. This frame rate is well above the 60 FPS threshold and provides a fluid experience.

For 4K users, the decision is more nuanced. The High preset at 68.2 FPS is the sweet spot, offering a good balance of visual quality and performance. The Ultra preset at 66.2 FPS is also viable, but the 2.0 FPS difference is negligible, so users should choose based on personal preference. The Medium preset at 95.4 FPS is a strong alternative for those who prioritize frame rate over fidelity, as it provides a substantial boost over High. The Low preset at 132.8 FPS is only recommended for competitive play, which is unlikely in a simulation title. Overall, the data suggests that the Ultra preset is the best experience at 1080p and 1440p, while High or Medium is optimal for 4K.