Pc Building Simulator

Pc Building Simulator is a simulation title that tasks players with assembling and configuring PCs, and the measured frame rates for the AMD Ryzen 9 5900X paired with the AMD Radeon RX 7700 provide a clear picture of its capabilities. The data shows a combo that is highly capable at mainstream resolutions, with performance scaling predictably as graphical load increases.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination of the AMD Ryzen 9 5900X and the AMD Radeon RX 7700 achieves a rank of 1348 out of 3002 tested combos in Pc Building Simulator. This places the pairing in the middle-to-upper tier of all tested systems, indicating that it is a balanced configuration that handles the game’s demands without being at the very top of the performance hierarchy.

This ranking is a product of both components' individual standings. The Ryzen 9 5900X sits at the 87th percentile among all CPUs, a strong position that reflects its high multi-threaded capability. In contrast, the RX 7700 is at the 58th percentile among all GPUs, which is a more modest placement. The game’s relatively low graphical intensity means the CPU’s strength helps boost the overall combo ranking, but the GPU’s middle-tier status prevents the pairing from breaking into the top tier of performers.

The CPU’s nearest rivals in the database include the Intel Core Ultra 7 366H, which scores 0.3% higher, and the Intel Core Ultra 7 356H, which is 0.4% higher. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 is also 0.4% higher, while the Intel Core i7-14650HX scores 0.5% lower. These are extremely tight margins, showing that the Ryzen 9 5900X’s processing power is squarely in a competitive band where minor architectural differences decide the leader. For the GPU, the nearest rivals are the AMD Radeon R9 370X, which scores 0.1% lower, and the AMD Radeon RX 9060, which is 1% higher. The AMD Radeon Pro W5500 is 1.1% lower, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is 1.7% higher. These small deltas indicate that the RX 7700’s raw graphics score is closely matched by several other cards, making its performance in this simulation title more dependent on driver and game optimization than on raw hardware advantages.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon RX 7700 is built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture and features 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a memory bandwidth of 624.1 GB/s. This large memory pool is a significant asset for a simulation game like Pc Building Simulator, which can involve managing multiple textures and detailed system models. The card’s boost clock is rated at 2459 MHz, with a game clock of 2041 MHz and a base clock of 1900 MHz, giving it a solid frequency headroom for sustained loads.

In the context of this game’s benchmark results, the GPU’s role becomes clear when examining the frame rates. At 1080p with Low settings, the combo achieves 282 FPS, which is a very high number that indicates the RX 7700 is not a bottleneck at that resolution. However, the GPU’s 58th percentile ranking among all GPUs suggests that while it is competent, it is not a top-tier performer. Its nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti, scores 1.7% higher in average benchmark scores, which is a modest but noticeable gap. The RX 7700’s 25.18 TFLOPS of FP32 compute power and 40 ray tracing cores are more than sufficient for this title, which does not appear to leverage advanced ray tracing effects heavily based on the measured FPS remaining high even at Ultra settings.

The memory clock of 2438 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective) and the 96 ROPs ensure that pixel fill rates are high, which is beneficial for rendering the detailed 2D and 3D elements in the game’s interface and simulation environments. The card’s 2560 shading units and 160 TMUs provide ample texture processing capability, which aligns with the game’s need to render many small components and text labels accurately.

Resolution Scaling

The measured FPS data shows a clear and predictable scaling pattern across resolutions. At 1080p with Low settings, the combo produces 282 FPS. Moving to 1440p Low drops this to 178 FPS, a reduction of 104 FPS or roughly 37%. At 4K Low, the average FPS is 93, which is another significant drop of 85 FPS from the 1440p figure, representing a 48% decrease. This scaling is typical for a game that becomes more GPU-bound as resolution increases.

The pattern is similar at Medium settings. The 1080p Medium result is 200 FPS, which falls to 126 FPS at 1440p Medium (a 74 FPS drop) and then to 66 FPS at 4K Medium (a 60 FPS drop). The percentage declines are 37% and 48% respectively, which are almost identical to the Low settings scaling. This consistency suggests that the game’s engine scales resolution and settings in a linear fashion, with the GPU being the primary limiting factor at higher resolutions.

At High settings, the 1080p result is 141 FPS, dropping to 89 FPS at 1440p (a 37% decrease) and then to 47 FPS at 4K (a 47% decrease). The Ultra settings show the same trend: 134 FPS at 1080p, 85 FPS at 1440p (a 37% drop), and 44 FPS at 4K (a 48% drop). The uniformity of these percentage drops across all settings presets is notable. It indicates that the transition from 1080p to 1440p consistently costs about 37% of the frame rate, and the transition from 1440p to 4K costs about 48%. This is a strong indicator that the RX 7700’s GPU resources are the dominant factor in determining performance at each resolution, as the CPU’s influence remains constant while the GPU’s workload increases with pixel count.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured data, the best experience balances visual fidelity with frame rate smoothness. At 1080p, the Ultra preset delivers 134 FPS, which is well above the threshold for smooth gameplay on high refresh rate monitors. The High preset at 141 FPS is only slightly faster, so the Ultra preset is the clear recommendation for 1080p users who want the best visuals without sacrificing playability.

At 1440p, the Ultra preset yields 85 FPS, which is still a very playable frame rate for a simulation game. The High preset at 89 FPS offers a marginal improvement of 4 FPS, which is unlikely to be noticeable in practice. Therefore, the Ultra preset remains the recommended choice at 1440p, as it provides the highest graphical quality while maintaining an average frame rate that is comfortably above 60 FPS.

For 4K resolution, the situation changes. The Ultra preset drops to 44 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS target that many players consider ideal. The High preset at 47 FPS is also below this threshold. The Medium preset, however, achieves 66 FPS, which is a more acceptable level for 4K gameplay. This makes the Medium preset the recommended choice for 4K, as it is the highest settings level that maintains an average frame rate above 60 FPS. The Low preset at 93 FPS is also viable, but the Medium preset offers a substantial visual improvement over Low while still providing a smooth experience.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The data provides exact frame rates for each resolution and settings combination. At 1920x1080, the Low preset averages 282 FPS, the Medium preset averages 200 FPS with a minimum of 170 FPS and a maximum of 230 FPS, the High preset averages 141 FPS, and the Ultra preset averages 134 FPS. This shows a clear hierarchy where each step up in settings reduces performance by a significant margin, with the largest single drop occurring between Low and Medium (82 FPS).

At 2560x1440, the Low preset averages 178 FPS. The Medium preset averages 126 FPS, with a minimum of 107 FPS and a maximum of 145 FPS. The High preset averages 89 FPS, and the Ultra preset averages 85 FPS. The gap between Low and Medium is 52 FPS, which is proportionally similar to the 1080p data. The difference between High and Ultra is only 4 FPS, indicating that the Ultra preset’s additional graphical effects have a minimal performance cost at this resolution.

At 3840x2160, the Low preset averages 93 FPS. The Medium preset averages 66 FPS, with a minimum of 56 FPS and a maximum of 76 FPS. The High preset averages 47 FPS, and the Ultra preset averages 44 FPS. The margin between Medium and High is 19 FPS, which is a substantial drop that pushes the frame rate below the 60 FPS threshold. The difference between High and Ultra is just 3 FPS, showing that the game’s Ultra settings do not heavily tax the GPU at 4K beyond what High already demands.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 9 5900X is a 12-core, 24-thread processor based on the Zen 3 architecture, with a base clock of 3.70 GHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz. It has a large 64 MB L3 cache and supports DDR4 memory with a bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s. This configuration provides substantial multi-threaded performance, which is evident in its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 16262 and its Geekbench multi-core score of 14118.

In Pc Building Simulator, the CPU’s role is significant because the game simulates many concurrent processes and system states. The 12 cores and 24 threads ensure that the game’s logic, which may include simulating multiple hardware components and their interactions, runs without becoming a bottleneck. This is supported by the fact that at 1080p Low settings, the combo achieves 282 FPS, a very high frame rate that suggests the CPU is feeding the GPU adequately. The CPU’s 87th percentile ranking among all CPUs, and its close rivalry with the Intel Core Ultra 7 366H (0.3% higher) and Intel Core i7-14650HX (0.5% lower), further confirms that it is a high-end processor capable of handling the game’s demands.

However, the CPU’s influence wanes as resolution increases. The consistent 37% and 48% frame rate drops when moving from 1080p to 1440p and from 1440p to 4K, respectively, indicate that the GPU becomes the limiting factor at higher resolutions. The CPU’s performance is likely sufficient to maintain high frame rates even at 4K, but the RX 7700’s rendering capabilities cap the output. This is typical for a simulation game that is not heavily dependent on physics or complex AI, allowing the CPU to maintain high throughput while the GPU handles the increasing pixel workload.

FAQ

Q: What is the highest average frame rate achieved by this combo in Pc Building Simulator?

A: The highest average frame rate is 282 FPS, which is achieved at 1920x1080 resolution with Low settings.

Q: How does the combo perform at 4K resolution with Ultra settings?

A: At 3840x2160 resolution with Ultra settings, the combo achieves an average frame rate of 44 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay.

Q: What is the recommended settings preset for 1440p gaming?

A: Based on the measured data, the Ultra preset is recommended for 1440p, as it delivers an average of 85 FPS while providing the highest visual quality.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU the limiting factor at higher resolutions?

A: The data suggests the GPU is the limiting factor at higher resolutions, as frame rate drops by approximately 37% from 1080p to 1440p and 48% from 1440p to 4K, regardless of the settings preset.

Q: How does the AMD Radeon RX 7700 compare to its nearest rival in average benchmark score?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7700’s nearest rival is the AMD Radeon R9 370X, which has an average score that is 0.1% lower. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti scores 1.7% higher.

Q: What is the combo’s overall rank among all tested configurations?

A: The combo ranks 1348 out of 3002 tested combos in Pc Building Simulator, placing it in the middle-to-upper tier of performance.