Pc Building Simulator

Pc Building Simulator

AVERAGE FPS
156
excellent

This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 156 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 57 61 85 117
1440p QHD 108 112 158 224
1080p Full HD 167 178 248 354

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Low 117
3840x2160 Medium 85
3840x2160 High 61
3840x2160 Ultra 57
2560x1440 Low 224
2560x1440 Medium 158
2560x1440 High 112
2560x1440 Ultra 108
1920x1080 Low 354
1920x1080 Medium 248
1920x1080 High 178
1920x1080 Ultra 167

Pc Building Simulator with AMD Ryzen 7 7700X + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080, In-Depth Analysis

Pc Building Simulator, a simulation title from 2019, proves to be surprisingly demanding on hardware, and the measured data for the AMD Ryzen 7 7700X paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 reveals a compelling performance profile. This combination delivers a wide spectrum of frame rates, from exceptionally high at 1080p to merely playable at 4K, indicating a system where the GPU becomes the primary bottleneck as resolution increases. The following analysis breaks down the measured results, interprets the component roles, and assesses how this duo ranks among other tested configurations.

Settings Recommendations

The measured data provides a clear hierarchy of performance across four quality presets. For users targeting the highest possible frame rates, the Low preset delivers extraordinary results, with an average of 354 FPS at 1080p, 223.9 FPS at 1440p, and 116.7 FPS at 4K. These numbers suggest that the Low preset eliminates most graphical overhead, likely making the CPU the primary limiting factor at 1080p and enabling even 4K gaming on high-refresh-rate displays.

However, the most balanced experience appears to be the High preset. At 1080p, it produces 178.2 FPS, which is more than sufficient for any current display technology. Moving to 1440p, the High preset still yields a smooth 111.8 FPS, and at 4K it maintains a playable 61 FPS. The Ultra preset, while visually superior, only offers a marginal improvement over High in terms of settings, yet it incurs a significant performance cost: 166.7 FPS at 1080p, 107.6 FPS at 1440p, and 56.8 FPS at 4K. The data suggests that High is the optimal choice, as it provides a substantial frame rate advantage over Ultra—roughly 7% faster at 1080p and 4% faster at 1440p—while likely offering similar visual fidelity in this simulation genre.

For those prioritizing visual quality at 4K, the Medium preset (85 FPS) represents a sensible middle ground, offering a 24 FPS improvement over High while still being playable. The Low preset at 4K, at 116.7 FPS, is intriguing for competitive play, but the High preset's 61 FPS average is the recommended baseline for a quality experience, as it balances detail and responsiveness.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080, built on the Ampere architecture with a GA102 chip, is the dominant component in this pairing. Its 10 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 320-bit bus provides a bandwidth of 760.3 GB/s, which is critical for handling the texture-heavy environments of a building simulator. The GPU's base clock of 1440 MHz and boost clock of 1710 MHz, combined with 8704 shading units, deliver a raw compute capability of 29.77 TFLOPS FP32. This raw power is evident in the benchmark results, where the GPU's Passmark G3D score of 25086 places it in the 80th percentile among all GPUs.

The impact of the GPU is most pronounced when comparing the scaling from 1080p to 4K. At High settings, the frame rate drops from 178.2 FPS at 1080p to 111.8 FPS at 1440p (a 37% reduction), and then to 61 FPS at 4K (a 45% reduction from 1440p). This steep decline indicates that the RTX 3080 is being pushed to its limits at higher resolutions, despite its substantial memory bandwidth. The GPU's performance relative to its nearest rivals shows it is competitive; for instance, it is 0.4% faster than the AMD Radeon 880M and 0.9% slower than the AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE, based on average benchmark scores. This suggests the RTX 3080 remains a formidable card, though its 10 GB frame buffer may become a constraint in newer, more demanding titles.

Resolution Scaling

The relationship between resolution and frame rate in this data is non-linear and reveals the system's bottleneck characteristics. At 1080p, the system is likely CPU-bound, as evidenced by the massive frame rates at Low settings (354 FPS). The jump from 1080p to 1440p at Low settings shows a 36.7% drop (from 354 to 223.9 FPS), which is substantial but still leaves headroom. The subsequent jump from 1440p to 4K at Low settings shows a 47.9% drop (from 223.9 to 116.7 FPS), indicating a shift toward GPU limitation.

This pattern is consistent across all settings. At Ultra, the 1080p to 1440p drop is 35.5% (from 166.7 to 107.6 FPS), and the 1440p to 4K drop is 47.2% (from 107.6 to 56.8 FPS). The fact that the 1440p to 4K drops are consistently around 45-48% suggests that the GPU is the primary limiter at 4K, as the pixel count increases by 2.25x, but the frame rate does not halve, implying some CPU overhead is still present. The data indicates that for a 4K experience, users must accept a significant frame rate penalty, with even the High preset falling to 61 FPS, which is just at the edge of smooth gameplay for many.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The complete measured dataset provides a comprehensive view of performance across all combinations of resolution and settings.

At 1920x1080, the results are as follows:

  • Ultra: 166.7 FPS
  • High: 178.2 FPS
  • Medium: 248.3 FPS
  • Low: 354 FPS

The scaling from Ultra to Low at 1080p shows a 112% performance increase, highlighting how much headroom the CPU provides when the GPU is less stressed.

At 2560x1440, the results are:

  • Ultra: 107.6 FPS
  • High: 111.8 FPS
  • Medium: 158 FPS
  • Low: 223.9 FPS

The High to Ultra difference at 1440p is minimal (only 3.9%), suggesting that the Ultra preset's additional graphical effects are not heavily taxing the GPU at this resolution, or that the CPU is starting to become a factor.

At 3840x2160, the results are:

  • Ultra: 56.8 FPS
  • High: 61 FPS
  • Medium: 85 FPS
  • Low: 116.7 FPS

The 4K data shows a clear GPU bottleneck, as even the Low preset cannot exceed 120 FPS. The gap between High and Ultra at 4K is 7.4%, which is the largest percentage difference between these two presets across all resolutions, indicating that the GPU's compute resources are fully saturated at 4K Ultra.

How This Combo Ranks

In the database of tested combinations, the AMD Ryzen 7 7700X and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 pair ranks 497th out of 1769 tested combos, placing it in the top 28% of all configurations. This is a strong result, considering the number of possible pairings. The rank suggests that while this combo is capable, there are many more powerful (and likely more expensive) combinations above it, but it significantly outperforms the majority of systems.

The CPU itself, the Ryzen 7 7700X, holds an 89th percentile ranking among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 34313. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core i5-13500, scores 34175, a delta of 0.4% in favor of the AMD chip. This indicates the 7700X is a top-tier processor for gaming and productivity. The GPU, with an 80th percentile ranking, is slightly less dominant in its field. The combo's overall rank of 497 suggests that the GPU is the limiting factor in this pairing, as the CPU's high percentile would typically push a combo higher if paired with a more powerful GPU.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 7 7700X, based on the Zen 4 architecture and codenamed Raphael, is a high-end desktop processor with 8 cores and 16 threads. Its base clock of 4.50 GHz and boost clock of 5.40 GHz, built on a 5 nm process, allow it to excel in both single-threaded and multi-threaded workloads. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 30325 and single-core score of 4281 demonstrate its capability, with the latter being crucial for gaming performance where per-core speed is often more important.

In this game, the CPU's role is evident at 1080p, where frame rates at Low settings reach 354 FPS. This extreme value indicates that the CPU is not the bottleneck at lower resolutions, as it can feed the GPU with enough data to achieve such high frame rates. However, the CPU's performance relative to its rivals shows it is marginally ahead of the Intel Core i7-12800HX (0.5% faster) and behind the Intel Core Ultra 7 165H (0.8% slower). The 7700X's 32 MB of shared L3 cache and support for DDR5 memory with 83.2 GB/s bandwidth provide ample data throughput for the RTX 3080. The data suggests that at 4K, the CPU has less influence, as the GPU's workload becomes the dominant factor, but at 1080p, the 7700X's high clocks and efficient architecture are key to unlocking the RTX 3080's full potential.

FAQ

Q: What is the best settings preset for a balance of visual quality and performance?

A: The High preset is recommended, as it delivers 178.2 FPS at 1080p, 111.8 FPS at 1440p, and 61 FPS at 4K, which are all playable and offer a significant performance advantage over Ultra (166.7 FPS, 107.6 FPS, and 56.8 FPS, respectively).

Q: Is the system capable of 4K gaming?

A: Yes, but with compromises. The High preset achieves an average of 61 FPS at 4K, while the Low preset reaches 116.7 FPS. The Ultra preset drops to 56.8 FPS, which may be below the threshold for smooth gameplay on some displays.

Q: Which component is the primary bottleneck at 4K?

A: The data indicates the GPU is the primary bottleneck at 4K, as frame rates drop dramatically (e.g., from 111.8 FPS at 1440p High to 61 FPS at 4K High), while at 1080p, the CPU's headroom is evident from the 354 FPS Low result.

Q: How does this combo rank compared to other tested systems?

A: It ranks 497th out of 1769 tested combos, placing it in the top 28% of all configurations, which indicates a strong but not top-tier performance level.

Q: What is the performance difference between High and Ultra settings?

A: At 1080p, High is 6.9% faster (178.2 vs 166.7 FPS); at 1440p, High is 3.9% faster (111.8 vs 107.6 FPS); and at 4K, High is 7.4% faster (61 vs 56.8 FPS).

Q: How does the CPU's benchmark score compare to its nearest rival?

A: The Ryzen 7 7700X has an average benchmark score of 34313, which is 0.4% higher than the Intel Core i5-13500 (34175) and 0.8% higher than the Intel Core i7-12800HX (34136), but 0.8% lower than the Intel Core Ultra 7 165H (34584).

Hardware Specifications

AMD Ryzen 7 7700X

Cores / Threads 8 / 16
Base Clock 4500 MHz
Boost Clock 5400 MHz
TDP 105W
Socket AMD Socket AM5
View Full CPU Details →

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080

VRAM 10 GB GDDR6X
Base Clock —
Boost Clock 1710 MHz MHz
TDP 320 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for AMD Ryzen 7 7700X + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 in Pc Building Simulator

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Low 116.7
3840x2160 Medium 85.0
3840x2160 High 61.0
3840x2160 Ultra 56.8
2560x1440 Low 223.9
2560x1440 Medium 158.0
2560x1440 High 111.8
2560x1440 Ultra 107.6
1920x1080 Low 354.0
1920x1080 Medium 248.3
1920x1080 High 178.2
1920x1080 Ultra 166.7

Pc Building Simulator with Ryzen 7 7700X + Other GPUs

See how Pc Building Simulator performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.

Pc Building Simulator with RTX 3080 + Other CPUs

See how Pc Building Simulator performs with the same GPU but different processors.

Other Games with Ryzen 7 7700X + RTX 3080

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.