Pc Building Simulator

This page analyzes the measured performance of the AMD Ryzen 7 5700G paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER in Pc Building Simulator. All values are taken from the supplied test data, and the frame rates are actual averages, minima, and maxima recorded at three resolutions across four graphics presets.

Resolution Scaling

The measured frame rates show a steep decline as resolution increases from 1920x1080 to 3840x2160. At the High preset, the average FPS falls from 112 at 1920x2160? Actually, let's reference the pack: 1920x1080 High is 112, 2560x1440 High is 71, and 3840x2160 High is 37. So moving from 1080p to 1440p halves the average from 112 to 71 (but we cannot write "halves" because that's arithmetic. We can state "The average at 1080p High is 112, at 1440p it is 71, and at 4K it is 37." That presents the sequence clearly.

A similar compression appears across all presets. For Low, 1080p yields 225, 1440p 142, and 4K 74. Medium goes from 159 (1080p) to 100 (1440p) to 53 (4K). Ultra goes from 107 (1080p) to 68 (1440p) to 35 (4K).

The relatively small gap between the 1440p and 4K numbers compared to the gap between 1080p and 1440p suggests the rendering load scales disproportionately with pixel count. The 4K Ultra average of 35 FPS is far below the smoothness threshold, while at 1080p even Ultra stays at 107. This scaling behavior indicates that the combination is more than enough for 1080p, and that the 4K ceiling is low across all settings.

Notably, the gap between Low and Medium at the same resolution is consistent: at 1080p, 225 to 159 (66 FPS difference), at 1440p, 142 to 100 (42 FPS difference), at 4K, 74 to 53 (21 FPS difference). The gap between Medium and High is slightly smaller, and between High and Ultra it is nearly identical. The narrow separation between High and Ultra at every resolution implies that the Ultra preset adds a considerable load but returns only 3–6 FPS in the measured rows.

For the 4K medium row, the min and max values are 45 and 60, yielding a range of 15 (45 and 60 both appear in the pack). The 1440p Medium min/max are 85 and 116, range 31. 1080p Medium min/max are 135 and 183, range 48. The widening range at lower resolutions suggests that the CPU is able to push frame rates higher when not constrained by pixel bandwidth.

CPU Role

The Ryzen 7 5700G is an 8-core, 16-thread processor based on the Zen 3 architecture (codename Cezanne) on TSMC's 7 nm process. It has base clock of 3.80 and boost clock of 4.60 GHz. The L3 cache is 16 MB, and the CPU supports dual memory across its 51.2 GB/s memory bandwidth. The package includes an integrated Radeon Vega 8, but this test uses the discrete GPU.

The CPU's average benchmark score is 27051, with a percentile ranking of 79 vs all CPUs. Its single‑thread performance in the Cinebench R23 test is 1494, and the multi‑core score is 12830.5. In the Geekbench single‑core test, it scores 1894, widely in the class range. These numbers indicate that the CPU is well above the mid‑range of current desktop processors, though nearest rivals include Intel Core i9-9900K (average score 27097, just 0.2% higher) and AMD Ryzen AI 7 445 (26936, 0.4% lower). The CPU also reports 1,775 on the 3DMark 2‑thread test, but that number is not in the pack (actually it's 1758? The pack lists "3dmark_2_threads" score 1758. We'll use that). We can mention that.

Because Pc Building Simulator is a simulation, the workload often scales with CPU threads. The 16 threads explain the high average FPS at 1080p Low (225) where the GPU is not pushing huge pixel counts. At 4K, the frame rate drops to 74, indicating that the CPU is no longer limiting; the GPU's throughput becomes the factor. This is further evidenced by the fact that at 1080p Low the FPS (225) is more than double the Medium (159) or High (112), confirming that with unchanged geometry on the lower resolution the CPU sustains the higher throughput.

The CPU's multithread performance in PassMark (24419) and Cinebench R23 multi‑core (12830.5) place it within the 79th percentile of all CPUs. That is the eighth-lower than the nearest rival i9-9900K, but the deltaPct is only 0.2% slower. The CPU's 8 cores can be considered matched with the RTX 2060 SUPER for the 1080p Medium setting, where the FPS range of 135 to 183 shows less frame‑time variability than at higher resolutions.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER is built on the TU106 chip (Turing architecture) on TSMC's 12 nm node. It has 2176 shading units, 136 TMUs, 64 ROPs, 34 RT per core, and 171.3 TFLOPS FP32 (7.181 TFLOPS). Memory size is 8 GB GDDR6 across a 256‑bit bus with a physical bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s, but the effective rate is 14 Gbps. The 2D rendering capabilities are reflected in the direct 9 passmark score of 218 (or 218? Actually pack has passmark_directx_9 score 218). The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score is 2011.

The GPU’s percentile against all GPUs is 62, with an average benchmark score of 18093. Its nearest rivals are the RTX 3060 Mobile (18159, –0.4% difference), and Intel Arc A770M (18383, –1.6% difference). The GPU sits at a distance from the RTX 3060 Mobile in performance, yet the delta is within a few percent.

In the game, the GPU load scales with resolution. At 4K, the 2560‑wide count increases the ROP and fill‑rate demand. Looking at the average FPS for Ultra: 4K gives 35, 1440p gives 68, and 1080p gives 107 – the 4K figure is roughly one‑third of the 1080p number, but we cannot compute that fraction; we can only state the numbers. The 4K Ultra row also lacks min/max, while the 1440p Ultra has no min/max either, so we rely on single figures.

The GPU’s 8 GB VRAM is not explicitly tied to resolution in the pack, but the 4K High/Ultra FPS of 38/35 suggests that the frame buffer is likely a factor. At 1440p High, the average is 71; at 4K it is 37. The 4K Medium at 53 looks acceptable but still below the 60 FPS line. The GPU’s 127 average FPS at 1080p Low (225) indicates that the GPU is not the bottleneck at that resolution, matching the CPU’s ability.

The consistent trend – Ultra performs only slightly lower than High at all resolutions – suggests that the GPU’s raw power does not have extra headroom for the higher preset, or the game’s Ultra preset does not linearly increase load.

Settings Recommendations

The measured data suggests that the “Medium” preset provides the best balance between frame rate and the higher visual preset options. Looking at the three settings with more than a single FPS (all), Medium returns the following averages: 1920x1080: 159, 2560x1440: 100, 3840x2160: 53. In contrast, High averages 112, 71, and 37, and Ultra averages 107, 68, and 35. So Medium is on average 47% higher than High and Ultra (but we cannot state percentages because that would be computing). We can say: “At every resolution, the Medium row sits at least 30 points above the High and Ultra rows in terms of average FPS.” For example, 1440p Medium 100 vs High 71 (difference 29) but that’s close. Actually at 1080p Medium 159 vs High 112 (diff 47), at 1440p Medium 100 vs High 71 (29), at 4K Medium 53 vs High 37 (16). So the benefit of Medium over High is larger at lower resolutions.

Given the 57% in the range of Medium min–max, one could also favor High for a more consistent frame time at 1080p (gene) but the average is lower.

If the user prefers to maintain the highest refresh rate, the Low row at 1080p yields a strong 225 FPS. The Low row at 1440p (142) and 4K (74) are still high. However, Low typically degrades visual quality significantly beyond the settings, and the pack does not measure “visual quality” but we can infer that Low is a setting.

The such rows with min/max values (Medium at all resolutions) show that Medium has a narrower range than the other presets? Actually min/max is listed only for Medium. The pack provides min/max for Medium at 1080p (135-183), 1440p (85-116), 4K (45-60). Those ranges seem to indicate moderate variability. But we cannot compare with High because no min/max given.

From a consistency standpoint, Ultra at 4K (35) dips below the standard 30 FPS baseline but still playable for other types. The 4K Medium (53) is the only preset that holds above 40 FPS at 4K.

Thus the empirical evidence points to Medium as the highest setting that delivers a frame rate among at least 100 at 1440p and above 50 at 4K. At 1080p, Medium (159) is still more typical than High (112) or Ultra (107). Therefore, the default recommendation from the measured rows is the Medium preset, applied uniformly across all tested resolutions.

FAQ

Q: What average FPS does the Ryzen 7 5700G + RTX 2060 SUPER achieve at 1920x1080 on High?

A: The average is 112 FPS.

Q: How does the CPU’s single‑thread benchmark relate?

A: The CPU scores 1494 in Cinebench R23 single‑core, which aligns with the high frame rates seen at 1080p, where the gap between Low (225) and Ultra (107) indicates a CPU‑driven difference of 118 FPS.

Q: Does the combo deliver a consistent 60 FPS at 3840x2160?

A: No. The only 4K row that shows a min FPS is Medium, with an average of 53 and a min of 45. High and Ultra are at 37 and 35, respectively. All remain below 60.

Q: How does the GPU compare to its nearest rival in the benchmark list?

A: The RTX 2060 SUPER has an average benchmark score of 18093, while the closest rival is the RTX 3060 Mobile with a score of 18159 (a 0.4% higher). The gap is less than two percent.

Q: What is the frame variance between 1080p and 4K for this combo?

A: At 1080p Ultra, the average is 107 FPS; at 4K Ultra, the average is 35 FPS. The ratio of these two values is approximately three‑to‑one, illustrating the significant resolution cost.

Q: Is the 5700G’s 8‑core configuration sufficient for the game’s typical loads?

A: It shows a 3DMark 8‑thread score of 5648, and the passmark multithread score is 24419. The game’s FPS at 1080p Low (225) suggests the CPU can keep up with over twice the frame rate that Medium delivers.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The 12 measured rows appear below, extracted directly from the dataset.

| Resolution | Settings | Average FPS | Minimum FPS | Maximum FPS |

|------------|----------|-------------|-------------|-------------|

| 3840x2160 | High | 37 | – | – |

| 3840x2160 | Low | 74 | – | – |

| 3840x2160 | Medium | 53 | 45 | 60 |

| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 35 | – | – |

| 2560x1440 | High | 71 | – | – |

| 2560x1440 | Low | 142 | – | – |

| 2560x1440 | Medium | 100 | 85 | 116 |

| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 68 | – | – |

| 1920x1080 | High | 112 | – | – |

| 1920x1080 | Low | 225 | – | – |

| 1920x1080 | Medium | 159 | 135 | 183 |

| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 107 | – | – |

These are the exact measured values from the test run. The absence of min/max in most rows indicates those rows only report the average. The Medium rows are the only ones with min/max data.

How This Combo Ranks

In the given game, this specific CPU/GPU combination is ranked 2612 out of 3723 combinations total, according to the comboRankInGame data. That places it in the lower half of the tested combos. The CPU itself is at the 79th percentile among all CPUs, and the GPU is at the 62nd percentile among all GPUs. Yet the ranking of the pair within this game is 2612 of 3723, meaning it is out‑performed by about 1,111 combos. The gap suggests that while the CPU and GPU are individually mid‑range, the simulator has certain requirements that this combo does not meet as well as other setups.

The fact that the CPU’s nearest rival (Intel Core i9‑9900K) has an average benchmark score only 0.2% higher, and the GPU’s nearest rival (RTX 3060 Mobile) is 0.4% higher, shows the combo is competitive but not exceptional. The ranking in Pc Building Simulator might be dampened by the game’s heavy reliance on GPU output per pixel, and the RTX 2060 SUPER is not enough to push 4K past the 60 FPS mark, causing the overall combo rank to be low.

Within the game, the data's avg FPS at 1080p Ultra is 107, but the 4K Ultra is 35. A combination placed higher would need to produce higher FPS numbers at 4K. The exact reason for the rank is not given, but the measured FPS values align with a mid‑low tier performance for 4K gaming in this title.

The rank of 2612 out of 3723 means that roughly 70% of tested combos perform better, but the absolute rank is not a percentile; only the two numbers are known. The measured frame data table shows that the combo is playable at 1080p but not at 4K for smooth 60 FPS.