Pc Building Simulator
This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 123 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 44 | 47 | 66 | 93 |
| 1440p QHD | 85 | 89 | 126 | 178 |
| 1080p Full HD | 134 | 141 | 200 | 267 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Pc Building Simulator with AMD Ryzen 7 3700X + AMD Radeon RX 7700, In-Depth Analysis
Pc Building Simulator, a simulation title from 2019, shows a distinct performance profile when paired with the AMD Ryzen 7 3700X and AMD Radeon RX 7700. The measured data reveals a system that is heavily GPU-bound at higher resolutions but possesses enough headroom to deliver high refresh rate gameplay at 1080p. This analysis breaks down the measured FPS across resolutions and settings, interprets the CPU and GPU roles based on their specifications and benchmark scores, and contextualizes the combo's standing within the broader database.
Resolution Scaling
The transition from 1920x1080 to 3840x2160 provides a clear picture of where the performance bottleneck lies. At 1080p with Low settings, the combo achieves an average of 267 FPS. This high frame rate strongly indicates that the CPU is capable of feeding the GPU far more data than it can process at lower resolutions. As the resolution increases, the workload shifts decisively to the GPU. Moving from 1080p Low to 1440p Low, the average FPS drops to 178, a reduction of 89 FPS. The jump to 4K Low yields 93 FPS, which is approximately half of the 1440p score. This halving pattern as resolution scales is a classic sign of a GPU-limited scenario.
The data reveals a significant scaling penalty at the highest resolution. At 4K Ultra, the average FPS falls to 44, which is a 49 FPS drop from the 4K Medium setting (66 FPS) and a 49 FPS drop from the 4K High setting (47 FPS) is just 3 FPS lower. The difference between 4K High (47 FPS) and 4K Ultra (44 FPS) is minimal, suggesting that the Ultra preset introduces settings that heavily tax the GPU with diminishing returns on visual fidelity. The trend across all settings is consistent: 1080p to 1440p yields a performance reduction of roughly 35-40%, while the further step to 4K results in another 45-50% reduction. This steep curve at 4K confirms that the AMD Radeon RX 7700, with its 16 GB of GDDR6 memory and 256-bit bus, is the limiting component at that resolution, unable to maintain playable frame rates on the highest presets.
Settings Recommendations
Based on the measured rows, the optimal experience depends heavily on the target resolution. For 1920x1080, the Ultra preset (134 FPS) is the best choice, as it provides a fully smooth experience well above the 60 FPS threshold. The High preset (141 FPS) offers a marginal 7 FPS improvement, which is negligible compared to the graphical uplift from High to Ultra. The Medium preset (200 FPS) is excessive for most displays and only serves to reduce visual quality without a practical benefit.
At 2560x1440, the High preset (89 FPS) is the recommended starting point. It delivers a smooth, high-refresh experience. The Ultra preset (85 FPS) is also viable, with only a 4 FPS cost over High, making it a strong candidate for users prioritizing visual detail. The Medium preset (126 FPS) is an option for competitive play or high refresh rate monitors, but it sacrifices significant visual quality. The Low preset (178 FPS) is unnecessary for this game's genre.
At 3840x2160, the situation is more constrained. The Medium preset (66 FPS) is the only setting that consistently achieves a playable frame rate above 60 FPS, with a minimum of 56 FPS. The High preset (47 FPS) and Ultra preset (44 FPS) fall below the 60 FPS threshold and would result in a less fluid experience. Therefore, for 4K, the Medium preset is the definitive recommendation to balance performance and visual quality. The Low preset (93 FPS) is playable but forgoes the visual benefits that make the simulation engaging.
FAQ
Q: What is the maximum average FPS achievable at 1080p with this combo?
A: The highest average FPS measured at 1920x1080 is 267 FPS, achieved with the Low settings preset.
Q: Can this system handle 4K gaming?
A: Yes, but with limitations. At 3840x2160, the Medium preset is the only one that maintains an average FPS above 60 (66 FPS). The High and Ultra presets average 47 FPS and 44 FPS, respectively.
Q: How does the combo rank compared to other tested systems in this game?
A: The combo ranks 1426 out of 3002 tested combinations, placing it in the upper half of the database for Pc Building Simulator.
Q: What is the performance difference between 1080p and 1440p at Ultra settings?
A: At Ultra settings, the average FPS drops from 134 at 1920x1080 to 85 at 2560x1440, a reduction of 49 FPS.
Q: Is the CPU or GPU the limiting factor at high resolutions?
A: The data indicates the GPU is the limiting factor at higher resolutions. The FPS drops significantly and consistently from 1440p to 4K, while the CPU has ample headroom, as shown by the very high frame rates at 1080p Low.
Q: What are the frame time consistency metrics for the Medium preset?
A: At 4K Medium, the minimum FPS is 56 and the maximum is 76. At 1440p Medium, the minimum is 107 and the maximum is 145. At 1080p Medium, the minimum is 170 and the maximum is 230.
How This Combo Ranks
Within the database of 3,002 tested combinations for Pc Building Simulator, this specific pairing of the AMD Ryzen 7 3700X and AMD Radeon RX 7700 holds the 1426th position. This rank places it in the 47th percentile of all tested combos, indicating it is a mid-pack performer. The ranking shows that while this system is far from the top-tier configurations, it significantly outperforms the lower half of the database. The rank is a composite measure influenced by the CPU's 84th percentile ranking among all CPUs and the GPU's 58th percentile ranking among all GPUs.
The CPU's high percentile (84) suggests it is a more capable component relative to its peers than the GPU is relative to its own peers. The GPU's lower percentile (58) pulls the overall combo rank down. The performance delta between the CPU and GPU is a key factor; the system is not balanced for maximum performance, as the GPU is the weaker link. However, the combination is still potent enough to provide a good experience in this particular simulation game, which is not typically as demanding as fast-paced action titles. The rank indicates that a substantial number of other combinations deliver higher frame rates, but this setup offers a solid baseline for the game's intended activities.
CPU Role
The AMD Ryzen 7 3700X is a Zen 2 architecture processor with 8 cores and 16 threads. Its base clock is 3.60 GHz and it can boost up to 4.40 GHz. These specifications are more than sufficient for a simulation game like Pc Building Simulator, which does not typically demand extreme single-thread performance. The CPU's benchmark scores support this. In Cinebench R15, it scores 2092 in multi-core and 204 in single-core. Its Geekbench scores are 8899 multi-core and 1593 single-core.
The high frame rates observed at 1080p Low (267 FPS) are a direct result of the CPU's capability to process game logic and draw calls quickly. The 16 threads allow for efficient handling of background simulation tasks, which are common in simulation genres. The processor's 32 MB of L3 cache helps keep frequently accessed data close to the cores, reducing latency. The average benchmark score of 34260 places it in the 84th percentile of all CPUs, and its nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (0.1% faster) and the Intel Core i5-13450HX (0.2% slower). This indicates that the 3700X is a very competitive processor even against newer parts. The CPU is not the bottleneck in this system, as evidenced by the fact that lowering resolution from 1440p to 1080p results in a massive FPS increase, which would not happen if the CPU were the limiting factor.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The following is the complete set of measured average FPS data for the AMD Ryzen 7 3700X and AMD Radeon RX 7700 combination.
At 1920x1080:
- Low: 267 FPS average.
- Medium: 200 FPS average, with a minimum of 170 FPS and a maximum of 230 FPS.
- High: 141 FPS average.
- Ultra: 134 FPS average.
At 2560x1440:
- Low: 178 FPS average.
- Medium: 126 FPS average, with a minimum of 107 FPS and a maximum of 145 FPS.
- High: 89 FPS average.
- Ultra: 85 FPS average.
At 3840x2160:
- Low: 93 FPS average.
- Medium: 66 FPS average, with a minimum of 56 FPS and a maximum of 76 FPS.
- High: 47 FPS average.
- Ultra: 44 FPS average.
The data shows a clear and consistent drop in performance as both resolution and graphical fidelity increase. At 1080p, the system is capable of delivering high refresh rate performance on any preset. At 1440p, it remains very playable on High and Ultra. At 4K, only the Medium preset provides a frame rate that is consistently above 60 FPS. The minimum FPS data for the Medium preset shows a relatively stable frame time at 1080p and 1440p, with a slightly wider variance at 4K.
GPU Role
The AMD Radeon RX 7700 is the primary driver of the visual output. It features 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 624.1 GB/s. Its core clocks are a base of 1900 MHz, a game clock of 2041 MHz, and a boost clock of 2459 MHz. This memory capacity and bandwidth are substantial, but the GPU's overall performance is what limits the system at higher resolutions.
The GPU's benchmark scores reflect its mid-range positioning. It scores 20974 in Passmark G3D, and 2865 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12. Its percentile ranking is 58th among all GPUs. Its nearest rivals in terms of average benchmark score include the AMD Radeon R9 370X (0.1% slower) and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti (1.7% faster). The RX 7700's performance is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p gaming, as shown by the FPS data. However, at 4K, its compute power is insufficient to maintain high frame rates on demanding presets.
The 16 GB of VRAM is not a limiting factor in this game, as even at 4K Ultra, the frame rate is more likely constrained by the GPU's shader and texture processing capabilities (25.18 TFLOPS FP32) rather than memory capacity. The significant FPS drop from 1440p to 4K—for example, from 85 FPS to 44 FPS at Ultra—shows that the GPU is being saturated by the pixel fill rate demand. The GPU's role as the primary bottleneck is clear: at 1080p, the CPU can push the GPU to its limits, but as the resolution increases, the GPU’s rendering throughput becomes the definitive constraint on performance.
Hardware Specifications
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
AMD Radeon RX 7700
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for AMD Ryzen 7 3700X + AMD Radeon RX 7700 in Pc Building Simulator
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 93.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 66.0 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 47.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 44.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 178.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 126.0 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 89.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 85.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 267.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 200.0 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 141.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 134.0 |
Pc Building Simulator with Ryzen 7 3700X + Other GPUs
See how Pc Building Simulator performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Pc Building Simulator with RX 7700 + Other CPUs
See how Pc Building Simulator performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with Ryzen 7 3700X + RX 7700
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.