Pc Building Simulator
This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 161 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 59 | 62 | 88 | 118 |
| 1440p QHD | 108 | 114 | 163 | 232 |
| 1080p Full HD | 176 | 181 | 261 | 367 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Pc Building Simulator with AMD Ryzen 5 9600X + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070, In-Depth Analysis
The AMD Ryzen 5 9600X paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 delivers a well-balanced experience in Pc Building Simulator, with measured frame rates that scale predictably across resolutions and settings. The data shows this combo ranks 427th out of 1,769 tested combinations, placing it in the upper quartile of systems. At 1080p, the pair produces triple-digit averages on every preset, while 4K remains playable on High settings. The following analysis breaks down how each component contributes to these results, which settings offer the best trade-off, and what the measured numbers mean for practical use.
CPU Role — cores, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results
The Ryzen 5 9600X is a 6-core, 12-thread processor built on the Zen 5 architecture (Granite Ridge) using a 4 nm process. It runs at a 3.90 GHz base clock and boosts to 5.40 GHz, with a 65 W TDP. The CPU has 32 MB of shared L3 cache and 1 MB of L2 per core, plus 80 KB of L1 per core. It supports DDR5 memory over a dual-channel bus with 89.6 GB/s of bandwidth, and it includes Radeon integrated graphics, though the discrete RTX 4070 handles all rendering here.
Benchmark results show strong single-thread performance: the 3dmark single-thread score is 1,253, and Cinebench R23 single-core reaches 3,603. Multi-thread scores are equally solid, with Cinebench R23 multi-core at 25,525 and Geekbench multi-core at 15,182. The CPU's percentile vs all CPUs is 85, meaning it outperforms the majority of processors in the database. Its nearest rivals are tightly clustered: the Intel Core i5-13490F is 0.3% ahead, the AMD Ryzen 5 230 is 0.3% ahead, the AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS is 0.4% behind, and the Intel Core i5-14500T is 0.5% behind. These deltas are negligible in real-world gaming.
For Pc Building Simulator, a simulation title, the CPU's high boost clock and strong single-thread performance matter more than raw core count. The game's logic, physics, and component simulation likely rely on a few heavily loaded threads, and the 5.40 GHz boost helps keep those threads fed. The 6 cores and 12 threads are sufficient for background tasks and any multi-threaded aspects of the simulation. The measured FPS data shows that at 1080p Low, the system hits 367.4 FPS, which is far beyond what any display can show, indicating the CPU is not a bottleneck at lower settings. Even at 4K Ultra, where the GPU is heavily loaded, the CPU still maintains 58.6 FPS, suggesting it has headroom to spare.
GPU Role — VRAM, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 uses the AD104 chip on the Ada Lovelace architecture, fabricated on a 5 nm process. It has 12 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 192-bit bus, delivering 504.2 GB/s of bandwidth. The GPU runs at a 1920 MHz base clock and boosts to 2475 MHz, with a 200 W TDP. It includes 5,888 shading units, 184 texture mapping units, 64 ROPs, 46 ray tracing cores, and 184 tensor cores. The card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, and it connects via PCIe 4.0 x16.
The GPU's percentile vs all GPUs is 81, and its average benchmark score is 37,283. Its nearest rivals show a mixed picture: the AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 is 0.6% ahead, the NVIDIA GeForce MX570 A is 1.9% ahead, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile is 2.2% ahead, and the AMD Radeon RX 5300M is 2.5% behind. These are small differences, but the RTX 4070's modern architecture and 12 GB VRAM give it an edge in newer titles that demand more memory bandwidth.
In Pc Building Simulator, the GPU's role becomes clear when examining the FPS scaling. At 1080p, the difference between Low (367.4 FPS) and Ultra (176.3 FPS) is substantial, but both are far above playable thresholds. At 1440p, the spread narrows: Low hits 232 FPS, while Ultra drops to 107.5 FPS. At 4K, the GPU is the limiting factor: Low produces 118.3 FPS, Medium 87.8 FPS, High 61.8 FPS, and Ultra 58.6 FPS. The 12 GB VRAM is sufficient for this game at all tested settings, as the simulation's textures and models do not appear to exceed that capacity. The 504.2 GB/s bandwidth helps maintain consistent frame pacing, especially at higher resolutions where memory throughput becomes more critical.
Settings Recommendations — which preset gives the best experience per the measured rows
The measured FPS data provides clear guidance for each resolution. At 1080p, every preset delivers well over 100 FPS, so the choice depends on whether you prioritize visual fidelity or maximum frame rate. Ultra runs at 176.3 FPS, which is still exceptionally smooth, and High at 181.2 FPS is nearly identical. Medium (260.5 FPS) and Low (367.4 FPS) offer diminishing returns for most users. For a simulation game where you might be reading small text or inspecting components, the visual clarity of High or Ultra is worth the small FPS cost.
At 1440p, High (114.4 FPS) and Ultra (107.5 FPS) are both excellent, with the difference between them being only 6.9 FPS. Medium (162.5 FPS) is also viable if you want extra headroom for streaming or recording. Low (232 FPS) is overkill for most displays. The sweet spot is High, as it provides a 6.4% FPS increase over Ultra while looking nearly identical in most scenes.
At 4K, the situation changes. Ultra (58.6 FPS) is technically playable but sits close to the 60 FPS threshold, and any scene complexity could cause dips. High (61.8 FPS) is marginally better and is the recommended preset for 4K, as it maintains a playable average without sacrificing much visual quality. Medium (87.8 FPS) is a strong alternative if you want a larger safety margin, and Low (118.3 FPS) is there for users with high-refresh 4K displays. The data suggests that High is the best overall choice at 4K, balancing fidelity and performance.
How This Combo Ranks — use comboRankInGame vs other tested combos
The combo of the Ryzen 5 9600X and RTX 4070 ranks 427th out of 1,769 tested combinations in Pc Building Simulator. This places it in the top 24% of all systems in the database, which is a strong result for a mid-range CPU paired with a high-end GPU. The rank reflects the combined performance of both components, and the measured FPS numbers confirm that this pairing is well-matched for this game.
The CPU's 85th percentile and the GPU's 81st percentile suggest that neither component is drastically underperforming relative to its peers. The nearest CPU rivals are all within 0.5% of the 9600X's average score, meaning the choice of processor has little impact on the final rank. Similarly, the GPU's nearest rivals are within 2.5%, so the RTX 4070's position is secure. The rank of 427 is likely driven more by the GPU's performance at higher resolutions, where the 12 GB VRAM and 504.2 GB/s bandwidth come into play.
Compared to other combos in the database, this system sits comfortably above the median. It is not a top-tier enthusiast build, but it is far from a budget setup. The data indicates that this pairing is capable of running Pc Building Simulator at high settings across all resolutions, with 4K Ultra being the only preset that dips below 60 FPS. For users targeting 1080p or 1440p, this combo offers headroom for future titles or more demanding scenes.
FAQ
Q: What is the average FPS at 1080p with Ultra settings?
A: The measured average FPS at 1920x1080 with Ultra settings is 176.3 FPS.
Q: Can this combo handle 4K gaming?
A: Yes, at 3840x2160 with High settings, the average FPS is 61.8, which is playable. Ultra settings drop to 58.6 FPS, so High is recommended for 4K.
Q: How does the Ryzen 5 9600X compare to its nearest rival, the Intel Core i5-13490F?
A: The Ryzen 5 9600X has an average benchmark score of 28,246, while the Intel Core i5-13490F scores 28,173, putting the 9600X 0.3% ahead.
Q: What is the GPU's memory bandwidth and size?
A: The RTX 4070 has 12 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 192-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 504.2 GB/s.
Q: What is the best preset for 1440p?
A: High settings at 2560x1440 produce 114.4 FPS, which is the best balance of visual quality and performance. Ultra is close at 107.5 FPS, but High offers a small FPS advantage.
Q: How does this combo rank among all tested systems?
A: It ranks 427th out of 1,769 combos, placing it in the top 24% of the database.
Measured FPS Breakdown — resolution by resolution, settings by settings, exact numbers
The following table lists all measured average FPS values from the FACT PACK, organized by resolution and settings preset.
| Resolution | Settings | Average FPS |
|------------|----------|-------------|
| 3840x2160 | High | 61.8 |
| 3840x2160 | Low | 118.3 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 87.8 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 58.6 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 114.4 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 232.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 162.5 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 107.5 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 181.2 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 367.4 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 260.5 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 176.3 |
At 4K, the gap between Low and Ultra is 59.7 FPS, showing the GPU's scaling under load. At 1440p, the spread is 124.5 FPS, and at 1080p, it is 191.1 FPS. The data shows that the RTX 4070 is most efficient at 1440p, where even Ultra stays above 100 FPS. At 1080p, the system is heavily CPU-bound at Low settings, with 367.4 FPS indicating that the 9600X's single-thread performance is more than adequate. The measured numbers confirm that this combo is versatile, capable of high-refresh 1080p gaming and smooth 4K at High settings.
Hardware Specifications
AMD Ryzen 5 9600X
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for AMD Ryzen 5 9600X + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 in Pc Building Simulator
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 118.3 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 87.8 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 61.8 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 58.6 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 232.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 162.5 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 114.4 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 107.5 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 367.4 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 260.5 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 181.2 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 176.3 |
Pc Building Simulator with Ryzen 5 9600X + Other GPUs
See how Pc Building Simulator performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Pc Building Simulator with RTX 4070 + Other CPUs
See how Pc Building Simulator performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with Ryzen 5 9600X + RTX 4070
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.