Palworld

Palworld

AVERAGE FPS
74
good

This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 74 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 29 34 46 58
1440p QHD 49 59 81 98
1080p Full HD 72 93 120 153

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Low 58
3840x2160 Medium 46
3840x2160 High 34
3840x2160 Ultra 29
2560x1440 Low 98
2560x1440 Medium 81
2560x1440 High 59
2560x1440 Ultra 49
1920x1080 Low 153
1920x1080 Medium 120
1920x1080 High 93
1920x1080 Ultra 72

Palworld with Intel Core i3-12100F + AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT, In-Depth Analysis

Palworld is a demanding survival title that stresses both CPU and GPU heavily, and this pairing of an Intel Core i3-12100F with an AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT shows a clear performance ceiling at higher resolutions. The data indicates that while the combo is capable of excellent frame rates at 1080p, it struggles to maintain smooth gameplay at 4K, where the GPU becomes the primary limiting factor. This analysis breaks down the measured results to show exactly where this combination excels and where it falls short.

Resolution Scaling

The frame rate drop from 1080p to 4K is steep and reveals a GPU-bound system at higher resolutions. At High settings, the average FPS falls from 92.9 at 1920x1080 to 59 at 2560x1440, a reduction of roughly 36%, and then plummets further to 34 at 3840x2160, which is about a 63% drop from the 1080p figure. This pattern is consistent across all settings presets, indicating that the Radeon RX 5700 XT's rendering capabilities are saturated as pixel count increases.

The scaling behavior points to the GPU as the dominant bottleneck in this configuration. When moving from 1440p to 4K at Medium settings, performance drops from 81.2 FPS to 45.7 FPS, a significant 44% loss. The gap between Low settings at 4K (58 FPS) and High settings at 1080p (92.9 FPS) further illustrates that resolution has a more substantial impact on performance than graphical fidelity. The data suggests that for 4K gaming, the graphics card is working at its absolute limit, and even reducing settings to Low only yields a playable, but not smooth, 58 FPS average.

How This Combo Ranks

In the grand scheme of tested hardware combinations for Palworld, this pairing sits in the lower-middle tier. The combo ranks 1259 out of 1718 tested combinations, placing it in roughly the 27th percentile of all systems. This ranking reflects that while the RX 5700 XT is a capable mid-range card, the Core i3-12100F, despite its strong single-threaded performance, holds back the system in a game that appears to benefit from additional CPU cores.

The ranking indicates that most other tested combos deliver higher average frame rates. This is not a top-tier setup for Palworld, but it is far from the bottom. The position suggests that users with this hardware can expect a playable experience at 1080p and 1440p with adjusted settings, but should not expect to compete with high-end systems that rank near the top. The data shows that this combo is better suited for 1080p gaming, where the CPU's limitations are less pronounced.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT is the workhorse of this combo, and its specifications directly correlate with the measured performance. It features 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This memory configuration is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p gaming, but at 4K, the 8 GB capacity can become a limiting factor as texture data exceeds the available VRAM, potentially contributing to the significant frame rate drops observed.

The card's clock speeds are also relevant. With a base clock of 1605 MHz, a game clock of 1755 MHz, and a boost clock of 1905 MHz, the GPU is running at frequencies that allow it to achieve a solid 9.754 TFLOPS of FP32 performance. The benchmark results show that the GPU's compute power is what drives the frame rates at lower resolutions. For instance, the jump from 34 FPS at 4K High to 92.9 FPS at 1080p High is a direct result of the GPU having to process far fewer pixels, allowing it to operate more efficiently. The data supports that this card is best utilized at 1080p or 1440p, where its capabilities are not overwhelmed.

Settings Recommendations

The measured FPS data provides a clear guide for optimal settings across different resolutions. At 1920x1080, the High preset delivers an average of 92.9 FPS, which is an excellent balance of visual quality and performance. The Low preset offers a much higher 153 FPS, but the visual downgrade is substantial. For most users, the High preset at 1080p is the recommended choice, as it provides a smooth, responsive experience without sacrificing too much graphical fidelity.

For 2560x1440, the Medium preset at 81.2 FPS is the best option. High settings drop to 59 FPS, which is still playable but less smooth, while Low jumps to 98 FPS but loses significant detail. At 3840x2160, no preset achieves a consistently smooth 60 FPS. The Low preset at 58 FPS is the only playable option, but even that is borderline. The data suggests that 4K gaming is not a practical use case for this combo, and users should stick to 1440p Medium or 1080p High for the best experience.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The complete dataset shows a clear performance hierarchy based on resolution and settings. At 1920x1080, the results are strong across the board: Low settings achieve 153 FPS, Medium reaches 119.9 FPS, High delivers 92.9 FPS, and Ultra still maintains a respectable 71.9 FPS. This resolution is where the combo shines, offering high frame rates even on Ultra.

Moving to 2560x1440, the frame rates decline but remain playable. Low settings hit 98 FPS, Medium drops to 81.2 FPS, High falls to 59 FPS, and Ultra dips to 48.5 FPS. The step from High to Ultra represents a significant 10.5 FPS loss, suggesting that the Ultra preset's extra effects are not worth the performance cost at this resolution. At 3840x2160, the results are disappointing. Low settings manage 58 FPS, Medium drops to 45.7 FPS, High falls to 34 FPS, and Ultra bottoms out at 28.7 FPS. These numbers confirm that the GPU is the bottleneck at 4K, with even Low settings failing to provide a consistent 60 FPS.

CPU Role

The Intel Core i3-12100F is a 4-core, 8-thread processor with a base clock of 3.30 GHz and a boost clock of 4.30 GHz. Its benchmark scores show strong single-threaded performance, with a 3dmark_single_thread score of 893 and a cinebench_r23_singlecore score of 1681. This is beneficial for Palworld, which likely relies on a few primary threads for game logic and physics.

However, the CPU's multi-threaded performance is limited by its core count. The cinebench_r23_multicore score of 11912 is respectable for a quad-core part, but in a game that can utilize more cores, this limitation becomes apparent. The combo's ranking of 1259 out of 1718 suggests that systems with higher-core-count CPUs achieve better performance. The 3dmark_16_threads score of 4051 is nearly identical to the max_threads score of 4023, confirming that the processor has no more than 8 threads to offer. In Palworld, this means that while the CPU can handle the primary game threads efficiently, it may struggle to feed the GPU quickly enough at lower resolutions, potentially capping frame rates in less GPU-intensive scenes. The data indicates that the CPU is not the primary bottleneck at 4K, but it could be a secondary limiting factor at 1080p where the GPU has more headroom.

Hardware Specifications

Intel Core i3-12100F

Cores / Threads 4 / 8
Base Clock 3300 MHz
Boost Clock 4300 MHz
TDP 58W
Socket Intel Socket 1700
View Full CPU Details →

AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT

VRAM 8 GB GDDR6
Base Clock —
Boost Clock 1905 MHz MHz
TDP 225 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for Intel Core i3-12100F + AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT in Palworld

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Low 58.0
3840x2160 Medium 45.7
3840x2160 High 34.0
3840x2160 Ultra 28.7
2560x1440 Low 98.0
2560x1440 Medium 81.2
2560x1440 High 59.0
2560x1440 Ultra 48.5
1920x1080 Low 153.0
1920x1080 Medium 119.9
1920x1080 High 92.9
1920x1080 Ultra 71.9

Palworld with ii3-12100F + Other GPUs

See how Palworld performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.

Palworld with RX 5700 XT + Other CPUs

See how Palworld performs with the same GPU but different processors.

Other Games with ii3-12100F + RX 5700 XT

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.