Palworld

Palworld

AVERAGE FPS
123
excellent

This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 123 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 41 57 73 91
1440p QHD 79 105 133 164
1080p Full HD 121 155 202 249

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Low 91
3840x2160 Medium 73
3840x2160 High 57
3840x2160 Ultra 41
2560x1440 Low 164
2560x1440 Medium 133
2560x1440 High 105
2560x1440 Ultra 79
1920x1080 Low 249
1920x1080 Medium 202
1920x1080 High 155
1920x1080 Ultra 121

Palworld with AMD Ryzen 5 9600X + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070, In-Depth Analysis

Palworld with an AMD Ryzen 5 9600X and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 shows a clear performance curve that is heavily dictated by the graphics preset. The data indicates that this combo ranks 404th out of 1718 tested combinations, placing it in the upper quartile of systems for this game. The measured FPS across resolutions and settings reveals a system capable of high refresh rate play at 1080p, but one that will require careful settings management to maintain smooth performance at 4K.

Resolution Scaling

The performance drop from 1080p to 4K is substantial and scales predictably with the increasing pixel count. At High settings, the average frame rate falls from 155 FPS at 1920x1080 to 104.9 FPS at 2560x1440, a reduction of roughly 32%. Moving to 3840x2160, the average drops further to 57.4 FPS, which represents a 63% decline from the 1080p result. This steep curve indicates that the RTX 4070 is the primary limiting factor at higher resolutions, as the demand on the GPU’s rendering pipeline grows faster than the CPU can compensate.

The pattern is consistent across all settings. At Low, the system delivers 248.5 FPS at 1080p, 164.3 FPS at 1440p, and 91.3 FPS at 4K. The percentage drop from 1080p to 4K is 63% at Low, which is nearly identical to the drop at High. This consistency suggests that the resolution scaling is purely a function of GPU workload, not a sudden shift in bottleneck behavior. At 1080p, the very high frame rates, particularly the 248.5 FPS Low result, hint that the CPU is keeping up well, but the GPU is still the component that determines the ceiling for each resolution.

The gap between 1440p and 4K is larger than the gap between 1080p and 1440p at every preset. For instance, at Medium settings, the drop from 1440p to 4K is from 132.9 FPS to 73.1 FPS, a 45% reduction, while the drop from 1080p to 1440p is only 34%. This non-linear scaling is typical for a GPU with 12 GB of VRAM and a 192-bit memory bus, as the 4K resolution pushes the memory bandwidth and fill rate to their limits. The data clearly shows that 4K is a demanding target for this combo, while 1440p offers a much more comfortable performance envelope.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 is built on the Ada Lovelace architecture with a 5 nm process and features 12 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 192-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 504.2 GB/s. The GPU has a base clock of 1920 MHz and a boost clock of 2475 MHz, with 5888 shading units and 64 ROPs. These specifications directly influence the measured results. The 12 GB frame buffer is sufficient for Palworld at 1080p and 1440p, but at 4K with Ultra settings, the game’s asset streaming and texture usage can push against this limit, contributing to the lower 41.4 FPS average.

The boost clock of 2475 MHz is the effective speed during gaming, and the data suggests that the card maintains high utilization across all tested settings. The performance difference between Low and Ultra at each resolution is notable. At 1080p, the spread is from 248.5 FPS to 121 FPS, a 51% reduction. At 4K, the spread is from 91.3 FPS to 41.4 FPS, a 55% reduction. This relative consistency indicates that the GPU is scaling its workload efficiently, but the absolute numbers at 4K Ultra fall below the 60 FPS threshold that many players consider the minimum for smooth play.

The GPU’s benchmark scores reflect its mid-to-high-end positioning. It achieves a PassMark G3D score of 26927 and a Geekbench OpenCL score of 168006, with an average benchmark score of 37283. This places it in the 81st percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals in the database include the AMD Radeon RX Vega 56, which is 0.6% slower, and the NVIDIA GeForce MX570 A, which is 1.9% slower. These close margins suggest that the RTX 4070 is a well-balanced card for its class, but it is not a top-tier performer for 4K gaming.

FAQ

Q: Can this system handle Palworld at 4K resolution?

A: Yes, but only with adjusted settings. At High settings, the average FPS is 57.4, which is playable but not ideal for fast-paced action. At Low settings, it reaches 91.3 FPS, but at Ultra it drops to 41.4 FPS, which is below the smoothness threshold.

Q: What is the best resolution for high refresh rate monitors?

A: The data shows 1080p is the sweet spot. At Medium settings, the system delivers 201.8 FPS, and at High it still manages 155 FPS. This allows for full utilization of 144Hz or even 240Hz monitors.

Q: How does the Ryzen 5 9600X perform in this game?

A: The CPU has 6 cores and 12 threads with a boost clock of 5.40 GHz. Its benchmark results, such as a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 25525 and a single-core score of 3603, indicate it provides ample headroom. At 1080p Low, the 248.5 FPS result shows the CPU is not a limiting factor.

Q: Is the RTX 4070’s 12 GB of VRAM enough for Palworld?

A: The measured results suggest it is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p, where the highest settings still produce playable frame rates. At 4K Ultra, the lower 41.4 FPS result may be partially due to VRAM capacity, but the overall GPU compute power is the more likely bottleneck.

Q: What settings should I avoid for the smoothest experience?

A: Ultra settings at any resolution produce the lowest frame rates. At 1440p, Ultra averages 79.2 FPS, which is acceptable, but at 4K it drops to 41.4 FPS. For a consistent 60 FPS target, High settings at 1440p or Medium settings at 4K are the safer choices.

Q: How does this combo compare to other systems in the database?

A: The combination ranks 404th out of 1718, placing it in the top 24% of tested systems. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 28246 puts it 0.3% ahead of the Intel Core i5-13490F and 0.5% behind the Intel Core i5-14500T.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal balance between visual quality and performance depends on the target resolution. For 1080p, the High preset is the clear recommendation, delivering 155 FPS. This is a significant jump from the 121 FPS of Ultra, and the visual difference between High and Ultra is often not worth a 22% performance hit. If a player prioritizes maximum frame rates, the Medium preset at 201.8 FPS is also excellent, but High provides a better image quality without sacrificing the high refresh rate experience.

For 1440p, the High preset is again the best choice, averaging 104.9 FPS. This is comfortably above the 60 FPS standard and close to 100 FPS, which is ideal for most gaming monitors. The Medium preset at 132.9 FPS is faster, but the drop to High is a worthwhile trade for improved fidelity. Ultra at 79.2 FPS is playable, but the data shows that the jump from High to Ultra carries a 24% performance penalty, which may not be justified.

At 4K, the situation is more constrained. The High preset at 57.4 FPS is just below the 60 FPS target, but it is the highest quality setting that remains close to playable. The Medium preset at 73.1 FPS is the recommended choice for a smoother experience, as it stays above 60 FPS while offering better visuals than Low. Ultra at 41.4 FPS should be avoided unless the player is willing to tolerate a slideshow-like experience. Low at 91.3 FPS is the fastest 4K option, but it sacrifices too much visual quality for the modest gain over Medium.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the system shows its strongest performance. The Low preset averages 248.5 FPS, which is exceptionally high and indicates that the CPU and GPU are both operating efficiently. The Medium preset follows at 201.8 FPS, and High drops to 155 FPS. The Ultra preset still manages 121 FPS, which is a solid result for maximum quality settings. The spread from Low to Ultra is 127.5 FPS, showing a wide range of options for different player preferences.

At 2560x1440, the performance scales down as expected. Low averages 164.3 FPS, Medium averages 132.9 FPS, and High averages 104.9 FPS. The Ultra preset at 79.2 FPS is the first setting that falls below the 100 FPS mark, but it remains playable for most users. The relative performance gap between presets is consistent with the 1080p results, suggesting that the GPU is handling the increased resolution without unexpected bottlenecks.

At 3840x2160, the frame rates become more moderate. Low averages 91.3 FPS, which is still above 60 FPS and provides a smooth experience. Medium averages 73.1 FPS, High averages 57.4 FPS, and Ultra drops to 41.4 FPS. The transition from High to Ultra at 4K represents a 28% drop, which is the largest single-setting penalty in the entire dataset. This indicates that Ultra settings at 4K are particularly demanding on the RTX 4070’s resources.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 5 9600X is a 6-core, 12-thread processor from the 9000 series, built on the Zen 5 architecture with a 4 nm process. It has a base clock of 3.90 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz, with 32 MB of shared L3 cache. The CPU’s benchmark performance is strong, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 25525 and a single-core score of 3603. In the database, its average benchmark score is 28246, placing it in the 85th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core i5-13490F, scores 28173, which is 0.3% slower, while the AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS scores 28369, which is 0.4% faster.

In Palworld, the CPU’s role is evident in the high frame rates at lower resolutions. At 1080p Low, the 248.5 FPS result shows that the CPU can feed the GPU effectively, since the RTX 4070 is not the bottleneck at these settings. The single-thread performance, highlighted by the Geekbench single-core score of 3363, is particularly important for a survival game like Palworld, which often has complex world simulation and AI logic that rely on a few heavily loaded threads. The boost clock of 5.40 GHz provides the necessary speed for these tasks.

The CPU’s 65 W TDP and 4 nm process make it an efficient choice, but the data does not indicate any thermal or power-related throttling that would affect the measured FPS. The 3DMark 16-thread score of 7585 and the max-thread score of 7590 show that the CPU scales well with multi-threaded workloads, but Palworld’s performance is more reliant on the single-thread and moderate-thread results. The 2-thread score of 2456 is a strong indicator for games that use a few primary threads, which aligns with the high frame rates observed at 1080p. Overall, the Ryzen 5 9600X provides a solid foundation for this GPU, ensuring that the RTX 4070 can perform to its full potential without being held back by the processor.

Hardware Specifications

AMD Ryzen 5 9600X

Cores / Threads 6 / 12
Base Clock 3900 MHz
Boost Clock 5400 MHz
TDP 65W
Socket AMD Socket AM5
View Full CPU Details →

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070

VRAM 12 GB GDDR6X
Base Clock —
Boost Clock 2475 MHz MHz
TDP 200 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for AMD Ryzen 5 9600X + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 in Palworld

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Low 91.3
3840x2160 Medium 73.1
3840x2160 High 57.4
3840x2160 Ultra 41.4
2560x1440 Low 164.3
2560x1440 Medium 132.9
2560x1440 High 104.9
2560x1440 Ultra 79.2
1920x1080 Low 248.5
1920x1080 Medium 201.8
1920x1080 High 155.0
1920x1080 Ultra 121.0

Palworld with Ryzen 5 9600X + Other GPUs

See how Palworld performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.

Palworld with RTX 4070 + Other CPUs

See how Palworld performs with the same GPU but different processors.

Other Games with Ryzen 5 9600X + RTX 4070

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.