Palworld

Palworld

AVERAGE FPS
75
good

This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 75 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 26 35 45 56
1440p QHD 47 63 81 100
1080p Full HD 72 95 123 152

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Low 56
3840x2160 Medium 45
3840x2160 High 35
3840x2160 Ultra 26
2560x1440 Low 100
2560x1440 Medium 81
2560x1440 High 63
2560x1440 Ultra 47
1920x1080 Low 152
1920x1080 Medium 123
1920x1080 High 95
1920x1080 Ultra 72

Palworld with AMD Ryzen 5 7400F + AMD Radeon RX 7600, In-Depth Analysis

Palworld, a survival game that blends creature collection with base building and exploration, places distinct demands on a gaming PC. This analysis examines the measured performance of the AMD Ryzen 5 7400F paired with the AMD Radeon RX 7600, using data from the FACT PACK to understand how this combination handles the game across different resolutions and quality presets. The data reveals a system that can deliver smooth gameplay at 1080p and 1440p but struggles to maintain playable frame rates at 4K, with the GPU acting as the primary bottleneck in more demanding scenarios.

Settings Recommendations

The measured FPS data for Palworld with this hardware combination shows a clear trade-off between visual fidelity and performance. The sweet spot for the best experience is the Medium preset at 1920x1080, which delivers 123 average FPS with a minimum of 105 and a maximum of 142. This provides a comfortable margin above the 60 FPS threshold, ensuring smooth gameplay even during intense moments with multiple Pals or complex base structures. The minimum FPS of 105 is particularly important, as it indicates the system rarely dips into uncomfortable territory. While the High preset at 1080p offers a higher visual quality with 95 average FPS, the Medium preset’s higher minimum frame rate makes it the more consistent and reliable choice for an uninterrupted experience.

At 2560x1440, the Medium preset again emerges as the most balanced option, yielding 81 average FPS with a minimum of 69 and a maximum of 93. The minimum of 69 FPS is just above the 60 FPS line, suggesting that while there might be occasional slight dips, the overall experience remains playable. The High preset at 1440p produces 63 average FPS, which is acceptable but offers less headroom for demanding scenes. For players prioritizing a stable, high-refresh-rate experience, Medium at 1440p is the recommended path. The Low preset at 1080p achieves 152 average FPS, which is excellent for competitive play or high-refresh-rate monitors, but this comes at the cost of significant visual downgrades, making it less appealing for general play.

The Ultra preset, while visually impressive, presents challenges. At 1080p, it yields 72 average FPS, which is playable, but the lack of a reported minimum FPS in the data suggests potential instability. At 1440p, Ultra drops to 47 average FPS, falling below the ideal playable threshold. At 4K, Ultra is not viable, with an average of only 26 FPS. The data suggests that the Medium preset provides the best balance of performance and visual quality across all tested resolutions, making it the recommended starting point for this hardware combination.

How This Combo Ranks

In the broader context of all tested hardware combinations for Palworld, the AMD Ryzen 5 7400F and AMD Radeon RX 7600 combination ranks 2036 out of 2944 tested combos. This places it in the lower third of all tested configurations, indicating that while it is a capable setup for 1080p and 1440p gaming, many other systems deliver higher frame rates. The percentile data for the individual components supports this assessment. The CPU ranks in the 83rd percentile among all tested CPUs, showing it is a strong processor, while the GPU ranks in the 57th percentile among all tested GPUs, placing it more squarely in the mid-range category.

The combo’s ranking suggests that the RX 7600 is the limiting factor in this pairing. The Ryzen 5 7400F, with its strong multi-core performance, is capable of feeding the GPU effectively, but the GPU’s overall performance ceiling constrains the system’s output in Palworld. The ranking of 2036 out of 2944 indicates that a significant number of other combinations, likely those with higher-end GPUs, will outperform this setup. For a player considering this build, the data implies it is a solid mid-range option, but not one that will compete with top-tier systems in demanding titles like Palworld at higher resolutions. The GPU's 57th percentile ranking is a clear indicator that most other graphics cards tested are either comparable or faster, which directly impacts the overall combo rank.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon RX 7600 is the central component for rendering Palworld’s world. Its performance is defined by its 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 288.0 GB/s, and its clock speeds, which include a base of 1720 MHz, a game clock of 2250 MHz, and a boost clock of 2655 MHz. The memory configuration, particularly the 8 GB capacity, plays a critical role in determining performance at higher resolutions and settings. The data shows a significant drop in FPS when moving from 1440p to 4K, which is a classic sign of the GPU hitting its memory bandwidth or capacity limits.

The game clock of 2250 MHz is the sustained speed expected during typical gaming loads, and the boost clock of 2655 MHz provides a temporary performance increase when thermals and power allow. These clocks, combined with the 2048 shading units, determine the raw compute throughput of the card. The FP32 performance of 21.75 TFLOPS gives an indication of its theoretical peak performance. In Palworld, the GPU’s role is most evident in the difference between Low and Ultra settings. At 1080p, the average FPS drops from 152 on Low to 72 on Ultra, a 53% reduction, which is directly attributable to the increased workload on the GPU’s shading units, TMUs, and ROPs. The GPU’s 57th percentile ranking among all tested GPUs suggests it is a mid-range performer, and the measured FPS data confirms that it is best suited for 1080p and 1440p gaming, where it can maintain high frame rates at reasonable settings. The 8 GB VRAM capacity is sufficient for these resolutions, but the 4K results, particularly the 26 FPS average on Ultra, indicate that the card’s memory subsystem is overwhelmed by the demands of 4K rendering.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a detailed look at how this system performs across different resolutions and settings.

At 1920x1080, the system shows strong performance. On the Low preset, it achieves an average of 152 FPS, indicating a very high level of performance that is ideal for high-refresh-rate displays. The Medium preset delivers 123 average FPS, with a minimum of 105 and a maximum of 142, demonstrating a stable and smooth experience. The High preset produces 95 average FPS, which is still very playable and offers better visual quality. The Ultra preset yields 72 average FPS, which is above the 60 FPS target but shows a noticeable performance cost for the highest settings. At 1080p, the system is clearly CPU-bound at lower settings, as the GPU has enough headroom to render frames quickly, and the CPU’s performance becomes the limiting factor.

At 2560x1440, the performance scales down as expected. The Low preset achieves 100 average FPS, which is still excellent. The Medium preset provides 81 average FPS, with a minimum of 69 and a maximum of 93, making it the best choice for a balance of quality and performance. The High preset drops to 63 average FPS, which is playable but closer to the edge of the ideal range. The Ultra preset falls to 47 average FPS, which is below the 60 FPS target and may feel less smooth in fast-paced situations. At this resolution, the GPU begins to become a more significant bottleneck, as the higher pixel count increases the load on the rendering pipeline.

At 3840x2160, the system struggles to maintain playable frame rates. The Low preset achieves 56 average FPS, which is barely playable but shows significant visual compromises. The Medium preset drops to 45 average FPS, with a minimum of 38 and a maximum of 52, indicating an inconsistent experience that would be noticeable in gameplay. The High preset yields only 35 average FPS, and the Ultra preset falls to 26 average FPS. These results clearly show that the RX 7600 does not have sufficient performance or memory bandwidth for 4K gaming in Palworld. The 8 GB VRAM is likely a major constraint, as the game’s high-resolution textures and geometry can exceed this capacity, leading to performance degradation. The data indicates that 4K is not a viable option for this hardware combination, and players should stick to 1080p or 1440p for a satisfactory experience.

FAQ

Q: What is the best resolution and settings combo for a smooth 60+ FPS experience?

A: The data shows the Medium preset at 1920x1080 delivers 123 average FPS with a minimum of 105. At 2560x1440, the Medium preset provides 81 average FPS with a minimum of 69, which also stays above 60 FPS. Both are viable, with 1080p Medium offering more headroom.

Q: Can this system handle 4K gaming in Palworld?

A: The measured results indicate no. At 3840x2160, the highest average FPS is 56 on the Low preset. The Medium preset averages 45 FPS, and the High and Ultra presets average 35 and 26 FPS respectively. These frame rates are below the standard for smooth playable performance.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its direct rivals?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 7400F has an average benchmark score of 32750. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core i5-14600T, scores 32707, which is a 0.1% difference. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H scores 32812, which is 0.2% higher. Performance is effectively on par with these rivals.

Q: How does the GPU compare to its direct rivals?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7600 has an average benchmark score of 15171. Its closest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM, scores 15199, which is 0.2% higher. The AMD Radeon 680M scores 15270, which is 0.7% higher. These are very small differences, indicating near-identical overall performance.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU the main bottleneck in this system?

A: The evidence points to the GPU. The GPU ranks in the 57th percentile of all tested GPUs, while the CPU ranks in the 83rd percentile. The significant FPS drops at higher resolutions, particularly to 4K, are characteristic of GPU limitations, not CPU limitations.

Q: What is the significance of the minimum FPS values in the data?

A: Minimum FPS values, where available, indicate the worst-case performance dips. For example, at 1080p Medium, the minimum is 105 FPS, showing consistent performance. At 4K Medium, the minimum is 38 FPS, revealing that the experience can become choppy and inconsistent.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 5 7400F is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on the Zen 4 architecture, with a base clock of 3.70 GHz and a boost clock of 4.70 GHz. It features 32 MB of shared L3 cache and supports DDR5 memory. Its benchmark scores are strong, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21765 and a single-core score of 3072, placing it in the 83rd percentile of all tested CPUs. In Palworld, the CPU’s role is to handle game logic, physics, AI, and the simulation of the world, which can be demanding in a survival game with many active entities.

The data suggests that the CPU is more than capable of keeping up with the GPU in this pairing. At 1080p with the Low preset, the system achieves 152 average FPS, which is likely near the CPU’s limit for frame generation. As the resolution increases to 1440p and 4K, the FPS drops, but this is primarily due to the GPU’s increased workload. The CPU’s performance, as indicated by its high percentile ranking and strong multi-core scores, means it is not the limiting factor in most scenarios. The comparison to its nearest rivals, such as the Intel Core i5-14600T with a 0.1% score difference, confirms that it is a competitive mid-range processor. Its 6 cores and 12 threads are well-suited for modern games, providing enough parallelism for Palworld’s various systems. The CPU’s high single-core performance, as seen in its Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3072, is also crucial for games that rely on a single main thread for frame pacing. In this system, the Ryzen 5 7400F provides a solid foundation, ensuring that the GPU is not starved of data to process.

Resolution Scaling

The FPS data reveals a clear pattern of performance degradation as resolution increases, which is typical for a system that is GPU-bound at higher settings. Moving from 1920x1080 to 2560x1440, the average FPS on the Medium preset drops from 123 to 81, a reduction of 34%. This is a significant decrease, but the 1440p performance remains playable. The transition from 2560x1440 to 3840x2160 is even more dramatic. On the Medium preset, the average FPS falls from 81 to 45, a 44% reduction. This steep drop indicates that the GPU is severely strained at 4K, and the 8 GB VRAM capacity may be insufficient for the higher resolution’s texture and buffer demands.

This scaling behavior strongly suggests that the GPU is the primary limiting component. If the CPU were the bottleneck, we would expect the FPS to remain relatively constant across resolutions, as the CPU’s workload (game logic, AI) does not change significantly with resolution. The fact that FPS drops consistently and sharply with increasing resolution points directly to the GPU’s rendering capabilities being overwhelmed. The gap between the Low and Ultra presets also widens at higher resolutions. At 1080p, the difference between Low and Ultra is 80 FPS (152 vs 72). At 4K, the difference is 30 FPS (56 vs 26), but the absolute performance is so low that it doesn’t matter. The data shows that this combination is best suited for 1080p, where it can deliver high frame rates at all settings, and 1440p, where it can deliver a smooth experience at Medium or High settings. The 4K results are consistently below playable thresholds, making it clear that this resolution is outside the scope of this hardware pairing for Palworld.

Hardware Specifications

AMD Ryzen 5 7400F

Cores / Threads 6 / 12
Base Clock 3700 MHz
Boost Clock 4700 MHz
TDP 65W
Socket AMD Socket AM5
View Full CPU Details →

AMD Radeon RX 7600

VRAM 8 GB GDDR6
Base Clock —
Boost Clock 2655 MHz MHz
TDP 165 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for AMD Ryzen 5 7400F + AMD Radeon RX 7600 in Palworld

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Low 56.0
3840x2160 Medium 45.0
3840x2160 High 35.0
3840x2160 Ultra 26.0
2560x1440 Low 100.0
2560x1440 Medium 81.0
2560x1440 High 63.0
2560x1440 Ultra 47.0
1920x1080 Low 152.0
1920x1080 Medium 123.0
1920x1080 High 95.0
1920x1080 Ultra 72.0

Palworld with Ryzen 5 7400F + Other GPUs

See how Palworld performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.

Palworld with RX 7600 + Other CPUs

See how Palworld performs with the same GPU but different processors.

Other Games with Ryzen 5 7400F + RX 7600

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.