Outriders

The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 delivers a formidable performance profile in Outriders, securing a combo rank of 349 out of 2913 tested configurations. This placement puts the pairing in the top 12% of all tested combos, indicating that this hardware combination is exceptionally well-suited for the game’s demands. The data shows that while the RTX 5090 is the primary driver of frame rates, the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 provides sufficient headroom to avoid bottlenecking at most settings, making this a balanced high-end platform for this looter shooter.

The rank is particularly impressive given the game’s release timeframe and the fact that this is a mobile-class CPU paired with a flagship desktop GPU. The combination outperforms the vast majority of systems, with only 349 other configurations achieving higher frame rates. This suggests that the pairing is not merely capable but is positioned near the apex of current hardware potential for Outriders. The benchmark results indicate a system that can handle the game’s most demanding scenarios with ease, though the specific frame rate outcomes vary significantly based on resolution and quality settings, as detailed in the sections below.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo’s overall rank of 349 out of 2913 places it firmly in the upper echelon of tested systems. This is a strong showing, especially when considering that the CPU is a 2025 mobile part, while the GPU is the current flagship. The percentile data reinforces this: the CPU sits in the 95th percentile against all processors, and the GPU is in the 92nd percentile against all graphics cards. When combined, these components produce a system that is capable of delivering high frame rates across all tested resolutions, but the exact performance level is heavily dependent on the graphics settings chosen.

Looking at the CPU’s nearest rivals, the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 is closely matched with several high-end desktop parts. It is 1.6% ahead of the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX and the AMD EPYC Embedded 8224P, and 2% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX. Conversely, it trails the Intel Core i9-14900K by 1.7%. These narrow margins indicate that the CPU’s multi-threaded performance is competitive with top-tier desktop offerings, which is surprising for a mobile chip with a 55W TDP. This level of headroom means that in Outriders, the CPU is unlikely to be the limiting factor at 1080p and 1440p, where the GPU is heavily utilized.

For the GPU, the RTX 5090’s nearest rivals in the database include the NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB (0.3% behind) and the AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT (1.1% behind). The RTX 5090 also leads the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X by 1.4%. These comparisons are based on average benchmark scores, which may not directly translate to Outriders, but they suggest that the GPU is positioned well above the median. The data strongly suggests that this combo is optimized for high-refresh-rate gaming at 1440p and smooth 4K experiences, with the rank reflecting its capability to handle the game’s engine without significant compromise.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 is the undisputed workhorse in this configuration, and its specifications directly explain the frame rates observed in Outriders. The GPU features 32 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 512-bit bus, delivering a massive 1.79 TB/s of bandwidth. This is more than sufficient for the game’s textures and assets, even at 4K Ultra settings, where memory capacity can sometimes be a limiting factor on lesser cards. The high bandwidth ensures that data flows efficiently to the GPU cores, minimizing stutter and maintaining consistent frame pacing.

Clock speeds are also a key factor. The GPU has a base clock of 2017 MHz and a boost clock of 2407 MHz. These high frequencies, combined with 21760 shading units, allow the GPU to process the complex lighting and particle effects in Outriders efficiently. The FP32 performance of 104.8 TFLOPS is indicative of raw compute power, which translates directly to the high average frame rates seen in the benchmarks. The data shows that the GPU is the dominant component in this pairing, as evidenced by the dramatic FPS differences between settings at the same resolution. For example, at 1440p, the average FPS jumps from 88 on Ultra to 220 on Low, a 150% increase that highlights the GPU’s sensitivity to graphical load.

The RTX 5090’s 170 RT cores and 680 tensor cores are present but are not heavily leveraged in Outriders, which is not a ray-tracing-centric title. The benchmark results indicate that the GPU’s traditional rasterization performance is what drives the scores. The GPU’s percentile rank of 92 places it well above average, and its average benchmark score of 79842 is within a fraction of its nearest rivals. In the context of this game, the GPU is clearly capable of pushing frame rates far beyond the 60 FPS target, even at 4K with medium settings, as the data confirms.

Resolution Scaling

The benchmark data reveals a clear scaling pattern across resolutions, which points to the GPU as the primary bottleneck at higher settings. At 1080p, the system is exceptionally fast, with average FPS ranging from 140 on Ultra to 257 on Low. This suggests that at lower resolutions, the CPU is still able to feed the GPU adequately, but the GPU is not being pushed to its limits. The difference between Low and Ultra at 1080p is 117 FPS, indicating that the GPU has massive headroom when the resolution is lowered.

Moving to 1440p, the frame rates remain high but begin to show the GPU’s workload. The average FPS at High is 122, which is a 37% drop from the 1080p High score of 194. At Low, the drop is 14% (from 257 to 220), showing that the GPU is still capable of high output but is being taxed more. The Ultra setting at 1440p (88 FPS) is 37% slower than the High setting, demonstrating that the most demanding preset significantly increases the GPU load.

At 4K, the scaling becomes more pronounced. The average FPS at High drops to 64, which is a 67% reduction compared to 1080p High. This steep decline is typical of a GPU-limited scenario, where the number of pixels quadruples from 1080p to 4K, demanding significantly more from the graphics card. The data shows that at 4K Ultra, the system falls to 46 FPS, which is below the ideal 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay. The scaling from 1440p to 4K at Medium shows a 48% drop (from 163 to 85 FPS), further confirming that the RTX 5090, while powerful, is the limiting component at this resolution. The results indicate that for 4K gaming, users should consider High or Medium settings to maintain playable frame rates.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS rows, the optimal settings depend on the user’s resolution priority. For 4K, the High preset at 64 FPS average is the most balanced choice, offering a smooth experience close to the 60 FPS target. The Medium preset at 85 FPS is also viable, providing a 33% performance boost over High while likely sacrificing some visual fidelity. The Ultra preset at 46 FPS is not recommended for 4K, as it falls below the threshold for smooth gameplay. The Low preset at 117 FPS is playable but may not fully utilize the hardware’s visual potential.

At 1440p, the High preset at 122 FPS is the sweet spot, offering a high-refresh-rate experience without significant visual compromises. The Medium preset at 163 FPS is also excellent, providing a 34% increase over High, which is ideal for 144Hz or higher displays. The Ultra preset at 88 FPS is playable and will satisfy users who prioritize maximum visual quality over frame rate. The Low preset at 220 FPS is excessive for most displays but demonstrates the system’s capability at this resolution.

For 1080p, the High preset at 194 FPS is the recommended starting point, as it provides a very high frame rate that exceeds most monitor refresh rates. The Medium preset at 228 FPS is even faster and is suitable for competitive play, though the visual difference may be noticeable. The Ultra preset at 140 FPS is a good choice for users who want the best visuals and have a 144Hz monitor, as it still delivers a high frame rate. The data suggests that the system is overkill for 1080p, and users should prioritize higher resolutions or visual quality settings to leverage the hardware effectively.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a comprehensive view of the system’s performance across all settings and resolutions. At 1920x1080, the average FPS values are: Low 257, Medium 228, High 194, and Ultra 140. The Medium setting has a recorded min FPS of 194 and max FPS of 262, indicating good frame pacing with minimal dips. The high scores at this resolution confirm that the system is not CPU-bound, as the Ryzen AI Max+ 395’s 16 cores and 32 threads provide ample processing power.

At 2560x1440, the average FPS values are: Low 220, Medium 163, High 122, and Ultra 88. The Medium setting shows a min FPS of 139 and max of 188, which is a wider range than at 1080p, suggesting the GPU is working harder. The drop from Low to Ultra is 132 FPS, which is a 60% reduction, highlighting the significant performance cost of the Ultra preset at this resolution. The data indicates that 1440p is the resolution where the GPU’s power is most effectively balanced with visual quality.

At 3840x2160, the average FPS values are: Low 117, Medium 85, High 64, and Ultra 46. The Medium setting has a min FPS of 72 and max of 98, which shows some variance but remains playable. The Ultra setting at 46 FPS is the only configuration that falls below 60 FPS, making it unsuitable for smooth gameplay. The scaling from Low to Ultra at 4K is a 71 FPS drop, which is a 61% reduction, underscoring the extreme load placed on the GPU at this resolution. The data clearly shows that 4K is the most demanding scenario for this combo, requiring careful setting selection.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 plays a supporting but crucial role in this configuration. It features 16 cores and 32 threads, based on the Zen 5 architecture, with a base clock of 3.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz. The CPU has a 64 MB shared L3 cache, which helps reduce memory latency and improves performance in gaming scenarios. The data shows that the CPU is not a bottleneck in Outriders, as evidenced by the high frame rates at 1080p where the CPU is typically more stressed.

The CPU’s benchmark scores are impressive, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 35314 and a single-core score of 2044. The Geekbench multi-core score of 20992 further confirms its capability. The CPU’s percentile rank of 95 indicates it is in the top 5% of all processors, and its average benchmark score of 77740 places it just 1.6% ahead of the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX. This level of performance ensures that the CPU can handle the game’s physics and AI calculations without slowing down the GPU.

However, the CPU’s TDP of 55W is surprisingly low for a chip with this performance, which may indicate power management is a factor. In Outriders, the data suggests that at 4K, the CPU is not the limiting factor, as the GPU is clearly the primary driver of performance. At 1080p, the CPU’s single-thread performance, as indicated by the Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2044, is sufficient to maintain high frame rates. The memory bandwidth of 256.0 GB/s from the LPDDR5X memory support is also ample for feeding the GPU, ensuring no data starvation occurs. Overall, the CPU provides a stable foundation for the GPU to operate at its full potential.

FAQ

Q: What is the best resolution for this combo to achieve over 100 FPS on High settings?

A: The data shows that at 2560x1440 on High settings, the average FPS is 122, which is over 100. At 1920x1080 on High, the average is 194 FPS. At 3840x2160 on High, the average drops to 64 FPS, which is below 100.

Q: Can this system handle 4K gaming smoothly?

A: The benchmark results indicate that 4K gaming is playable but requires setting adjustments. At 4K Medium, the average FPS is 85, and at High, it is 64. The Ultra preset at 46 FPS is not recommended for smooth gameplay, as it falls below 60 FPS.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the Intel Core i9-14900K?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 is 1.7% behind the Intel Core i9-14900K in average benchmark score. This is a narrow margin, indicating comparable multi-threaded performance in the database’s tests.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory bandwidth, and why is it important for this game?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 has a memory bandwidth of 1.79 TB/s from its 32 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 512-bit bus. This high bandwidth ensures texture streaming and asset loading are efficient, contributing to stable frame rates in Outriders.

Q: Is there a significant difference between Medium and High settings at 1440p?

A: Yes, the data shows that at 2560x1440, Medium averages 163 FPS, while High averages 122 FPS. This is a 41 FPS difference, or a 34% increase, making Medium the better choice for high-refresh-rate displays.

Q: Does the CPU become a bottleneck at any resolution?

A: Based on the data, the CPU does not appear to be a bottleneck. Even at 1080p Low, the average FPS is 257, which is a high score that suggests the CPU is keeping up with the GPU. The GPU is the limiting factor at all resolutions, especially at 4K.