Minimum
This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 80 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 28 | 37 | 44 | 58 |
| 1440p QHD | 53 | 69 | 82 | 108 |
| 1080p Full HD | 82 | 107 | 128 | 167 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Minimum with Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX + AMD Radeon 8050S, In-Depth Analysis
The Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX paired with the AMD Radeon 8050S places at rank 2152 out of 2939 tested combinations in Minimum. This puts the combo in the 73rd percentile of all tested systems, meaning it outperforms roughly three-quarters of the field while trailing the top quartile. The ranking reflects a balanced pairing where neither component dramatically bottlenecks the other, though the GPU’s position in its own percentile ranking (89th) is notably stronger than the CPU’s (94th), suggesting the graphics card carries slightly more weight in this specific game’s performance profile.
The delta between the combo’s overall rank and the individual component percentiles indicates that Minimum is not pushing either part to its absolute limit. A system with a top-tier CPU but mid-range GPU would likely see a similar ranking, and vice versa. The data shows the 8050S in this configuration delivers frame rates that are competitive with dedicated mobile GPUs from the same generation, but the 275HX’s 24-core design appears to be more than sufficient for this title’s demands.
GPU Role
The AMD Radeon 8050S operates with a base clock of 1295 MHz and a boost clock of 2800 MHz, built on the RDNA 3.5 architecture using a 4 nm process. Its memory configuration is entirely system-shared, with no dedicated VRAM pool, meaning bandwidth and capacity are dependent on the host system’s DDR5 memory. The GPU’s 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operations processors provide a raw compute ceiling of 11.47 TFLOPS for both FP32 and FP16 workloads.
In Minimum, the shared memory architecture proves workable but not ideal. The measured frames per second at 1080p High (107 avg) and 1440p High (69 avg) show the GPU handling geometry and effects without stutter, but the lack of dedicated VRAM likely contributes to the steep performance cliff at 4K Ultra, where the average drops to 28 FPS. The GPU’s 89th percentile ranking versus all GPUs places it near the AMD Radeon Pro W6600M (0.3% ahead) and slightly behind the Radeon RX 7600M (2.6% behind) and RX 9060 XT LP (2.7% behind), confirming it sits in the upper-midrange tier of mobile graphics.
The 32 ray tracing cores and DirectX 12 Ultimate support are present in the spec sheet, but Minimum’s 2014 release date means these features are largely irrelevant to the measured results. The GPU’s 179.2 GPixel/s pixel rate and 358.4 GTexel/s texture rate are the more relevant metrics for this title’s older rendering pipeline.
Resolution Scaling
The measured FPS data reveals a predictable scaling pattern as resolution increases. At 1080p Low, the combo achieves 167 FPS average. Moving to 1440p Low drops this to 108 FPS (a 35% reduction), and 4K Low further reduces it to 58 FPS (a 46% reduction from 1440p). This scaling behavior indicates the GPU becomes the limiting factor at higher resolutions, as the CPU’s 24 cores and 5.40 GHz boost clock are unlikely to saturate at any of these settings.
At High settings, the scaling is steeper: 107 FPS at 1080p drops to 69 FPS at 1440p (36% reduction) and then to 37 FPS at 4K (46% reduction from 1440p). The consistent percentage drops across resolution transitions suggest a GPU-bound scenario at all quality levels above Low. The Ultra preset shows the most dramatic falloff, with 82 FPS at 1080p falling to 53 FPS at 1440p (35% reduction) and then to 28 FPS at 4K (47% reduction from 1440p).
The pattern is remarkably uniform: each resolution step costs roughly 35-47% of the previous frame rate, regardless of quality preset. This uniformity strongly implies the Radeon 8050S is the primary performance limiter in this configuration, as a CPU bottleneck would typically show smaller percentage drops when moving from 1080p to 1440p. The system-shared memory bandwidth, which is system-dependent, may also contribute to the scaling penalty, as higher resolutions demand more memory throughput.
Settings Recommendations
The measured data provides clear guidance on optimal settings for this combo. At 1080p, the Low preset delivers 167 FPS average, which is more than sufficient for competitive play. However, the Medium preset at 128 FPS average (with a measured minimum of 109 FPS) offers a better balance of visual quality and performance, staying well above 100 FPS while providing improved textures and effects. The High preset at 107 FPS average remains playable, but the 20 FPS gap between Medium and High suggests diminishing returns.
At 1440p, the Medium preset produces 82 FPS average with a minimum of 70 FPS, which remains smooth for most gameplay scenarios. The High preset at 69 FPS is borderline, and the Ultra preset at 53 FPS may introduce noticeable stutter in fast-paced third-person shooter combat. For 1440p, Medium appears to be the sweet spot, preserving the 70 FPS minimum while keeping the average in the 80s.
At 4K, the situation is more constrained. The Low preset achieves 58 FPS average, which is playable but visually basic. The Medium preset drops to 44 FPS average with a 38 FPS minimum, which is below the 60 FPS threshold most players prefer. The High and Ultra presets at 37 FPS and 28 FPS respectively are not recommended for smooth gameplay. For 4K, Low is the only setting that maintains an average above 55 FPS.
The data indicates this combo is best suited for 1080p Medium or High, or 1440p Medium, with 4K reserved for lower quality presets or less demanding scenes.
FAQ
*Q: How does this combo rank against all tested systems in Minimum?*
A: The Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX and AMD Radeon 8050S combination ranks 2152 out of 2939 tested combos, placing it in the upper 73rd percentile of all systems.
*Q: What is the best resolution for this combo in Minimum?*
A: Based on measured FPS, 1080p is the strongest resolution, with the Low preset delivering 167 FPS and Medium delivering 128 FPS. 1440p Medium at 82 FPS is also viable, while 4K only reaches playable levels at Low (58 FPS).
Q: Is the CPU or GPU the limiting factor in this game?
A: The scaling data indicates the GPU is the primary limiter. Resolution transitions from 1080p to 1440p to 4K consistently reduce FPS by roughly 35-47%, which is characteristic of GPU-bound performance rather than CPU limitations.
Q: How does the Radeon 8050S compare to its nearest rivals?
A: The 8050S scores 0.3% higher than the AMD Radeon Pro W6600M, 2.5% lower than the Radeon Pro Vega 56, 2.6% lower than the RX 7600M, and 2.7% lower than the RX 9060 XT LP in average benchmark scores.
Q: What is the FPS range for 1080p Medium settings?
A: The measured data shows an average of 128 FPS with a minimum of 109 FPS and a maximum of 147 FPS at 1080p Medium.
Q: Does the CPU’s 24-core configuration provide an advantage in this title?
A: The Core Ultra 9 275HX’s 24 cores and 24 threads are far more than Minimum requires, given the GPU-bound scaling pattern. Its 94th percentile CPU ranking ensures it will not bottleneck the GPU at any tested resolution.
CPU Role
The Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX is a 24-core, 24-thread processor based on the Arrow Lake-HX architecture, manufactured on a 3 nm process by TSMC. Its base clock of 2.70 GHz can boost up to 5.40 GHz, and it carries 36 MB of shared L3 cache alongside 3 MB of L2 cache per core. The CPU’s 94th percentile ranking versus all CPUs places it within 0.3-0.7% of nearest rivals including the Intel Xeon w5-3525, AMD EPYC 4484PX, and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX.
In Minimum, the CPU’s role is largely to feed the GPU without becoming a bottleneck. The measured FPS data shows no evidence of CPU limitation: at 1080p Low, the system produces 167 FPS, and the single-core performance (Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2204) is more than adequate for a 2014 title with modest AI and physics demands. The 24 threads provide ample headroom for background tasks and streaming overhead, though the game itself is unlikely to use more than a handful of cores.
The CPU’s 55 W TDP and integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU are notable for a mobile platform, but in this discrete-GPU configuration, the integrated graphics remain idle. The dual-channel DDR5 memory support with 102.4 GB/s bandwidth feeds both the CPU and the system-shared GPU memory, which may become a limiting factor at 4K where the GPU requires more memory bandwidth. The CPU’s multi-threaded benchmark scores (Cinebench R23 multi-core of 35589, Geekbench multi-core of 20795) confirm it is a high-end mobile part, but these capabilities are largely unused in this game.
Measured FPS Breakdown
1080p Resolution
At Low settings, the combo averages 167 FPS, the highest measured result across all configurations. Medium settings reduce the average to 128 FPS, with observed minimum and maximum values of 109 FPS and 147 FPS respectively. High settings deliver 107 FPS average, while Ultra drops to 82 FPS average. The transition from Low to Medium costs 39 FPS (23%), Medium to High costs 21 FPS (16%), and High to Ultra costs 25 FPS (23%). The 109 FPS minimum at Medium ensures consistent smoothness, while the Ultra preset’s lack of minimum data suggests potential frame drops below 82 FPS.
1440p Resolution
The 1440p results show a similar pattern with reduced absolute numbers. Low settings produce 108 FPS average, Medium delivers 82 FPS with a 70 FPS minimum and 95 FPS maximum, High reaches 69 FPS, and Ultra drops to 53 FPS. The Medium preset’s 70 FPS minimum remains above the 60 FPS threshold for acceptable gameplay, making it the recommended choice at this resolution. The percentage drops between presets are slightly larger than at 1080p, with Medium to High costing 13 FPS (16%) and High to Ultra costing 16 FPS (23%).
4K Resolution
At 3840x2160, only the Low preset maintains a playable average at 58 FPS. Medium averages 44 FPS with a 38 FPS minimum and 51 FPS maximum, High drops to 37 FPS, and Ultra falls to 28 FPS. The gap between Low and Medium at 4K is 14 FPS (24%), which is consistent with the scaling seen at lower resolutions. None of the settings above Low achieve a 60 FPS average, indicating that 4K gaming with this combo requires compromise on visual quality. The Medium preset’s 38 FPS minimum suggests occasional drops that could impact gameplay in combat-heavy scenes, while the High and Ultra presets are likely unsuitable for smooth play.
The data across all resolutions shows a consistent pattern: the combo performs best at 1080p Medium or High, remains viable at 1440p Medium, and is limited to Low settings at 4K. The uniform scaling behavior reinforces the GPU-bound analysis, with the Radeon 8050S’s system-shared memory architecture being the most probable constraint at higher resolutions.
Hardware Specifications
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
AMD Radeon 8050S
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX + AMD Radeon 8050S in Minimum
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 58.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 44.0 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 37.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 28.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 108.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 82.0 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 69.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 53.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 167.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 128.0 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 107.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 82.0 |
Minimum with iUltra 9 275HX + Other GPUs
See how Minimum performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Minimum with 8050S + Other CPUs
See how Minimum performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with iUltra 9 275HX + 8050S
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.