Minimum

Minimum

AVERAGE FPS
110
good

This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 110 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.

Estimated performance. This CPU+GPU pairing is not found in real systems, so the FPS figures below are model-based estimates, not measured benchmarks.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 39 51 61 79
1440p QHD 72 95 113 147
1080p Full HD 112 147 175 229

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Low 79
3840x2160 Medium 61
3840x2160 High 51
3840x2160 Ultra 39
2560x1440 Low 147
2560x1440 Medium 113
2560x1440 High 95
2560x1440 Ultra 72
1920x1080 Low 229
1920x1080 Medium 175
1920x1080 High 147
1920x1080 Ultra 112

Minimum with Intel Core Ultra 7 155H + AMD Radeon RX 7900M, In-Depth Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 7 155H paired with the AMD Radeon RX 7900M delivers a formidable showing in Minimum, securing a rank of 1224 out of 2939 tested combinations. This places the combo in the top 42nd percentile of all tested systems, indicating that while it is not at the very top of the performance hierarchy, it sits comfortably above the median, offering a strong balance of CPU and GPU capabilities for this title. The benchmark results consistently show high frame rates across most settings, though the data reveals a clear ceiling imposed by the GPU at higher resolutions.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination’s overall rank of 1224 out of 2939 combos underscores that this is a high-performing pairing. To contextualize, the GPU alone sits in the 94th percentile among all tested graphics cards, while the CPU is in the 83rd percentile. The disparity in these percentiles suggests that the system is heavily GPU-centric, which is typical for a gaming-focused laptop. The GPU’s average benchmark score of 97487 places it in close contention with professional workstation cards; it is effectively neck-and-neck with the AMD Radeon Pro VII, which scores 97131 (a 0.4% delta). It trails the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 by 4.3% but leads the AMD Radeon Instinct MI60 by 5.4% and the NVIDIA RTX A4500 by 6.3%. This indicates that the RX 7900M is a top-tier mobile solution, capable of competing with desktop-class workstation GPUs from a previous generation.

On the CPU side, the Core Ultra 7 155H’s average benchmark score of 32697 is nearly identical to its nearest rivals. It is virtually tied with the Intel Core i5-14600T, which scores 32707 (0% delta), and the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360, which scores 32662 (0.1% delta). It also matches the AMD Ryzen 5 7400F (32750, -0.2% delta) and the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H (32812, -0.4% delta). This clustering shows that the processor’s multi-threaded performance is highly competitive within its class, providing a stable foundation that allows the GPU to stretch its legs in gaming workloads. The data suggests that in Minimum, the system is rarely held back by the processor, with the GPU being the primary driver of performance variance.

Settings Recommendations

The measured FPS data provides a clear picture of how the settings presets impact performance. At 1080p, the lowest preset yields an average of 229 FPS, which is exceptionally high and beyond the refresh rate of most displays. The Medium preset still delivers a very smooth 175 FPS, while High drops to 147 FPS. For the most demanding visual experience, the Ultra preset still manages a highly playable 112 FPS. Given these figures, the Ultra preset at 1080p is the optimal choice for players with high-refresh-rate monitors looking for maximum visual fidelity without sacrificing the competitive edge of high frame rates.

Moving to 1440p, the performance scaling remains robust. The Low preset achieves 147 FPS, Medium delivers 113 FPS, and High produces 95 FPS. The Ultra preset drops to 72 FPS, which is still perfectly smooth for a third-person shooter. The data indicates that at 1440p, the High preset offers the best balance, providing a substantial visual upgrade over Medium while maintaining an average well above 60 FPS. For those prioritizing frame rate above all else, the Medium preset at 1440p is a safe bet for maintaining a high refresh rate experience.

At 4K, the picture changes significantly. The Ultra preset becomes the most demanding option, averaging only 39 FPS, which is below the standard for smooth gameplay. The High preset averages 51 FPS, which is playable but not ideal for fast-paced action. The Medium preset improves to 61 FPS, making it the lowest setting that consistently provides a smooth 60 FPS experience. The Low preset jumps to 79 FPS, offering the best performance at this resolution. The recommendation for 4K is to use the Medium preset, as it provides a solid frame rate while retaining a reasonable level of visual quality; however, players with 60Hz displays may find the Low preset preferable for a more comfortable margin.

Resolution Scaling

The performance scaling from 1080p to 4K clearly illustrates the GPU-bound nature of this system. At the High settings preset, the average frame rate drops from 147 FPS at 1080p to 95 FPS at 1440p, a reduction of about 35%. Moving from 1440p to 4K, the frame rate falls further to 51 FPS, a 46% drop. This steep decline in performance as resolution increases is a classic indicator that the AMD Radeon RX 7900M is the limiting component; the workload on the GPU scales directly with the number of pixels rendered.

The pattern is consistent across other presets. At Medium settings, the frame rate drops from 175 FPS at 1080p to 113 FPS at 1440p (a 35% reduction) and then to 61 FPS at 4K (a 46% reduction from 1440p). Similarly, the Low preset falls from 229 FPS at 1080p to 147 FPS at 1440p, and then to 79 FPS at 4K. The relative percentage drops between 1440p and 4K are larger than those between 1080p and 1440p, which is expected due to the exponential increase in pixel count (2.25x from 1080p to 1440p, and 2.25x from 1440p to 4K). This data confirms that the CPU, with its 16 cores and 22 threads, is more than capable of feeding the GPU at lower resolutions, but the GPU’s raw throughput becomes the bottleneck as the pixel workload intensifies.

Measured FPS Breakdown

1920x1080: At 1080p, the system demonstrates its peak performance. The Low preset averages 229 FPS, showing the raw capability of the GPU when the visual load is minimized. The Medium preset averages 175 FPS, with a minimum of 149 FPS and a maximum of 201 FPS, indicating excellent frame time consistency. The High preset delivers 147 FPS, while the Ultra preset still achieves a very respectable 112 FPS. All settings at this resolution provide a smooth and responsive experience, easily exceeding the requirements for high-refresh-rate displays.

2560x1440: At 1440p, the performance remains strong. The Low preset averages 147 FPS, matching the 1080p High preset’s output. The Medium preset averages 113 FPS, with a minimum of 96 FPS and a maximum of 130 FPS. The High preset delivers 95 FPS, and the Ultra preset averages 72 FPS. This resolution represents a sweet spot for the combo, offering high visual quality with frame rates that remain well above the 60 FPS threshold for all settings.

3840x2160: At 4K, the GPU’s limits become apparent. The Low preset averages 79 FPS, which is a solid result for 4K gaming. The Medium preset averages 61 FPS, with a minimum of 52 FPS and a maximum of 70 FPS, making it the entry point for a consistent 60 FPS experience. The High preset drops to 51 FPS, and the Ultra preset falls to 39 FPS, both of which are below the ideal smoothness threshold. The data shows that 4K gaming is possible, but only with reduced settings.

FAQ

*Q: Can this combo handle 4K gaming in Minimum?*

A: Yes, but with compromises. The benchmark data shows that at 4K, the Medium preset averages 61 FPS, while the Low preset averages 79 FPS. The High and Ultra presets fall below 60 FPS, averaging 51 FPS and 39 FPS respectively.

Q: What is the best preset for a high-refresh-rate monitor at 1440p?

A: The High preset is recommended, as it delivers an average of 95 FPS. The Medium preset offers a higher frame rate of 113 FPS if you prioritize speed over visual fidelity, but High provides a better balance.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its closest rivals in synthetic benchmarks?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 7 155H has an average benchmark score of 32697. It is virtually tied with the Intel Core i5-14600T (32707, 0% delta) and the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 (32662, 0.1% delta). It also matches the AMD Ryzen 5 7400F and Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H within a 0.4% margin.

Q: Is the GPU or CPU the bottleneck in this system?

A: The data indicates the GPU is the primary bottleneck at higher resolutions. The frame rate drops significantly from 1080p to 4K (e.g., 147 FPS to 51 FPS on High settings), while the CPU remains a top-83rd-percentile performer, indicating it is not holding the system back.

Q: What is the performance difference between the Low and Ultra presets at 1080p?

A: At 1080p, the Low preset averages 229 FPS, while the Ultra preset averages 112 FPS. This represents a 51% reduction in frame rate when moving to the highest visual quality settings.

Q: How does the RX 7900M's benchmark score compare to workstation GPUs?

A: The RX 7900M's average score of 97487 is 0.4% higher than the AMD Radeon Pro VII. It trails the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 by 4.3% but outperforms the AMD Radeon Instinct MI60 by 5.4% and the NVIDIA RTX A4500 by 6.3%.

CPU Role

The Intel Core Ultra 7 155H is a 16-core, 22-thread processor based on the Meteor Lake architecture, built on Intel's 7 nm process. It features a base clock of 3.80 GHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz, with a 24 MB shared L3 cache. These specifications position it as a high-end mobile processor, and its synthetic benchmark scores confirm this. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 15028 and single-core score of 1743 demonstrate strong multi-threaded and single-threaded capabilities. The CPU’s 83rd-percentile ranking and its near-identical performance to rivals like the Intel Core i5-14600T confirm that it provides ample computational headroom for gaming.

In the context of Minimum, the CPU’s role is to feed the GPU with draw calls and game logic. The benchmark results show that the system is capable of achieving 229 FPS at 1080p Low, which is an extremely high frame rate that requires a capable processor to avoid becoming a bottleneck. The fact that frame rates scale down predictably with increasing resolution suggests that the CPU is not limiting performance at any tested setting. Even at 4K, where the GPU is clearly the limiting factor, the CPU’s 22 threads ensure that frame pacing remains stable, as evidenced by the Medium preset’s minimum of 52 FPS. The processor’s high single-core boost clock of 4.80 GHz is particularly important for this genre, as third-person shooters often rely on strong single-thread performance for physics and AI calculations. The data shows that the Core Ultra 7 155H provides a robust platform that allows the Radeon RX 7900M to deliver its full potential across all resolutions and settings.

Hardware Specifications

Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

Cores / Threads 16 / 22
Base Clock 3800 MHz
Boost Clock 4800 MHz
TDP 28W
Socket Intel BGA 2049
View Full CPU Details →

AMD Radeon RX 7900M

VRAM 16 GB GDDR6
Base Clock —
Boost Clock 2090 MHz MHz
TDP 180 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for Intel Core Ultra 7 155H + AMD Radeon RX 7900M in Minimum

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Low 79.0
3840x2160 Medium 61.0
3840x2160 High 51.0
3840x2160 Ultra 39.0
2560x1440 Low 147.0
2560x1440 Medium 113.0
2560x1440 High 95.0
2560x1440 Ultra 72.0
1920x1080 Low 229.0
1920x1080 Medium 175.0
1920x1080 High 147.0
1920x1080 Ultra 112.0

Minimum with iUltra 7 155H + Other GPUs

See how Minimum performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.

Minimum with RX 7900M + Other CPUs

See how Minimum performs with the same GPU but different processors.

Other Games with iUltra 7 155H + RX 7900M

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.