Minimum

The Intel Core i9-14900K paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8 GB delivers a strong showing in Minimum, a 2014 third-person shooter, with benchmark results indicating that this combination ranks 1113th out of 2939 tested combos. The data shows that the CPU’s 24 cores and 32 threads, combined with the GPU’s 8 GB of GDDR7 memory, produce playable frame rates even at 4K, though the Ultra preset becomes demanding at higher resolutions.

FAQ

Q: What is the combo’s overall rank in this game?

A: The Intel Core i9-14900K and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8 GB combination ranks 1113th out of 2939 tested combos in Minimum.

Q: How much VRAM does the RTX 5060 Ti 8 GB have, and what type is it?

A: The GPU features 8 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 128-bit bus, with a memory bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s.

Q: What is the boost clock of the Intel Core i9-14900K?

A: The CPU has a base clock of 3.20 GHz and a boost clock of 6.00 GHz.

Q: What is the best average FPS recorded in the measured data?

A: The highest average FPS is 233, achieved at 1920x1080 resolution with Low settings.

Q: At which resolution and settings does the combo drop below 60 FPS?

A: At 3840x2160 with Ultra settings, the average FPS is 40, which is below 60 FPS.

Q: What is the launch MSRP of the CPU?

A: The Intel Core i9-14900K has a launch MSRP of $589.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival in terms of average benchmark score?

A: The Intel Core i9-14900K has an average benchmark score of 79097, while its closest rival, the Intel Core i9-14900KF, scores 79371, a delta of -0.3%.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8 GB is built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture, using a GB206 chip fabricated on TSMC’s 5 nm process. The GPU contains 21,900 million transistors on a 181 mm² die, with a transistor density of 121.0M per mm². Its base clock is 2407 MHz, boosting to 2572 MHz, and the memory runs at 1750 MHz with 28 Gbps effective speed. This configuration yields a memory bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s across a 128-bit bus, which is a key factor in how the GPU handles Minimum’s various settings.

The GPU’s 8 GB of GDDR7 memory is sufficient for the game’s demands, as evidenced by the measured FPS. At 1920x1080, the average FPS ranges from 114 on Ultra to 233 on Low, showing that the memory capacity and bandwidth are not bottlenecks at this resolution. The shading units (4608), TMUs (144), and ROPs (48) contribute to the GPU’s ability to process the game’s geometry and effects, while the 36 ray tracing cores and 144 tensor cores provide additional features, though Minimum from 2014 does not heavily utilize these modern capabilities.

The GPU’s fill rates are notable: a pixel rate of 123.5 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 370.4 GTexel/s. These figures explain why the card performs well at 1080p, where it can push out high frame counts. At 2560x1440, the average FPS drops to 73 on Ultra and 150 on Low, indicating that the GPU’s compute power (23.70 TFLOPS FP32) is sufficient for mid-range resolutions. However, at 3840x2160, the data shows a more pronounced strain: Ultra averages 40 FPS, while High averages 52 FPS, suggesting that the 8 GB VRAM and 128-bit bus are limiting factors at 4K, as the memory bandwidth becomes a constraint.

The GPU’s passmark G3D score of 21981 and 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 4019 provide synthetic benchmarks that align with the measured game performance. The GPU’s percentile rank against all GPUs is 29, which places it below many modern counterparts, but in Minimum, a title from 2014, the RTX 5060 Ti still delivers playable results. The nearest rivals in terms of average benchmark score include the AMD FirePro W5130M (4904, delta -0.1%) and NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 (4893, delta 0.2%), which are older or lower-tier cards, highlighting that the RTX 5060 Ti’s raw score is modest but its architecture is more efficient.

The GPU’s TDP is 180 W, with a suggested PSU of 450 W, and it uses a single 8-pin power connector. These power characteristics are relevant for system builders, but the benchmark data focuses on performance. The measured FPS at 1920x1080 Medium shows an average of 178 FPS with a minimum of 151 and maximum of 205, indicating strong consistency. At 2560x1440 Medium, the average is 115 FPS with a min of 98 and max of 132, showing that the GPU can maintain smooth gameplay at this resolution. The 4K Medium results (62 average, 53 min, 71 max) are lower but still above the 30 FPS threshold, though the Ultra preset at 4K falls to 40 average, which is below the ideal for fast-paced shooters.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo of the Intel Core i9-14900K and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8 GB ranks 1113th out of 2939 tested combos in Minimum. This places it in the upper-middle tier of all tested systems, meaning that while it is not among the top performers, it significantly outperforms the majority of combinations. The data indicates that this rank is influenced by both the CPU’s strong multi-threaded performance and the GPU’s moderate capabilities relative to modern standards.

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 79097, with a percentile rank of 95 against all CPUs, demonstrating that it is a high-end processor. In contrast, the GPU’s percentile rank is 29, which is low, suggesting that the GPU is the limiting factor in this combo’s overall rank. The nearest CPU rivals include the Intel Core i9-14900KF (avg score 79371, delta -0.3%) and the Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus (79574, delta -0.6%), showing that the i9-14900K is within 1% of these competitors. The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 has a score of 77740, which is 1.7% lower, indicating that the i9-14900K outperforms it.

For the GPU, the nearest rivals are older cards like the AMD FirePro W5130M and NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450, with deltas of -0.1% and 0.2% respectively. This suggests that the RTX 5060 Ti 8 GB’s synthetic benchmark score is comparable to these legacy parts, but in Minimum, the measured FPS shows better real-world performance due to modern features like GDDR7 memory and higher clock speeds. The combo’s rank of 1113 out of 2939 reflects that many systems with more powerful GPUs (e.g., higher VRAM or wider bus) outperform it, but the i9-14900K helps boost the overall position.

The measured FPS data reinforces this ranking. At 1920x1080, the combo achieves 233 FPS on Low, which is exceptional for a game from 2014. At 3840x2160, the Ultra preset’s 40 FPS indicates that the combo is not ideal for 4K gaming at maximum settings, but the High preset at 52 FPS is playable. This suggests that the rank is primarily driven by the GPU’s limitations at high resolutions, while the CPU provides ample headroom for the game’s logic and physics.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a clear picture of how the Intel Core i9-14900K and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8 GB perform across resolutions and settings. At 1920x1080, the combo excels: Low settings yield an average of 233 FPS, Medium averages 178 FPS with a minimum of 151 and maximum of 205, High averages 149 FPS, and Ultra averages 114 FPS. These numbers indicate that at 1080p, the GPU is the primary driver, and the CPU’s high boost clock (6.00 GHz) and 24 cores ensure that frame times are consistent.

Moving to 2560x1440, the performance scales as expected. Low settings produce an average of 150 FPS, Medium averages 115 FPS (min 98, max 132), High averages 96 FPS, and Ultra averages 73 FPS. The drop from 1080p to 1440p is roughly 30-35% across settings, which aligns with the increased pixel count. The Medium preset’s minimum FPS of 98 shows that the combo maintains smooth gameplay even in demanding scenes, while Ultra’s 73 FPS is still above the 60 FPS threshold for most monitors.

At 3840x2160, the limitations of the 8 GB VRAM and 128-bit bus become apparent. Low settings average 81 FPS, which is playable, but Medium drops to 62 FPS (min 53, max 71), High averages 52 FPS, and Ultra falls to 40 FPS. The data shows a clear trend: each settings tier reduces the average FPS by roughly 10-20 FPS at 4K. The Ultra preset’s 40 FPS is below the ideal for a third-person shooter, where fast camera movements require higher frame rates for smoothness. However, the Low preset at 81 FPS demonstrates that the combo can handle 4K if the user is willing to sacrifice graphical fidelity.

The measured FPS also shows that the Medium preset is the only one with min/max values recorded across all resolutions. At 1080p, the min is 151 and max is 205; at 1440p, the min is 98 and max is 132; at 4K, the min is 53 and max is 71. These ranges indicate good frame pacing, with no major stutters, which is typical for a game of this era. The lack of min/max data for other presets suggests that the benchmark only captured these for Medium, but the averages for other presets are consistent with expected performance.

CPU Role

The Intel Core i9-14900K is a 14th-generation processor from Intel’s Core series, built on the Raptor Lake architecture with a Raptor Lake-R codename. It features 24 cores and 32 threads, with a base clock of 3.20 GHz and a boost clock of 6.00 GHz. The CPU has a TDP of 125 W and supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. Its cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache, which is crucial for gaming performance in Minimum.

In Minimum, a third-person shooter from 2014, the CPU’s role is to handle game logic, physics, and AI, which are typically single-threaded or lightly threaded. The i9-14900K’s high boost clock of 6.00 GHz is particularly beneficial for these tasks, as it ensures low latency and high single-core performance. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2262.5 and Geekbench single-core score of 2655 reflect this strength, and the benchmark results show that even at 1080p, the CPU does not bottleneck the GPU, as evidenced by the 233 FPS average on Low settings.

The CPU’s multi-threaded performance is also robust, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 39399.5 and a Geekbench multi-core score of 21697. While Minimum may not utilize all 24 cores, the headroom ensures that background tasks do not interfere with gameplay. The Passmark scores for data compression (792694), encryption (46813), and integer math (210622) indicate that the CPU is capable of handling a wide range of workloads, but in gaming, the single-core performance is the most critical factor.

The CPU’s nearest rivals in terms of average benchmark score include the Intel Core i9-14900KF (delta -0.3%) and Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus (delta -0.6%), both of which are within 1% of the i9-14900K. This suggests that the i9-14900K is a top-tier processor, and its 95th percentile rank against all CPUs confirms this. The AMD EPYC 7413 has a delta of -1.2%, which is a server chip, and the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 is 1.7% lower, showing that the i9-14900K outperforms even the latest AMD mobile processors.

The CPU’s integrated graphics, UHD Graphics 770, are not used in this combo, but they provide a fallback for troubleshooting. The CPU supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, which is compatible with the RTX 5060 Ti’s PCIe 5.0 x8 interface, ensuring sufficient bandwidth for data transfer. The 10 nm process node and 257 mm² die size are standard for this generation, and the CPU’s launch MSRP of $589 is a notable data point.

In the context of Minimum, the CPU’s high clock speed and core count ensure that the game runs smoothly even at 4K, where the GPU is the bottleneck. The measured FPS at 3840x2160 Low (81 FPS) indicates that the CPU can feed the GPU enough data to maintain playable frame rates, while at 1080p, the CPU’s performance allows the GPU to reach its maximum potential (233 FPS). The data shows that the CPU’s role is to provide a stable foundation, and it does so without any signs of stuttering or frame drops, as seen in the Medium preset’s min/max values.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings for the Intel Core i9-14900K and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8 GB depend on the user’s resolution and refresh rate. At 1920x1080, the combo can handle any preset with ease. Low settings produce 233 FPS, which is ideal for high-refresh-rate monitors (240 Hz or above). Medium settings at 178 FPS are also excellent, with a minimum of 151 FPS ensuring no drops below the 144 Hz threshold. High settings at 149 FPS are still above 144 Hz, making them a good choice for competitive play, while Ultra at 114 FPS is smooth on 60 Hz or 120 Hz displays.

At 2560x1440, the recommendations shift. Low settings at 150 FPS are perfect for 144 Hz monitors, and Medium at 115 FPS (min 98) is suitable for 100 Hz or 120 Hz displays. High settings at 96 FPS are playable on 60 Hz monitors but may show slight tearing on 144 Hz screens without V-Sync. Ultra at 73 FPS is acceptable for 60 Hz displays, but for competitive play, Medium or High is recommended to maintain higher frame rates.

At 3840x2160, the data suggests that Ultra settings (40 FPS) are not recommended for smooth gameplay, as they fall below the 60 FPS target. High settings at 52 FPS are also below 60 FPS, making them less ideal. Medium settings at 62 FPS (min 53) are borderline playable, but the minimum FPS of 53 may cause noticeable drops during intense action. Low settings at 81 FPS are the best option for 4K, as they provide a comfortable margin above 60 FPS and ensure a smooth experience. Users with 4K 60 Hz monitors should choose Low, while those with 1440p or 1080p displays can enjoy higher presets.

The Medium preset is the most balanced across all resolutions, with recorded min/max values indicating stable performance. At 1080p, Medium’s average of 178 FPS with a min of 151 and max of 205 provides a great balance between visual quality and performance. At 1440p, Medium’s 115 FPS average (min 98, max 132) is ideal for high-refresh-rate gaming. At 4K, Medium’s 62 FPS average (min 53, max 71) is serviceable, but Low is recommended for a more consistent experience.

The Ultra preset is only viable at 1080p, where it averages 114 FPS. At 1440p, Ultra drops to 73 FPS, which is acceptable for casual play, but at 4K, it falls to 40 FPS, making it unsuitable for a third-person shooter that benefits from responsive controls. The data shows that the GPU’s 8 GB VRAM and 128-bit bus are the limiting factors at 4K, so users should prioritize lower settings to maximize frame rates. Overall, the best experience per the measured rows is achieved by using Medium at 1080p or 1440p, and Low at 4K, as these configurations provide the highest FPS while maintaining reasonable visual quality.