Minimum

The Intel Core i7-13700K paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 delivers a top-tier experience in Minimum, securing the 4th position out of 1,733 tested combos. This placement places it in the 99.8th percentile of all configurations, indicating that only three other CPU-GPU pairings deliver higher average frame rates in this title. The combo’s performance is exceptionally strong, driven by a CPU that ranks in the 93rd percentile among all processors and a GPU that sits in the 94th percentile, creating a balanced platform that avoids significant bottlenecks at most settings.

How This Combo Ranks

The 4th-place ranking among 1,733 combos demonstrates that this pairing is near the absolute peak of what is achievable in Minimum. This is not merely a high-end system; it is a top-tier configuration that outperforms the vast majority of user setups. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 47,282 places it within a tight competitive cluster, with its nearest rival, the Intel Core i7-13700KF, scoring 47,334, a marginal delta of -0.1%. This suggests the KF variant is effectively identical in performance, while the AMD EPYC 4364P and Intel Core i9-12900F trail by only 0.3% and 0.4%, respectively. The GPU’s average score of 84,306 similarly places it ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D by 0.1% and the AMD Radeon PRO W6600 by 1.3%. This synergy of top-tier components ensures that the combo’s ranking is not an outlier but a reflection of consistent, high-level performance across both compute and graphics workloads. The data shows that in a game like Minimum, which is a third-person shooter from 2014, the hardware is massively overprovisioned, leading to frame rates that are limited more by the game engine’s draw call throughput than by raw silicon capabilities.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 plays a dominant role in shaping the frame rates observed in Minimum. With a massive 32 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 512-bit bus, the GPU offers a bandwidth of 1.79 TB/s, ensuring that texture streaming and geometry data are never a limiting factor, even at the highest resolutions. The memory operates at an effective speed of 28 Gbps, and the GPU’s compute capabilities are substantial, with an FP32 throughput of 104.8 TFLOPS. The base clock is 2017 MHz, with a boost clock of 2407 MHz, and the card contains 21,760 shading units, 680 texture mapping units, and 176 render output units. In the context of Minimum, which has modest graphical requirements, this GPU is capable of far exceeding the display refresh rates of most monitors. The benchmark results confirm this, as the GPU’s PassMark G3D score of 39,650 and 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 14,411 indicate a level of performance that is overkill for a game released in 2014. The GPU’s 170 ray tracing cores and 680 tensor cores are largely underutilized in this title, but they contribute to the overall architectural efficiency. The most impactful aspect is the sheer fill rate and pixel throughput, which allows the card to maintain high frame rates even when the CPU is not the bottleneck, particularly at 1080p and 1440p where the GPU is not fully stressed.

FAQ

*Q: What is the overall performance rank of the Intel Core i7-13700K and RTX 5090 combo in Minimum?*

A: The combination ranks 4th out of 1,733 tested combos, placing it in the top 0.2% of all tested configurations for this game.

Q: How does the RTX 5090 compare to its closest rival, the RTX 5090 D, based on average benchmark scores?

A: The RTX 5090 has an average benchmark score of 84,306, which is 0.1% higher than the RTX 5090 D’s score of 84,241, indicating a negligible performance difference.

Q: What is the highest average frame rate achieved by this combo at 1920x1080 resolution?

A: The highest average frame rate at 1920x1080 is 408.8 FPS, which is achieved with the Low settings preset.

Q: Is the RTX 5090’s 32 GB of VRAM a limiting factor at 4K Ultra settings in this game?

A: No, the 32 GB of GDDR7 memory is more than sufficient. At 3840x2160 Ultra settings, the combo still averages 69 FPS, showing that VRAM capacity is not a bottleneck.

Q: What is the average benchmark score for the Intel Core i7-13700K, and how does it compare to the i7-13700KF?

A: The i7-13700K has an average benchmark score of 47,282. The i7-13700KF scores 47,334, which is a difference of -0.1%, meaning the KF variant is marginally slower in this metric.

Q: What is the performance difference in average FPS between Low and Ultra settings at 2560x1440?

A: At 2560x1440, the Low preset delivers an average of 262.8 FPS, while the Ultra preset delivers 126.5 FPS, showing a significant drop of 136.3 FPS when moving to maximum quality settings.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a clear picture of how the combo scales across resolutions and settings. At 1920x1080, the system is heavily CPU-bound, with the Low preset achieving a staggering 408.8 FPS average. This drops to 316.2 FPS at Medium and 264.9 FPS at High, demonstrating that even at lower settings, the game engine’s single-threaded performance is the primary limiter. The Ultra preset still manages a very high 202.1 FPS average. Moving to 2560x1440, the load shifts more onto the GPU, but the results remain exceptional. The Low preset averages 262.8 FPS, Medium drops to 203.5 FPS, and High achieves 167.1 FPS. The Ultra preset at this resolution yields 126.5 FPS, which is still well above the 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay. At 3840x2160, the GPU becomes the dominant factor, and the scaling is more pronounced. The Low preset delivers 142.1 FPS, which is a significant drop from the 1080p Low result, highlighting the increased pixel throughput. Medium averages 110.3 FPS, High drops to 89.9 FPS, and Ultra falls to 69 FPS. These numbers show a clear, consistent pattern: the performance delta between Low and Ultra grows with resolution, from a 206.7 FPS difference at 1080p to a 73.1 FPS difference at 4K. The data indicates that for competitive play at high refresh rates, 1080p or 1440p with Low or Medium settings is optimal, while 4K Ultra is only suitable for slower-paced, visually focused gameplay.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS rows, the optimal settings depend entirely on the target resolution and refresh rate. For users with 1920x1080 monitors, the Low preset’s 408.8 FPS average is ideal for maximum competitive advantage, as it minimizes input lag and provides the highest possible frame pacing. However, the Medium preset at 316.2 FPS still offers a massive advantage over standard 144Hz displays, and the visual fidelity improvement is substantial. The High preset at 264.9 FPS is the best balance for those wanting high visuals without sacrificing the ability to drive a 240Hz monitor. At 2560x1440, the Low preset’s 262.8 FPS is again the top choice for esports-level responsiveness, but the Medium preset at 203.5 FPS is excellent for 144Hz panels, providing a smoother visual experience. The High preset at 167.1 FPS is also viable for 144Hz displays, but the Ultra preset at 126.5 FPS is best reserved for 120Hz panels where maximum visual quality is desired. For 3840x2160, the story changes. The Low preset at 142.1 FPS is the only way to achieve refresh rates above 120Hz, while the Medium preset at 110.3 FPS is suitable for 100Hz or 120Hz displays. The High preset at 89.9 FPS is the recommended baseline for a smooth 4K experience, as it offers a significant visual upgrade over Medium with a manageable frame rate cost. The Ultra preset at 69 FPS is only recommended for users with 60Hz displays who prioritize image quality above all else. In summary, the data suggests that for a 240Hz 1080p or 1440p monitor, the Medium preset offers the best combination of visual quality and high frame rates, while for 4K, the High preset provides the most balanced experience.