Minimum
This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 103 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 36 | 48 | 57 | 74 |
| 1440p QHD | 68 | 89 | 106 | 138 |
| 1080p Full HD | 105 | 137 | 164 | 214 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Minimum with Intel Core i7-13700K + AMD Radeon RX 7700, In-Depth Analysis
# Minimum with Intel Core i7-13700K + AMD Radeon RX 7700
The Intel Core i7-13700K paired with the AMD Radeon RX 7700 delivers a highly capable Minimum experience, with measured frame rates ranging from 36 FPS at 4K Ultra to 214 FPS at 1080p Low. This combination sits at rank 1298 out of 2939 tested combos in this game, placing it in the upper-middle tier of the database. The data shows a system that can handle the game comfortably at 1080p and 1440p across most settings, while 4K requires careful settings selection to maintain playable frame rates.
CPU Role
The Intel Core i7-13700K is a 16-core, 24-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, built on Intel's 10 nm process. It operates with a base clock of 3.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz, with a 125 W TDP. The CPU features a cache hierarchy of 80 KB L1 per core, 2 MB L2 per core, and 30 MB of shared L3 cache. In synthetic benchmarks, this processor achieves a 3DMark max-threads score of 12412, a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 30745, and a single-core score of 2116. Its passmark multithread score of 45887 and single-thread score of 4333 further demonstrate its balanced performance profile.
For Minimum, a third-person shooter from 2014, the CPU's role is primarily about maintaining consistent frame pacing and handling game logic. The 5.40 GHz boost clock provides strong single-threaded performance, which is critical for games of this era that often rely heavily on one or two main threads. The 3DMark 2-thread score of 2262 and 4-thread score of 4469 indicate that the processor has ample headroom for the game's threading model. The CPU's 89th percentile ranking among all CPUs confirms its position as a high-end part, though the game itself is not particularly demanding by modern standards.
The i7-13700K's nearest rivals in the database include the AMD Ryzen 9 5900, which scores a near-identical average of 46971 versus the Intel's 46881 avgBenchmarkScore, a delta of -0.2%. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 is similarly close at -0.3%, while the AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX and Intel Xeon w3-2535 are both 0.5% ahead. This clustering suggests that the i7-13700K sits in a performance band where small differences are unlikely to translate into meaningful FPS changes in Minimum, as the game's frame rates at lower resolutions are more likely bound by the graphics card.
GPU Role
The AMD Radeon RX 7700 is built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture with the Navi 32 chip, manufactured on TSMC's 5 nm process with 28,100 million transistors. It features 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 624.1 GB/s of bandwidth. The GPU operates at a base clock of 1900 MHz, a game clock of 2041 MHz, and a boost clock of 2459 MHz, with memory running at 2438 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective). The card includes 2560 shading units, 160 TMUs, 96 ROPs, and 40 RT cores, with a pixel rate of 236.1 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 393.4 GTexel/s.
In terms of raw compute, the RX 7700 delivers 25.18 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, Vulkan 1.4, and OpenGL 4.6. Its passmark G3D score of 20974 and 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2865 reflect its mid-range positioning. The GPU's 58th percentile among all GPUs is notably lower than the CPU's 89th percentile, indicating that the graphics card is the primary bottleneck in this pairing for most scenarios. The 16 GB VRAM is generous for a game like Minimum, which has modest texture requirements even at 4K, so memory capacity is unlikely to be a limiting factor.
The RX 7700's nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon R9 370X with an average score of 15862 (delta -0.1%), the AMD Radeon RX 9060 at 16014 (delta -1%), the AMD Radeon Pro W5500 at 15679 (delta 1.1%), and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti at 16129 (delta -1.7%). These small deltas place the RX 7700 in a competitive mid-range segment where performance differences are minimal in synthetic benchmarks, though the measured FPS in Minimum will clarify how these translate to real-world gaming.
Resolution Scaling
The measured FPS data reveals a clear pattern of scaling from 1080p to 4K. At High settings, the average frame rate drops from 137 FPS at 1080p to 89 FPS at 1440p, then to 48 FPS at 4K. This represents a 35% reduction from 1080p to 1440p and a 65% reduction from 1080p to 4K. Low settings show even higher absolute numbers: 214 FPS at 1080p, 138 FPS at 1440p, and 74 FPS at 4K. Medium settings produce 164 FPS at 1080p, 106 FPS at 1440p, and 57 FPS at 4K, with the 1440p and 4K rows including minimum FPS values of 90 and 48 respectively.
Ultra settings present the most demanding scenario, with 105 FPS at 1080p, 68 FPS at 1440p, and 36 FPS at 4K. The scaling pattern across all settings shows that the GPU becomes increasingly dominant as the resolution rises. At 1080p, the high frame rates (137 FPS High, 214 FPS Low) suggest that the CPU is keeping pace adequately, but the GPU is still doing most of the work. The drop to 48 FPS at 4K High indicates that the RX 7700 is the limiting factor at higher resolutions, as the CPU's performance headroom is less relevant when the GPU is processing over 8 million pixels.
The data suggests that at 1080p, the system is well-balanced, with the GPU able to push frame rates well above 100 FPS on most presets. At 1440p, the system still delivers smooth gameplay, with even Ultra settings maintaining 68 FPS. At 4K, however, the GPU's limitations become apparent, with only Low settings (74 FPS) and Medium settings (57 FPS) providing playable frame rates. This resolution scaling analysis points to the RX 7700 as the bottleneck in this configuration, particularly at 4K where the gap between the CPU's capability and the GPU's output widens significantly.
Settings Recommendations
Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings for this combination depend heavily on the target resolution and desired frame rate. At 1080p, the High preset delivers 137 FPS, which is well above the 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay, while Medium offers 164 FPS for those with high-refresh-rate monitors. The Ultra preset at 105 FPS is also viable, providing enhanced visual quality without sacrificing playability. For competitive play, Low settings at 214 FPS will maximize responsiveness, though the visual trade-off may not be worth it for a single-player-focused third-person shooter.
At 1440p, the High preset's 89 FPS is the recommended balance of visual fidelity and performance, as it stays comfortably above 60 FPS while offering improved image quality over Medium's 106 FPS or Low's 138 FPS. The Ultra preset at 68 FPS is playable but close to the edge, and the lack of minimum FPS data for this row means frame dips could be more pronounced. At 4K, the situation changes dramatically. The Medium preset at 57 FPS with a minimum of 48 FPS is the highest quality option that maintains playable performance, while Low at 74 FPS provides more headroom. The High preset at 48 FPS and Ultra at 36 FPS are below ideal thresholds for smooth gameplay, making them less suitable for a game that benefits from consistent frame pacing.
The data indicates that the Medium preset offers the best experience overall, as it provides a meaningful visual upgrade over Low while maintaining frame rates that are within 5-10% of High at each resolution. The measured minimum and maximum FPS for Medium (48-65 at 4K, 90-121 at 1440p, 139-188 at 1080p) show consistent frame delivery without extreme dips, which is important for a shooter where sudden frame drops can affect aiming and reaction times. Players with 144Hz or higher refresh monitors should opt for High at 1080p or Medium at 1440p to stay within the monitor's refresh window.
How This Combo Ranks
The Intel Core i7-13700K + AMD Radeon RX 7700 combination ranks 1298 out of 2939 tested combos in Minimum, placing it in the 56th percentile of all tested systems. This ranking reflects the mid-range nature of the GPU relative to the high-end CPU, as the combo's overall performance is dragged down by the graphics card's 58th percentile standing. The CPU's 89th percentile ranking is significantly higher, suggesting that this processor could drive a more powerful GPU to better overall rankings in future upgrades.
The combo's position in the database indicates that there are 1297 combinations that perform better and 1641 that perform worse. This places it squarely in the middle of the distribution, which aligns with the measured FPS showing playable performance at 1080p and 1440p but struggles at 4K Ultra. The rank is consistent with the GPU's nearest rival scores, as the RX 7700's performance is similar to the RTX 3060 Ti (1.7% faster) and RX 9060 (1% faster), meaning combos with those GPUs and similar CPUs would likely rank close to this one. The relatively low rank of 1298 out of 2939 is more a reflection of the database's composition, which includes many high-end GPU configurations, than a criticism of this combo's suitability for Minimum.
FAQ
Q: What is the best resolution to play Minimum with this combo?
A: The measured data shows that 1440p High delivers 89 FPS, which is smooth and visually appealing, while 1080p High reaches 137 FPS for higher refresh rates. At 4K, only Medium (57 FPS) and Low (74 FPS) maintain playable frame rates.
Q: How does the i7-13700K compare to its closest rivals in synthetic benchmarks?
A: The i7-13700K scores 46881 on average, which is 0.2% below the AMD Ryzen 9 5900 (46971) and 0.3% below the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 (47022), while being 0.5% above both the AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX (46654) and Intel Xeon w3-2535 (46653).
Q: Is the RX 7700's 16 GB VRAM sufficient for Minimum?
A: Yes, the 16 GB GDDR6 memory is far more than Minimum requires, as the game's 2014 release date predates high-resolution texture packs. The 624.1 GB/s bandwidth is also more than adequate for the game's rendering needs.
Q: What is the frame rate difference between Medium and Ultra at 1080p?
A: Medium averages 164 FPS with a minimum of 139 FPS, while Ultra averages 105 FPS. This represents a 59 FPS difference, meaning Ultra is roughly 36% slower than Medium at 1080p.
Q: How does this combo rank compared to all tested systems in Minimum?
A: This combination ranks 1298 out of 2939 tested combos, placing it in the upper-middle portion of the database. There are 1641 combos that perform worse and 1297 that perform better.
Q: At 4K, which settings should be avoided for smooth gameplay?
A: The data shows that 4K High (48 FPS) and 4K Ultra (36 FPS) fall below the 50 FPS threshold for comfortable gaming. Players should stick to Medium (57 FPS) or Low (74 FPS) at 4K to ensure consistent frame rates.
Hardware Specifications
Intel Core i7-13700K
AMD Radeon RX 7700
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for Intel Core i7-13700K + AMD Radeon RX 7700 in Minimum
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 74.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 57.0 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 48.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 36.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 138.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 106.0 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 89.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 68.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 214.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 164.0 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 137.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 105.0 |
Minimum with ii7-13700K + Other GPUs
See how Minimum performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Minimum with RX 7700 + Other CPUs
See how Minimum performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with ii7-13700K + RX 7700
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.