Minimum

Minimum

AVERAGE FPS
155
excellent

This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 155 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 58 70 84 114
1440p QHD 101 135 158 210
1080p Full HD 161 209 245 322

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Low 114
3840x2160 Medium 84
3840x2160 High 70
3840x2160 Ultra 58
2560x1440 Low 210
2560x1440 Medium 158
2560x1440 High 135
2560x1440 Ultra 101
1920x1080 Low 322
1920x1080 Medium 245
1920x1080 High 209
1920x1080 Ultra 161

Minimum with Intel Core i7-12700KF + AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX, In-Depth Analysis

Resolution Scaling

The measured frame rates for this Intel Core i7-12700KF and AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX combination reveal a classic resolution-dependent scaling curve in Minimum. At 1920x1080 with Ultra settings, the system delivers 160.5 FPS. Moving to 2560x1440 at the same preset drops the average to 101 FPS, a reduction of roughly 37%. Pushing further to 3840x2160 brings the average down to 58 FPS, which is only about 36% of the 1080p figure. This steep decline indicates that the GPU is the dominant limiting factor as pixel count increases, a trend consistent with the RX 7900 XTX’s role in this pairing.

The pattern holds across all settings tiers. At High settings, the frame rate falls from 209 FPS at 1080p to 135.1 FPS at 1440p, then to 69.7 FPS at 4K. The drop from 1440p to 4K is particularly sharp—roughly 48%—which is characteristic of a game that becomes heavily pixel-bound at higher resolutions. Low settings show the most extreme scaling: 321.9 FPS at 1080p, 209.7 FPS at 1440p, and 113.5 FPS at 4K. Even with the graphics load reduced to its minimum, the 4K result still falls well below the 1440p figure, reinforcing that the GPU’s raw throughput—not the CPU—is what governs performance at 3840x2160.

At 1080p, the data suggests the CPU begins to assert its influence. The gap between High (209 FPS) and Low (321.9 FPS) at 1080p is substantial, but the gap between Medium (244.5 FPS) and Low is also large. This indicates that at lower resolutions, where the GPU has spare capacity, the processor’s ability to feed frames becomes more relevant. However, the i7-12700KF’s 12 cores and 20 threads are evidently sufficient to avoid any catastrophic bottleneck, as even the most demanding 1080p Ultra preset maintains 160.5 FPS. The real story is that 4K performance is dictated almost entirely by the GPU, while 1080p results are a hybrid of both components.

CPU Role

The Intel Core i7-12700KF is built on the Alder Lake architecture with a 10 nm process node, featuring 12 cores and 20 threads. Its base clock is 3.60 GHz, with a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, and it carries 25 MB of shared L3 cache. These specifications position it as a high-end desktop part, and the benchmark data confirms its strength. In Cinebench R23, the chip scores 28,979 points in multi-core and 4,091 in single-core. Its PassMark multithread score of 34,092 further underscores its multi-threaded capability.

In Minimum, the CPU’s role is most visible at 1080p with lower graphics presets. At Low settings, the system hits 321.9 FPS, which is nearly double the Ultra result at the same resolution (160.5 FPS). This suggests that at Low settings, the GPU is not the primary constraint; instead, the CPU’s frame generation limits the output. The i7-12700KF’s high boost clock and robust single-thread performance—reflected in a Geekbench single-core score of 2,526—help sustain these high frame rates. However, the game does not appear to be heavily multi-threaded, as the 3DMark 16-thread score of 9,282 is not dramatically higher than the 8-thread score of 7,211.

Compared to its immediate rivals, the i7-12700KF sits in a tight cluster. Its average benchmark score is 35,355, which is 0.1% ahead of the Intel Core i5-14400 (35,336) and 0.2% behind the Intel Core i7-13800H (35,416). The delta against the Intel Core i9-12900HX is 0.2% (35,289), and it leads the Intel Core i5-13600T by 0.3% (35,256). These differences are negligible in real-world gaming, meaning the CPU is not a differentiator in Minimum when paired with this GPU. Instead, it provides a stable foundation that allows the RX 7900 XTX to express its full potential at 1440p and 4K.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX is the star of this configuration, built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture with a 5 nm process node from TSMC. It packs 24 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 384-bit bus, delivering 960.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The GPU’s boost clock is 2,498 MHz, with a game clock of 2,365 MHz, and it houses 6,144 shading units and 192 ROPs. These specs translate to a pixel rate of 479.6 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 959.2 GTexel/s, making it a formidable 4K contender.

The measured FPS data confirms the GPU’s dominance at high resolutions. At 4K Ultra, the system manages 58 FPS, which is playable but not silky smooth. Dropping to High at 4K yields 69.7 FPS, a 20% improvement. The Low preset at 4K achieves 113.5 FPS, showing that the GPU has substantial headroom when visual effects are reduced. At 1440p, the Ultra preset hits 101 FPS, which is a comfortable experience for a third-person shooter, while High reaches 135.1 FPS. The 1080p results are even more impressive, with Ultra at 160.5 FPS and High at 209 FPS.

The GPU’s 24 GB frame buffer is a notable asset, but in Minimum, it does not appear to be a limiting factor at any tested resolution. The PassMark G3D score of 31,238 places it in the 85th percentile among all GPUs, and its average benchmark score of 44,019 is competitive. Against its nearest rivals, the RX 7900 XTX is 0.8% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile (43,667) and 1.6% ahead of the NVIDIA Quadro M6000 (43,313). It trails the AMD Radeon Pro 580 by 0.4% (44,195) and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti by 2% (44,900). These narrow margins suggest that the RX 7900 XTX provides top-tier performance, and in Minimum, it is clearly the component that determines playability at 4K.

Settings Recommendations

The measured rows provide a clear hierarchy for optimizing the experience in Minimum. For 4K displays, the High preset at 69.7 FPS is the sweet spot, offering a balance between visual fidelity and smoothness that exceeds the 60 FPS threshold. The Ultra preset at 58 FPS is slightly below that target, making it less ideal for competitive play, while Medium (84.2 FPS) and Low (113.5 FPS) offer higher frame rates but with reduced graphical quality. Given that the game is a third-person shooter, the High preset is recommended for 4K to maintain immersion without sacrificing responsiveness.

At 1440p, the High preset delivers 135.1 FPS, which is excellent for high-refresh-rate monitors. Ultra at 101 FPS is also viable, providing near-maximum quality with triple-digit frame rates. For players who prioritize frame rate above all else, Low at 209.7 FPS is the extreme option, but Medium at 157.8 FPS offers a better middle ground. The data indicates that 1440p Ultra is the best overall choice for this resolution, as it combines strong visual detail with performance that exceeds 100 FPS.

For 1080p, all presets are playable, but the Ultra setting at 160.5 FPS is the recommended choice for most users, as it fully utilizes the GPU without any perceptible stutter. High at 209 FPS is also excellent, and Low at 321.9 FPS is overkill for most displays, which typically cap at 240 Hz or 360 Hz. The Medium preset at 244.5 FPS is redundant given the minimal performance gain over High. In summary, the optimal experience is Ultra at 1080p or 1440p, and High at 4K.

FAQ

Q: What is the best resolution to use with this CPU-GPU combo for the highest frame rates?

A: The 1920x1080 Low preset delivers the highest average at 321.9 FPS, but for a balanced experience, 1080p Ultra at 160.5 FPS or 1440p High at 135.1 FPS are stronger choices.

*Q: Can this system handle 4K gaming in Minimum?*

A: Yes, at 4K Ultra the average is 58 FPS, which is playable. For smoother gameplay, the High preset at 4K yields 69.7 FPS, and Low achieves 113.5 FPS.

Q: How does the Intel Core i7-12700KF compare to its nearest rival in synthetic benchmarks?

A: The i7-12700KF scores 35,355 on average, which is 0.1% ahead of the Intel Core i5-14400 (35,336) and 0.2% behind the Intel Core i7-13800H (35,416).

Q: Is the AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX significantly faster than the RTX 4070 Ti?

A: In average benchmark scores, the RX 7900 XTX (44,019) is 2% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti (44,900), meaning the RTX 4070 Ti is actually slightly higher, not the other way around.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory bandwidth and does it impact 4K performance?

A: The RX 7900 XTX has 960.0 GB/s of bandwidth across a 384-bit bus with 24 GB GDDR6, which supports the high frame rates seen at 4K, particularly at Low settings (113.5 FPS).

Q: Does the CPU bottleneck the GPU at any resolution?

A: At 1080p Low (321.9 FPS), the CPU likely becomes a limiting factor, but at 4K, the GPU is clearly the bottleneck, as shown by the significant FPS drop when raising resolution.

Hardware Specifications

Intel Core i7-12700KF

Cores / Threads 12 / 20
Base Clock 3600 MHz
Boost Clock 5000 MHz
TDP 125W
Socket Intel Socket 1700
View Full CPU Details →

AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX

VRAM 24 GB GDDR6
Base Clock —
Boost Clock 2498 MHz MHz
TDP 355 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for Intel Core i7-12700KF + AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX in Minimum

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Low 113.5
3840x2160 Medium 84.2
3840x2160 High 69.7
3840x2160 Ultra 58.0
2560x1440 Low 209.7
2560x1440 Medium 157.8
2560x1440 High 135.1
2560x1440 Ultra 101.0
1920x1080 Low 321.9
1920x1080 Medium 244.5
1920x1080 High 209.0
1920x1080 Ultra 160.5

Minimum with ii7-12700KF + Other GPUs

See how Minimum performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.

Minimum with RX 7900 XTX + Other CPUs

See how Minimum performs with the same GPU but different processors.

Other Games with ii7-12700KF + RX 7900 XTX

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.