Minimum
This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 113 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 41 | 51 | 60 | 78 |
| 1440p QHD | 76 | 99 | 117 | 149 |
| 1080p Full HD | 114 | 152 | 180 | 237 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Minimum with Intel Core i5-14600KF + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB, In-Depth Analysis
The Intel Core i5-14600KF paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB delivers a highly capable 1080p experience in Minimum, but the data shows a sharp performance cliff as resolution increases. At 1080p Low settings, the combo produces 237 FPS, yet this drops to 41 FPS at 4K Ultra, revealing a GPU-bound scenario at higher loads. The combo ranks 732nd out of 1733 tested configurations, placing it in the 58th percentile of all pairings, a solid mid-pack result for a 2014 third-person shooter.
FAQ
*Q: What is the best resolution for this CPU/GPU combo in Minimum?*
A: The data shows 1920x1080 is the sweet spot. At 1080p, all four settings presets (Low, Medium, High, Ultra) produce average FPS above 113, with Low hitting 237 FPS and High at 151.7 FPS. At 2560x1440, only Low (148.9 FPS) and High (98.9 FPS) remain above 60 FPS, while 3840x2160 drops below 60 FPS for all presets except Low (78.3 FPS).
Q: How does the RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB compare to its closest rival?
A: The GPU's average benchmark score is 2913, which is identical to the NVIDIA GeForce GT 555M (deltaPct 0). It is 0.2% ahead of the RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB and 0.7% ahead of the GT 650M, but 1.5% behind the GTX 860M. This places the GPU at the 17th percentile of all GPUs, indicating its performance is modest relative to the broader database.
Q: Is the Core i5-14600KF a bottleneck at 1080p?
A: The CPU data suggests it is not the limiting factor at lower resolutions. The i5-14600KF scores 32889 in Cinebench R23 multicore and 4643 in single-core, ranking in the 93rd percentile of all CPUs. The 237 FPS result at 1080p Low indicates the GPU still has headroom, but the scaling from Low to Ultra at 1080p (237 to 113.8 FPS) shows the GPU becomes more relevant as settings increase.
Q: What is the FPS difference between 1080p and 4K at High settings?
A: At High settings, the average FPS drops from 151.7 at 1920x1080 to 98.9 at 2560x1440, then to 50.7 at 3840x2160. This represents a 66.6% reduction in FPS from 1080p to 4K, indicating that the GPU’s 8 GB VRAM and 288.0 GB/s bandwidth are strained at 4K.
Q: Which settings preset offers the best balance for 1440p play?
A: The Medium preset at 2560x1440 delivers 116.7 FPS, which is 18% higher than High (98.9 FPS) and 53% higher than Ultra (76.2 FPS). Given that Low raises this to 148.9 FPS, Medium provides the best compromise between visual fidelity and frame rate, keeping the experience above 100 FPS.
Q: Does the combo rank well among all tested configurations?
A: The combo ranks 732 out of 1733 tested combos, placing it in the top 42% of all pairings. This is a respectable position, but not elite, as the 4K Ultra result of 41 FPS shows the GPU is a limiting factor at the highest loads.
GPU Role
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB is built on the Ada Lovelace architecture with a 5 nm process from TSMC. Its boost clock of 2535 MHz and 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus provide a bandwidth of 288.0 GB/s. In Minimum, the GPU’s role is clear from the measured FPS: at 1080p Low, the combo achieves 237 FPS, but at 4K Ultra, it falls to 41 FPS. This 196 FPS swing demonstrates that the GPU is the primary driver of performance when settings and resolution are increased.
The 8 GB VRAM is a notable constraint at 4K, where High settings yield 50.7 FPS and Ultra drops to 41 FPS. The GPU’s 22.06 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 121.7 GPixel/s pixel rate are sufficient for 1080p and 1440p, but the 4K results suggest the memory bandwidth and capacity are the bottlenecks. The GPU’s percentile rank of 17 against all GPUs highlights that this is not a high-end part, yet its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2913 shows it can handle modern workloads, albeit with limitations at extreme resolutions.
Resolution Scaling
The FPS scaling from 1080p to 4K reveals a GPU-bound system at higher resolutions. At Low settings, the average FPS drops from 237 at 1920x1080 to 148.9 at 2560x1440 (a 37% reduction), then to 78.3 at 3840x2160 (a 67% reduction from 1080p). At High settings, the drop is steeper: 151.7 FPS at 1080p falls to 98.9 at 1440p (35% reduction) and 50.7 at 4K (66% reduction). This pattern indicates that the GPU’s fill rate and memory bandwidth are the limiting factors, as the CPU’s high single-core score of 4643 (Cinebench R23) would not be the primary constraint at these pixel counts.
The data shows that the RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB cannot maintain 60 FPS at 4K with Medium settings (59.7 FPS) or above, and only Low settings at 4K (78.3 FPS) provide a playable frame rate. Conversely, at 1080p, even Ultra settings deliver 113.8 FPS, proving the combo is well-suited for 1080p gaming. The scaling curve suggests that for 1440p, Medium settings (116.7 FPS) are the practical ceiling for a 100+ FPS experience.
Settings Recommendations
For 1920x1080, the Ultra preset delivers 113.8 FPS, which is above the 100 FPS threshold, making it the recommended choice for maximum visual quality without compromising smoothness. The data shows High at 151.7 FPS offers a 33% improvement over Ultra, but Ultra remains playable. At 2560x1440, Medium settings produce 116.7 FPS, which is the best balance; High yields 98.9 FPS (still smooth), while Ultra drops to 76.2 FPS, which may be acceptable for some players but is a 35% reduction from Medium.
At 3840x2160, the only playable preset is Low, with 78.3 FPS. Medium (59.7 FPS) barely misses the 60 FPS mark, and High (50.7 FPS) and Ultra (41 FPS) are not recommended for competitive play. The data indicates that users should prioritize 1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, as these settings provide the best experience per the measured rows, balancing frame rate and visual fidelity.
How This Combo Ranks
The combo ranks 732 out of 1733 tested combinations in Minimum, placing it in the 42nd percentile of all tested pairings. This is a mid-pack result, reflecting the GPU’s 17th percentile rank against all GPUs, while the CPU ranks in the 93rd percentile against all CPUs. The discrepancy suggests the GPU is the weaker link in this pairing, especially at higher resolutions. The data shows the combo performs well at 1080p, where it can exceed 150 FPS on High settings, but falls behind at 4K, where it cannot maintain 60 FPS on Medium or higher.
Compared to other combos in the database, this pairing is not a top performer, but it is not a weak one either. The CPU’s strong multi-core score of 32889 (Cinebench R23) and single-core score of 4643 ensure it does not bottleneck the GPU at lower resolutions, but the GPU’s 8 GB VRAM and 128-bit bus limit its 4K potential. For a 2014 game, this combo offers a capable 1080p experience, but users seeking 4K should consider a more powerful GPU.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 3840x2160, the average FPS ranges from 41 on Ultra to 78.3 on Low. Medium settings yield 59.7 FPS, while High settings produce 50.7 FPS. These results show a 91% difference between Low and Ultra, with only Low exceeding 60 FPS.
At 2560x1440, the average FPS ranges from 76.2 on Ultra to 148.9 on Low. Medium settings deliver 116.7 FPS, and High settings reach 98.9 FPS. The gap between Low and Ultra is 95%, with all presets above 60 FPS.
At 1920x1080, the average FPS ranges from 113.8 on Ultra to 237 on Low. Medium settings produce 180 FPS, and High settings achieve 151.7 FPS. The difference between Low and Ultra is 108%, but all presets exceed 110 FPS, making this resolution the most flexible for settings.
CPU Role
The Intel Core i5-14600KF features 14 cores and 20 threads, with a base clock of 3.50 GHz and a boost clock of 5.30 GHz. Its 24 MB of shared L3 cache and support for DDR4 and DDR5 memory make it a strong gaming CPU. In Minimum, the CPU’s role is to feed the GPU, and its benchmarks indicate it does so effectively at 1080p: the 237 FPS result at Low settings suggests the CPU is not a bottleneck, as its single-core score of 4643 (Cinebench R23) is in the 93rd percentile of all CPUs.
However, the CPU’s influence diminishes at higher resolutions. The FPS drop from 1080p to 4K at the same settings (e.g., High: 151.7 to 50.7 FPS) is far larger than the CPU’s performance variance would cause, confirming the GPU is the limiting factor. The CPU’s nearest rivals include the Intel Core i5-14600K (0.4% faster) and AMD Ryzen 9 5950X (0.6% faster), but these differences are negligible for gaming. The CPU’s 125 W TDP and Intel Socket 1700 compatibility make it a straightforward pairing with the RTX 4060 Ti, which has a 160 W TDP and a suggested PSU of 450 W.
Hardware Specifications
Intel Core i5-14600KF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for Intel Core i5-14600KF + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB in Minimum
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 78.3 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 59.7 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 50.7 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 41.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 148.9 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 116.7 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 98.9 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 76.2 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 237.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 180.0 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 151.7 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 113.8 |
Minimum with RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB + Other CPUs
See how Minimum performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with ii5-14600KF + RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.