Minimum
This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 98 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 35 | 46 | 53 | 71 |
| 1440p QHD | 63 | 86 | 99 | 130 |
| 1080p Full HD | 103 | 129 | 159 | 204 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Minimum with Intel Core i3-12100F + AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT, In-Depth Analysis
The Intel Core i3-12100F paired with the AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT delivers a surprisingly balanced 1080p experience in Minimum, but the data reveals a distinct shift in bottleneck behavior as resolution climbs. At 1920x1080, the combination produces an average of 204.1 FPS on Low settings, indicating a system that is heavily CPU-limited at lower graphical loads. As resolution increases, the frame rate drops are steep and consistent, pointing to the GPU becoming the primary constraint. Moving from 1080p to 1440p at High settings reduces the average from 128.9 FPS to 85.8 FPS, a 33% decrease. The jump to 4K at High settings further cuts performance to 46 FPS, a 64% drop from the 1440p figure. This scaling pattern suggests that at 4K Ultra, the RX 6700 XT is fully saturated, yielding just 35.4 FPS, which is below the threshold for smooth gameplay.
Resolution Scaling
The FPS degradation from 1080p to 4K is not linear but exponential, highlighting the GPU's workload limits. At 1080p Low, the i3-12100F's strong single-thread performance allows the RX 6700 XT to run nearly unconstrained, hitting 204.1 FPS. However, the margin between settings narrows dramatically at higher resolutions. At 4K, the difference between Low and High settings is 24.6 FPS (70.6 vs 46), whereas at 1080p, the same settings gap is 75.2 FPS (204.1 vs 128.9). This compression indicates that at 4K, the GPU's pixel throughput and memory bandwidth become the limiting factors, regardless of the CPU's capability. The data shows that the 12 GB of GDDR6 memory and 384.0 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for 1440p High, but at 4K Ultra, the 35.4 FPS average suggests the RDNA 2.0 architecture is struggling with the fill-rate demands of the game's third-person shooter environments.
GPU Role
The AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT, built on the 7 nm process with 17,200 million transistors, demonstrates its mid-range pedigree through these benchmark results. Its base clock of 2321 MHz and boost clock of 2581 MHz provide the raw compute power, yet the 13.21 TFLOPS FP32 performance is clearly outpaced by the game's 4K Ultra preset. The GPU's 64 ROPs and 160 TMUs are tasked heavily at 3840x2160, where the average FPS falls to 35.4. The memory configuration, with a 192-bit bus and 2000 MHz memory clock (16 Gbps effective), delivers 384.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This is adequate for 1440p, where the Ultra preset still manages 62.7 FPS, but at 4K, the bandwidth becomes a bottleneck. The GPU's percentile ranking of 77 among all GPUs and its average benchmark score of 33721 place it as a solid mainstream performer, but the data shows it cannot sustain 60 FPS at 4K in this title, even on Medium settings (52.9 FPS). The GPU's nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX 6800, scores 0.7% higher on average, confirming the 6700 XT's position just below the high-end tier.
CPU Role
The Intel Core i3-12100F, with 4 cores and 8 threads, proves to be a capable partner for the RX 6700 XT, particularly at lower resolutions. Its base clock of 3.30 GHz and boost clock of 4.30 GHz, combined with 12 MB of shared L3 cache, deliver a single-thread benchmark score of 3444 in PassMark and a Geekbench single-core score of 2224. This single-thread strength is why the 1080p Low preset reaches 204.1 FPS, as the game's engine appears to scale well with high clock speeds. The CPU's multi-threaded performance, scoring 11912 in Cinebench R23 and 14015 in PassMark multi-thread, is less critical here, as the FPS data shows diminishing returns beyond 1440p. The i3-12100F's percentile ranking of 72 among all CPUs and its average benchmark score of 13516 put it slightly below the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX (delta -0.1%) and just above the Intel Core i7-7700K (delta 1.8%). This indicates that while the CPU is not the primary constraint at 4K, its 58 W TDP and 4-core design are sufficient to avoid dragging down performance at 1080p, where the GPU is waiting on the CPU to feed it frames.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The measured FPS data provides a clear picture of the combination's capabilities across all settings. At 1920x1080, the results are consistently high: Low averages 204.1 FPS, Medium 159 FPS, High 128.9 FPS, and Ultra 103.1 FPS. These figures suggest that gamers with 1080p 144Hz monitors can comfortably enable High settings, with headroom for Ultra. Moving to 2560x1440, the averages drop to 129.5 FPS on Low, 99.1 FPS on Medium, 85.8 FPS on High, and 62.7 FPS on Ultra. This resolution is the sweet spot for the RX 6700 XT, as even Ultra settings remain playable. At 3840x2160, the performance craters: Low averages 70.6 FPS, Medium 52.9 FPS, High 46 FPS, and Ultra 35.4 FPS. Only the Low preset at 4K approaches a smooth experience, while the higher presets fall below the 60 FPS threshold. The data shows that the combination is best suited for 1440p gaming, where the GPU's 12 GB VRAM and bandwidth are fully utilized without being overwhelmed.
How This Combo Ranks
Among the 1,733 tested combinations in the database, this specific pairing of the i3-12100F and RX 6700 XT ranks 966th. This placement, just past the midpoint, reflects the CPU's budget-tier positioning relative to the GPU's mid-range performance. The rank is influenced by the CPU's single-thread score of 893 in 3DMark, which is competitive for gaming, but the 4-core limitation shows in multi-threaded workloads. In comparison, the GPU's nearest rival, the AMD Radeon HD 7950, scores 1% lower on average, while the NVIDIA RTX A5000 scores 1.3% higher. The CPU's nearest rivals include the Intel Core i3-10105 (0.6% higher avg score) and the Intel Core i7-7700K (1.8% higher), indicating that the i3-12100F holds its own against older quad-core flagships. The overall ranking suggests that for this specific game, the combination is adequate for 1080p and 1440p, but users seeking 4K performance should look at higher-tier GPU pairings.
FAQ
*Q: Can this combo achieve 60 FPS at 4K in Minimum?*
A: Only on Low settings, where the average FPS is 70.6. On Medium, the average drops to 52.9 FPS, and on High it is 46 FPS, so 60 FPS at 4K is not achievable on higher presets.
Q: What is the best resolution for this pairing?
A: The data indicates 1440p is the optimal resolution, as even the Ultra preset averages 62.7 FPS, while 1080p offers excessive headroom (103.1 FPS on Ultra) and 4K struggles above Low settings.
Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival?
A: The i3-12100F scores 0.1% lower than the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX and 1.8% higher than the Intel Core i7-7700K in average benchmark score, showing it is competitive with much higher-end parts in synthetic tests.
Q: Is the GPU's VRAM sufficient for this game?
A: The 12 GB of GDDR6 memory is not a limiting factor in the measured results, as the FPS drops are consistent with compute and bandwidth limitations rather than memory capacity issues.
Q: What is the FPS difference between Low and Ultra at 1080p?
A: The difference is 101 FPS, with Low averaging 204.1 FPS and Ultra averaging 103.1 FPS, showing a significant performance hit from the Ultra preset's effects.
Q: Does the GPU bottleneck the CPU at 4K?
A: Yes, at 3840x2160, the GPU becomes the limiting component. The FPS does not scale with the CPU's capabilities, as evidenced by the small difference between Low (70.6 FPS) and High (46 FPS) settings.
Settings Recommendations
Based on the measured rows, the best experience is achieved at 2560x1440 with High settings, which delivers an 85.8 FPS average. This settings combination balances visual fidelity with smoothness, staying well above the 60 FPS threshold. For gamers prioritizing maximum frame rates, the 1920x1080 Low preset at 204.1 FPS is the clear choice, though it sacrifices visual quality. The 1440p Ultra preset at 62.7 FPS is acceptable for those who want the highest image quality without a 144Hz monitor, but it is close to the edge of playability. At 4K, the 3840x2160 Low preset at 70.6 FPS is the only viable option, as Medium (52.9 FPS) and above fall below 60 FPS. The data suggests that the Ultra preset at any resolution beyond 1080p causes a disproportionate FPS loss, so High is the recommended ceiling for this combination.
Hardware Specifications
Intel Core i3-12100F
AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for Intel Core i3-12100F + AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT in Minimum
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 70.6 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 52.9 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 46.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 35.4 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 129.5 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 99.1 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 85.8 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 62.7 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 204.1 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 159.0 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 128.9 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 103.1 |
Minimum with ii3-12100F + Other GPUs
See how Minimum performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Minimum with RX 6700 XT + Other CPUs
See how Minimum performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with ii3-12100F + RX 6700 XT
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.