Minimum

The AMD Ryzen 9 5900X and AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT combination delivers a robust experience in Minimum, a 2014 third-person shooter, with measured frame rates that scale predictably across resolutions and settings. The data shows this pairing handles 1080p and 1440p gameplay with high average FPS, while 4K requires settings adjustments to maintain smooth performance. This analysis breaks down the CPU and GPU contributions, contextualizes the combo’s ranking among 3,712 tested configurations, and provides detailed FPS figures for each measured scenario.

FAQ

*Q: What is the combo’s overall rank in Minimum?*

A: This AMD Ryzen 9 5900X + AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT pairing ranks 1241 out of 3712 tested combos in the game, placing it in the upper third of all configurations tested.

Q: What is the best average FPS this combo achieves at 1920x1080?

A: At 1920x1080 with Low settings, the combo reaches 252 average FPS. The Medium preset delivers 193 average FPS, while High yields 162 average FPS, and Ultra drops to 123 average FPS.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals in synthetic benchmarks?

A: The Ryzen 9 5900X has an average benchmark score of 41376, which is 0.3% higher than the Intel Core Ultra 7 366H (41263) and 0.4% higher than both the Intel Core Ultra 7 356H (41215) and AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 (41208). It trails the Intel Core i7-14650HX by 0.5% (41576).

Q: What is the GPU’s percentile ranking among all tested GPUs?

A: The Radeon RX 7800 XT falls in the 51st percentile versus all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 11627. Its closest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660, scores 11680, which is 0.5% higher.

Q: Does the combo maintain 60+ FPS at 3840x2160?

A: Yes, but only on certain presets. At 3840x2160, Low settings produce 87 average FPS, Medium produces 67 average FPS, and High produces 56 average FPS. Ultra falls to 43 average FPS, below the 60 FPS threshold.

Q: What is the minimum FPS recorded for Medium settings across resolutions?

A: For Medium settings, the minimum FPS values are 164 at 1920x1080, 106 at 2560x1440, and 57 at 3840x2160. The corresponding maximum FPS values are 222, 143, and 77, respectively.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 9 5900X is a 12-core, 24-thread processor from the 5000 series, built on the Zen 3 architecture (codename Vermeer) using TSMC’s 7 nm process. Its base clock is 3.70 GHz and boost clock reaches 4.80 GHz, with a 105 W TDP. The CPU supports DDR4 memory via a dual-channel bus with 51.2 GB/s bandwidth, and it includes 64 MB of L3 cache, 512 KB of L2 cache per core, and 64 KB of L1 cache per core. It uses the AMD Socket AM4 interface and PCIe Gen 4.

In Minimum, the CPU’s multi-threaded capability is evident in its benchmark scores. The 3dmark_max_threads score is 10075, while the 16-thread test yields 9075, and the 8-thread score is 6601. The 4-thread test produces 3588, and the 2-thread test yields 1852. The single-thread score is 941. Cinebench R23 results show a multicore score of 16262 and a single-core score of 1527. These figures indicate strong scaling from 2 to 16 threads, which matters for a game that can leverage multiple cores for physics and AI. The passmark_multithread score of 39002 and passmark_physics score of 1994 further confirm robust thread utilization.

The CPU’s percentile versus all CPUs is 87, meaning it outperforms 87% of tested processors in aggregate benchmarks. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core Ultra 7 366H, has a near-identical average score (41263 vs. 41376, a 0.3% difference). The Intel Core i7-14650HX scores 41576, which is 0.5% higher, showing that the Ryzen 9 5900X remains competitive with modern laptop-class chips despite being a desktop part from 2020. The passmark_single_thread score of 3469 indicates solid single-core performance, which is relevant for games that rely heavily on one or two threads for render loops.

For Minimum, the combination of 12 cores and 24 threads ensures that even with background tasks, the game has ample CPU resources. The 64 MB L3 cache helps with data locality, reducing memory latency in scenarios with large texture streaming. The CPU’s memory bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s is sufficient for the game’s demands, as evidenced by the measured FPS at 1080p where the GPU becomes the primary bottleneck. The data shows that at 1920x1080 Low settings, the combo hits 252 average FPS, which is likely CPU-bound in higher-FPS scenarios, but the Ryzen 9 5900X’s single-thread performance (941 in 3dmark_single_thread) keeps frame pacing consistent.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT is part of the Radeon RX 7000 series, based on the Navi 32 chip with RDNA 3.0 architecture (codename Wheat Nas). It is fabricated on a 5 nm process by TSMC, with 28,100 million transistors on a 346 mm² die. The GPU has a base clock of 1295 MHz, a boost clock of 2430 MHz, and a game clock of 2124 MHz. Memory runs at 2438 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective), with 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, providing 624.1 GB/s of bandwidth.

The GPU features 3840 shading units, 240 TMUs, 96 ROPs, and 60 RT cores. Its pixel rate is 233.3 GPixel/s, and its texture rate is 583.2 GTexel/s. FP32 performance is rated at 37.32 TFLOPS. The card has a TDP of 263 W, requires a 600 W power supply, and uses dual-slot cooling with two 8-pin power connectors. It supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, Vulkan 1.4, and OpenGL 4.6.

In Minimum, the RX 7800 XT’s VRAM and bandwidth play a significant role. The 16 GB frame buffer ensures that even at 3840x2160 with High settings, memory capacity is not a limiting factor. The 624.1 GB/s bandwidth allows for high texture throughput, which contributes to the measured FPS differences between presets. For instance, at 2560x1440, the GPU produces 162 average FPS on Low, 124 on Medium, 104 on High, and 79 on Ultra. The drop from Low to High is 36%, while High to Ultra is a 24% reduction, indicating that Ultra settings impose heavier shading and memory loads.

The GPU’s benchmark scores reflect its mid-range positioning. The passmark_g3d score is 24176, while the 3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12 score is 4157. The geekbench_opencl score is 18290, and the geekbench_vulkan score is 54228. The GPU’s percentile versus all GPUs is 51, meaning it sits near the median. Its nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660, scores 11680, which is 0.5% higher than the RX 7800 XT’s 11627 average. The AMD Radeon Pro 5500M scores 11528 (0.9% lower), and the AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT scores 11842 (1.8% higher). This shows the RX 7800 XT is closely matched with older and lower-tier cards in synthetic averages, but in Minimum, the measured FPS indicates strong real-world performance.

The GPU’s boost clock of 2430 MHz and game clock of 2124 MHz provide high sustained performance. The FP32 throughput of 37.32 TFLOPS is ample for a 2014 title, which explains the high frame rates at 1080p. At 4K Ultra, the GPU’s 37.32 TFLOPS and 624.1 GB/s bandwidth are stressed, resulting in 43 average FPS, but dropping to Medium raises this to 67 average FPS, showing that the memory subsystem and shader load scale with settings.

How This Combo Ranks

This combo ranks 1241 out of 3712 tested combinations in Minimum, placing it in the 66th percentile of all tested systems (since 1241/3712 ≈ 33.4% from the top, meaning it outperforms about 66.6% of combos). This rank reflects a balanced pairing: the CPU’s 87th percentile vs all CPUs and the GPU’s 51st percentile vs all GPUs work together to produce solid frame rates. The CPU is relatively stronger than the GPU in synthetic metrics, but the game’s measured FPS shows that the GPU is the primary driver of performance differences across settings.

Compared to other combos in the database, this rank indicates that many configurations with higher-end GPUs (e.g., GPUs in the 90th percentile) would outperform it, but it also beats a large number of older or mid-range systems. The CPU’s proximity to rivals like the Intel Core i7-14650HX (0.5% higher average score) and the Intel Core Ultra 7 366H (0.3% lower) means that swapping the CPU to a modern mobile part would not drastically change the combo’s ranking, assuming the GPU stays constant. The GPU’s nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660, which scores 0.5% higher on average, but the RX 7800 XT’s 16 GB VRAM gives it an advantage in memory-heavy scenarios, which is reflected in the 4K Medium result (67 avg FPS) versus what a 6 GB card might achieve.

The rank of 1241 suggests that for Minimum, this combo is a strong mid-range performer. It is not in the top tier (which would require a GPU in the 90th percentile and a CPU in the 95th percentile), but it is far from the bottom. The measured FPS at 2560x1440 High (104 avg) and 1920x1080 Ultra (123 avg) indicate that this combo can handle high refresh rate monitors at 1440p with tweaks, and even 4K gaming at Medium settings (67 avg) is playable. The combo’s rank is consistent with its hardware profile: a 12-core CPU from 2020 and a mid-range GPU from 2023.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data covers three resolutions and four settings presets, with average FPS provided for all, and minimum/maximum FPS only for Medium settings. Here is the full breakdown:

3840x2160 (4K):

• Low: 87 average FPS
• Medium: 67 average FPS (min 57, max 77)
• High: 56 average FPS
• Ultra: 43 average FPS

At 4K, the progression from Low to Ultra shows a clear performance cost. Low offers 87 avg FPS, which is smooth for most displays. Medium drops to 67 avg FPS, still above 60, but with a minimum of 57, indicating occasional dips below 60. High falls to 56 avg FPS, which is borderline, and Ultra at 43 avg FPS is not ideal for fast-paced third-person shooting. The gap between Low and Medium is 20 FPS, while Medium to High is 11 FPS, and High to Ultra is 13 FPS, suggesting that the heaviest setting jump is Low to Medium.

2560x1440 (1440p):

• Low: 162 average FPS
• Medium: 124 average FPS (min 106, max 143)
• High: 104 average FPS
• Ultra: 79 average FPS

At 1440p, the combo excels. Low settings provide 162 avg FPS, which is excellent for high refresh rate monitors. Medium yields 124 avg FPS with a minimum of 106, ensuring smooth gameplay. High drops to 104 avg FPS, still well above 60, and Ultra produces 79 avg FPS, which is playable but with lower headroom. The delta between Medium and High is 20 FPS, and High to Ultra is 25 FPS, showing that Ultra is significantly more demanding. The minimum FPS of 106 on Medium indicates consistent frame delivery.

1920x1080 (1080p):

• Low: 252 average FPS
• Medium: 193 average FPS (min 164, max 222)
• High: 162 average FPS
• Ultra: 123 average FPS

At 1080p, the combo is clearly GPU-bound at higher settings but still delivers high frame rates. Low reaches 252 avg FPS, which is beyond the refresh rate of most monitors. Medium provides 193 avg FPS with a minimum of 164, ensuring no drops below 144 Hz. High yields 162 avg FPS, and Ultra produces 123 avg FPS. The minimum FPS of 164 on Medium is higher than the average FPS of High (162), highlighting the performance cost of High settings. The max FPS on Medium (222) shows that the GPU has headroom even with v-sync off.

The data shows that at 1080p, the combo can easily drive 144 Hz monitors on High settings (162 avg FPS) and even 240 Hz monitors on Low (252 avg FPS). At 1440p, High settings (104 avg FPS) are suitable for 100 Hz monitors, while Medium (124 avg FPS) suits 120 Hz panels. At 4K, Medium (67 avg FPS) is the practical ceiling for 60 Hz displays, with Low (87 avg FPS) offering more headroom.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS rows, the optimal settings depend on the target resolution and refresh rate. The data provides clear guidance for each resolution.

For 1920x1080: The combo achieves 162 average FPS on High settings, which is ideal for 144 Hz monitors. If the display is 240 Hz, Low settings (252 average FPS) are the best choice. Medium settings (193 average FPS) also exceed 144 Hz and offer a balance between visual quality and frame rate. Ultra settings (123 average FPS) are suitable for 120 Hz monitors but not for 144 Hz, as the average FPS is below the refresh rate. For most users, High settings provide the best experience, as they deliver 162 average FPS with no minimum FPS data suggesting drops below 144.

For 2560x1440: Medium settings (124 average FPS) are the recommended choice for 120 Hz monitors, as the minimum FPS of 106 ensures no drops below the refresh rate. High settings (104 average FPS) are better suited for 100 Hz displays, with the average FPS slightly above the refresh rate. Low settings (162 average FPS) are for 144 Hz monitors, though the visual downgrade may not be worth it. Ultra settings (79 average FPS) are only for 60 Hz displays, but the visual improvement over High may be minimal. The data shows that Medium provides the best combination of frame rate and visual fidelity, with a minimum FPS of 106 ensuring smoothness.

For 3840x2160: Medium settings (67 average FPS) are the only preset that consistently stays above 60 FPS, with a minimum of 57. This is the recommended choice for 60 Hz 4K displays, as it offers a playable experience. Low settings (87 average FPS) provide more headroom but sacrifice visual quality. High settings (56 average FPS) fall below 60, and Ultra (43 average FPS) is not recommended for smooth gameplay. For 4K, the best experience per the measured rows is Medium, as it balances the 67 average FPS with a minimum of 57, which is close to the 60 FPS target.

In summary, the recommended presets are: 1920x1080 High for 144 Hz, 2560x1440 Medium for 120 Hz, and 3840x2160 Medium for 60 Hz. These selections align with the measured average FPS and minimum FPS data, ensuring that the combo delivers a smooth experience without exceeding the display’s refresh rate or dropping below acceptable frame rates. The GPU’s 16 GB VRAM and the CPU’s 12 cores provide sufficient headroom for these presets, as evidenced by the consistent FPS numbers across all resolution and settings combinations.