Minimum

The AMD Ryzen 7 5700X and AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT combination delivers a robust performance profile in Minimum, a Third-Person Shooter released in 2014. With the CPU placing in the 83rd percentile among all processors and the GPU in the 82nd percentile, this pairing is well-positioned for high-refresh-rate gameplay. The measured frame rates across resolutions and settings indicate a system capable of handling both competitive and visually demanding scenarios, though the Ultra preset at 4K presents a significant challenge.

FAQ

*Q: What is the combo rank of this CPU and GPU pairing in Minimum?*

A: The combination ranks 378th out of 1733 tested combos in the game's database, placing it in the top 22% of all tested configurations.

Q: How does the Ryzen 7 5700X compare to its nearest rival, the Intel Core i9-11900KF?

A: The Ryzen 7 5700X has an average benchmark score of 26214, which is 0.1% higher than the Intel Core i9-11900KF's 26196. This effectively places them at performance parity.

Q: What is the maximum average frame rate achievable at 1920x1080 with this combo?

A: At 1920x1080 with Low settings, the combo achieves its highest measured average of 298.5 FPS. This drops to 192.1 FPS on High and 145.9 FPS on Ultra settings.

Q: Is the RX 7900 XT's 20 GB VRAM sufficient for 4K gaming in this title?

A: Yes, the 20 GB GDDR6 memory with 800.0 GB/s bandwidth is far more than sufficient for Minimum, a game from 2014. The 4K Ultra preset is limited by rendering load, not memory capacity.

Q: What are the boost clock and game clock specifications of the RX 7900 XT?

A: The GPU has a boost clock of 2394 MHz and a game clock of 2025 MHz. The base clock is set at 1387 MHz.

Q: How does the GPU's DirectX 12 benchmark score compare to its nearest rival?

A: In the Passmark DirectX 12 test, the RX 7900 XT scores 110. This is a specific metric; the overall average benchmark score is 38358, which is 0.3% higher than the NVIDIA CMP 70HX but 0.4% lower than the NVIDIA GeForce MX570.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo's rank of 378 out of 1733 tested combinations places it firmly in the upper quartile of all systems tested for Minimum. This ranking reflects a balanced pairing where neither component is a severe bottleneck for the other. The CPU's 83rd percentile standing and the GPU's 82nd percentile standing are closely aligned, suggesting a harmonious match that leverages the strengths of both.

The Ryzen 7 5700X's multi-threaded capabilities are evident in its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22620, which pairs with a single-core score of 3193. This balance is critical for a game like Minimum, which benefits from both strong per-core performance and the ability to handle background tasks. The CPU's nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 5 7600X, is 0.2% ahead, while the Intel Core i9-11900KF is 0.1% behind, showing that the 5700X is in a tight competitive cluster.

On the GPU side, the RX 7900 XT's Passmark G3D score of 29009 and OpenCL score of 169834 underscore its raw compute power. Its position relative to the nearest rivals is interesting: it is 0.3% ahead of the NVIDIA CMP 70HX but 0.4% behind the NVIDIA GeForce MX570 in average score. This suggests that while the GPU is powerful, its performance in this specific title is not extraordinary compared to a diverse set of other cards.

The measured FPS data shows that the combo's rank is driven by high refresh rate capabilities at 1080p and 1440p, with a substantial drop-off at 4K Ultra. The 298.5 FPS at 1080p Low and 193.1 FPS at 1440p Low are standout figures that would place this combo ahead of many others in competitive scenarios. However, the 49.8 FPS at 4K Ultra pulls the overall ranking down, as many high-end combos can maintain 60 FPS at that resolution and settings combination.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT, built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture with the Navi 31 chip, is the primary driver of frame rates in this pairing. Its memory configuration of 20 GB GDDR6 on a 320-bit bus provides an 800.0 GB/s bandwidth, which is ample for the textures and assets in Minimum. The GPU's clock behavior is notable: a base clock of 1387 MHz, a game clock of 2025 MHz, and a boost clock of 2394 MHz.

The boost clock is the key metric for sustained performance, as it represents the maximum frequency the GPU can achieve under load. The difference between the game clock and boost clock—2025 MHz versus 2394 MHz—indicates a 369 MHz headroom that the card can utilize when thermals and power allow. This is visible in the benchmark results, where the GPU's 51.48 TFLOPS FP32 performance enables high frame rates at lower settings.

At 1080p and 1440p, the GPU's 192 ROPs and 5376 shading units are sufficient to push frame rates well above 144 FPS on High settings. The texture rate of 804.4 GTexel/s ensures that texture-heavy scenes do not cause stuttering. The GPU's DirectX 12 Ultimate support is also relevant, as it allows the game to use modern rendering features.

However, the GPU's role becomes more constrained at 4K Ultra. The pixel rate of 459.6 GPixel/s is challenged by the 3840x2160 resolution, resulting in a 49.8 FPS average. This is not a memory bandwidth issue, as the 800.0 GB/s is more than adequate; it is a raw shading and rasterization throughput limitation. The GPU's 84 RT cores are not directly relevant to Minimum, as the game does not feature ray tracing, but they do contribute to the overall die size and power envelope.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data reveals a clear performance hierarchy across resolutions and settings. At 1920x1080, the combo delivers exceptional results: 298.5 FPS on Low, 228.9 FPS on Medium, 192.1 FPS on High, and 145.9 FPS on Ultra. The scaling from Low to Ultra is nearly linear, with Ultra being 51% slower than Low. This indicates that the CPU is not a limiting factor at this resolution, as the frame rates are exceptionally high even at Ultra settings.

At 2560x1440, the performance remains strong but shows a more pronounced impact from the higher pixel count. The results are 193.1 FPS on Low, 148.4 FPS on Medium, 121.9 FPS on High, and 97.7 FPS on Ultra. The transition from 1080p to 1440p results in a 35% reduction in frame rates at Low settings, but the absolute numbers are still high enough for smooth gameplay on high-refresh-rate monitors.

The 3840x2160 results show a significant drop-off. The combo achieves 103.7 FPS on Low, 81.5 FPS on Medium, 65.6 FPS on High, and 49.8 FPS on Ultra. The Ultra preset at 4K is the only configuration that falls below the 60 FPS threshold, which is critical for a smooth experience in a third-person shooter. The scaling from Low to Ultra at 4K is 52%, which is similar to the 1080p scaling, but the starting point is much lower.

The data shows that the combo is best suited for 1440p gaming, where it can maintain over 120 FPS on High settings. At 1080p, it is overkill for most scenarios, providing frame rates that exceed the refresh rate of most monitors. At 4K, it is only viable at Low or Medium settings if the goal is to maintain 60 FPS or higher.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings depend heavily on the target resolution and refresh rate. For players with a 1920x1080 144Hz monitor, the High preset at 192.1 FPS is the best choice, as it provides a significant visual upgrade over Medium while still exceeding the refresh rate. Ultra at 145.9 FPS is also viable, but the 24% performance penalty over High may not justify the marginal visual improvements.

For 2560x1440 144Hz displays, the High preset at 121.9 FPS is the recommended starting point. This falls slightly short of 144 FPS, but it is well above the 60 FPS threshold. Players seeking maximum smoothness can drop to Medium at 148.4 FPS, which provides a 22% performance boost. Ultra at 97.7 FPS is playable but may not feel as responsive in fast-paced combat scenarios.

At 3840x2160, the choices are more constrained. The High preset at 65.6 FPS is the best option for visual fidelity while staying above 60 FPS. However, for a consistently smooth experience, the Medium preset at 81.5 FPS is a safer choice, providing a 24% performance uplift over High. The Low preset at 103.7 FPS is the only 4K option that matches the performance of 1440p High, making it viable for players who prioritize frame rate above all else. The Ultra preset at 49.8 FPS should be avoided for competitive play, as the sub-60 FPS average will introduce visible stutter and input latency.