Minimum
This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 86 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 29 | 38 | 49 | 64 |
| 1440p QHD | 55 | 74 | 86 | 117 |
| 1080p Full HD | 87 | 117 | 139 | 178 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Minimum with AMD Ryzen 7 5700X + AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT, In-Depth Analysis
The AMD Ryzen 7 5700X and AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT combination delivers a highly playable experience in Minimum, provided the settings are chosen with the hardware’s strengths in mind. The measured data shows a clear progression from the demanding Ultra preset to the fluid Low preset, with the most balanced experience found at Medium. At 1080p, the Medium preset achieves an average of 139.1 FPS, which is a substantial 60.8% higher than the Ultra setting’s 86.5 FPS, while still offering a significant visual upgrade over Low. The High preset at 1080p produces 117.1 FPS, which is certainly smooth, but the jump to Medium adds 22.0 FPS for a relatively minor graphical trade-off in a fast-paced third-person shooter. For players targeting the highest refresh rates, the Low preset at 1080p delivers an exceptional 177.7 FPS, making it the optimal choice for competitive play where every frame counts. At 1440p, the Medium preset remains the sweet spot, holding 86.3 FPS, while High dips to 73.7 FPS. The data strongly suggests that Medium is the recommended preset for this combo, as it consistently provides a high frame rate cushion across all resolutions without pushing the GPU into the sub-60 FPS territory seen at Ultra.
GPU Role
The AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT is the primary driver of performance in Minimum, and its specifications reveal why the Ultra preset proves so demanding. The GPU’s 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus provides a bandwidth of 280.3 GB/s, which is a capable amount for this title, but the real bottleneck at high settings is the raw compute throughput. The card’s boost clock of 2635 MHz and game clock of 2410 MHz are aggressive, yet the 10.79 TFLOPS of FP32 performance is what the game’s rendering engine is drawing upon. The benchmark results show a stark contrast between settings: at 4K, the Ultra preset yields a meager 29.2 FPS, while the Low preset achieves 64.0 FPS. This 34.8 FPS gap highlights how the GPU’s shading units, TMUs, and ROPs are saturated by the higher-fidelity effects. The card’s 72nd percentile ranking among all GPUs places it as a mid-range performer, and the measured FPS data confirms that it is best utilized with settings that reduce the load on its 2048 shading units and 64 ROPs. The RX 6650 XT’s 8 GB frame buffer is sufficient for the game’s geometry and textures at Medium and High, but the Ultra preset’s additional post-processing and shadow effects are what cause the frame rate to plummet, indicating a compute limitation rather than a memory capacity issue.
Resolution Scaling
The FPS data across the three tested resolutions reveals a classic GPU-bound scaling pattern, with the frame rate dropping as pixel count increases. At 1080p, the combo achieves an average of 139.1 FPS on Medium, which falls to 86.3 FPS at 1440p and further to 48.9 FPS at 4K. This represents a 37.9% performance hit when moving from 1080p to 1440p, and a 64.8% drop when moving from 1080p to 4K. The scaling is consistent with the GPU being the limiting component, as the CPU has ample headroom to feed the graphics card at lower resolutions. The High preset shows a similar trend, with 117.1 FPS at 1080p, 73.7 FPS at 1440p, and 37.7 FPS at 4K. The most telling data point is the Low preset, which at 4K still manages 64.0 FPS, while at 1080p it reaches 177.7 FPS. This stark difference indicates that the RX 6650 XT is the primary constraint; if the CPU were the bottleneck, the frame rate would not scale so dramatically with resolution. The 4K Ultra result of 29.2 FPS is the only scenario where the combo falls below playable thresholds, and it underscores that 4K gaming with this GPU is only viable on lower settings. The data suggests that 1440p is the practical ceiling for this pairing on higher presets, while 1080p allows the system to stretch its legs fully.
How This Combo Ranks
In the broader context of all tested hardware combinations, this pairing of the Ryzen 7 5700X and the RX 6650 XT holds a rank of 1077 out of 1733 combos in Minimum. This places it in the lower-middle tier of the database, which is consistent with the GPU’s 72nd percentile ranking among all graphics cards and the CPU’s 83rd percentile among all processors. The rank suggests that while this is not a top-tier setup by any means, it is far from the bottom of the barrel. The combo’s performance is heavily influenced by the GPU, as the data shows that the CPU is rarely the limiting factor in this game. The measured FPS figures at 1080p Medium (139.1 FPS) are respectable for a mid-range system, but the rank indicates that many other combos with more powerful GPUs or newer architectures will deliver higher frame rates. The delta between this combo’s parts and their nearest rivals is minimal in synthetic benchmarks, with the CPU sitting within 0.2% of the AMD Ryzen 5 7600X and the GPU within 0.6% of the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH, but in real-world gaming, the RX 6650 XT’s 8 GB memory and 128-bit bus are what hold it back relative to higher-ranked setups. This rank is a useful indicator for buyers: it is a competent 1080p machine, but expectations for 4K or high-refresh-rate 1440p should be tempered.
CPU Role
The AMD Ryzen 7 5700X provides a solid foundation for this combo, and its specifications suggest it is more than capable of keeping up with the RX 6650 XT in Minimum. With 8 cores and 16 threads based on the Zen 3 architecture, the CPU offers a boost clock of 4.60 GHz and a base clock of 3.40 GHz. The 32 MB of shared L3 cache is a significant advantage for gaming, as it reduces memory latency and improves frame pacing. The CPU’s benchmark scores are impressive, with a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 22620 and a single-core score of 3193, placing it in the 83rd percentile of all CPUs. In the context of Minimum, the CPU’s role is to feed the GPU with draw calls and game logic, and the measured FPS data indicates it does this effectively. At 1080p Low, the combo reaches 177.7 FPS, which is a strong indicator that the CPU is not the bottleneck, as the frame rate is high and the GPU is still the limiting factor at higher settings. The CPU’s nearest rival, the Intel Core i9-11900KF, scores within 0.1% in average benchmark performance, confirming that the 5700X is a competitive mid-range option. The 65W TDP and 7 nm process node ensure efficient operation, but the real takeaway from the data is that the CPU’s 8 cores and 16 threads are sufficient for this game’s threading model, allowing the GPU to be the sole determinant of performance across all tested resolutions.
Hardware Specifications
AMD Ryzen 7 5700X
AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for AMD Ryzen 7 5700X + AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT in Minimum
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 64.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 48.9 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 37.7 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 29.2 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 117.1 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 86.3 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 73.7 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 55.3 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 177.7 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 139.1 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 117.1 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 86.5 |
Minimum with Ryzen 7 5700X + Other GPUs
See how Minimum performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Minimum with RX 6650 XT + Other CPUs
See how Minimum performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with Ryzen 7 5700X + RX 6650 XT
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.