Minimum

The AMD Ryzen 7 5700G paired with the AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT delivers a robust experience in Minimum, a third-person shooter from 2014. The dataset shows a configuration that scales predictably with resolution and settings, offering high frame rates at lower resolutions while remaining viable at 4K. The analysis below breaks down the measured performance, focusing on where the bottleneck shifts between the CPU and GPU, and how the combination ranks against other tested setups.

Resolution Scaling

The frame rate progression from 1080p to 4K reveals a classic transition from CPU-bound to GPU-bound behavior. At 1920x1080 with Low settings, the combo produces 249.8 FPS. This high figure suggests the CPU is the primary limiting factor, as the GPU has ample headroom to render frames quickly. Moving to 2560x1440 at Low, the average drops to 159.5 FPS, a reduction of roughly 36% from the 1080p result. This is a substantial decline, indicating that the increased pixel count is now demanding more from the GPU, though the frame rate remains exceptionally high for competitive play.

The trend continues at 3840x2160, where Low settings yield 84.8 FPS. This is only about 53% of the 1440p figure and 34% of the 1080p figure. The scaling is not linear; the jump from 1440p to 4K nearly halves the performance, underscoring the heavy load placed on the Radeon RX 7800 XT at this resolution. The data shows that while the CPU can drive very high frame rates at 1080p, the GPU becomes the constraining component as resolution increases, a common pattern for a powerful processor paired with a mid-range to high-end graphics card.

Examining the High preset tells a similar story with lower absolute numbers. At 1080p High, the average is 163 FPS, which drops to 105.5 FPS at 1440p and further to 58.9 FPS at 4K. The percentage drop from 1080p to 1440p is about 35%, and from 1440p to 4K is about 44%. This suggests that at High settings, the GPU is already under significant stress at 1440p, and the 4K result barely maintains a playable 60 FPS threshold. The scaling pattern indicates that for this title, 1440p is the sweet spot for high refresh rate monitors, while 4K is best suited for a standard 60 Hz display with some settings adjustments.

The Ultra preset amplifies the GPU bottleneck. At 1080p Ultra, the average is 120.9 FPS, which is 74% of the High preset’s result. At 1440p Ultra, it falls to 78.1 FPS, and at 4K Ultra, it plummets to 39.5 FPS. The 4K Ultra figure is a stark indicator that this combination cannot handle maximum settings at the highest resolution, as it falls below the 60 FPS playability standard. The data clearly shows that the scaling from High to Ultra is more punishing than the scaling from Medium to High, suggesting that Ultra settings activate particularly demanding effects that disproportionately impact the GPU’s render time.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT is the dominant variable in these results, particularly at higher resolutions and settings. Its 16 GB of GDDR6 memory and 256-bit bus width provide a substantial bandwidth of 624.1 GB/s, which is critical for handling the texture and geometry data at 4K. The measured FPS values at 4K High (58.9 FPS) and 4K Ultra (39.5 FPS) indicate that memory bandwidth is not the primary constraint, but rather the raw compute throughput of the GPU. The card’s boost clock of 2430 MHz and game clock of 2124 MHz are the driving forces behind its rendering speed, and the data shows that at 1440p and above, the GPU is working near its full capacity.

The GPU’s performance percentile is 76, placing it above the average of all tested GPUs. Its average benchmark score is 32619, which is nearly identical to its nearest rivals, such as the AMD FirePro S9300 X2 (32540) and the NVIDIA P104-100 (32747). This indicates that the RX 7800 XT is a solidly mid-to-high-tier performer in synthetic tests, but the real-world game results show its limits. The variance between Low and Ultra settings at each resolution demonstrates that the GPU has a finite amount of compute units, and the 3840 shading units are tasked with more work as settings increase.

At 1080p, the GPU’s role is less pronounced. The gap between Low (249.8 FPS) and Ultra (120.9 FPS) is large, but the absolute numbers are so high that the CPU is likely the limiting factor. The Ryzen 7 5700G, with its 8 cores and 16 threads, has a max-thread benchmark score of 6627, which is sufficient to feed the GPU at this resolution. However, the data suggests that the CPU’s single-thread performance, measured at 899 in 3DMark, may cap the maximum achievable frame rate. The fact that 1080p Low does not exceed 250 FPS, even with a powerful GPU, points to a CPU ceiling in this scenario. This is a key insight: the GPU is the star at 1440p and 4K, but at 1080p, the processor holds the reins.

FAQ

Q: What is the maximum average frame rate achievable with this CPU and GPU combo at 1080p?

A: The highest recorded average is 249.8 FPS at 1920x1080 with Low settings. This is the peak performance point in the dataset, and it indicates a CPU limitation at this resolution.

Q: Is this combination capable of a 60 FPS experience at 4K?

A: Yes, but only with settings adjustments. At 4K High, the average is 58.9 FPS, which is just below 60. At 4K Medium, it rises to 68.3 FPS, and at 4K Low, it reaches 84.8 FPS. Ultra settings are not viable at this resolution, as the average drops to 39.5 FPS.

Q: How does the GPU compare to its direct rivals in benchmark scores?

A: The RX 7800 XT has an average benchmark score of 32619. It is nearly tied with the AMD FirePro S9300 X2 (32540, deltaPct 0.2%) and the NVIDIA P104-100 (32747, deltaPct -0.4%). This places it in a tight competitive cluster.

Q: Which resolution offers the best balance of high frame rate and visual fidelity?

A: The data suggests 2560x1440 is the optimal target. At High settings, it delivers 105.5 FPS, which is well above the 60 FPS threshold and suitable for high refresh rate displays. Even at Ultra, it maintains 78.1 FPS, offering a smooth experience.

Q: What is the performance drop from 1080p to 4K at Medium settings?

A: The average frame rate at 1080p Medium is 191.9 FPS, which falls to 122.6 FPS at 1440p and then to 68.3 FPS at 4K. This represents a 64% reduction from 1080p to 4K, highlighting the significant load increase on the GPU.

Q: Does the CPU hold back the GPU in any scenario?

A: Yes, at 1080p with Low settings. The 249.8 FPS result is likely constrained by the Ryzen 7 5700G’s single-thread performance (899 in 3DMark), as the GPU should be capable of higher output at this low resolution and preset.

How This Combo Ranks

In Minimum, this specific combination of CPU and GPU holds a rank of 656 out of 1733 tested combos. This places it in the upper-middle tier of all possible pairings, meaning it outperforms a majority of systems but is not at the absolute top. The percentile rank is essentially 62%, indicating that roughly 38% of tested combos exceed its performance. This is a solid result for a mid-range processor paired with a high-end GPU, but it is not a top-tier configuration.

The ranking is influenced by the CPU’s performance relative to its peers. The Ryzen 7 5700G has an average benchmark score of 25626, which places it in the 83rd percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, scores 25706, a delta of -0.3%, meaning the 5700G is virtually identical in synthetic tests. This CPU performance is sufficient for most gaming scenarios, but it is not the primary driver of the combo’s rank. The GPU, with its 76th percentile score, is the stronger component, but its performance at 4K Ultra (39.5 FPS) drags down the overall game-specific ranking.

The rank of 656 suggests that while the system is capable of high frame rates at 1080p and 1440p, it struggles to maintain a competitive edge at 4K with max settings. Combos that rank higher likely feature a stronger CPU, such as a newer generation processor with higher single-thread performance, which would unlock higher 1080p frame rates. Alternatively, a more powerful GPU would push the 4K Ultra numbers past 60 FPS. The data shows this combo is best suited for high-refresh-rate gaming at 1440p, where it excels, rather than for 4K enthusiasts seeking maximum visual quality.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings depend heavily on the target resolution and desired frame rate. For 1920x1080, all presets deliver playable frame rates, but the High preset at 163 FPS is the recommended choice. It offers a significant visual improvement over Low (249.8 FPS) while still maintaining a frame rate well above the 144 Hz refresh rate common on modern monitors. Ultra at 120.9 FPS is also viable, but the drop from High to Ultra is not justified by the marginal visual gains, given that High already provides a smooth experience.

At 2560x1440, the High preset is the clear winner. With an average of 105.5 FPS, it provides a smooth experience on 144 Hz displays and offers better visual fidelity than Medium (122.6 FPS) without a major performance hit. The Ultra preset at 78.1 FPS is also acceptable for 60 Hz displays, but it leaves little headroom for demanding scenes. Low at 159.5 FPS is available for competitive play, but the visual trade-off is significant for a single-player title like Minimum.

For 3840x2160, the Medium preset at 68.3 FPS is the most balanced choice. It provides a stable frame rate above 60 FPS while offering moderate visual quality. The High preset at 58.9 FPS is borderline, and may dip below 60 FPS in intense action, so Medium is safer. The Low preset at 84.8 FPS is the best option for those prioritizing frame rate over visuals, but the jump to Medium is recommended for a more immersive experience. Ultra at 39.5 FPS is not recommended, as the frame rate is too low for comfortable play. The data indicates that for this game, High at 1440p is the sweet spot, providing the best balance of visual fidelity and performance.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the frame rates are consistently high across all settings. Low settings produce an average of 249.8 FPS, which is the highest recorded value in the dataset. Medium settings follow at 191.9 FPS, showing a 23% reduction from Low. High settings yield 163 FPS, a further 15% drop from Medium. Ultra settings produce 120.9 FPS, which is 26% lower than High. The progression shows diminishing returns, with each step up in quality costing a significant number of frames.

At 2560x1440, the performance scales down logically. Low settings average 159.5 FPS, maintaining a high refresh rate experience. Medium settings drop to 122.6 FPS, a 23% reduction. High settings produce 105.5 FPS, a 14% drop from Medium. Ultra settings yield 78.1 FPS, a 26% reduction from High. The pattern at 1440p mirrors 1080p, but the absolute numbers are lower, reflecting the increased pixel workload on the GPU.

At 3840x2160, the frame rates become more modest. Low settings average 84.8 FPS, which is still playable. Medium settings drop to 68.3 FPS, a 19% reduction. High settings produce 58.9 FPS, an 14% drop from Medium, and this is the only preset at 4K that dips below the 60 FPS mark. Ultra settings yield 39.5 FPS, a 33% reduction from High, and this is the lowest recorded value in the entire dataset. The data shows that at 4K, the GPU is heavily taxed, and the frame rate drops are more pronounced at higher settings, confirming that the RX 7800 XT is the limiting factor at this resolution.