Minimum

The AMD Ryzen 5 7400F pairs with the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER to deliver a decidedly mixed experience in Minimum, a third-person shooter from 2014. The data indicates that this combination is heavily GPU-bound at higher resolutions, while the CPU’s strong single-threaded performance provides a solid foundation for high frame rates at 1080p. The overall combo rank of 2509 out of 2939 tested configurations places it in the lower-mid tier, suggesting that while playable, this setup requires careful settings management to avoid dipping below acceptable frame rates.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 5 7400F is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on the Zen 4 architecture and codenamed Raphael. It operates with a base clock of 3.70 GHz and a boost clock of 4.70 GHz, which are the key drivers for its performance in Minimum. The CPU’s benchmark scores show a strong single-thread showing, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3072 and a Passmark single-thread score of 3689. This single-thread strength is critical for a game like Minimum, which typically relies on a few well-optimized threads for game logic and physics. The multi-threaded capabilities are also robust, evidenced by a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21765 and a Passmark multithread score of 25645, which helps maintain frame pacing in busy scenes with many AI entities.

The CPU’s performance relative to its peers is tight. Its average benchmark score of 32750 places it at the 83rd percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Core i5-14600T with an average score of 32707 (0.1% behind) and the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H with an average score of 32812 (0.2% ahead). This indicates the 7400F is positioned in a highly competitive performance band, where differences between chips are minimal. In the context of Minimum, this means the CPU is unlikely to be the primary bottleneck at most settings. The data shows that at 1920x1080 with Low settings, the combo achieves 131 FPS, and at High settings, it reaches 84 FPS. These numbers suggest the CPU has ample headroom to feed frames to the GPU, as the frame rate scales predictably with graphics load rather than hitting a CPU-imposed ceiling.

The 7400F’s 32 MB of shared L3 cache and support for DDR5 memory with a dual-channel bus and 83.2 GB/s bandwidth further bolster its capability to handle data throughput efficiently. The processor is unlocked for overclocking, but the measured FPS data does not include overclocked results, so all analysis is based on stock performance. The CPU’s TDP of 65 W also indicates it runs cool and efficiently, which is beneficial for sustained gaming sessions without thermal throttling. In summary, the Ryzen 5 7400F provides more than enough computational power for Minimum, ensuring that the frame rate limits observed in the data are almost exclusively dictated by the GPU.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER is a Turing-architecture GPU with 6 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, delivering a memory bandwidth of 336.0 GB/s. Its base clock is 1530 MHz with a boost clock of 1785 MHz. The GPU’s 1408 shading units and 48 ROPs are responsible for the pixel processing that directly impacts resolution scaling. The measured FPS data reveals a clear performance cliff as resolution increases, which is typical for a GPU with a 6 GB frame buffer and moderate compute power.

The GPU’s average benchmark score is 12986, placing it at the 53rd percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile (0.4% higher score) and the AMD Radeon RX 580 (0.4% higher score). This shows the GTX 1660 SUPER is competitively positioned, but it is an older design that is now end-of-life. The GPU benchmarks, such as a Passmark G3D score of 12699 and a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1278, reflect its mid-range capabilities. The 12 nm process node and 125 W TDP indicate it is a power-hungry card by modern standards, but it remains functional for this title.

In Minimum, the GPU’s role is to render the scene at the target resolution. At 3840x2160 (4K), the GPU is severely strained. The average FPS at High settings is 29, dropping to 22 at Ultra. Even at Low settings, the average is only 46 FPS, which is not smooth for a shooter. Moving to 2560x1440 provides a more playable experience, with High settings averaging 54 FPS and Medium hitting 65 FPS. The sweet spot is clearly 1920x1080, where the GPU can push 84 FPS at High and 131 FPS at Low. The data shows that the 6 GB VRAM is sufficient for this 2014 title, but the GPU’s raw compute power is the limiting factor, particularly at higher resolutions where the fill rate requirements exceed its capabilities.

FAQ

*Q: Is this combo capable of running Minimum at 60 FPS on a 1440p monitor?*

A: At 2560x1440, the combo achieves an average of 65 FPS on Medium settings, but only 54 FPS on High. Therefore, it is capable of 60+ FPS only if you select Medium or lower settings.

Q: What is the highest playable resolution for this setup?

A: The data shows that 1920x1080 is the most playable resolution, with all settings yielding average FPS above 64. At 2560x1440, the Ultra setting drops to 41 FPS, which is less playable. 3840x2160 is not recommended for smooth gameplay, as even Low settings only reach 46 FPS.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its closest rival, the Intel Core i5-14600T?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 7400F has an average benchmark score of 32750, which is 0.1% higher than the Intel Core i5-14600T’s score of 32707. This indicates they perform virtually identically in synthetic benchmarks.

*Q: Does the GPU have enough VRAM for Minimum at maximum settings?*

A: The GPU has 6 GB of GDDR6 memory. The measured data shows that at 1920x1080 with Ultra settings, the combo achieves 64 FPS, indicating that the VRAM capacity is sufficient for this game’s textures and assets at this resolution.

Q: What is the best setting for 4K gaming with this combo?

A: None of the settings at 3840x2160 produce an average FPS above 46. The Low preset provides the highest average at 46 FPS, but this is still below the 60 FPS threshold for a fluid experience. The Ultra preset is the worst, at 22 FPS.

Q: Is this GPU better than the AMD Radeon RX 580?

A: The GTX 1660 SUPER has an average benchmark score of 12986, which is 0.4% higher than the AMD Radeon RX 580’s score of 12928. This makes them essentially equal in performance, with the NVIDIA card having a slight edge.

How This Combo Ranks

The AMD Ryzen 5 7400F and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER combination ranks 2509 out of 2939 tested combos in Minimum. This places it in the 15th percentile of all configurations, meaning that approximately 85% of tested systems outperform it in this specific game. This low rank is primarily due to the GPU’s age and limited compute power, as the CPU performs admirably. The rank indicates that while the combo is not a top-tier performer, it is not at the absolute bottom either, and it can still deliver a playable experience at lower resolutions.

The ranking is influenced by the GPU’s inability to maintain high frame rates at 4K, where it struggles to stay above 30 FPS on any setting. In contrast, the CPU’s strong performance ensures that the combo does not fall into the lowest ranks, as it can achieve high frame rates at 1080p. The combo’s position in the lower quartile suggests that gamers with this setup will need to prioritize resolution and settings to get a good experience. The data shows that at 1920x1080, the combo is competitive, but it falls behind at higher resolutions, which is the primary reason for its low overall rank.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a detailed view of performance across three resolutions and four settings presets.

At 3840x2160, the combo is clearly overwhelmed. The Low preset yields an average FPS of 46, which is the only setting above 30 FPS. The Medium preset averages 35 FPS with a minimum of 30 and a maximum of 40, indicating noticeable frame dips. High settings drop to 29 FPS, and Ultra falls to 22 FPS. The data suggests that this resolution is not viable for a smooth experience, as even the lowest settings produce sub-60 FPS.

At 2560x1440, performance improves significantly. The Low preset achieves 85 FPS, which is excellent. Medium settings average 65 FPS with a minimum of 55 and a maximum of 74, providing a mostly smooth experience. High settings average 54 FPS, which is playable but not ideal for fast-paced action. The Ultra preset falls to 41 FPS, making it the least desirable option at this resolution. The data shows that 1440p is a viable option if you stick to Low or Medium settings.

At 1920x1080, the combo performs best. The Low preset achieves a high 131 FPS, ensuring maximum fluidity. Medium settings average 100 FPS with a minimum of 85 and a maximum of 115, providing a smooth and consistent experience. High settings average 84 FPS, which is still very playable. Even the Ultra preset manages 64 FPS, which is above the 60 FPS threshold. This resolution is the clear sweet spot, offering high frame rates across all settings.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal experience for this combo is at 1920x1080 resolution. For competitive play or users seeking the highest frame rates, the Low preset delivers 131 FPS, which is ideal for a third-person shooter where responsiveness is key. However, the Medium preset is the best balance, offering 100 FPS with a minimum of 85 FPS, ensuring smooth gameplay with improved visual fidelity over Low. The High preset at 84 FPS is also excellent, providing a richer visual experience without sacrificing playability.

For users with a 2560x1440 monitor, the Low preset is the only option that guarantees a high refresh rate experience, hitting 85 FPS. The Medium preset is acceptable for casual play, with a 65 FPS average, but the minimum of 55 FPS may cause occasional stutter in intense scenes. High and Ultra presets are not recommended at this resolution, as they drop below 60 FPS.

Finally, 3840x2160 should be avoided for this game. Even the Low preset only reaches 46 FPS, which is below the playable threshold for a shooter. The Medium preset’s minimum FPS of 30 is too low for a smooth experience, and the Ultra preset is unplayable. The data clearly indicates that the GTX 1660 SUPER lacks the raw power to drive Minimum at 4K. Therefore, the recommended configuration is 1920x1080 with the Medium preset, as it provides the best combination of visual quality and performance, ensuring a consistently smooth and responsive gaming session.