Microsoft Flight Simulator

Microsoft Flight Simulator

AVERAGE FPS
59
playable

This combination offers playable performance with an average of 59 FPS, though you may want to lower settings for smoother gameplay.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 34 36 46 58
1440p QHD 44 50 64 80
1080p Full HD 60 61 78 99

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Low 58
3840x2160 Medium 46
3840x2160 High 36
3840x2160 Ultra 34
2560x1440 Low 80
2560x1440 Medium 64
2560x1440 High 50
2560x1440 Ultra 44
1920x1080 Low 99
1920x1080 Medium 78
1920x1080 High 61
1920x1080 Ultra 60

Microsoft Flight Simulator with Intel Core i9-14900K + AMD Radeon RX 7600, In-Depth Analysis

Resolution Scaling

The measured FPS data for Microsoft Flight Simulator with the Intel Core i9-14900K and AMD Radeon RX 7600 shows a clear pattern of GPU-bound scaling as resolution increases. At 1080p Low, the combo produces 98.8 FPS, which drops to 80.2 FPS at 1440p Low and 58.2 FPS at 4K Low. That is a 41.1% reduction from 1080p to 4K at Low settings, indicating the GPU is the primary limiter even at the lowest quality preset.

The scaling becomes more pronounced at higher settings. At Ultra, the combo delivers 59.8 FPS at 1080p, 43.6 FPS at 1440p, and 33.7 FPS at 4K. The 4K Ultra result is 43.6% lower than the 1080p Ultra result, which is a larger relative drop than the Low preset's 41.1% decline. This suggests that as settings increase, the GPU workload grows disproportionately, reinforcing that the RX 7600 is the bottleneck in this pairing.

The Medium preset shows similar behavior: 77.9 FPS at 1080p, 63.8 FPS at 1440p, and 46 FPS at 4K. The 4K Medium result is 40.9% below the 1080p Medium result. High settings follow the same trend: 60.5 FPS at 1080p, 49.9 FPS at 1440p, and 35.9 FPS at 4K, with the 4K High result 40.7% lower.

Notably, the gap between 1080p and 1440p is smaller than the gap between 1440p and 4K across all settings. For example, at Low, 1080p to 1440p drops 18.8% (98.8 to 80.2 FPS), while 1440p to 4K drops 27.4% (80.2 to 58.2 FPS). This non-linear scaling is typical of a GPU that runs out of memory bandwidth or raw throughput at higher resolutions. The data clearly indicates that the CPU has ample headroom; the i9-14900K is not the limiting component in any resolution or settings combination.

How This Combo Ranks

The Intel Core i9-14900K and AMD Radeon RX 7600 combination ranks 1219 out of 1795 tested combos in Microsoft Flight Simulator. This places it in the 32.1st percentile of all tested configurations, meaning roughly two-thirds of tested combos deliver higher average FPS in this game. The rank is heavily influenced by the GPU, as the CPU alone sits in the 97th percentile among all processors.

The i9-14900K's own benchmark scores are exceptional: it achieves 49872 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 7040 in single-core, with a Geekbench multi-core score of 20370 and single-core of 3064. Its Passmark multi-thread score is 58674, and its average benchmark score is 79824, placing it 0.3% below the AMD EPYC 7413 (80041) and 0.7% above the Intel Core i9-14900KF (79245). The data shows this CPU is a top-tier part, but the RX 7600's 63rd percentile GPU ranking (average benchmark score 20258) drags the combo down.

The RX 7600's nearest rivals in GPU benchmarks include the RX 7600 XT (0.6% higher score), the RX 460 (0.8% higher), the RTX 3070 Mobile (1.3% lower), and the Intel Arc B570 (1.5% lower). This tight clustering around the 20258 average score indicates that the GPU is a mid-range part, and its performance in Microsoft Flight Simulator is consistent with that positioning. The combo rank reflects this: the CPU is overqualified for the GPU, and the measured FPS is dictated almost entirely by the RX 7600's capabilities.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon RX 7600 is built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture with the Navi 33 chip, fabricated on a 6 nm process at TSMC. It has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The GPU features 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operation units, along with 32 ray tracing cores. Its base clock is 1720 MHz, with a game clock of 2250 MHz and a boost clock of 2655 MHz.

In Microsoft Flight Simulator, the 8 GB VRAM capacity and 288.0 GB/s bandwidth are the most relevant specifications. The game's high-resolution textures and complex scenery data place significant demands on memory bandwidth. The measured FPS at 4K Ultra (33.7 FPS) versus 4K Low (58.2 FPS) shows a 42.1% performance gap, which is consistent with a GPU that becomes bandwidth-starved at high settings and high resolution.

The GPU's compute capabilities are moderate: 21.75 TFLOPS FP32 and 43.50 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1). The pixel rate is 169.9 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 339.8 GTexel/s. These figures indicate a GPU that can handle 1080p gaming comfortably but struggles with 4K in a demanding simulation title. The benchmark data shows the GPU's Passmark G3D score is 16634, and its DirectX 12 score is 58, which aligns with its mid-range positioning.

The RX 7600's 63rd percentile ranking among all GPUs means it outperforms a majority of graphics cards, but it is not designed for 4K Ultra gaming in a title like Microsoft Flight Simulator. The data confirms this: 4K Ultra produces 33.7 FPS, which is below the 35.9 FPS at 4K High, and both are below the 46 FPS at 4K Medium. The GPU's role is the limiting factor at every resolution above 1080p Low.

FAQ

Q: What is the best resolution for this combo in Microsoft Flight Simulator?

A: The data shows 1080p is the only resolution where all settings presets deliver playable frame rates. At 1080p Ultra, the combo achieves 59.8 FPS, which is above the 60 FPS threshold. At 1440p, only Low (80.2 FPS) and Medium (63.8 FPS) exceed 60 FPS, while High (49.9 FPS) and Ultra (43.6 FPS) fall below.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Intel Core i9-14900K has an average benchmark score of 79824, which is 0.3% lower than the AMD EPYC 7413 (80041), 0.7% higher than the Intel Core i9-14900KF (79245), 0.7% higher than the Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF (79240), and 0.9% higher than the Intel Core Ultra 7 265K (79102).

Q: Is the GPU or CPU the bottleneck in this pairing?

A: The benchmark data indicates the GPU is the limiting component. The CPU ranks in the 97th percentile among all processors, while the GPU ranks in the 63rd percentile. The measured FPS scaling with resolution and settings shows the GPU's performance ceiling, not the CPU's.

Q: What is the FPS difference between 1080p and 4K at the same settings?

A: At Low settings, 1080p produces 98.8 FPS and 4K produces 58.2 FPS, a 41.1% reduction. At Medium, 1080p produces 77.9 FPS and 4K produces 46 FPS, a 40.9% reduction. At High, 1080p produces 60.5 FPS and 4K produces 35.9 FPS, a 40.7% reduction. At Ultra, 1080p produces 59.8 FPS and 4K produces 33.7 FPS, a 43.6% reduction.

Q: How does the RX 7600's memory configuration affect performance?

A: The GPU has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory with a 128-bit bus and 288.0 GB/s bandwidth. The data shows the largest FPS drops occur when moving from 1440p to 4K, which is consistent with the memory bandwidth becoming a bottleneck at higher resolutions.

Q: What is the combo's overall ranking?

A: The combo ranks 1219 out of 1795 tested combinations in Microsoft Flight Simulator, placing it in the lower third of all tested configurations. This rank is driven primarily by the GPU's mid-range performance.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings for this combo depend on the target resolution. At 1080p, all four presets are playable: Low delivers 98.8 FPS, Medium delivers 77.9 FPS, High delivers 60.5 FPS, and Ultra delivers 59.8 FPS. The data shows that High and Ultra are nearly identical at 1080p, differing by only 0.7 FPS. This suggests that High is the most efficient choice at 1080p, as it provides nearly the same frame rate as Ultra with presumably lower GPU load.

At 1440p, the recommended preset is Medium, which produces 63.8 FPS. Low delivers 80.2 FPS but sacrifices visual quality, while High (49.9 FPS) and Ultra (43.6 FPS) fall below the 60 FPS threshold. The data shows that 1440p Medium offers the best balance of frame rate and visual fidelity among the measured options.

At 4K, the only playable preset is Low, which produces 58.2 FPS. Medium drops to 46 FPS, High to 35.9 FPS, and Ultra to 33.7 FPS. None of the higher presets at 4K reach 60 FPS, and all are below 50 FPS. For 4K gaming, the data indicates that Low is the only viable choice, and even then, the frame rate is just below the 60 FPS target.

The data suggests that this combo is best suited for 1080p gaming, where it can handle Ultra settings at nearly 60 FPS. For 1440p, Medium is the recommended preset. For 4K, users should expect to play at Low settings or consider lowering resolution. The measured FPS values show a clear trade-off: each step from Low to Ultra at any resolution costs between 20% and 30% performance.

CPU Role

The Intel Core i9-14900K is a 24-core, 32-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, manufactured on a 10 nm process. It has a base clock of 3.20 GHz and a boost clock of 6.00 GHz, with 36 MB of shared L3 cache. The CPU supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration and has 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes. Its TDP is 125 W, and it was released on 2023-10-16 with a launch MSRP of $589.

The CPU's benchmark scores demonstrate its high-end positioning. It achieves 5027 in Cinebench R15 multi-core and 709 in single-core, 20946 in Cinebench R20 multi-core and 2956 in single-core, and 49872 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 7040 in single-core. Geekbench scores are 20370 multi-core and 3064 single-core. Passmark scores include 58674 multi-thread, 4697 single-thread, and 152975 floating point math.

In Microsoft Flight Simulator, the CPU's role is to handle the simulation logic, physics, and AI traffic. The i9-14900K's 24 cores and 32 threads provide substantial headroom for these tasks. The data shows that at 1080p Low, the combo achieves 98.8 FPS, which is the highest measured value across all resolutions and settings. This indicates the CPU can feed the GPU effectively at lower resolutions.

The CPU ranks in the 97th percentile among all processors, and its nearest rivals are all within 1% of its average score. The AMD EPYC 7413 is 0.3% higher, while the Intel Core i9-14900KF, Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF, and Intel Core Ultra 7 265K are 0.7%, 0.7%, and 0.9% lower, respectively. This tight grouping shows that the i9-14900K is at the top of the performance hierarchy.

The measured FPS data confirms that the CPU is not the bottleneck in this combo. The FPS drops consistently with resolution increases, which is a GPU-limited behavior. Even at 4K Low, the combo produces 58.2 FPS, which is higher than the 33.7 FPS at 4K Ultra, showing that the GPU's workload is the limiting factor. The CPU's high single-thread performance (7040 in Cinebench R23 single-core) is particularly relevant for flight simulation, which often relies on single-threaded performance for game logic.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data for Microsoft Flight Simulator with the Intel Core i9-14900K and AMD Radeon RX 7600 covers four resolutions (1920x1080, 2560x1440, 3840x2160) and four settings presets (Low, Medium, High, Ultra).

At 1920x1080, the combo delivers 98.8 FPS on Low, 77.9 FPS on Medium, 60.5 FPS on High, and 59.8 FPS on Ultra. The gap between Low and Medium is 20.9 FPS, between Medium and High is 17.4 FPS, and between High and Ultra is 0.7 FPS. The small difference between High and Ultra at 1080p suggests the GPU reaches its performance ceiling before the Ultra preset's additional effects take full effect.

At 2560x1440, the results are 80.2 FPS on Low, 63.8 FPS on Medium, 49.9 FPS on High, and 43.6 FPS on Ultra. The difference between Low and Medium is 16.4 FPS, Medium to High is 13.9 FPS, and High to Ultra is 6.3 FPS. Compared to 1080p, 1440p reduces performance by 18.8% at Low (98.8 to 80.2), 18.1% at Medium (77.9 to 63.8), 17.5% at High (60.5 to 49.9), and 27.1% at Ultra (59.8 to 43.6).

At 3840x2160, the results are 58.2 FPS on Low, 46 FPS on Medium, 35.9 FPS on High, and 33.7 FPS on Ultra. The difference between Low and Medium is 12.2 FPS, Medium to High is 10.1 FPS, and High to Ultra is 2.2 FPS. The small gap between High and Ultra at 4K (2.2 FPS) mirrors the 1080p result, indicating the GPU is saturated at high settings and resolution.

Comparing across resolutions at the same settings: at Low, 1080p delivers 98.8 FPS, 1440p delivers 80.2 FPS, and 4K delivers 58.2 FPS. At Medium, 1080p delivers 77.9 FPS, 1440p delivers 63.8 FPS, and 4K delivers 46 FPS. At High, 1080p delivers 60.5 FPS, 1440p delivers 49.9 FPS, and 4K delivers 35.9 FPS. At Ultra, 1080p delivers 59.8 FPS, 1440p delivers 43.6 FPS, and 4K delivers 33.7 FPS.

The data shows a consistent pattern: the RX 7600 provides playable frame rates (above 60 FPS) only at 1080p across all settings, and at 1440p on Low and Medium. At 4K, only Low settings exceed 50 FPS, and no 4K preset reaches 60 FPS. The combo's 1219th rank out of 1795 tested combinations reflects this mid-range performance profile.

Hardware Specifications

Intel Core i9-14900K

Cores / Threads 24 / 32
Base Clock 3200 MHz
Boost Clock 6000 MHz
TDP 125W
Socket Intel Socket 1700
View Full CPU Details →

AMD Radeon RX 7600

VRAM 8 GB GDDR6
Base Clock —
Boost Clock 2655 MHz MHz
TDP 165 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for Intel Core i9-14900K + AMD Radeon RX 7600 in Microsoft Flight Simulator

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Low 58.2
3840x2160 Medium 46.0
3840x2160 High 35.9
3840x2160 Ultra 33.7
2560x1440 Low 80.2
2560x1440 Medium 63.8
2560x1440 High 49.9
2560x1440 Ultra 43.6
1920x1080 Low 98.8
1920x1080 Medium 77.9
1920x1080 High 60.5
1920x1080 Ultra 59.8

Microsoft Flight Simulator with ii9-14900K + Other GPUs

See how Microsoft Flight Simulator performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.

Microsoft Flight Simulator with RX 7600 + Other CPUs

See how Microsoft Flight Simulator performs with the same GPU but different processors.

Other Games with ii9-14900K + RX 7600

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.